Everything is working so well right now I'm not sure I want to deploy
beta code. How long do you estimate before this goes into production?
Rob
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This
If I'm reading the e-mail and the logs correctly, declude / f-prot did
scan that e-mail, and it passed.
I'll keep my eyes much more open today!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 11:54 AM
To:
It did say Virus Free. F-prot has bugbear.A@mm
Obviously, BANEXT will now be catching this. Boy, what a waste of time.
Thanks,
Rob
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail
Hi
The bugbear virus is getting through f-prot / declude virus. Not always,
but more than once. It's being caught by Norton AV on my desktop. Here's
the latest:
F-prot is up to date. I use fpcmd.
Virus log shows it being scanned.
The attachment had the name AAL benefit.doc.scr
I have BANEXT
One more bit of info - using Virus Lite, which I just learned will not ban
extensions.
Hi
The bugbear virus is getting through f-prot / declude virus. Not always,
but more than once. It's being caught by Norton AV on my desktop. Here's
the latest:
F-prot is up to date. I use fpcmd.
Virus
, 2003 11:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Bugbear getting through
Have you tried sending a copy of the virus' that are passing by F-Prot to
FSI for review?
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Robert Grosshandler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday
Windows version (fpcmd).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Bugbear getting through
Robert, I have noticed the same thing,
Title: Message
Do
people use Fire Daemon or something similar to get around this problem? Or
a chron job of some sort?
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kami RazvanSent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:54
AMTo: [EMAIL
Thanks to all for the quick notification of the new virus. We seemed to
have escaped any harm.
We immediately put BANEXT zip into our virus.cfg file, and that seemed to be
a good thing.
Now I'm thinking about lowering our protection back to where it was.
Is it possible, with Virus Standard,
Klinge
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 10:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] BANEXT
Geeze.. So you want the virus to only effect certain users?
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
Grosshandler
Sent
Also - f-prot 3.14b is the current version. It's an important upgrade if I
recall correctly.
terry ip wrote:
Hi All,
Desktop Norton caught but declude didn't. I'm using Declude 1.75 +
F-prot 3.14a with the latest virus pattern. Anyone have the same
problem as I'm? or any cure on
I'm lazy (actually, just small staff, and I want to keep it that way).
I would love to find a way to give Scott Co. the way to automatically
force my installation to upgrade to the next interim release, if important.
I understand that there is a possibility that might backfire, but I think
John -
Thinking about it some more, I think it might be the same. You can choose
to have that notification go to your pager. I could choose to have that
notification spawn a script. Scott only has to maintain one list.
After you got that notification, you could choose to login to your servers
Ah, if were that easy. It actually went to a support e-mail box, which gets
dozens of emails a minute sometimes, under all sorts of different aliases.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
Upgraded to 8.11 - no apparent issues. Did a reboot just in case.
About 1.5 hours later, a bagle virus, in a .cpl file, found it's way to my
computer. McAfee alerted me.
Unfortunately, McAfee completely wiped out any trace of said virus, so I'm
unable to go back to logs on server to confirm
No problem here.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe
We're seeing it too.
McAfee on desktop catching as a "trojan". AVG and F-Prot not
catching it yet.
Declude not stopping, either.
newprice.zip is the attachment name.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus
GuflerSent: Monday, August 09, 2004 11:23 AMTo:
Problem is, I want to get "good" zipped
exe's.
Oh well. Until the AV programs start catching it, I've made our
e-mail less useful by blocking any zips with exe's in
them.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004
- Original Message -
From: Robert Grosshandler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 1:02 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] JS/illWill
Problem is, I want to get good zipped exe's.
Oh well. Until the AV programs start catching it, I've made our
e-mail less
I for one do not recall receiving such an
e-mail.
I'm not complaining, just posting here in case others have
a similar issue.
Since I didn't get it, is there a way to see that e-mail
online someplace?
Thanks,
Rob
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL
Interesting. For about a month I've been seeing headers from you, as well.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman
Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2006 5:46 PM
Subject: [Declude.Virus]
Organization:Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
Declude has a problem with non-standard headers. There is a whole
category of spam that has headers with this problem.
The other symptom we see is that Declude is unable to edit the headers
properly when this happens. That is, for us, Declude cannot alter the
Subject line (which we use in
Also, what about those of us on 3.x ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Carter
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 3:17 PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.Virus] Built in virus detector
Just noticed yesterday's 4.2.3 release
Matt -
Thanks for keeping track of all of this for the rest of us.
Rob
-Original Message-
David,
I'm just wondering about the issue with the invalid characters in the Mail
From's that caused massive spam leakage almost a month ago. Is this too
supposed to be fixed?
I'm also very,
Folk -
Chiming in here on the CRLF issue. For many months, David R (Rocqa?) from
Declude sent me versions to test that were attempting to fix this issue.
None solved the problem (we probably tested four or five versions), but
never once did he or anybody point a finger at the email server.
It
Hi
We tried installing, decludeproc wouldn't start. We have fallen back to
4.3.30, successfully. Getting on the phone now with Declude.
Your mileage hopefully will vary.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Monday,
Hi
We tried installing, decludeproc wouldn't start. We have fallen back to
4.3.30, successfully. Getting on the phone now with Declude.
Your mileage hopefully will vary.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Monday,
. You don't need PERL to use the new library.
That was worth the time I spent on this.
Thanks Declude.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
Grosshandler
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 10:12 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
. You don't need PERL to use the new library.
That was worth the time I spent on this.
Thanks Declude.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
Grosshandler
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 10:12 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Hi
We're seeing the HEADER warning being triggered where it was never triggered
before. Here's one sample:
Headers:
Received: from QMTA01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.16] by
smtp.igive.com with ESMTP
(SMTPD-9.23) id A12C03D8; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 05:38:36 -0500
Received: from
Try Gammadyne Mailer.
www.gammadyne.com
I believe it has a feature that will allow this.
Rob
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Hirthe,
Alexander
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 9:57 AM
To: 'declude.virus@declude.com'
Subject: [Declude.Virus] OT -
Thanks!
From: David Barker [mailto:david.bar...@mailsbestfriend.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 12:02 PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.Virus] RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude stopped logging, high
CPU usage, slow processing
If you don’t have the last build 4.12.02 get it
32 matches
Mail list logo
