Any one familiar with that line in the headers, and do you know if that
would be causing a CR vulnerability to occur?
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the De
I agree with the "sudden death" scenario. With Virus scanners it would
be helpful to stop after the first found virus.
If the first scanner is significantly more efficient than the others
(such as FProt) then the savings would be amplified quite a bit.
Since virus scanners are almost always "dumb
> Actually, it's close to 100% if Declude Virus Pro isn't being
> used (since HTML has to be checked, even if there is no
> attachment, and most people now send HTML E-mails even if
> their E-mail is in plain text).
Ok, my mistake.
But how much would it cost to implement such an option? More
If we assume that from the resting 33% of legit messages one quarter has a
file attachment...
Actually, it's close to 100% if Declude Virus Pro isn't being used (since
HTML has to be checked, even if there is no attachment, and most people now
send HTML E-mails even if their E-mail is in plain t
> >When running multiple scanners is their a way to prevent the other
> >configured virus scanners from scanning the message if the
> first virus
> >scanner finds a virus?
>
> No, there is not. Given that all non-virus E-mails will be
> sent through all scanners, the extra time used is minim
This would be a great benefit as in times when a large volume of mail comes
in I often see several "scan.exe" from mcafee listed taking 20% cpu. Where
as my other scanner (F-Prot) hardly ever pops up in the task manager. It
would be nice to have all virus processing stop when F-Prot finds a vi
When running multiple scanners is their a way to prevent the other
configured virus scanners from scanning the message if the first virus
scanner finds a virus?
No, there is not. Given that all non-virus E-mails will be sent through
all scanners, the extra time used is minimal unless a high pe
When running multiple scanners is their a way to prevent the other
configured virus scanners from scanning the message if the first virus
scanner finds a virus?
Darrell
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utili
I've used it for a couple of years with no problems. It has a smaller
footprint in memory than Norton, for sure. Found that real handy with
some older systems. Then there's the price difference, and the fact
that you can set updates to hourly, or pull them off your local
network.
I like to set u
At 03:10 PM 08/01/2004, Douglas Cohn wrote:
I have used it on client
machines for the past 6 months and also find it
equal to Norton Corp except for one thing. It handles mail
clients
differently in that it does not scan email as they come in but instead
seems
to scan it only when you attempt to
Working fine on my pc. I had Norton, but switched to f-prot to experience
exactly what is going on in our mail server. So far so good, however don't
forget to turn on the RealTime Protector in the desktop (not in the server).
Compared to Norton, f-prot is not as friendly. But for me it is OK.. it
11 matches
Mail list logo
