Re: [Declude.Virus] Running declude 4.x

2006-02-20 Thread Bill Landry
on 2/10, but have yet to hear anything back. Bill - Original Message - From: Kevin Bilbee To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2006 1:10 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Running declude 4.x I guess Declude needs to standup and answer

Re[4]: [Declude.Virus] Running declude 4.x

2006-02-20 Thread Sanford Whiteman
P.S. This time, I clipped out the Org setting completely. Yeah, uh, _this_ time. . . . :) Last test. I'd never use the list for tests, normally, but this time it's the list that has the prob (that is, I'm not running 3+) --Sandy --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA

Re: [Declude.Virus] Running declude 4.x

2006-02-20 Thread John Pearson
I am having trouble finding 3.0.5.23 on the website? I would like to try that release. Thanks, John - Original Message - From: Scott Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2006 1:29 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Running declude 4.x

RE: [Declude.Virus] Running declude 4.x

2006-02-19 Thread Kaj Søndergaard Laursen
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee Sent: 19. februar 2006 08:33 To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Subject: [Declude.Virus] Running declude 4.x I am wondering if the headers showing in the body of this message

Re: [Declude.Virus] Running declude 4.x

2006-02-19 Thread Matt
to be from different causes. Matt Kaj Sndergaard Laursen wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee Sent: 19. februar 2006 08:33 To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Subject: [Declude.Virus] Running declude 4.x I am

Re: [Declude.Virus] Running declude 4.x

2006-02-19 Thread John Pearson
Laursen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2006 3:52 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Running declude 4.x -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee Sent: 19. februar 2006 08:33 To: Declude.Virus

RE: [Declude.Virus] Running declude 4.x

2006-02-19 Thread Kevin Bilbee
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Subject: [Declude.Virus] Running declude 4.x I am wondering if the headers showing in the body of this message was intentional. If not then there is a bug in declude 4.x. I'm also seeing this with Declude 3.0.5.26. Some mails, like the "Oxygen" mail

Re: [Declude.Virus] Running declude 4.x

2006-02-19 Thread Matt
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2006 9:27 AM To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Running declude 4.x This is also affecting Nick Hayer's posts, and seemed to start when

RE: [Declude.Virus] Running declude 4.x

2006-02-19 Thread Barry Simpson
Title: Message Kevin, Thanks, we will be looking at this.. Barry From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin BilbeeSent: Sunday, February 19, 2006 4:11 PMTo: Declude.Virus@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Running declude 4.x I guess Declude needs

Re: [Declude.Virus] Running declude 4.x

2006-02-19 Thread Scott Fisher
PROTECTED] To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2006 12:12 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Running declude 4.x I get this problem too. Declude denies it is their problem. It is happening with one of my lists. I rolled back to 3.0.5.20 and it works again, but 3.0.5.26 triggers

RE: [Declude.Virus] Running declude 4.x

2006-02-19 Thread Kevin Bilbee
Subject: [Declude.Virus] Running declude 4.x I am wondering if the headers showing in the body of this message was intentional. If not then there is a bug in declude 4.x. I'm also seeing this with Declude 3.0.5.26. Some mails, like the "Oxygen" mail-list from Panda consistently shows up

[Declude.Virus] Running declude 4.x

2006-02-18 Thread Kevin Bilbee
I am wondering if the headers showing in the body of this message was intentional. If not then there is a bug in declude 4.x. I have seen this from another source and reported it to Declude but am wndering if it has not appeared from a different source. If so it would comfirm to me that the