[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of John T (Lists)Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006
7:37 PMTo: Declude.Virus@declude.comSubject:
RE: [Declude.Virus] Encoded viruses...worried
Matt, are you
saying the attachment as Declude would see it is B64, UU, UUE
ubject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Encoded viruses...worried
Matt, are
you saying the attachment as Declude would see it is B64, UU, UUE, MIM,
MME, BHX and HQX? If that is so, what harm would be in blocking those
for now?
John T
eServices
For You
"Seek,
an
-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Reimer
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 12:26 PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus]
Encoded viruses...worried
I'm curious. Are people banning BHX, HQX,
UUE, UU, and MIM since the Kapser/Blac
al Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On
Behalf Of John T (Lists)Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 7:37
PMTo: Declude.Virus@declude.comSubject: RE:
[Declude.Virus] Encoded viruses...worried
Matt, are you
saying the attachment as Declude would see it is B6
Virus@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Encoded
viruses...worried
Am I the only one that is wondering why there
wouldn't have been an official response to this from Declude?
While I have added the extension listed to block
attachments, (and FProt did detect on all of my
Am I the only one that is wondering why there
wouldn't have been an official response to this from Declude?
While I have added the extension listed to block
attachments, (and FProt did detect on all of my instances), when a potential
flaw is pointed out, it would be nice to have an official
--Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 6:40 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus]
Encoded viruses...worried
I've grep'ed trough the logfiles for the
last 7 days on
Excellent.
Thanks Bill -
-Nick
Bill Landry wrote:
Nick, I put this together quite some
time ago and have sent it to people upon request. Hopefully posting it
here will make it more widely accessible. At least it can point you to
some tutorials and give you a sampling of how
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Brown
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 7:24 AM
To: Markus Gufler
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Encoded viruses...worried
Off list - what grep do you use or which is the best for a W32 box?
Wednesday
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Brown
> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 7:24 AM
> To: Markus Gufler
> Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Encoded viruses...worried
>
> Off list - what grep do you use or which is the best for a W32 box?
>
>
&g
Gufler
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Encoded viruses...worried
Off list - what grep do you use or which is the best for a W32 box?
Wednesday, February 1, 2006, 8:40:19 AM, Markus Gufler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
MG>
MG>
MG> I've grep'ed trough the logfiles for the last
;
MG>
MG>
MG> Markus
MG>
MG>
MG>
MG>
MG>
MG>
MG>
MG>
MG> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MG> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
MG> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 3:19 PM
MG> To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
MG> Subj
day, February 01, 2006 3:19 PMTo:
Declude.Virus@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Encoded
viruses...worried
You know, I was going to ask if you would do a search, but I
figured you might do it anyway :) You did leave out the ".uue"
extension, but I doubt that would have chang
PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Colbeck,
Andrew
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 6:04 PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Encoded viruses...worried
John, the other formats are
common (or, were common) on Macintosh and Unix based systems for binary
att
Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Colbeck,
AndrewSent: Tuesday, January
31, 2006 6:35 PMTo:
Declude.Virus@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Encoded
viruses...worried
On the plus side,
there are mitigating circumstances...
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006
6:35 PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus]
Encoded viruses...worried
On the plus side, there are mitigating
circumstances...
First, let me point out that although the
antivirus companies will lag
s in so few formats).
Andrew 8)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T
(Lists)Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 5:44 PMTo:
Declude.Virus@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Encoded
viruses...worried
Actuall
] On Behalf Of John T
(Lists)Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 5:44 PMTo:
Declude.Virus@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Encoded
viruses...worried
Actually, I am
already blocking hqz and uue so I went and added the others and will see what
happens.
John
T
e
ists)
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 5:37 PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus]
Encoded viruses...worried
Matt, are you saying the attachment as
Declude would see it is B64, UU, UUE, MIM, MME, BHX and HQX? If that is so,
what harm would be in blocking those for now?
Matt, are you saying the attachment as
Declude would see it is B64, UU, UUE, MIM, MME, BHX and HQX? If that is so,
what harm would be in blocking those for now?
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall
find!"
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto
20 matches
Mail list logo
