RE: [Declude.Virus] new Spam report from Sophos

2004-03-02 Thread Rick Klinge
The top 10 is: uu.net chinanet-gd kornet.net above.net chinanet-cq level3.net exodus.net hinet.net cw.net interbusiness.it http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/35937.html ~Rick > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus G

[Declude.Virus] X-Declude-Status: Waiting for activation code

2004-03-02 Thread Rick Klinge
Installed newest declude file and I'm still getting (X-Declude-Status: Waiting for activation code) within the email header Anyone know of a hack or hex editor I can use to fix this? Thanks, ~Rick ___ Virus Scanned and Filtered by

RE: [Declude.Virus] X-Declude-Status: Waiting for activation code

2004-03-02 Thread Rick Klinge
> >Installed newest declude file and I'm still getting > > > >(X-Declude-Status: Waiting for activation code) within the > email header > > > >Anyone know of a hack or hex editor I can use to fix this? > > If you upgrade to the latest interim it will remove that line. > Scott.. I did download a

RE: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot down?

2006-12-18 Thread Rick Klinge
Obviously not down in the upper 48's.. Working well from here ~ confirmed. Always run multiple scanners.. And then some homebrew.. ~ Rick > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of David Dodell > Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 11:37 PM - MGM

RE: [Declude.Virus] Current Version of Clam AV

2007-03-01 Thread Rick Klinge
http://www.asspsmtp.org/wiki/ClamAV_Win32 Try that.. Maybe it will work better with Declude? ~Rick > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Scott Fisher > Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 2:05 PM - MGMT > To: declude.virus@declude.com > Subj

RE: [Declude.Virus] re: [072-0DC11263-CB79] You do not have permission to post to the declude.virus@declude.com list

2007-04-24 Thread Rick Klinge
I didn't file a ticket.. what is this? Rick _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 7:09 PM - MGMT To: declude.virus@declude.com Subject: [Declude.Virus] re: [072-0DC11263-CB79] You do not have permission to post to the declude.virus@declude.c

RE: [Declude.Virus] re: [1EE-0F3A4F36-9FAD] You do not have permission to post to the declude.virus@declude.com list

2008-02-05 Thread Rick Klinge
Will you morons please remove me from your spam list? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 10:33 PM To: declude.virus@declude.com Subject: [Declude.Virus] re: [1EE-0F3A4F36-9FAD] You do not have permission to post to the declude.virus@declude.com li

RE: [Declude.Virus] F-prot

2003-09-29 Thread Rick Klinge
Pat, Here's a start for you: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg72506.html hth, ~Rick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Pat Hastings Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 4:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.Virus] F-prot

RE: [Declude.Virus] containing the Unknown Virus

2003-10-28 Thread Rick Klinge
Is this true for the DOS version of f-prot too? ~Rick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 6:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] containing the Unknown Virus >Thanks for the he

RE: [Declude.Virus] New virus in town..

2003-11-26 Thread Rick Klinge
Yes.. I think another poster recommended adding Private.zip into the declude virus.cfg file to block that attachment ~Rick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kami Razvan Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 12:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

RE: [Declude.Virus] New, fast-spreading virus: MyDoom

2004-01-26 Thread Rick Klinge
Scary thought for sure.. Thank God I banned *.zip files two days ago.. ~Rick > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John > Tolmachoff (Lists) > Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 7:08 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus]

RE: [Declude.Virus] BANEXT

2004-01-26 Thread Rick Klinge
Geeze.. So you want the virus to only effect certain users? ~Rick > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert > Grosshandler > Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 9:19 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Declude.Virus] BANEXT > > > Than

RE: [Declude.Virus] Banned Extensions at Bechtel

2004-01-28 Thread Rick Klinge
We ban a lot more than that. Some files we ban, source code, is to prohibit the sending/receiving of proprietary code. Although this may help stop the theft of software/source code it's not perfect. ~Rick > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Beh

RE: [Declude.Virus] Banned Extensions at Bechtel

2004-01-28 Thread Rick Klinge
That's all up to your acceptable use policy concerning email and attachments. Most corps have folks zip the files.. Some lately even rename them to something else like *.duh and just have the recipient rename it back to zip and business as usual. I for one.. Send all kinds of attachments.. And it

RE: [Declude.Virus] Kudos on saving me from myself

2004-02-05 Thread Rick Klinge
Umm.. Don't you need to delete the blank line(s), within your *.eml files, right after your SKIPIFVIRUSNAMESHAS .. ?? ~Rick > > I recently added a couple of new SKIPIFVIRUSNAMEHAS entries > to my .eml files. Then I noticed that I was no longer > receiving any notifications at all. Upon revie

RE: [Declude.Virus] Kudos on saving me from myself

2004-02-05 Thread Rick Klinge
Posting to my post.. Sorry.. Something like this or is mine wrong? Ommitt the dashes "-" ~Rick -- SKIPIFVIRUSNAMEHAS Braid SKIPIFVIRUSNAMEHAS Bridex SKIPIFVIRUSNAMEHAS Bugbear SKIPIFVIRUSNAMEHAS Dumar SKIPIFVIRUSNAMEHAS Fizzer SKIPIFVIR

RE: [Declude.Virus] 20 FORGINGVIRUS line limit in 1.75 and earlier releases

2004-02-05 Thread Rick Klinge
Well Great!.. I learned something new today. Thanks Kami, ~Rick > > Rick: > > It seems like you want to skip mailing the email if the > sender is forged. With the latest release you can do the > following. This is our sender.eml file. Using skipifforging > you don't have to keep tarck o

RE: [Declude.Virus] Mail Freezing up...

2004-02-06 Thread Rick Klinge
There's also a 4th value that is used for terminal server, not to exceed 3072, ie: SharedSection=1024,3072,2048,512 ~Rick > > Hello, > > It's a very long story how I got to this answer for our mail > servers, but if you do the following registry change I'll bet > a cup of coffee that your pr

RE: [Declude.Virus] New virus Tanx

2004-02-17 Thread Rick Klinge
Symantec labeled it [EMAIL PROTECTED] HA.. I just label it an "exe attachment virus" and carry on. Surprisingly, since I thought most email admins block exe attachments, this one is moving fast. ~Rick > > > F-Prot calls it w32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You mean "Bagle" and not "Bagel" ?! > __

RE: [Declude.Virus] New virus Tanx

2004-02-17 Thread Rick Klinge
I chuck it with ASSP and if it makes it past that then declude should kick it via the ban extension exe. If still passes that then hopefully the F-Prot will woof it. ~Rick Using mail server mail.famhost.com.220 ict-famhost.email.system X1 HELO www.declude.com 250 hello JaRay.net MAIL FROM: 250

RE: [Declude.Virus] X-Declude-Status: Waiting for activation code

2004-02-20 Thread Rick Klinge
Scott, Is this version for the declude virus our all the declude products? Thanks, ~Rick > > >I haven't seen an answer to this thread. Ver 1.78 shows Waiting for > >activation code, but reinstalling 1.77 will get rid of the > >X-Declude-Status line. Ver 1.78 still works, but it sure is a