So, about https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143197 ...
The bug author, ajlittoz, wrote:
> to be honest, it took me years to develop a satisfactory mental
model, though I read thoroughly the available documentation
I had asked on the bug page regarding whether or not this
On 13/05/2022 19:40, Heiko Tietze wrote:
Discourse is no bells and whistles
It has:
* Moving content
* Dozens of pictures in the window
* Hundreds of visual elements, if we include all of the labels, and
badges, and what-not
That's bells and whistles.
TBH though, I haven't seen what the
Ok, so, I have to take back what I said, because I conflated Discourse
with Discord (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zSXh4a_1eg shows you what
Discord is like)
I take it that the LO discourse would look like this:
https://ask.libreoffice.org/
but not for users to ask support questions?
And
I am staunchly opposed to LO shipping with any sort of data collection
by default. It's better not to have user metrics then to install spyware.
I would only accept something which meets the following criteria:
1. An add-on; not included in the default installer.
2. Not directly suggested to
There are a more concerns, and questions, and potential answers to
questions. These include additions I've made after the session
concluded, based partially on my points in the chat, and as suggested I
do by Heiko. For now I'll just add the Questions section after my additions.
Questions
+
On 14/07/2022 0:44, John Mills wrote:
Do you consider people manipulated by asking them an unambiguous
question that would default to no?
"Would you like to place a bet of 100 EUR on a die roll, winning an
extra 100 on a 6 and losing otherwise? [N/Y]: N_
Suppose I ask a million people this
Hello Heiko and list denizens,
I'm going to _try_ and make it to this week's meeting, but it's unlikely
I'll be available before 21:00 CEST. I realize that the meeting is held
when it is held, and a later time may not be convenient for you, but if
it so happens that some of you (or Heiko, if
of course. Besides disliking the phrasing of
your concerns I wonder what alternatives you have in mind. Or do you
reject the need for user data? All good questions to discuss at the
right place, and that's what the blog post is for.
On 01.11.22 16:34, Eyal Rozenberg wrote:
What, this again?
I have to protest meeting in which most bugs up for discussion are ones I've
either filed or have been part of the discussion on, scheduled without
consulting me regarding the time. I'm at work in the afternoon and can usually
not attend at these hours. And then of course when I'm not there,
I have some suggestions on more self-educative work, if I may, rather
than helping with something concrete:
1. Obligatory pitch due to being an RTL language guy: Our languages, as
well as CJK languages, have many particular issues with LO, which are
usually due to original software developers
On 17/11/2022 16:28, Heiko Tietze wrote:
* Allow regular deletion of selection containing an entire
generated index/table
+ https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152030
+ at creation time and later it is possible to unset the protection
flag
+ the context menu
On 03/11/2022 15:20, Heiko Tietze wrote:
* Writer: Caption strings should be set to document language instead
of UI language
+ https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151020
+ use translation from PS for variable names requested on ask.libo
(André)
+ not much of
What, this again?
polypoly is a commercial enterprise planning to make money by selling
the results of spying on people. Not to mention that it makes
Euro-nationalist arguments about how it's important for European
commercial entities rather than non-European ones to profit from spying
on
Thanks for posting this a week in advance.
Can I ask for a deferment of discussion of the issues I've opened (all
of these I think) to a week later? I will be traveling for a family
occasion between the 14th and the 17th and will not be able to make it.
I promise not to complain about other
the modification.
Please don't understand input from UX as a gatekeeper to the
development, you are free to reopen tickets and seek for response from
other people.
Cheers,
Heiko
On 15.02.23 22:41, Eyal Rozenberg wrote:
Heiko, you again scheduled bugs of mine for a discussion without
taking
Sorry for missing the session today... I'll have to comment offline.
It's always difficult to "argue" with the minutes, but I guess there's
no getting around it.
So, here is the part of the minutes I am concerned about:
On 12/04/2023 21:44, Heiko Tietze wrote:
* Rename Presentation Styles
ers (for both enterprise and
individual profiles).
I'm not saying that we should embrace the Firefox approach, but
thinking about Italo's idea (8 <-> infinite), I guess the message of
this version could be consolidation, not exactly innovation.
Best
Gustavo
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 4
To put last thing first: I'm not staunchly opposed to bumping the
version number to 8. So think of this as a theoretical discussion.
Anyway...
Noting Italo's explanation that:
> 80% (and probably more) of what we communicate is targeted to
"normal" software users, and not to community members
I respectfully disagree with Italo.
First, about the "frame of reference". In my opinion, decisions such as
major version number bumping are not, first and foremost, marketing
decisions. That is a _consideration_, since the version number is
declarative than technical. But - such an action
Regarding bug 153899, "Clone format of unmerged cells breaks up merging,
applies to first unmerged cell only"
So the two pertinent questions brought up in the bug (in comment 4) are:
Q1: Should "being merged" be considered one of the formatting properties
of a cell?
Q2: If "being merged"
Heiko, you again scheduled bugs of mine for a discussion without taking
a moment to check whether I can join the meeting.
I asked you not to do that and I'm asking you again. This is unfair,
especially after I've explicitly asked that you not do that.
The treatment of these bugs is usually
asoning, without getting inside the head of
whoever set the current state of affairs.
On 16/02/2023 1:39, toki wrote:
On 15/02/2023 21:41, Eyal Rozenberg wrote:
objections or claims which I would probably be able to convincingly
rebut or disprove are stated and accepted with no retort or objectio
Oh, no, no, no, come on... I know I wasn't in the session (which I
couldn't since it was in the middle of a workday), but - there had been
extensive discussion on the bug pages, and the session itself seems to
have just ignore it all. This is really exasperating.
On 15/06/2023 18:29, Heiko Tietze wrote:
Present: Happy, Hossein, Heiko
Comments: Mike, Dieter, Eyal
Tickets/Topics
* More centralized endnote/footnote settings
+ make footnote numbering page-style-specific, rename the Insert > F
dialog "Out-of-order Note" or "Special Note",
I want to draw our attention to the first bug which was on the agenda in
yesterday's design meeting:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158588
I would say that bug is misnamed. It should be called:
"LibreOffice unexpectedly and strangely modifies an ODT file without
they user
regarding modification date etc.) ?
On 22/12/2023 9:11, Heiko Tietze wrote:
On 21.12.23 20:05, Eyal Rozenberg wrote:
"LibreOffice unexpectedly and strangely modifies an ODT file without
they user having done anything, and embedding unnecessary fonts nobody
asked it to."
Sounds like ano
In this week's design meeting, bug 158253 came up:
Shapes-via-Gallery is problematic & partially redundant with the Shapes
sub-toolbars and sidebar
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158253
I was not available to attend (it was during my work hours); but since
this is not
Will sessions be recorded? Or even live-streamed?
Eyal
On 01/02/2024 18:32, Alexander Brateanu wrote:
Dear LibreOffice design-team,
we would be thrilled to welcome participants from LibreOffice design at
our new event *FOSS Backstage Design* where we want to take a deep dive
into UX Design in
On 22/02/2024 16:46, Heiko Tietze wrote:
* Simplified options dialogs
You seem to have ignored the basic problem with how this bug has been
handled, which I pointed out in comment:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90989#c9
+ name, icons, interface, colors, ui lang,
Sorry for missing a meeting with a few of "my own" bug reports...
On 24/04/2024 21:58, Heiko Tietze wrote:
* Want indication of whether a master slide is in use or not
+ https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160403
+ MSO Powerpoints shows the number of slides in a
30 matches
Mail list logo
