Here is a couple of quick stats from the responses: Of those using Windows Server 2003 at the time;
0-5K messages per day 4 5K-10K messages per day 2 10K-20K messages per day 2 20K-30K messages per day 1 30K-50K messages per day 0 50K-75K messages per day 1 75K-100K messages per day 0 100K or more per day 1 Now, how can you see a pattern with those amounts of respondes with problems on W2K3 compared to W2K? John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Omar K. > Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 5:06 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows Server 2003 > > Statistically, a random 10% sample is sufficient on a lot of things. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee > Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2003 2:50 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows Server 2003 > > > Hey John they do samples in surveys of less that of your sample as > compared > to the number of Imail servers. > > If you consider the number of people that watch TV and the small sample of > people that NEILSON users to rate a shows popularity. I bet you have a > better sampling than they do. > > > Kevin Bilbee > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Tolmachoff > > (Lists) > > Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 4:29 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows Server 2003 > > > > > > No. I am saying that only 176 responses to the survey does not give a > > reliable survey result when there are clearly at least 10 times that > many > > out there, if not way more. > > > > John Tolmachoff > > Engineer/Consultant/Owner > > eServices For You > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd Holt > > > Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 4:13 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows Server 2003 > > > > > > John, > > > Are you saying that small servers are not reliable?? :)) > > > > > > Todd Holt > > > Xidix Technologies, Inc > > > Las Vegas, NV USA > > > www.xidix.com > > > 702.319.4349 > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists) > > > > Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 3:05 PM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows Server 2003 > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, there were only 176 responses, mostly from small to > mid > > > > size > > > > setups. Therefore, the results were not reliable. > > > > > > > > John Tolmachoff > > > > Engineer/Consultant/Owner > > > > eServices For You > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Omar K. > > > > > Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 2:15 PM > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows Server 2003 > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, whatever happened to that, I poured my heart out there :) > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > DLAnalyzer > > > > > Support > > > > > Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 11:52 PM > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows Server 2003 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > John, > > > > > > > > > > I remember you did a survey awhile back on problems with > Imail/etc. > > > > Were > > > > > the results of that ever posted? > > > > > > > > > > Darrell > > > > > ------------------------------------------------ > > > > > Check Out DLAnalyzer a comprehensive reporting tool for > > > > > Declude Junkmail Logs - http://www.dlanalyzer.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > John Tolmachoff (Lists) writes: > > > > > > > > > > > For the majority, W2K3 is the way to go if you are able to. > > > Ipswitch > > > > > does > > > > > > support running Imail on W2K3. > > > > > > > > > > > > There are some possible issues. > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Running MS DSN service on W2K3 WITH Imail Anti-Spam DNS tests > > > is a > > > > > > problem. > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Some issues have been reported on the Imail list when the > > > server > > > > > > processes a high volume of messages per day. Nothing seems to be > > > > > conclusive > > > > > > as far as I know to date, and from the posts, I have not seen a > > > > definite > > > > > > pattern. > > > > > > > > > > > > John Tolmachoff > > > > > > Engineer/Consultant/Owner > > > > > > eServices For You > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > > > > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > > > > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan > > > > > >> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 10:44 PM > > > > > >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows Server 2003 > > > > > >> > > > > > >> So I haven't heard anything else back on this .. are you guys > all > > > > > staying > > > > > >> away from Windows 2003 and Imail? I'm having a hard time trying > > > to > > > > > justify > > > > > >> the risk of running new servers on 2k3 when 2k works just fine > .. > > > but > > > > > then > > > > > >> again, 2k3 seems more stable over time .... but not if Imail > > > doesn't > > > > > >> support it well yet. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> grrrr > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Thoughts? > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Jonathan > > > > > >> > > > > > >> At 05:04 PM 12/4/2003, you wrote: > > > > > >> >The issues seem to appear at high volumes. > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >Besides, I am more than willing to use those licenses for you. > > > ;) > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >John Tolmachoff > > > > > >> >Engineer/Consultant/Owner > > > > > >> >eServices For You > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > >> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > > > > > >> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan > > > > > >> > > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:43 PM > > > > > >> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >> > > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows Server 2003 > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > So, what's the scoop with current Imail 8, declude, > sniffer, > > > etc > > > > on > > > > > >> > > Windows > > > > > >> > > 2003 Server? We're thinking about moving it to some new > iron > > > > > >> internally, > > > > > >> > > and Ive got some 2k3 licenses just burning a hole in my > > > pocket. > > > > :) > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > I heard some stability issues, saw some imail patches/etc > .. > > > > things > > > > > >> stable > > > > > >> > > (and *robust*) now? Relatively high volumes of email .. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > Jonathan > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > --- > > > > > >> > > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > > > > > >> > > (http://www.declude.com)] > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > --- > > > > > >> > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. > To > > > > > >> > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], > and > > > > > >> > > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be > > > found > > > > > >> > > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >--- > > > > > >> >[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > > > > > >> >(http://www.declude.com)] > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >--- > > > > > >> >This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > > > > > >> >unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > > > > > >> >type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be > found > > > > > >> >at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> --- > > > > > >> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > > > > > >> (http://www.declude.com)] > > > > > >> > > > > > >> --- > > > > > >> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > > > > > >> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > > > > > >> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > > > > > >> at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > > > > > (http://www.declude.com)] > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > > > > > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > > > > > > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > > > > > > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > > > > > (http://www.declude.com)] > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > > > > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > > > > > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > > > > > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > > > > > (http://www.declude.com)] > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > > > > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > > > > > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > > > > > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > > > > > --- > > > > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > > > > (http://www.declude.com)] > > > > > > > > --- > > > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > > > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > > > > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > > > > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > --- > > > > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > > > > (http://www.declude.com)] > > > > > > > > > --- > > > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > > > (http://www.declude.com)] > > > > > > --- > > > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > > > (http://www.declude.com)] > > > > > > --- > > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > > > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > > > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > --- > > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > (http://www.declude.com)] > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > --- > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > (http://www.declude.com)] > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > --- > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > (http://www.declude.com)] > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
