Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ATTACH Still not working. Bah.

2003-11-05 Thread R. Scott Perry
Here's the text from the spamattach email. I would recommend trying to latest interim release, from http://www.declude.com/release/176i/declude.exe . There have been several changes in the interim release that may affect how this situation is handled. If it continues with the latest interim

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ATTACH Still not working. Bah.

2003-11-05 Thread Matt Robertson
OK, I did what John said last nite (with the logs set to 'high' and the spool name on) and what Scott said (use the interim release) this morning. Here's the log entry. I picked something going to me so I could say for sure it showed up in my inbox (it did, and it most definitely was spam). Set

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ATTACH Still not working. Bah.

2003-11-05 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
, November 05, 2003 7:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ATTACH Still not working. Bah. OK, I did what John said last nite (with the logs set to 'high' and the spool name on) and what Scott said (use the interim release) this morning. Here's the log entry. I picked

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ATTACH Still not working. Bah.

2003-11-05 Thread Matt Robertson
Tolmachoff (Lists) Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 8:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ATTACH Still not working. Bah. Look at last action, Ignore. Is there a White list anywhere that could affect that? John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ATTACH Still not working. Bah.

2003-11-05 Thread Kami Razvan
Robertson Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 11:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ATTACH Still not working. Bah. I do have an external whitelist, but it consists of stuff like WHITELIST FROM @amazon.com WHITELIST FROM @ebay.com WHITELIST FROM @expedia.com And is a total of 22

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ATTACH Still not working. Bah.

2003-11-05 Thread Matt Robertson
John wrote: Where was the message sent from? Various spammers all over the planet. Since this morning Scott and I have been trading detailed debug logs, and doing stuff to try to track this down. I had to sit back for a bit while a client of mine did a big mailer to their membership (I

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ATTACH Still not working. Bah.

2003-11-05 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Just got a reading and am passing it off to Scott. I did find that I had catchallmails enabled, although it wasn't actually doing anything. That may have been the problem. Gotcha. I just got back from a client and had not seen any update. BTW, the catchallmails has called other problems

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ATTACH Still not working. Bah.

2003-11-05 Thread Matt Robertson
John wrote: BTW, the catchallmails has called other problems before. I'm not surprised. I had no idea I was running it. Must've del'd the comment by accident as I've never used the thing. Easy to fix. Unfortunately a short time after I received more of the same, so that wasn't it. :-( --

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ATTACH Still not working. Bah.

2003-11-04 Thread R. Scott Perry
Per Scott's earlier suggestion I fixed the spamattach.eml. I've gotten three of these in the last several minutes: a completely intact spam with no sign of Declude acting on it except for the headers (below). No proper 'you've got spam' attachment msgs rcvd yet What version of Declude are

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ATTACH Still not working. Bah.

2003-11-04 Thread Matt Robertson
What version of Declude? 1.76b. Downloaded it yesterday. What does the log show? See below for the latest arrival in my inbox. Included are the headers, plus Declude and Imail logs; the latter of which looks pretty normal. If I switch back to bounce they bounce as expected. Complete headers

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ATTACH Still not working. Bah.

2003-11-04 Thread R. Scott Perry
What does the log show? See below for the latest arrival in my inbox. Included are the headers, plus Declude and Imail logs; the latter of which looks pretty normal. If I switch back to bounce they bounce as expected. If you type \IMail\Declude -diag from a command prompt (without changing

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ATTACH Still not working. Bah.

2003-11-04 Thread paul
Matt, I don't know the answer, but here's another question. on these lines in your JM log: 11/04/2003 13:54:02 Q1fc2024f002acd29 Msg failed WEIGHT1319 (Total weight between 13 and 19.). Action=ATTACH. 11/04/2003 13:54:02 Q1fc2024f002acd29 L1 Message OK How can it be OK and failing at the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ATTACH Still not working. Bah.

2003-11-04 Thread Matt Robertson
Yup. Pro Registered jm and std reg virus. Here's the text from the spamattach email. Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Declude JunkMail [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: %ALLRECIPS% Subject: You have spam Date: %RFCDATETIME% MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed;

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ATTACH Still not working. Bah.

2003-11-04 Thread Matt Robertson
Paul wrote: How can it be OK and failing at the same time?? Am I misreading something here? No, you aren't missing anything. This isn't supposed to happen. ere's a msg from 11/2, a couple of days ago. This one was a bounce as expected. The only real difference is that in

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ATTACH Still not working. Bah.

2003-11-04 Thread Matt Robertson
I wrote: I'm setting it back to bounce again to see what happens. I did and its back to normal log entries and behavior using 1.79b -- --- Matt Robertson, [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSB Designs, Inc. http://mysecretbase.com

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ATTACH Still not working. Bah.

2003-11-04 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ATTACH Still not working. Bah. What version of Declude? 1.76b. Downloaded it yesterday. What does the log show? See below for the latest arrival in my inbox. Included are the headers, plus Declude and Imail logs; the latter of which