On 9/13/05, Damien Pollet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
oops, paraît que j'ai posté en HTML à l'insu de mon plein gré... spa
moi m'sieu c'est GMail /o\
--
D
___
Demexp-dev mailing list
Demexp-dev@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/deme
On 9/12/05, David MENTRE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, the easy exchange between svn and svk is interesting. Have you
tried SVK? The SVK web site seems to be down. :(
I use it, probably not very extensively though : I just have two
branches of the same code, one for changes I intend to contribute
2005/9/12, luna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So don't take care of this problem just now and stay with tla (which is
> yet efficient) for a while. You have time for choosing an other SCM
> before tla become useless, do you ?
Sure. But as I'm not totally satisfied with tla/Arch, this is a
pretext to swit
Hi,
David MENTRE wrote:
> Ok, the easy exchange between svn and svk is interesting. Have you
> tried SVK? The SVK web site seems to be down. :(
> http://svk.elixus.org/
No, I haven't tried it personnaly, but a friend (how worked during the
Google Summer of Code on Subversion) told me that it w
Hi Thomas,
2005/9/12, Thomas Petazzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Did you give a try to svk ? It is a decentralized SCM built on top of
> Subversion. One of its advantages is that it is compatible with
> Subversion: you can checkout a regular SVN repository within svk, and
> someone using svn can chec
Hello Thomas,
2005/9/12, Thomas de Grenier de Latour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> - About Mercurial (with an Arch->Mercurial conversion script):
> http://linuxfr.org/~GomGom/18736.html
Thank you for this one. I read Edouard Gomez posts but overlooked the
Arch->Mercurial script. The Wiki of Tailor als
Hi,
David MENTRE wrote:
> - Subversion (svn): really nice but centralized;
Did you give a try to svk ? It is a decentralized SCM built on top of
Subversion. One of its advantages is that it is compatible with
Subversion: you can checkout a regular SVN repository within svk, and
someone using sv
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:43:45 +0200
David MENTRE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've not taken any decision yet, but it is always fun to play
> with a new SCM, so be assured I'll break all existing
> repositories. ;) Of course, I'll be glad to hear any opinion on
> the relative merit of other SCM.
I
Hello,
I just learned (on linuxfr.org) that TLA (aka GNU Arch) has been
dropped by Tom Lord, its main developer.
As I'm using Arch to manage demexp source code, it is going to be an
issue in the long term. In the short term, Arch is available and it
does not seem to have particular blocking bug (
