Andy
You ARE aware that there are well-documented situations where Imail
can
get
messages past Declude - so they never show up in the Declude logs?
This
may
be have been fixed in the latest Imail 8 fixes - but I don't know this
for
certain.
Where would I find this documented?
Goran
Title: Message
Other
than the firewall/router - doesn't their SMTP server application(e.g.,
like IIS) have the ability to restrict inbound connections to certain IP
ranges.
We
hada similar issue with one of my relay customers - and we just defined
IIS SMTP to only accept mail from my
It does have this configuration, however I'm not sure about how secure
that might be, or if it will still reject E-mail addressed locally
(IMail does not for instance). I think that this might be appropriate
as long as the server doesn't have roaming users that connect with SMTP
AUTH, or at
At 12:17 PM 6/15/2004, Matt wrote:
This domain was recently moved to our DNS and I suspect that someone at
their old DNS hosting provider is infected and using their old unremoved
DNS entries and that is why they are bypassing us. Note though that some
spammers are definitely caching old
Hi,
The mail-archive for the Declude.JunkMail and/or Declude.Virus list had
discussions for a while (several months ago), when Scott and various
customers where trying to determine, why some emails would not appear in any
Declude lists.
It had been amplified by an early Imail 8 Version.
But -
- Original Message -
From: Russ Uhte (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 12:17 PM 6/15/2004, Matt wrote:
This domain was recently moved to our DNS and I suspect that someone at
their old DNS hosting provider is infected and using their old unremoved
DNS entries and that is why they are
Hi all,
I know I should have stayed on top of this all along, but we need to
make some adjustments now.
What is the current recommendation as far as virus notification setting
goes? We need to make sure we aren't doing more harm than good in this
arena. I know Matt had said he had some
At 01:23 PM 6/15/2004, David Fletcher wrote:
Hi all,
I know I should have stayed on top of this all along, but we need to
make some adjustments now.
What is the current recommendation as far as virus notification setting
goes? We need to make sure we aren't doing more harm than good in this
My immediate manager has some previous experience using a gateway device to deal with
viruses and
other issues. He wants general information about putting something like that in front
of our IMail
server (which also hosts our public Web site), and he's specifically interested in the
Symantec
Ditto!
I only send to myself so I have a sense of what is going on from a quick
overview
Harry Vanderzand
inTown Internet Computer Services
11 Belmont Ave. W.
Kitchener, ON
N2M 1L2
519-741-1222
Did you know we offer:
- Province wide dial-up and high speed internet access
- Web accessible
We've had two incidents where a virus got through our mail server,
apparently during the time lag
while F-Prot was writing/distributing a new virus definition. (We update
every hour.)
What does the Declude Virus log file say for one of these E-mails?
What's next?
OK, what can we do about these?
http://www.sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/symbcabira.html
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus
What is the current recommendation as far as virus notification setting
goes? We need to make sure we aren't doing more harm than good in this
arena. I know Matt had said he had some suggestions for us once when we
where corresponding privately on another matter.
We recommend running the latest
There are products available to use with the IIS SMTP virtual server that
can do this.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Keith Purtell
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 1:24 PM
It says...
06/13/2004 15:38:49 Qbb483a9701d225cb Scanned: Virus Free [MIME: 3 23323]
Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator
VantageMed Corporation (Kansas City office)
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole
use of the
intended recipient(s) and
I send to everybody on NON-forging viruses (very few)
I assume that most vulnerables and exploits are just spam and skip them
with the forging viruses.
If someone with Kak or a word macro virus tries to send a real file,
then if everyone knows something can get figured out. Otherwise, it just
06/13/2004 15:38:49 Qbb483a9701d225cb Scanned: Virus Free [MIME: 3 23323]
That means that F-Prot didn't detect a virus (and didn't report any
error). I'm doubting that it would have reported that there was no virus
unless it really didn't see the virus. Could it be that the E-mail arrived
That is most likely what happened. Now I just have to make sure management understands
that this is
a fact of life on the Internet. By the way, the URL you posted was a very interesting
article.
Thanks!
Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator
VantageMed Corporation (Kansas City office)
Voice:
That is most likely what happened. Now I just have to make sure
management understands that this is
a fact of life on the Internet. By the way, the URL you posted
was a very interesting article.
Thanks!
If you are running Declude Virus Pro, then you could add one or more of the
free virus
- Original Message -
From: Brad Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you are running Declude Virus Pro, then you could add one or more of
the
free virus scanners to your configuration. I added ClamAV after seeing an
article that said it was very high on the list of who gets updates out the
Another one is BitDefender. Their free scanner has just the right features
for Declude Virus.
It doesn't appear to be free for commercial use.
I was sure that it allowed commercial use (or rather commercial use was not
prohibited), but after going to http://www.bitdefender.com/ (and finding
Does not look like it can be called by command line.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 5:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
Another one is BitDefender. Their free scanner has just the right
features for Declude Virus.
Does not look like it can be called by command line.
I'm using the Free BitDefender for Windows and it does have a command line
scanner. I don't remember seeing any licensing restrictions.
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Another one is BitDefender. Their free scanner has just the right
features
for Declude Virus.
It doesn't appear to be free for commercial use.
I was sure that it allowed commercial use (or rather commercial use was
24 matches
Mail list logo
