Re: [Declude.Virus] Slightly OT: Encrypting or Securing Email Content

2005-10-11 Thread Michael Thomas - Mathbox
Kevin, I am licensed for Declude 3.x, but have not yet installed it. I am waiting until I think the dust has settled. So, I am running Declude Version 1.82. At version 1.82, Declude virus scanning was enabled or disabled at the email account level or domain level. If enabled, the rule set was one

Re: [Declude.Virus] Slightly OT: Encrypting or Securing Email Content

2005-10-11 Thread Michael Thomas - Mathbox
Kevin, Also, for those one-time events, rename the ZIP file before attachement, like MyEncrypted.Zip is renamed to MyEncrypted.Zip.Txt, with a message to the recipient to rename the file. Mike - Original Message - From: "Kevin Rogers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, October 11,

Re: [Declude.Virus] Slightly OT: Encrypting or Securing Email Content

2005-10-11 Thread Michael Thomas - Mathbox
Hah, On that note: Is it safe? Answer me! Is it safe? For those of you that do not recognize it, it is from "Marthon Man" (1976) starring Dustin Hoffman. A graduate student and obsessive runner in New York is drawn into a mysterious plot involving his globe trotting brother, his European girlfr

[Declude.Virus] Under specific conditions, action not as specified

2006-02-12 Thread Michael Thomas - Mathbox
Michael Thomas Mathbox 978-683-6718 1-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free) N¬f¢—¬±Æ§ç_¢»â®ë±¼ƒyÉnuá 0uç%¹×œ¢dáŠÁ&j)\jgŸ®‰­…àÞr[yX«ºÉšŠX§‚X¬µ:.žË›±Êâmèî²ÛÖ§f¢–Ú"™¨¥²»ÝyÉnuç(™©Ý·*^º{.nÇ+‰·ƒyÉnuåb®ë…æ«r¯zǝ·Ÿ¢éÝjØm¶Ÿÿà &j)Z­Èb½ç(

[Declude.Virus] Apologies

2006-02-12 Thread Michael Thomas - Mathbox
Hi All, I inadvertently sent a plain text message encoded as base64 to list. I had been comparing spammer generated plain text messages encoded as base64 to the same generated by Outlook Express. I forgot to switch it back. My Apologies, Michael Thomas Mathbox 978-683-6718 1-877-MATHBOX (Toll

Re: [Declude.Virus] Under specific conditions, action not as specified

2006-02-12 Thread Michael Thomas - Mathbox
Darrell, Ooops, my mistake All of the ones that I thought should have been deleted were for customers that had JunkMail processing blocked. So, it did do the right thing. Now, I need to fire off another email to support Mike --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.d

RE: [Declude.Virus] New Virus: zipped word doc with Macro-Virus

2006-06-28 Thread Michael Thomas - Mathbox
David, >From my point of view, the problem with that response is that if Imail handle all the issues presented by abnormal mail messages, we would not need Declude. Imail handles normal messages just fine. If it were not for viruses and spammers, we would not see these problems. We got Declude to

[Declude.Virus] On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned

2006-10-19 Thread Michael Thomas - Mathbox
, producing a CrLf pair after the To field and the From field. I also added the string "No Cr" to the end of the subject of RfcNoCr.eml and added No Lf to the subject of RfcNoLf.eml. So for example change: ---- From: "Michael Thomas - Mathbox" <[EMAIL PRO

[Declude.JunkMail] On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned

2006-10-19 Thread Michael Thomas - Mathbox
press the Enter Key, producing a CrLf pair after the To field and the From field. I also added the string "No Cr" to the end of the subject of RfcNoCr.eml and added No Lf to the subject of RfcNoLf.eml. So for example change: ---- From: "Michael Thomas - Mathbox" &l

RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.Virus] On RFC Violation - Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through untouched and unscanned

2006-10-22 Thread Michael Thomas - Mathbox
eclude.Virus] On RFC Violation - > Declude allows attachments and Virus to pass through > untouched and unscanned > > Michael, > > Why is it necessary to run two tests (failing on Cr>Lf and on Lf>CR)? > Why not just one test (failing on Cr<>Lf)? > > > Thu