It seems like a lot of you have had the same problem I had with McAfee's
dat file from the other day. Has McAfee admit there was a problem yet?
Has anybody heard anything from them about this?
Thank you for making YourNET Connection your connection to the world
Jim O'Keefe
Technical Support
This isn't someone we know. I looked them up based on the admin messages we
were getting from declude.virus+mcaffee and they're a technology consulting
firm - which could explain the arrogance. I responded back to his (director
of operations) email. He claimed that they might of been ip spoofed,
Hi,
I have just started using Declude with F-Prot as our virus scanner. Was
using Trend Viruswall. Have noticed that F-Prot is letting thru viruses that
Trend desktop scanners are catching. I have had 11 TROJ_REVOP.F get thru
today alone. Is anyone else seeing this? Trying to use ClamAV as a
I have just started using Declude with F-Prot as our virus scanner. Was
using Trend Viruswall. Have noticed that F-Prot is letting thru viruses that
Trend desktop scanners are catching. I have had 11 TROJ_REVOP.F get thru
today alone. Is anyone else seeing this? Trying to use ClamAV as a
Thanks for the info.
Is there a good template on how to setup virus.cfg?
I have the basic stuff from the instructions but it would be nice to get a
real world version.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, June
Is there a good template on how to setup virus.cfg?
I have the basic stuff from the instructions but it would be nice to get a
real world version.
The real question is what are you looking to do?
The default Declude Virus configuration file usually doesn't need to be
changed, aside from your
Have you sent those caught viruses to the declude or F-prot virus traps?
They may be corrupted and not viable viruses any longer. Meaning they are
no longer harmful (Possibly).
F-prot would surely want to see this. Go to their website and submit the
samples.
Doug
-Original Message-
http://www.sss.ca/sensible/home.nsf/docbyid/16DB651DF6279C1F85256EB7004AEF5F?OpenDocument
McAfee has announced that the 4160 scan engine and earlier versions
contained in McAfee Anti-virus products will cease to work correctly
after applying the 4367 DAT files or later. The 4.1.60 scan
TS Has McAfee admit there was a problem yet?
TS Has anybody heard anything from them about this?
Article on web site:
http://www.nai.com/us/promos/4160_engine.htm
Note Scenario 2 where some users running 4320 also failed because
of scanpm.
I think SuperDat will not work if
Also the older Engines will NOT catch all the viruses.
Current engine is almost as important as currnent DATs (virus definition
files).
At least one of the sites having trouble has been trying the current engine.
(I would double check and do a re-boot to make sure the new engine is used.)
Greg
More info on problems with the old engine. Also sometimes (esp on Win
98) it may take some extra procedures to fully update the engine.
http://forums.mcafeehelp.com/viewtopic.php?t=27957
PS For any McAfee question this forum is a GREAT resource.
(Focused on Retail customers, but there is a small
11 matches
Mail list logo
