Hi,
[... sorting on spam weight in spamreview...]
I've solved this be marking the subject line of all hold
messages with [spam %weight%]
Well, I have that too now but. that did not solve the problem because
the subject column in the top windows is empty. Strange, as the subject line
in
Hmmm...no, we use this technique as well and see the proper
subject...perhaps a reinstall of SpamReview would be in order?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Bonno Bloksma [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 10:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail
Well, I have that too now but. that did not solve the
problem because the subject column in the top windows is
empty. Strange, as the subject line in the window below that
*does* show the subject. Anybody else have this problem too?
It's not a problem.
There is a switch in the config
1.) It's much easier to reply if the original message is in PLAIN -TEXT
Is Spam Review still being maintained?
As I know it's not more maintained by the initial developer, but he has
offered to give the source to someone who is interrested to maintain it in
the future.
1) When I
What would be the best way to do the below :
I've solved this be marking the subject line of all hold messages with
[spam %weight%]
Now you can sort in spamreview by sibject line and it will show all hold
messages in weighted order.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
What would be the best way to do the below :
I've solved this be marking the subject line of all hold messages with
[spam %weight%]
Now you can sort in spamreview by sibject line and it will show all hold
messages in weighted order.
---
[This E-mail scanned
What would be the best way to do the below :
I've solved this be marking the subject line of all hold
messages with [spam %weight%]
For example we hold on 100 points and mark any message above 75 points in
the subject line.
So we have in the $default$.junkmail file
WEIGHT75
product/tools line?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 8:30 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
1.) It's much easier to reply if the original message is in PLAIN -TEXT
Is Spam Review
] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Lawrence
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 6:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
Did anyone have any problem installing Spam Review?
I'm trying to install it on a Windows 2000 Server and it tells
me
That would be great John.
Thanks,
Dean
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 12:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
Some what known issue. What you
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Lawrence
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 8:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
Did anyone have any problem installing Spam Review?
I'm trying to install it on a Windows 2000 Server and it tells
me that it needs to update
Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Lawrence
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 9:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
, August 18, 2004 12:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
USE AT YOUR OWN RISK!
(And watch for line wraps)
I think this is what the setup.lst file needs to be for Windows Server 2003:
_
[Bootstrap]
SetupTitle=Install
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 10:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
Scott, do you know anything about this as a possible addition to your
product/tools line?
It is something
and
sending mail server HELO/IP.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: John Shacklett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 2:59 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg17568.html
I remember
In the Global.cfg file, add the
following line:
XINHEADER X-RBL-Warning: Total
weight: %WEIGHT%
XOUTHEADER X-RBL-Warning: Total weight:
%WEIGHT%
Put that above all other header lines.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
Can you give me the syntax for that?
- Original Message -
From: Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 12:37 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
How do I get the Weight: to show?
Andy,
It's not the answer but maybe
Can you give me the syntax for that?
Assuming you have configured 2 weight tests like
WEIGHT10
WEIGHT20
in your global.cfg file and you want to hold on 20 points:
Set the two actions
WEIGHT10 SUBJECT [spam%WEIGHT%]
WEIGHT20 HOLD
in your $default$.junkmail file. (Note the space after the ]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
Can you give me the syntax for that?
Assuming you have configured 2 weight tests like
WEIGHT10
WEIGHT20
in your global.cfg file and you want to hold on 20 points:
Set the two actions
WEIGHT10 SUBJECT [spam%WEIGHT%]
WEIGHT20 HOLD
in your
John,
You can find information on this at http://www.slsoft.com/spamreviewhelp.htm
You may need to run File/Check for Updates to get the latest version.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Olden
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002
Oops. My bad. I had the XSENDER commented out. I just uncommented it and
set it to ON. I'll let you know in a little while when I get some junkmail.
Thanks,
Todd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz (by
way of R. Scott Perry
Scott, would it be possible to use instead of X-Sender, something like:
XINHEADER X-Addr: %MAILFROM% [%REMOTEIP%]
or something other than X-Sender so that we do not end up with multiple
X-Sender entries?
Yes, that would work fine.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was
How about:
Here is the headers that I am inserting - in case that helps:
XINHEADER X-Declude: Version %VERSION%; %QUEUENAME% from %REVDNS%
[%REMOTEIP%]
XINHEADER X-Declude: Failed %TESTSFAILED% [%WEIGHT%]
XINHEADER Return-Path: %MAILFROM%
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1
-Original Message-
From: Tom Schwarz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 1:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review kill.lst problem question
So do I/We need to decide on what needs to be used so I can program
spamreview to support both
Tom, how about using:
XINHEADER X-SenderIP: [%REMOTEIP%]
since isn't is really the remote IP address that we are looking for, and not
necessarily the e-mail address? Or am I confused. What are we looking for
here, the original sending mail servers IP address or something else?
There are
PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review kill.lst problem question
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 2:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review kill.lst
I second this!!
Todd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bennie
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 3:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Update v1.0.7
Hey Tom,
I have a suggestion... :)
On your spam
I'm getting the weight just fine.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Grant Griffith
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Update v1.0.7
Noticed after updating to v1.0.12
Hey Tom,
I have a suggestion... :)
On your spam review software.. can you have a button so we can sort by sent
address... then we can select all of those and delete a block at a time...
I have noticed when I am cleaning it out.. i have a number of spams which
have the same return email
Reply to: Tom Schwarz
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Update v1.0.7 on Saturday 10:18:30 AM
Seems to me the best way to handle same sender messages is to
detect within the program matching senders than ask with a popup
'Delete all instances of this sender?' Yes No. or even have
has
an option to add to the imail kill list, but that requires a restart of
SMTP.
Todd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Roger Heath
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 7:22 PM
To: Tom Schwarz
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Update
All
I am wanting to do is a quick way to remove blocks from the review of spams
that have been caught...
Bennie
- Original Message -
From: Todd Holt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 9:02 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Update v1.0.7
for in the
first place.
Todd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bennie
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 10:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Update v1.0.7
But with the black list the sender of the spam would
Hey Tom,
I have a suggestion... :)
On your spam review software.. can you have a button so we can sort by sent
address... then we can select all of those and delete a block at a time...
I have noticed when I am cleaning it out.. i have a number of spams which
have the same return email
Yes. Can you also build a your a @#$($## for sending me this stupid
SPAM feature?!!! :-))
Love the app!
Todd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Reply to: Tom Schwarz
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Question on Wednesday 9:38:23 AM
Actually, the next most useful feature for me would
be to take the real sender and add-to-kill.lst function.
Then if you consistently see an abuser, you just add his
address to Imails kill file
Yes, actually, I would love to be able to just forward/redirect the message
to my SPAMCOP mailbox. I currently do that automatically with Declude for
Weight 20 and above.
Then SPAMCOPY will figure out who REALLY is to notify - because sending it
back to the originator in 99 out of 100 times
Roger.
Where do you ad this line?
Bennie
This line gives me the 'real' sender and I'd love to kill.lst
some of these if they are clearly doing only spamming...:
XINHEADER X-Note: SMTP Real-From: %MAILFROM%
I do not see an immediate need to notify senders of bad mail.
--
. Love the app so far.
-Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger Heath
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:47 AM
To: Tom Schwarz
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Question
Reply to: Tom Schwarz
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam
Kudos to Tom! Wonderful tool.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Watchman
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review it is fantastic
Thanks Tom, Spam Review is
http://www.slsoft.com/spamreview
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Webmaster
Oilfield Directory
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 1:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review it is fantastic
Did i miss
nope! that doesn't work, tells me your not authorized to view that page.
Nice try anyway.
- Original Message -
From: Tom Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:23 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review it is fantastic
http
Sorry...
http://www.slsoft.com/spamreview.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Webmaster
Oilfield Directory
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 1:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review it is fantastic
nope
I would prefer a separate button. Because when I delete something I don't
necessarily want to kill the address. But when I kill the address I would
probably want to delete the message.
Todd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz
it just in case.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Todd Holt
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 6:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review and Kill File
I would prefer a separate button. Because when I delete
Tom,
I would want 2 separate button options.
1. Button to the delete Kill list.
2. Button to the Delete folder only.
Not 100% for sure but a warning in the documentation about having the
%MAILFROM% variable in your header as Scott was stating in a previous
post. Does this address the
By default don't your new configuation files put out a warning at 10?
Yes, that is correct.
The XINHEADER X-Note: Total weight of %WEIGHT%. could be used instead, so
that the weight appears in all E-mails (whether or not the weight is
greater than or equal to 10).
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 3:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Program
Yes http://www.slsoft.com/spamreview.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Reply to: Tom Schwarz
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Program on Saturday 10:28:46 AM
I appreciate this. It would prove useful if it works well.
I manage my files over a network, all but the drive is ok
in that path. I'd like a copy, but I am already wondering
if I can change the path
I have received several replies. If it's ok with Declude, I will post the
download address on this list. If someone from Declude would reply to me I
would appreciate it.
Feel free to post it. I can also include a link at
http://www.declude.com/tools .
-Scott
---
[This
can i use a unc to get to the spooled files or does it have to be mapped?
thanks!!
Jim
- Original Message -
From: Tom Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 12:48 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Software
Exactly 15 hours after I
Either will work.
\\myserver\imail\spool
or
c:\imail\spool
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Jones, Jr.
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 1:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Software
can i
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Software
Either will work.
\\myserver\imail\spool
or
c:\imail\spool
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Jones, Jr.
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 1:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Software
I must be missing something, because I have tried it both ways and it just
doesn't seem to list any emails... there are over 100 in the spool\spam
dir...
Thanks,
Jim
- Original Message -
From: Tom Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
Hi,
Has it been posted anywhere yet?
Thanks,
Andy Baldwin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.thumpernet.com
315-282-0020
Saturday, January 26, 2002, 11:28:46 AM, you wrote:
TS I have received several replies. If it's ok with Declude, I will post the
TS download address on this list. If someone
Yes http://www.slsoft.com/spamreview.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of andyb@thumpernet
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 4:00 PM
To: Tom Schwarz
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Program
Hi,
Has it been posted
Reply to: Tom Schwarz
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Program on Saturday 10:28:46 AM
Tom, I am really enjoying the speed of your app.
You web page mentions that you place a weight message
in your headers using Declude but does not show how this
is done. Can you show this here? I'd
Scott,
By default don't your new configuation files put out a warning at 10?
Tom
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 7:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review
58 matches
Mail list logo
