[Declude.Virus] Declude v1.36 released

2002-02-01 Thread R. Scott Perry
We have just released Declude v1.36. This takes care of the issues that have been reported since the last release. Declude JunkMail customers who downloaded v1.35 should upgrade, as there was an issue with 1.35 that could cause the WARN action not to be used. -Scott

[Declude.Virus] DELIVERERRORS

2002-02-01 Thread Don Brown
Scott, Does DELIVERERRORS apply to incoming mail, outgoing mail or both incoming and outgoing? Does this variable have any impact upon a scanner time-out? Thanks, Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inetconcepts.net PGP Key ID:

Re: [Declude.Virus] DELIVERERRORS

2002-02-01 Thread R. Scott Perry
Does DELIVERERRORS apply to incoming mail, outgoing mail or both incoming and outgoing? It applies to any E-mail that is scanned. If the virus scanner reports an error, if the DELIVERERRORS setting is ON, then the E-mail will be delivered. Otherwise, it will be quarantined. Does this

[Declude.Virus] Badtrans got through...

2002-02-01 Thread Jeff Lesperance
Hi all, I haven't had a virus slip through in a long time, but this morning one came through to an alias. * I'm running Declude 1.34 with F-prot with definitions dated 1/28/02. The version of Badtrans that was caught by Norton on the desktop was reported as [EMAIL PROTECTED] * The header

Re: [Declude.Virus] Badtrans got through...

2002-02-01 Thread R. Scott Perry
* I'm running Declude 1.34 with F-prot with definitions dated 1/28/02. The version of Badtrans that was caught by Norton on the desktop was reported as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Which version of F-Prot? You need 3.11 in order to catch some variants of Badtrans. -Scott ---

Re: [Declude.Virus] Badtrans got through...

2002-02-01 Thread Jeff Lesperance
F-Prot is version 3.11 - I've definitely seen other variants of Badtrans, and this one, .enc. get caught in the past. At 11:47 AM 2/1/2002, you wrote: * I'm running Declude 1.34 with F-prot with definitions dated 1/28/02. The version of Badtrans that was caught by Norton on the desktop was

RE: [Declude.Virus] Badtrans got through...

2002-02-01 Thread Michael Hardrick
the latest def for f-prot are 1/30/02 atm... u might want to update them and see what happens?? Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff Lesperance Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:

RE: [Declude.Virus] Badtrans got through...

2002-02-01 Thread Linette Casey
We caught it on 1/31/02 with Declude 1.35a, F-Prot 3.11 1/30/02 defs. -Linette -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jeff Lesperance Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Badtrans got

Re: [Declude.Virus] Badtrans got through...

2002-02-01 Thread R. Scott Perry
* The Declude log reported that Q file as Virus Free [MIME: 0 0] There's a clue. It looks like the E-mail may have been severely malformed, so that the attachments could not be view (or possibly in a plaintext segment). The 0 0 means that Declude detected 0 attachments. You don't happen to