Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: [libreoffice-design] LibreOffice cover photo - Google+

2012-12-08 Thread Tom Davies
me Barrientos >To: charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org >Cc: market...@global.libreoffice.org; design@global.libreoffice.org >Sent: Saturday, 8 December 2012, 14:23 >Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: [libreoffice-design] LibreOffice >cover photo - Google+ > >>

Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: [libreoffice-design] LibreOffice cover photo - Google+

2012-12-08 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
2012/12/8 Adolfo Jayme Barrientos > > But why? Isn't the foundation supposed to represent the community? :-) > > OK, let's say the Foundation and the community are one thing, and > LibreOffice other thing (the "Product"). Why should the first thing > share its logo with the latter? :) > Because

Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: [libreoffice-design] LibreOffice cover photo - Google+

2012-12-08 Thread Adolfo Jayme Barrientos
> But why? Isn't the foundation supposed to represent the community? :-) OK, let's say the Foundation and the community are one thing, and LibreOffice other thing (the "Product"). Why should the first thing share its logo with the latter? :) -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@glo

Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: [libreoffice-design] LibreOffice cover photo - Google+

2012-12-08 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
2012/12/8 Adolfo Jayme Barrientos > On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 6:11 AM, Charles-H. Schulz > wrote: > > I am sorry... but why is it relevant? LibreOffice is the community. > There's > > no LibreOffice and the community. > > I think he meant the Foundation and the community. These are not the > same,

Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: [libreoffice-design] LibreOffice cover photo - Google+

2012-12-08 Thread Adolfo Jayme Barrientos
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 6:11 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote: > I am sorry... but why is it relevant? LibreOffice is the community. There's > no LibreOffice and the community. I think he meant the Foundation and the community. These are not the same, and shouldn't have the same logo. -- Unsubscribe

Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: [libreoffice-design] LibreOffice cover photo - Google+

2012-12-08 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
Florian, I am sorry... but why is it relevant? LibreOffice is the community. There's no LibreOffice and the community. Best, Charles. 2012/12/8 Florian Monfort > Hi Charles, > > Even if it's not as good, it is still more relevant for a Community than > the standard logo ;) > > Let's launch a

Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: [libreoffice-design] LibreOffice cover photo - Google+

2012-12-08 Thread Florian Monfort
Hi Charles, Even if it's not as good, it is still more relevant for a Community than the standard logo ;) Let's launch a contest, but it is important to differenciate the Community from the official page. On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Charles-H. Schulz < charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org>

Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: [libreoffice-design] LibreOffice cover photo - Google+

2012-12-08 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
Hmm, I'm really not so sure I like the new logo. Florian, would you mind replacing it by our standard logo? Perhaps we can launch a design contest afterwards. Thanks, Charles. 2012/12/8 Florian Monfort > Nope, but I think that brings up a very interesting point : two pages is > maybe too much.