[Declude.Virus] Log entries

2003-08-22 Thread Doug McKee
08/22/2003 09:01:15 Q221e106 Could not find parse string Found in report.txt 08/22/2003 08:58:07 Q211910e WARNING: Couldn't remove .vir directory d:\IMail\spool\D211910e.vir\: EXTRA FILES THERE. 08/22/2003 08:58:07 Q211910e Likely problem: Your virus scanner is leaving extra files/directories

Re: [Declude.Virus] Log entries

2003-08-22 Thread R. Scott Perry
08/22/2003 09:01:15 Q221e106 Could not find parse string Found in report.txt This will happen if the virus scanner detects a virus, but the report.txt file that it creates does not include the virus name where Declude Virus expects it (more specifically, in this case, the word Found was not in

[Declude.Virus] Postmaster Email Alert

2003-08-22 Thread Dan Star
Is there a way to make Declude email postmaster at the originating IP address reverse DNS domain and not the domain in the FROM field which is usually spoofed? -- Dan --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the

Re: [Declude.Virus] Postmaster Email Alert

2003-08-22 Thread R. Scott Perry
Is there a way to make Declude email postmaster at the originating IP address reverse DNS domain and not the domain in the FROM field which is usually spoofed? No. The SKIPIFVIRUSNAMEHAS option is used for cases like this. We have considered using reverse DNS, IPWHOIS, [EMAIL PROTECTED], etc.,

[Declude.Virus] Using FORGINGVIRUS with more than one virus

2003-08-22 Thread Paul Fuhrmeister
In my virus_cfg.txt file, I have: FORGINGVIRUSKlez To add the sobig virus, do I add another line? like this? FORGINGVIRUSKlez FORGINGVIRUSSobig [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the

RE: [Declude.Virus] Using FORGINGVIRUS with more than one virus

2003-08-22 Thread Bridges, Samantha
Yep..Exactly...you got it. Have a great day. -Original Message- From: Paul Fuhrmeister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 11:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.Virus] Using FORGINGVIRUS with more than one virus In my virus_cfg.txt file, I have:

Re: [Declude.Virus] Using FORGINGVIRUS with more than one virus

2003-08-22 Thread R. Scott Perry
In my virus_cfg.txt file, I have: FORGINGVIRUSKlez To add the sobig virus, do I add another line? like this? FORGINGVIRUSKlez FORGINGVIRUSSobig That is correct. You may want to take a look at the default files at http://www.declude.com/virus/manual.htm to see what other viruses

RE: [Declude.Virus] Postmaster Email Alert

2003-08-22 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
And the reason being is that many if not most mail server are not configured to accept messages to the IP address. Also, in the case of Sobig, that would not work anyway, as the IP address is of the workstation infected, which could be anywhere. John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA Engineer/Consultant

Re[2]: [Declude.Virus] McAfee Enterprise 7.0 not picking up Sobig.F

2003-08-22 Thread David Sullivan
Hello R., Thursday, August 21, 2003, 2:59:18 PM, you wrote: I did that with eicar and the On-Demand Scanner picked it up. However, when I did it with Sobig.F, there was no attachment. Then I noticed that it was a bounced message from another server (not using SKIPIFVIRUSNAMEHAS). I'm now

RE: [Declude.Virus] Sobig- Phase II bombardment

2003-08-22 Thread R. Scott Perry
No only that - but what's this web address that will be updated. If it's an IP - then it should be easy to contact the upstream provider. If it's a FQDN - then it should be easy for the registrar to lock this particular domain against updates I don't see why this is supposedly so difficult to

[Declude.Virus] Pentagon

2003-08-22 Thread Bill Newberg
The Pentagon would never buy Declude. It's not pricey enough, it's too straight forward and easy to use, you don't have to hire a consultant to study it for several million dollars, and it's name is not Pentagon proper. Perhaps Scott can rename it to Declude Electronic Communication Attack

RE: [Declude.Virus] Sobig- Phase II bombardment

2003-08-22 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
According to this NBC news report, it will occur every Friday and Sunday. http://www.nbc4.tv/technology/2426381/detail.html?treets=latml=la_natlbreak ts=Ttmi=la_natlbreak_15913_01270008222003 John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA Engineer/Consultant eServices For You www.eservicesforyou.com

RE: [Declude.Virus] Sobig- Phase II bombardment

2003-08-22 Thread Fritz Squib
See http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?date=2003-08-22 Sobig Update Cycle SoBig-F, the most recent incarnation in the family of Sobig mass mailing viruses, will be entering its update cycle today at 19:00 UTC. Between 19:00 and 22:00 UTC, the virus will attempt to contact a predefined set of hosts

RE: [Declude.Virus] Sobig- Phase II bombardment

2003-08-22 Thread Avolve Support
Exactly, if the servers are known, why doesn't the upstream providers be pro-active and block those ip's from being accessed ? -- Original Message -- From: Andy Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 14:20:53 -0400

[Declude.Virus] SoBig - Narrowing down on source

2003-08-22 Thread Mark Smith
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A32161-2003Aug22.html --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe

Re: [Declude.Virus] Sobig- Phase II bombardment

2003-08-22 Thread Bill Landry
Thanks for the heads-up, Kris. We have applied filter rules to all of our Internet routers to block all outbound IP access to the IP addresses listed below and to block all outbound udp access to port 8998. Bill - Original Message - From: Kris Rickerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL

Re: [Declude.Virus] Sobig- Phase II bombardment

2003-08-22 Thread paul
It make's me really wonder how many stupid people is not able to patch the own system (or at least outlook). Exactly! they can't do more. (except write a worm that install automatically all available patches from MS) What they (M$) really need to do, is make windows update integrated into

RE: [Declude.Virus] Sobig- Phase II bombardment

2003-08-22 Thread Mark Smith
What they (M$) really need to do, is make windows update integrated into Windows, the problem is they tell you Stay current with updates in a little box above the taskbar when There are huge debates about this. It's amazing that people are against this. Look at the newsgroups, etc...

Re: [Declude.Virus] Sobig- Phase II bombardment

2003-08-22 Thread andyb
If it was easy, and if every computer user was computer literate and responsible, we wouldn't have jobs... Andy - Original Message - From: Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 3:17 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Sobig- Phase II bombardment

RE: [Declude.Virus] Sobig- Phase II bombardment

2003-08-22 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Any one seeing hearing of any happenings on this? John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA Engineer/Consultant eServices For You www.eservicesforyou.com --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To

RE: [Declude.Virus] Sobig- Phase II bombardment

2003-08-22 Thread R. Scott Perry
Any one seeing hearing of any happenings on this? F-Secure has reported that 1 of the 20 servers appears to be up, but it is so overwhelmed that viruses aren't getting anything from it. But that does mean that some could be getting through. All we've seen is what seems to be a precautionary

RE: [Declude.Virus] VirusScan Enterprise 7.0 not detecting Sobig.F

2003-08-22 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
What is sick is their scanner loaded on Dell computers is NOT picking up Sobig.F either. I just ran a complete scan on a client computer with the installed McAfee, and it came back clean. This was using their online scanner as installed on computers. Sick. I wonder how many home users out there