EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Declude.Virus] suggestion for the Virus Manual
>
>
>
> Scott:
> Just a suggestion for Declude Virus Manual and sample virus config file
>
> Could you add a section that explains how the following work
> BANZIPEXTS
> BANEZIPEXTS
>
>
Panda Consulting S.A.
Luis Alberto Arango
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 1:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.Virus] suggestion for the Virus Manual
Scott:
Just a suggestion for Declude Virus Manual and sample virus config file
Could you add a section that explains how the following
Scott:
Just a suggestion for Declude Virus Manual and sample virus config file
Could you add a section that explains how the following work
BANZIPEXTS
BANEZIPEXTS
As far as I have seen the only way to learn how it works is by reading the
release notes and the list.
New users and old ones will
This might be a way to block virus traffic, but allow employees and
selected customers to send and receive EZip files.
For example, when a virus sample is sent to McAfee's AVERT, they want a
zip encrypted with "infected". Currently I expect that since I'm
blocking EZips, I could not send a sampl
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 7:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Suggestion
>I would love to find a way to give Scott & Co. the way to automatically
>force my installation to upgrade to the next interim release, i
I would love to find a way to give Scott & Co. the way to automatically
force my installation to upgrade to the next interim release, if important.
That is a good idea. There is a third party program that can automatically
upgrade to new betas and released versions, but it doesn't handle interim
I'm lazy (actually, just small staff, and I want to keep it that way).
I would love to find a way to give Scott & Co. the way to automatically
force my installation to upgrade to the next interim release, if important.
I understand that there is a possibility that might backfire, but I think
that
after putting in this "BANCRVIRUSES OFF"
I still get this
[Outlook 'Boundary Space Gap' Vulnerability] / [No attachment]
There is an interim release 1.76i16 at
http://www.declude.com/release/176i/declude.exe that will take care of this.
-Scott
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Suggestion
Unfortunately, the only way to do this is to turn off all vulnerability
detection, which is not recommended. But if you feel the benefits of
allowing some vulnerabilities through outweighs the risks of letting all
vulnerabilities t
Unfortunately, the only way to do this is to turn off all vulnerability
detection, which is not recommended. But if you feel the benefits of
allowing some vulnerabilities through outweighs the risks of letting all
vulnerabilities through, that is your decision (you can use "BANCRVIRUSES
OFF"
We have a number of large customers who has serius problems with 'Blank
Folding'
We would like to be able to skip scanning for this single problem until
the problems are solved on a per domain setting.
Unfortunately, the only way to do this is to turn off all vulnerability
detection, which is
We have a number of large customers who has serius problems with 'Blank Folding'
We would like to be able to skip scanning for this single problem until the problems
are solved on a per domain setting.
The reason to this is that there are no pattern in where the mail are coming from or
which cl
As I am finishing this contract on Monday, I have just been signing my work
over to the Office manager, who asked about Declude.
When I said about checking for updates she asked if the Email support listed
Notified me of the new release, I said no.
Scott - I think that it would be handy to have
13 matches
Mail list logo
