I thought of another possible candidate for the new jar file to
execute the tools and network server as part of DERBY-1063:
derbyrun.jar, which also works as runderby.jar
So far these are the proposed names:
derbycmd.jar
derbyctl.jar
derbygo.jar
derbyrun.jar
goderby.jar
runderby.jar
Does anyone
On 3/1/06, Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA) wrote:
>
> svn commit #380278 resolved this issue. Had a typo in the issue number
> in the svm commit comment, entered DERBY-996 instead of 966.
>
You can edit the contents of svn commit messages after the fact, with
the --revprop option:
svn propedi
[Auto-generated mail]
*TinderBox_Derby* 382204/2006-03-02 01:32:41 CET
*derbyall*
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
---
*Jvm: 1.5*
1640639 0 102.35% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
Details in
http://www.multi
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-966?page=all ]
Daniel John Debrunner resolved DERBY-966:
-
Fix Version: 10.2.0.0
Resolution: Fixed
svn commit #380278 resolved this issue. Had a typo in the issue number in
the svm commi
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1005?page=all ]
Daniel John Debrunner resolved DERBY-1005:
--
Fix Version: 10.2.0.0
Resolution: Fixed
Changes & tests committed
> getHoldability does not return CLOSE_CURSORS_AT_COMMIT in a g
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1024?page=all ]
Daniel John Debrunner updated DERBY-1024:
-
Fix Version: 10.2.0.0
> Client's XAResource.start throws XAException with XAER_RMFAIL when local
> transaction is active
> --
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1024?page=all ]
Daniel John Debrunner resolved DERBY-1024:
--
Resolution: Fixed
CHanges committed
> Client's XAResource.start throws XAException with XAER_RMFAIL when local
> transaction is activ
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1006?page=all ]
Daniel John Debrunner resolved DERBY-1006:
--
Fix Version: 10.2.0.0
Resolution: Fixed
Changes submitted and tests added to XATest.java
> Client allows setHoldability to HOLD_C
Is there any tooling builtin to the JVM to show reference chains, so I
can see at shutdown who is holding onto the generated plan?
Perhaps this can help? https://hat.dev.java.net/doc/README.html
bryan
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-627?page=all ]
Jean T. Anderson updated DERBY-627:
---
Other Info: (was: [Patch available])
Patch was committed so am marking it unavailable to aid Jira searches.
> Documentation needs to be updated with cor
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-627?page=all ]
Jean T. Anderson resolved DERBY-627:
Fix Version: 10.2.0.0
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Jeff Levitt
Committed patch derby627.diff, revision 382282. Modified files:
$ svn comm
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-629?page=all ]
Jean T. Anderson updated DERBY-629:
---
Other Info: (was: [Patch available])
Patch was applied, so marking unavailable to aid Jira searches.
> Update documentation with correct default values
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-629?page=all ]
Jean T. Anderson resolved DERBY-629:
Fix Version: 10.2.0.0
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Jeff Levitt
Committed patch derby629.diff, revision 382278. Modified files:
$ svn comm
Hi, Jeff,
There's a minor problem with this patch -- it has full paths for the C
drive on your PC:
Index: C:/derby/work/trunk/src/adminguide/radmindrdamaxthreads.dita
Instead of relative path, as for the DERBY-678 patch:
Index: src/devguide/cdevconcepts842385.dita
I'll edit this patch to c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Auto-generated mail]
*TinderBox_Derby* 382140/2006-03-01 21:02:22 CET
*derbyall*
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
---
*Jvm: 1.5*
15640625 095.12% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
Detail
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-210?page=all ]
Deepa Remesh updated DERBY-210:
---
Attachment: derby-210-patch5-v1.diff
derby-210-patch5-v1.status
Attaching a patch 'derby-210-patch5-v1.diff' which removes the actual memory
leaks
For DERBY-538 I have code to use a class loader, for the application
jars installed in a database, based upon the standard Java
URLClassLoader. The advantages to this are the standard security
features of URLClassLoader are picked up such as signature checking and
Jar sealing.
However, I hit a cou
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1061?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1061:
-
Attachment: derbyall_report.txt
Hi Anurag,
I applied this patch and ran derbyall. I saw 35 failed tests. Most of these are
message formatting problems and s
On 3/1/06, Stanley Bradbury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Having all the jars start with 'derby' has the advantage of making them
> easy to search for and they will short together in an alphabetical
> listing like is produced by most directory listings. Having them sort
> together when listing ou
On 3/1/06, Rick Hillegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, Andrew. What new items are we likely to see inside the
> distributions?
Well, if I get my way, goderby.jar (or whatever it ends up being named
- DERBY-1063) and new scripts in a bin directory in the -bin
distribution (DERBY-1032). There
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-965?page=comments#action_12368416 ]
Dag H. Wanvik commented on DERBY-965:
-
Note: I did not get any answer to my question on the phaseTester canon,
as far as I can see.
> DatabaseMetadata method supportsResu
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-627?page=comments#action_12368415 ]
Deepa Remesh commented on DERBY-627:
Thanks for making the changes. I took a look at the attached html files and
they cover what I describe. Patch looks good to me.
> Docu
Thanks, Andrew. What new items are we likely to see inside the
distributions?
Cheers,
-Rick
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
On 3/1/06, Rick Hillegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I heard a vague rumor that the 10.2 distributions would look different
than the 10.1 distributions available a
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1070?page=comments#action_12368412 ]
Dag H. Wanvik commented on DERBY-1070:
--
The name HoldabilityTest.junit may be too general if you only plan to include
tests for scrollable result sets in it. I also think
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-629?page=comments#action_12368413 ]
Deepa Remesh commented on DERBY-629:
Thanks for making the changes. I took a look at the attached html files and the
changes cover what I describe. Patch looks good to me.
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
On 3/1/06, Kathey Marsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How about *goderby.jar*
Only 7 letters and documents itself as a vehicle to get you on your way.
I like this. I also like the fact that it starts with g instead of d.
It will stand out in the list of jars:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-629?page=comments#action_12368407 ]
Jeff Levitt commented on DERBY-629:
---
Could someone please review this patch? Thanks in advance!
> Update documentation with correct default values for network server propert
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-627?page=comments#action_12368406 ]
Jeff Levitt commented on DERBY-627:
---
Could someone possibly review this patch please?
> Documentation needs to be updated with correct return type for COUNT functions
> -
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-916?page=comments#action_12368405 ]
Suresh Thalamati commented on DERBY-916:
Thanks very much for documenting online backup. changes looks good except for
one minor error in
SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_DISABLE_LO
On 3/1/06, Rick Hillegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I heard a vague rumor that the 10.2 distributions would look different
> than the 10.1 distributions available at
> http://db.apache.org/derby/releases/release-10.1.2.1.cgi. Have you heard
> this rumor and if so can you elaborate?
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-571?page=comments#action_12368401 ]
Jeff Levitt commented on DERBY-571:
---
Eric recently asked if there are any tables to doc for this. I second that
motion. Could someone please provide information so that thi
On 3/1/06, Kathey Marsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How about *goderby.jar*
>
> Only 7 letters and documents itself as a vehicle to get you on your way.
I like this. I also like the fact that it starts with g instead of d.
It will stand out in the list of jars: "one of these things is not
[Auto-generated mail]
*TinderBox_Derby* 382140/2006-03-01 21:02:22 CET
*derbyall*
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
---
*Jvm: 1.5*
15640625 095.12% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
Details in
http://www.mult
Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-690?page=comments#action_12367999 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-690:
-
Andreas wrote:
--- quote
True. This would also be the situation if:
* The Result
Hi,
Daniel John Debrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> JDBC says you might see it, due to the "as the rows are retrieved".
> Here's an example of what I'm saying.
[snipped: Dan's example of sensitivity resulting from not all rows in
result set being materialized at once]
> allows the driv
Fernanda Pizzorno (JIRA) wrote:
> Dan wrote:
>
>>[...] Hence, like Oracle, Derby should perform the equivalent of a
>>refreshRow.
>
>
> Do you mean that we should also, like Oracle, allow users to use the
> refreshRow() method to get an updated row, or should it still be a
> no-op when it i
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-997?page=comments#action_12368394 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-997:
-
Chris Newell wrote: (on derby-user)
> I seem to have resolved my own issue as I was preparing a message to
> this li
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-997?page=all ]
Daniel John Debrunner reassigned DERBY-997:
---
Assign To: Daniel John Debrunner
> ClassCastException when executing queries with aggregates in app servers
> -
I suggest you upload v2 including the implicit refresh for updateRow.
I don't suggest we change the no-op of refreshRow, unless Dan changes
his mind and insists, because even he concedes that is inviolation of
the JDBC spec.
I still feel the refresh isnt right, but we dont want to get bogged
down
If I can know the size of log file which is needed to be scaned
during ecovery, I can caculate the speed of recovery in X KB/second.
I got an idea to estimate the size of log which is needed to be
scaned during recovery. But I am not sure whither it is correct
or not.
As far as I know, derby will
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1010?page=all ]
Kathey Marsden resolved DERBY-1010:
---
Fix Version: 10.2.0.0
Resolution: Fixed
Date: Wed Mar 1 15:18:01 2006
New Revision: 382195
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=382195&view=
A revised proposal and complete topic outline for the Working With Derby
document has been posted to Derby-913. This can be downloaded via the
URL below. You are invited to review the v1.1 proposal plus topic list
and let me know if you see anything amiss (a nonessential topic or a
missing es
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1072?page=all ]
Satheesh Bandaram updated DERBY-1072:
-
Component: Newcomer
SQL
Description:
while dropping a view which does not really exist on a database , the error
message throw
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-690?page=comments#action_12368384 ]
Fernanda Pizzorno commented on DERBY-690:
-
Dag wrote:
> In our implementation, a positioned UPDATE (for the same result set)
> is considered an "own" change, cf. the wr
Mamta Satoor wrote:
Hi Satheesh,
The difference in behavior is seen because in one case you are doing
"select * from mamta.t1" and in another you have "select count(*) from
mamta.t1". If you change the second one to "select * from mamta.t1",
you should see the same error.
Now, we have a
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
>On 3/1/06, Kathey Marsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Bryan Pendleton wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Then, the "new user" tools and examples could just tell users
>>>to run things like
>>>
>>> java -jar derbyall.jar ij
>>> java -jar derbyall.jar NetworkServerControl star
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
Bryan Pendleton wrote:
Here's a thought for a totally different approach to solving
the original problem, which I will unfairly summarize as:
Make it easier for brand new users to run Derby in trial
situations without having to learn a lot about scripts and
C
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-805?page=all ]
A B updated DERBY-805:
--
Attachment: d805_phase3_v1.patch
d805_phase3_v1.stat
Attaching a "Phase 3" patch, d805_phase3_v1.patch, to implement the changes
described in steps 2, 3, 4 and 6 of
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-834?page=all ]
Myrna van Lunteren closed DERBY-834:
> i18n/urlLocale.sql test fails on Windows XP
> ---
>
> Key: DERBY-834
> URL: http://issues.ap
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-594?page=comments#action_12368363 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-594:
-
Confirmed that this is not an issue for DERBY-538, the raw store daemon thread
stops correctly in the situation I'm s
hi,
I have 2 tables with around 100,000 rows and I was running the following
query.
select mtb1.col5 from mytable1 mtb1 inner join mytable2 mtb2 on
mtb1.col5=mtb2.col5 where mtb1.col1>0 AND mtb1.col4='tab1_col4' AND
(mtb1.col1>0 OR mtb2.col1>0);
This query should return 0 rows. When I run
Hi Satheesh,
Pardon me if I keep asking questions on areas that are work in progress. But I just want to be clear on things as I do my work on EXTERNAL SECURITY.
I am copying following from the spec
start of text from functional spec
CREATE PROCEDURE SALES.TOTAL_REVENUE(IN
believe me i know the feeling.
I am not quite sure why the methods below are not mentioned for the
update and insert section.
I will cover this with the EG and discuss possibly clarifying the other
wording u suggested
i think that covers it yes?
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
Lance J. Ande
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-834?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre resolved DERBY-834:
---
Fix Version: 10.2.0.0
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 382138.
> i18n/urlLocale.sql test fails on Windows XP
> -
Lance J. Andersen wrote:
> maybe i am blind today, but i only see the wording in 14.2.4.2 not
> 14.2.4.3 WRT othersXXXAreVisible method that u refer to below
Sorry my mistake, looked at so many things this morning.
Maybe the issue is 14.2.4.3 does not refer other inserts are visible.
Dan.
maybe i am blind today, but i only see the wording in 14.2.4.2 not
14.2.4.3 WRT othersXXXAreVisible method that u refer to below
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
Lance J. Andersen wrote:
The wording in chapter 14 of JDBC 3 in sections 14.2.4.1 Updating a Row,
14.2.4.2 Deleting a Row,
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1071?page=all ]
Sunitha Kambhampati updated DERBY-1071:
---
Attachment: Derby1071.diff.txt
UserAuthenticator.html
I am attaching patch Derby1071.diff.txt to fix the javadoc for
UserAuthenti
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1063?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-1063:
---
Summary: Add new jar file to execute tools/network server with java
-jar (was: Add derby.jar/derbyclient.jar to manifest Class-Path attribute in
der
On 3/1/06, Kathey Marsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bryan Pendleton wrote:
>
> > Then, the "new user" tools and examples could just tell users
> > to run things like
> >
> >java -jar derbyall.jar ij
> >java -jar derbyall.jar NetworkServerControl start
>
> +1
>
> I like it!
This is certa
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1063?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-1063:
---
Attachment: derby1063_v2.diff
Updated patch that moves the java -jar functionality to a new jar called
derbycmd.jar, and now includes NetworkServerContro
Daniel John Debrunner wrote (2006-03-01 06:58:39):
> Bernt M. Johnsen wrote:
>
>
> > We should also strive to make "insensitivity" as close to the SQL
> > defintion as possible (SQL 2003 p. 96):
> >
> >A change to SQL-data is said to be independent of a cursor CR if
> >and o
Hi Andrew,
I heard a vague rumor that the 10.2 distributions would look different
than the 10.1 distributions available at
http://db.apache.org/derby/releases/release-10.1.2.1.cgi. Have you heard
this rumor and if so can you elaborate?
Thanks,
-Rick
For those new developers asking questions about the code, it would
be interesting to know what parts of the code they looked at and
could not find the info they needed. I realize with the derby layout
it is often hard to find the info since at least in store there is often
a protocol description
[Auto-generated mail]
*TinderBox_Derby* 382021/2006-03-01 15:02:25 CET
*derbyall*
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
---
*Jvm: 1.5*
1640639 0 102.29% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
Details in
http://www.multi
Kristian Waagan wrote:
> Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA) wrote:
>
>> Client should unwrap exceptions thrown in privilege blocks rather than
>> throwing the java.security.PrivilegedActionException
>> -
That is what I was worried about. The truncate is the one that will
possibly cause reuse of RowLocations. Defragment moves rows around,
with new rows getting new row locations.
I am still ok with the direction you propose, but some code work is
going to be necessary to get there. Store could c
Misleading/wrong error message while dropping a view
Key: DERBY-1072
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1072
Project: Derby
Type: Bug
Versions: 10.1.2.2
Environment: windows xp , jdk1.5
Re
Yes, you are right. It does not really need to be written, but
in the current implementation it doesn't cost very much to
write it since we sync the entire file at the end. I tried to
add some more descriptive comments about this in:
BaseDataFileFactory.java!checkpoint
The actual loop is in th
Make UserAuthenticator javadoc mention clearly about what is passed in userName
in authenticateUser
Key: DERBY-1071
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1071
Pro
Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA) wrote:
Client should unwrap exceptions thrown in privilege blocks rather than throwing
the java.security.PrivilegedActionException
---
Ke
Andreas Korneliussen wrote:
> Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
>
>> Bernt M. Johnsen wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> We should also strive to make "insensitivity" as close to the SQL
>>> defintion as possible (SQL 2003 p. 96):
>>>
>>> A change to SQL-data is said to be independent of a cursor CR if
>>> and o
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-690?page=comments#action_12368322 ]
Dag H. Wanvik commented on DERBY-690:
-
Dan said:
> I think one difference is I don't see the argument for triggered
> actions being "other changes" Triggered actions are at
Bryan Pendleton wrote:
> Here's a thought for a totally different approach to solving
> the original problem, which I will unfairly summarize as:
>
> Make it easier for brand new users to run Derby in trial
> situations without having to learn a lot about scripts and
> CLASSPATH settings.
>
Bryan Pendleton wrote:
> Here's a thought for a totally different approach to solving
> the original problem, which I will unfairly summarize as:
>
> Make it easier for brand new users to run Derby in trial
> situations without having to learn a lot about scripts and
> CLASSPATH settings.
>
Here's a thought for a totally different approach to solving
the original problem, which I will unfairly summarize as:
Make it easier for brand new users to run Derby in trial
situations without having to learn a lot about scripts and
CLASSPATH settings.
What if we shipped two configuratio
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-948?page=comments#action_12368319 ]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-948:
--
Just realized there might be one issue with my implementation of
ResultSet.getHoldability() in the embedded driver. To find
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1059?page=comments#action_12368316 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1059:
--
Thanks, Anurag, this looks like an improvement. However, lots of useful javadoc
has disappeared. Could you add appropriate javadoc
Lance J. Andersen wrote:
> The wording in chapter 14 of JDBC 3 in sections 14.2.4.1 Updating a Row,
> 14.2.4.2 Deleting a Row, 14.2.4.3 Inserting a Row
>
> The wording was carried unmodified forward to JDBC 4
There are two bugs in the spec (both 3.0 and 4.0) in this area:
(JDBC 3.0 section numbe
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-690?page=comments#action_12368311 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-690:
-
I think one difference is I don't see the argument for triggered actions being
"other changes"
Triggered actions are
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-618?page=comments#action_12368310 ]
Deepa Remesh commented on DERBY-618:
Thanks for pointing this out. I think I can add a test to
jdbcapi/checkDriver.java for an url with spaces in the database name. I had
The wording in chapter 14 of JDBC 3 in sections 14.2.4.1 Updating a
Row, 14.2.4.2 Deleting a Row, 14.2.4.3 Inserting a Row
The wording was carried unmodified forward to JDBC 4
Andreas Korneliussen (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-690?page=comments#action_123
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1007?page=all ]
A B updated DERBY-1007:
---
Other Info: [Patch available]
> Optimizer can return incorrect "best cost" estimates with nested subqueries,
> which leads to generation of sub-optimal plans.
>
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-965?page=comments#action_12368307 ]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-965:
--
It seems like Dag has addressed the concerns of the reviewers. I'm
planning to commit this patch tomorrow, so please scream
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-809?page=comments#action_12368306 ]
Kristian Waagan commented on DERBY-809:
---
I have checked that the documentation change happens in the latest alpha
manuals. They do not in the 10.1 manuals (or 10.0 manual
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-690?page=comments#action_12368299 ]
Dag H. Wanvik commented on DERBY-690:
-
Dan> I need to think a little more about why you think oracle's
Dan> behaviour is not JDBC compliant (excluding supporting refreshRow
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-924?page=all ]
Dyre Tjeldvoll updated DERBY-924:
-
Other Info: [Patch available]
I'm checking the 'Patch available' box to signal that a new, as of yet
unreviewed, patch has been uploaded to this issue. If tha
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
Bernt M. Johnsen wrote:
We should also strive to make "insensitivity" as close to the SQL
defintion as possible (SQL 2003 p. 96):
A change to SQL-data is said to be independent of a cursor CR if
and only if it is not made by an or a
that is positioned on
Calling ResultSet.close() a second time will be a no-op and this will
be updated for the PFD of JDBC 4
-lance
Knut Anders Hatlen (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1060?page=all ]
Knut Anders Hatlen reassigned DERBY-1060:
--
Bernt M. Johnsen wrote:
> We should also strive to make "insensitivity" as close to the SQL
> defintion as possible (SQL 2003 p. 96):
>
>A change to SQL-data is said to be independent of a cursor CR if
>and only if it is not made by an or a
> that is positioned on CR.
>
>A chan
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
>I think the difference to shared code, is that mixed jars in a simple
>shared code model could break each other, or reduce functionality, that
>doesn't happen here.
>
>
I will differ to others to do the proper due diligence on behalf of the
user community with rega
Well, this is handled differently by a variety of vendors. For example
Oracle and the IBM DB2 drivers currently throw an exception for every
case except ResultSet.TYPE_SCROLL_SENSITIVE, ResultSet.CONCUR_UPDATABLE
Some other vendors only follow the guidelines in the javadocs as to
when they th
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-924?page=all ]
Dyre Tjeldvoll updated DERBY-924:
-
Attachment: derby-924.v1.diff
derby-924.v1.stat
derbyall_report.v1.txt
Patch (derby-924.v1.*). Ran derbyall (1.5) verify that t
Daniel John Debrunner wrote (2006-03-01 06:31:05):
> Bernt M. Johnsen wrote:
>
> > We should also strive to make "insensitivity" as close to the SQL
> > defintion as possible (SQL 2003 p. 96):
>
> but not when it comes to being updateable apparently :-)
Yes. During this debate it ha
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-928?page=all ]
Kathey Marsden resolved DERBY-928:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Checked this into the trunk
Date: Wed Mar 1 05:55:05 2006
New Revision: 382019
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=382019&view=re
Bernt M. Johnsen wrote:
> We should also strive to make "insensitivity" as close to the SQL
> defintion as possible (SQL 2003 p. 96):
but not when it comes to being updateable apparently :-)
Dan.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-690?page=comments#action_12368286 ]
Andreas Korneliussen commented on DERBY-690:
I found the following in the JDBC 2.1 spec:
"
5.8.3 A result set s own changes We have pointed out that the visibility o
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1017?page=comments#action_12368285 ]
Mark H. Kaplan commented on DERBY-1017:
---
This issue is also reproducible with the embedded version of Derby.
On another note, if you take the ORDER BY clause away, the f
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-690?page=comments#action_12368284 ]
Dag H. Wanvik commented on DERBY-690:
-
(reposting a mail comment by Bernt. -Dag)
Dag H. Wanvik (JIRA) wrote (2006-02-27 15:44:44):
> [
> http://issues.apa
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-690?page=comments#action_12368283 ]
Dag H. Wanvik commented on DERBY-690:
-
(reposting a mail comment by Dan here. -Dag)
Øystein Grøvlen wrote:
> Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA) wrote:
>
>> Agreed, it's the sam
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1070?page=all ]
Andreas Korneliussen updated DERBY-1070:
Other Info: [Patch available]
Description:
Environment:
> add tests for holdable SUR
> --
>
> Key: D
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
