: Friday, December 19, 2003 8:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows Server 2003
Here is a couple of quick stats from the responses:
Of those using Windows Server 2003 at the time;
0-5K messages per day 4
5K-10K messages per day 2
10K-20K
/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 10:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows Server 2003
So I haven't heard
.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 3:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows Server 2003
, December 18, 2003 10:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows Server 2003
So I haven't heard anything else back on this .. are you guys all
staying
away from Windows 2003 and Imail? I'm having a hard time trying to
justify
the risk of running new servers on 2k3 when 2k
So I haven't heard anything else back on this .. are you guys all staying
away from Windows 2003 and Imail? I'm having a hard time trying to justify
the risk of running new servers on 2k3 when 2k works just fine .. but then
again, 2k3 seems more stable over time but not if Imail doesn't
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 10:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows Server 2003
So I haven't heard anything else back on this .. are you guys all staying
away from Windows 2003 and Imail? I'm having a hard time trying
Of Omar K.
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 2:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows Server 2003
Yeah, whatever happened to that, I poured my heart out there :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of DLAnalyzer
, December 19, 2003 3:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows Server 2003
Unfortunately, there were only 176 responses, mostly from small to mid
size
setups. Therefore, the results were not reliable.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd Holt
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 4:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows Server 2003
John,
Are you saying that small servers are not reliable?? :))
Todd Holt
Xidix Technologies, Inc
Las Vegas, NV USA
Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 4:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows Server 2003
No. I am saying that only 176 responses to the survey does not give a
reliable survey result when there are clearly at least 10 times that
many
out
Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 4:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows Server 2003
No. I am saying that only 176 responses to the survey does
Statistically, a random 10% sample is sufficient on a lot of things.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2003 2:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows Server 2003
Hey
] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Omar K.
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 5:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows Server 2003
Statistically, a random 10% sample is sufficient on a lot of things.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
The issues seem to appear at high volumes.
Besides, I am more than willing to use those licenses for you. ;)
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan
14 matches
Mail list logo
