Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail nul

2004-02-27 Thread Bennie
PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 7:57 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail nul I may be beating a dead horse, but I cant seem to find any threads that talk about this. Back when I first got declude and was using it with my imail system I setup

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail nul

2004-02-27 Thread Joe Wolf
, February 27, 2004 5:01 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail nul Hey Scott, It was filling up the test mailbox, then it started bouncing again when the mail box was full. I guess what I am looking for is a way to delete E-mails addressed to non-existing accounts rather than having them

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail nul

2004-02-26 Thread Sanford Whiteman
all mail that was not sent to a valid user name will be passed to the alias nobody. Which will resolve to test. As the mail arrives in test it is deleted. Do you think that it's helping your server's performance to spool mail that will never be delivered to a human? The 'nobody'

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail nul

2004-02-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
I may be beating a dead horse, but I cant seem to find any threads that talk about this. Back when I first got declude and was using it with my imail system I setup the following in Imail. 1) Made a user mailbox: test made all mail forward to: nul 2) Set up an Aliases: nobody made it

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail nul

2004-02-26 Thread Joe Wolf
I've never tried it, but couldn't you just have the nobody ailias resolve to NUL? It's an interesting concept that would present at least one solution to the dictionary attacks. I might give that a try on one of my stable domains (no deleted users in years) just to see what it does to

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail nul

2004-02-26 Thread Darin Cox
: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail nul I've never tried it, but couldn't you just have the nobody ailias resolve to NUL? It's an interesting concept that would present at least one solution to the dictionary attacks. I might give that a try on one of my stable domains (no deleted users in years

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail nul

2004-02-26 Thread Joe Wolf
whole lot more than I do. -Joe - Original Message - From: "Sanford Whiteman" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Bennie" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 10:51 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail nul all mail that was not sent to a

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail nul

2004-02-26 Thread Matt
do. -Joe - Original Message - From: "Sanford Whiteman" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Bennie" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 10:51 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail nul all mail that was not sent to a valid user name will be passed t

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail nul

2004-02-26 Thread Darin Cox
Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 12:51 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail nul Sandy, I'm not going to claim to be an email server expert, but here's what I see... I could be wrong. When you're hit with a dictionary attack we all know they send

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail nul

2004-02-26 Thread Joe Wolf
, but it seems reasonable. I'm open to the knowledge of those that know a whole lot more than I do. -Joe - Original Message - From: Sanford Whiteman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bennie [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 10:51 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail nul all mail