[Declude.Virus] IPBypass and notifications

2004-03-01 Thread Russ Uhte (Lists)
Just set up a gateway mailserver, and I realized that if a virus comes through the gateway, the notification that gets sent out sees the gateway mailservers IP address. Is there a way to hook the IPBypass functionality into Declude Virus? Thanks, Russ --- Russ Uhte, CCNA, MCP, A+ Network

Re: [Declude.Virus] IPBypass and notifications

2004-03-01 Thread Bill Landry
That shouldn't make any difference, since virus notifications do not get sent to IP address, they get sent to the sender's e-mail address or the [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill - Original Message - From: Russ Uhte (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 6:30

RE: [Declude.Virus]

2004-03-01 Thread John Shacklett
Thank you. Now that I've had to block ZIP files, this has become a larger issue. After years of telling my users just ZIP up anything you need to send that would otherwise get blocked I'm ready to scream. I'm guessing I won't be screaming alone though. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

Re: [Declude.Virus] Server Load

2004-03-01 Thread R. Scott Perry
I m curious what kind of server load people have experienced with declude. Like anyone else using this product we re on MS, I/O is quite an issue for us and I d like to know what to expect prior to purchasing declude. We typically find that each GHz of CPU power allows for about 100,000

[Declude.Virus] bagle.f and mcafee

2004-03-01 Thread Mailing Lists
Looks like some bagle.f are slipping thru on declude with mcafee. Defs are at 4330. Ones that have been forwarded to me are password protected zip archives. As much as I would love to block all zip files, we cannot because too many customers complained when we did this a while back. How

Re: [Declude.Virus] bagle.f and mcafee

2004-03-01 Thread Jim Matuska
If indeed these password protected zips are not being picked up by virus scanners, Scott can you add a feature to declude antivirus or junkmail that could check for passwords on zip files and if they exist block them. Is this doable? Jim Matuska Jr.Computer Tech IICCNANez Perce

RE: [Declude.Virus] bagle.f and mcafee

2004-03-01 Thread Markus Gufler
Following NAI's website they detect Bagle.F in passworded zip files with 4330 defs. The saem website states also that any Bagle-F message with passworded zip attachment contains "archive password", "password:" or "pass:" in the body. Unfortunately I can't find any message with this

[Declude.Virus] .PIF files being held instead of deleted?

2004-03-01 Thread Marc Catuogno
I am running the latest beta 1.78. I have the following in my virus.cfg file: BANEXT scr BANEXT pif BANEXT bat BANEXT exe DELETEVIRUSES ON Yet I am still seeing e-mails with .PIF extensions being held in the virus subfolder. I'm concerned that these are

RE: [Declude.Virus] bagle.f and mcafee

2004-03-01 Thread Markus Gufler
We've also blocked zip attachments and inform the sender in the bannotify.eml that this is a temporary issue and if he want to send a zip archive he can rename it to something like "filename.zix" Markus From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mailing

RE: [Declude.Virus] bagle.f and mcafee

2004-03-01 Thread Todd Holt
And then what happens when the senders start putting this in the message body: To open the attached file, save it, then rename the extension to .zip, and then open it with the following password. IMHO: Youre just backing the problem up one step. If the users will open the .zip

Re: [Declude.Virus] .PIF files being held instead of deleted?

2004-03-01 Thread R. Scott Perry
I am running the latest beta 1.78. I have the following in my virus.cfg file: BANEXT scr BANEXT pif BANEXT bat BANEXT exe DELETEVIRUSES ON Yet I am still seeing e-mails with .PIF extensions being held in the virus subfolder. I'm concerned that these are