Re: [Declude.Virus] FW: MS Windows/Critical Error

2005-01-27 Thread William Stillwell
NO... Rar is Supperior Zip is Inferior Zip Compression is Open (ie, can download) Rar Compression is not. However, BANEXT ZIP will not cover RAR Furthermore, WindowsXP doesn't nativly support Rar Compression, therefore the risk is low, and most experienced users who use Rar, Will know this is a

RE: [Declude.Virus] FW: MS Windows/Critical Error

2005-01-27 Thread Andy Schmidt
Furthermore, WindowsXP doesn't nativly support Rar Compression, therefore the risk is low I know they added TAR, GZ etc. support to WinZIP. Let's hope there isn't already a version out there that also supports RAR. Then it will appear with a neat zip icon for easy double-clicking. Best

Re: [Declude.Virus] FW: MS Windows/Critical Error

2005-01-27 Thread William Stillwell
It isn't gonna happen, unless rarsoft sells to winzip. Tar,GZ I believe are open source, so technically, WinZIP can have them. note to self: block .tar, .gz - Original Message - From: Andy Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 9:36 AM

RE: [Declude.Virus] RAR Support - why not?

2005-01-27 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hm, It isn't gonna happen, unless rarsoft sells to winzip. I'm not sure if this it legit: http://www.rarlab.com/rar_add.htm But it appears that unrar source code, DLLs etc are readily available to software developers? (Even if it was not, Winzip already has command line links for some of the

RE: [Declude.Virus] RAR Support - why not?

2005-01-27 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hm, http://www.rarreg.com/licence.php No person or company may distribute separate parts of the package == with the exception of the UnRAR components ==, without written permission of the copyright owner. So - it looks as if it's an open license for the UnRAR components - and only the

RE: [Declude.Virus] RAR Support - why not?

2005-01-27 Thread R. Scott Perry
In fact, I wonder if Declude 2.1 could use those libraries to unrar files to look inside RAR archives? How about 1.82? :) 1.82 will treat encrypted .RAR files the same as encrypted .ZIP files, and will block banned file extensions in .RAR files the same way as it blocks banned file extensions

RE: [Declude.Virus] RAR Support - why not?

2005-01-27 Thread Andy Schmidt
1.82 will treat encrypted .RAR files the same as encrypted .ZIP files, and will block banned file extensions in .RAR files the same way as it blocks banned file extensions in .ZIP files. Beautiful! Now we just need McAfee to scan inside RAR files G (Globally banning zipped .EXE files is not

Re: [Declude.Virus] RAR Support - why not?

2005-01-27 Thread Bill Landry
- Original Message - From: Andy Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Now we just need McAfee to scan inside RAR files G Indeed! Even F-Prot scans inside of .rar files: = cat report.txt Virus scanning report - 27 January 2005 @ 16:46 F-PROT ANTIVIRUS Program version: 3.16a Engine version: