SNIFFER external nonzero sniffer.exe authcode 1 0
SNIFFER-SCAMS external 053 sniffer.exe authcode 2 0
SNIFFER-PORN external 054 sniffer.exe authcode 2 0
SNIFFER-MALWARE external 055 sniffer.exe authcode 3 0
SNIFFER-OBFUSC external 062 sniffer.exe authcode 2 0
Actually,
, January 10, 2005 7:17 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Calling an Executable - evaluating in
multiple tests
SNIFFER external nonzero sniffer.exe authcode 1 0
SNIFFER-SCAMS external 053 sniffer.exe authcode 2 0
SNIFFER-PORN external 054
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Calling an Executable - evaluating in
multiple tests
FWIW, we use the Sniffer tests in this way. We assign 2/3 our hold weight
to SNIFFER nonzero, then if it also fails the porn, scams, malware tests it
gets the other third.
---
[This E-mail
Title: Message
If you are going to quote me, please do so without editing:
If you aren't getting +95% hit rates on Sniffer, then
something is
wrong, and everything points to your current config which is definitely
non-standard.
I pointed out the config issues because it does represent a
Title: Message
Andy, why is every thread you start on
here saying the message is personal?
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt
Sent: Sunday, January
Title: Message
Hm... good point. Let me check my Outlook defaults.
It
clearly makes no sense to use that flag when posting to a
newsgroup...
Is
this causing problems?
Best
RegardsAndy SchmidtPhone: +1 201 934-3414 x20
(Business)Fax: +1 201 934-9206
-Original
