Re: [Declude.Virus] NAV 2003 catches beagleJ in encrypted zip?

2004-03-07 Thread R. Scott Perry
I was trying to test the latest interim and when I tried to send myself a copy of the virus, NAV outbound scanning caught it even though it was passworded. I tried to unzip it to make sure and it does require a password. I didn't think they could detect it like that... Is this a NAV E-mail

RE: [Declude.Virus] NAV 2003 catches beagleJ in encrypted zip?

2004-03-07 Thread marc catuogno
Plain old NAV 2003 on my Win XP workstation that scans e-mail - sorry for not being specific. BUT the weird thing is there was no e-mail with a PW. I had saved the file from one that had gotten through and attached it to a e-mail with the only the word test in the body of the e-mail. I don't even

RE: [Declude.Virus] NAV 2003 catches beagleJ in encrypted zip?

2004-03-07 Thread R. Scott Perry
Plain old NAV 2003 on my Win XP workstation that scans e-mail - sorry for not being specific. BUT the weird thing is there was no e-mail with a PW. I had saved the file from one that had gotten through and attached it to a e-mail with the only the word test in the body of the e-mail. I don't

RE: [Declude.Virus] NAV 2003 catches beagleJ in encrypted zip?

2004-03-07 Thread marc catuogno
If you want I can send it to you, it isn't important but I found it curious. All I know is it is a virus, it is reported as beagle.j by NAV, it is in a passworded .Zip file, there in nothing but the word test in the body of the e-mail and it is caught by the e-mail scanning as it goes out.

Re: [Declude.Virus] Bagle.J / news.com article on AV software opening zipped files.

2004-03-07 Thread Bennie
how would you ban encrypted zips... signed Confused (aka Bennie) - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 6:22 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Bagle.J / news.com article on AV software opening zipped files.

[Declude.Virus] BANEXT question

2004-03-07 Thread joe
I'm currently using: BANEXT EZIP, becuase BANEZIP ON does not work for me. I'm running the latest intrum version of Declude w/ F-Prot. I have a Standard Declude license. Does BANEZIP ON only work for the Pro version of Declude? If yes, I guess I should just continue to use BANEXT EZIP ? (Such a

Re: [Declude.Virus] BANEXT question

2004-03-07 Thread Don Hickey
Scott, posted this last week: With the latest interim release, you can use: BANEXT EZIP - This line will ban all .ZIP files with an encrypted file in them BANZIPEXTS ON - This line (Pro version only) will ban all file extensions listed in BANEXT lines, if they appear in

[Declude.Virus] Swen not tagged as forging?

2004-03-07 Thread Matt
I just had a client ask me to turn off all virus notifications, and the message that they sent back was for Swen.A. Date: 03/07/2004 17:37:53 Subject: Abort Notice Host: cybermatsa.com.mx [148.233.93.6] Attachment: enqofe.exe Virus: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Is it possible that this isn't in

Re: [Declude.Virus] NAV 2003 catches beagleJ in encrypted zip?

2004-03-07 Thread Matt
Why not test the encrypted password protected ECAIR virus from Scott's test virus sender? BTW, Beagle.J appears to come with a fixed number of variations, and a combination filter in JunkMail would take 5 minutes to work up which should catch this 100% of the time.