Re: [Declude.Virus] Upgrade issues

2004-12-22 Thread Greg Hedgepath
@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 4:22 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Upgrade issues 1- Please do not base keys on mac adresses. IP maybe, but not mac I believe the decision was made to use the MAC address based on the fact that some people might be running copies of IMail on separate

RE: [Declude.Virus] Upgrade issues

2004-12-22 Thread Andy Schmidt
PROTECTED] To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 4:22 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Upgrade issues 1- Please do not base keys on mac adresses. IP maybe, but not mac I believe the decision was made to use the MAC address based on the fact that some people might

RE: [Declude.Virus] Upgrade issues

2004-12-22 Thread Jonathan
Perhaps now would be a good time for Barry to comment on this thread. Jonathan At 08:56 AM 12/22/2004, you wrote: A) major technical/setup changes to the availability/installability are made without proper warning (even in a public beta)! Actually, the IMail version should work exactly as before,

RE: [Declude.Virus] Upgrade issues

2004-12-22 Thread R. Scott Perry
Well - it is my understanding that there is now an automated Setup again and people have either been reporting (or possibly only speculating?) that it might fiddle with my carefully laid out configuration files and or message templates. Yes. That was due to a bug in the install program. It was

Re: [Declude.Virus] Upgrade issues

2004-12-22 Thread Greg Hedgepath
I first wrote: The use of MAC address will break my network config. Scott Perry wrote : Do you mean that you have a MAC address that changes constantly? Could you please explain how that works? My reply; Let me preface with my initial post was somewhat lame and at best too brief. As you read

Re: [Declude.Virus] Upgrade issues

2004-12-22 Thread Doug Anderson
have the same mac? - Original Message - From: Greg Hedgepath [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 9:12 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Upgrade issues I first wrote: The use of MAC address will break my network config. Scott Perry wrote

Re: [Declude.Virus] Upgrade issues [was: DO NOT UPGRADE]

2004-12-21 Thread R. Scott Perry
Just upgraded to 2.0B, and declude stoped working When running -diag I am getting a strange line: Declude v2.0b key request on MAC 000E7F2E754C. What is this key request ? For the next release, we are looking at having activation codes handled automatically. Why is declude not working ? I

RE: [Declude.Virus] Upgrade issues [was: DO NOT UPGRADE]

2004-12-21 Thread Jeff Lancton
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 3:03 PM To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Upgrade issues [was: DO NOT UPGRADE] Just upgraded to 2.0B, and declude stoped working When running -diag I am getting a strange line: Declude v2.0b key

RE: [Declude.Virus] Upgrade issues [was: DO NOT UPGRADE]

2004-12-21 Thread R. Scott Perry
I had the same problem with 2.0b not working. E-mails kept piling up in the spool. Cycled queue manager, emails went through, unchecked by Declude. We are aware of an issue with 2.0b where this could happen; we are awaiting more information to resolve the problem.

Re: [Declude.Virus] Upgrade issues

2004-12-21 Thread Darin Cox
I would need a better understanding of exactly what that means before I would be comfortable with it. Darin. - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 7:16 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Upgrade issues

RE: [Declude.Virus] Upgrade issues

2004-12-21 Thread decvirus
PM To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Upgrade issues So is this why the new versions have an actual installer? Off-topic, but I think Microsoft did the world a great disservice by introducing hardware-tied activation as an accepted practice. Sidenote, how exactly do