[Declude.Virus] Parsing of Report.txt

2009-02-05 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hi, With the ability of ClamD to run at lightning speed as a native Windows service (e.g., http://oss.netfarm.it/clamav, without CygWin), offering frequent updates during the day (quite contrary to the internal scanner that often lags days behind) and has acceptable licensing terms - it certain

RE: [Declude.Virus] Parsing of Report.txt

2009-02-05 Thread David Barker
Hi Andy we will certainly look at this, although to be clear, it is very presumptions to say that adding this will only be 2 min work. Please be careful when making statements like this because it raises a false expectation for others. You have no idea about the complexity of the code, other items

RE: [Declude.Virus] Parsing of Report.txt

2009-02-05 Thread Scott Fisher
I think you missed the real point of Andy's email. The last official Declude release was 4.4.0 on 3/17/2008. It's already Febuary 2009, so it's about a year with no with no official releases. That doesn't make me feel like I'm getting much out of my maintenance renewal money. S

RE: [Declude.Virus] Parsing of Report.txt

2009-02-05 Thread David Barker
Scott I got that point. There have been interims throughout the year we are now on 4.4.25 which is available to all with service agreements. I can roll this up into an official release. David B From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher Sent: Thursday, Fe

RE: [Declude.Virus] Parsing of Report.txt

2009-02-05 Thread Gary Steiner
David, If 4.4.25 "is available to all with service agreements", where is it? Declude's main download page shows 4.4.0, and the interim page shows versions 4.4.23 and 4.4.24. And, as your readme.txt file in your interim directory says, "Interim releases are versions of Declude that are release

RE: [Declude.Virus] Parsing of Report.txt

2009-02-05 Thread David Barker
Gary, I apologize the latest is 4.4.24. Yes you are correct the readme.txt does have the following note. Interim releases are stable and tested but as they are not "official" I guess you have a point... if I could give you an analogy - it is for the same reason Google has not taken GMAIL out of Be