Re: [Design] Design Digest, Vol 7, Issue 10

2015-10-09 Thread Aaron Wolf
On 10/09/2015 11:52 PM, Stephen Michel wrote: > For clarity: that's the location he's working out of, and it's not a > mirror of anything on git.gnu.io, correct? > Yes, I know this is confusing. We may work to merge in that stuff to git.gnu.io at some point, but it's separate. The main Snowdri

Re: [Design] Design Digest, Vol 7, Issue 10

2015-10-09 Thread Stephen Michel
For clarity: that's the location he's working out of, and it's not a mirror of anything on git.gnu.io, correct? On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 2:46 AM, Aaron Wolf wrote: On 10/09/2015 11:42 PM, Stephen Michel wrote: Are we working directly with .pngs or are there .svg files somewhere? We are

Re: [Design] Design Digest, Vol 7, Issue 10

2015-10-09 Thread Aaron Wolf
On 10/09/2015 11:42 PM, Stephen Michel wrote: > Are we working directly with .pngs or are there .svg files somewhere? > We are (and least speaking for myself) working with .svg in Inkscape. The .png files are being linked to because SVG rendering of such complex images in browsers isn't as simp

Re: [Design] Design Digest, Vol 7, Issue 10

2015-10-09 Thread Stephen Michel
Are we working directly with .pngs or are there .svg files somewhere? On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 2:30 AM, Aaron Wolf wrote: On 10/08/2015 02:53 AM, Jacob Chapman wrote: I think the feeling we want is one that says there's good promise, good progress, but lots to do, and we need to work toget

Re: [Design] Design Digest, Vol 7, Issue 10

2015-10-09 Thread Aaron Wolf
On 10/08/2015 02:53 AM, Jacob Chapman wrote: >> I think the feeling we want is one that says there's good promise, good >> progress, but lots to do, and we need to work together to get it done, >> *will we do it?*… i.e. a middle-ground in the time-line, partly cleared, >> reason for both optimism

Re: [Design] Design Digest, Vol 7, Issue 10

2015-10-08 Thread Jacob Chapman
> I think the feeling we want is one that says there's good promise, good > progress, but lots to do, and we need to work together to get it done, > *will we do it?*… i.e. a middle-ground in the time-line, partly cleared, > reason for both optimism and concern, much to do still. This is exactly wh