Re: [Declude.Virus] Running declude 4.x

2006-02-20 Thread Bill Landry
Title: Message The was definitely a change between Declude Version 3.0.5.23 and Version 3.0.5.26 in its handling of header processing. We had to roll back to .23 because .26 was causing strange behavior with certain mime encapsulated messages. I sent evidence to David Franco-Rocha off-line

[Declude.Virus]

2006-02-20 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Organization:Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Kevin Bilbee Declude.Virus@declude.com Subject: Re[3]: [Declude.Virus] Running declude 4.x In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0

Re[4]: [Declude.Virus] Running declude 4.x

2006-02-20 Thread Sanford Whiteman
P.S. This time, I clipped out the Org setting completely. Yeah, uh, _this_ time. . . . :) Last test. I'd never use the list for tests, normally, but this time it's the list that has the prob (that is, I'm not running 3+) --Sandy --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA

Re: [Declude.Virus] Running declude 4.x

2006-02-20 Thread John Pearson
I am having trouble finding 3.0.5.23 on the website? I would like to try that release. Thanks, John - Original Message - From: Scott Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2006 1:29 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Running declude 4.x If

RE: [Declude.Virus]

2006-02-20 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Declude has a problem with non-standard headers. There is a whole category of spam that has headers with this problem. The other symptom we see is that Declude is unable to edit the headers properly when this happens. That is, for us, Declude cannot alter the Subject line (which we use in