Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nautilus
I'm on Ubuntu 8.04, my nautilus version is 1:2.22.2-0ubuntu. This box
was upgraded from a Gutsy install.
I do not have the Preference Behavior Always open in browser
windows turned on, and haven't for several revs of Ubuntu.
The behavior I
It's still spatial; it just no longer closes parent windows. Spatial has
obviously not been removed, it has simply changed.
My understanding is that spatial mode originated upstream, not in
Ubuntu, and that Ubuntu diverged some version ago (hence the key
no_ubuntu_spatial in conf).
So, this is
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 287561 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/287561
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Apport retracing service
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 287561 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/287561
If my bug is a duplicate, how
The released fix does indeed fix my problem. Now everything works, right
up through the appearance applet, which was relying on gnome-settings-
daemon, which seemed to rely on gst.
Thanks!
--
totem-gstreamer crashed with SIGSEGV in visual_object_unref()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/287561
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: evince
I'm on Karmic, 64bit, reasonably current dual-core CPU with 4G.
Often when I run evince, sometimes it takes about 30s or more for the UI
to show up, and then another long wait before I can even click on
anything. All during this time,
Bug still exists in Karmic 64bit.
--
Loading PDF file hang on Loading...
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256048
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
1. Yes it is reproducible, but not 100% of the time. When it happens, it
happens over and over, without fail, on any login (I have two that I
use). Perhaps it is cleared by rebooting?
When it doesn't happen, it's not reproducible. I can't yet tell what the
difference is.
2. If I could have given
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: totem
totem 2.28.2 on Karmic x86_64.
I noticed that my usual radio streams have been stalling lately, and
then I noticed that it's always about 9:15 after I start them. The
software doesn't crash; it just stops. If I press pause, wait a bit,
then press
First, not sure why totem --debug doesn't create any debug text...
that's probably another bug.
But, thanks, Pedro... I followed your instructions precisely. I get the
same problem (stream stops after ~ 9m) and this is the contents of
log.txt:
** Message: no file info
That's it.
--
Totem
** Attachment added: log.txt.bz2
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35544885/log.txt.bz2
--
Totem stalls on streamed audio after about 9m15s
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475865
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
--
Sorry; Launchpad ate my comment.
Turns out that I put the GST* messages on separate lines; I didn't
realize that they should be prefixes to the totem command. Sorry. It
worked now, though it generated 400+ MB of text in ~5m. Sorry about the
file size.
Basically the same thing happened; the
Bug still affects me; I'll try to get a trace; it's hard, since gnome-
panel can't seem to be cleanly killed.
Even killing it with -9 and it starts up incomplete/frozen... I'll keep
trying.
--
gnome-panel non-responsive on login
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351300
You received this bug
Public bug reported:
EOG used to work; now trying to run it on any image, it just hangs.
Running in the console hangs too; there is no output.
After about 20 seconds, I get GLib-GIO-CRITICAL **: Timeout was
reached
Nothing shows up in .xsession-errors.
Sorry this isn't probably a very
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to eog in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881581
Title:
eog hangs when trying to display any image
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Public bug reported:
There are other bug reports with this description, but they are either
3-4 years old, or closed, or invalid, or expired.
I'm not doing anything exotic, but after about an hour or two of using
my system (not even copying or moving files, or thumbnailing, or...)
memory usage
** Attachment added: valgrind.log.bz2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890441/+attachment/2596932/+files/valgrind.log.bz2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890441
Sebastien, it's hard to tell; I have nautilus painting the desktop, so
it's always in use. I don't have a solid opinion about this, but yes,
it *seems* to happen ALWAYS, but worse when there is a lot of nautilus
use.
I am using kupfer, yes... but there is no nautilus plugin, so if Kupfer
is using
Sorry, you're right about python-nautilus!
I did aptitude show python-nautilus and saw the Automatically
installed: no and read it as installed: no. My mistake. No
applications seem to be using it, so I purged it.
I understand your explanation, thanks for that. But I don't know how to
proceed...
I made another comment; it doesn't seem to be here!
I have looked in the memory map feature of Gnome-System-Monitor, and
the big chunk is [heap] currently sitting on 367MiB.
The various .so files do appear below, but all are taking up almost no
memory.
Does this help?
--
You received this bug
Ok, I quit Kupfer, I quit Dropbox, I killed Nautilus, then re-opened it;
of course the desktop re-painted.
I'm using Gnome-System-Monitor to watch. I'm watching the Processes
tab.
Nautilus started out eating ~ 26M of RAM at first. I have opened no file
explorers, done nothing other than have the
Thanks Sebastien.
I'll try moving the extension dir out of the way and running nautilus as
you suggest.
Did you see my comment about looking at the memory map? Very little
memory is claimed by those .so files, for whatever it's worth.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Ok, I did some tests...
1. When nautilus does NOT draw the desktop, memory use stays put at
around 20M and does not grow. This is without moving the extension
directory, so Dropbox and Kupfer could still be active.
2. If I move aside that extensions directory and restart nautilus, if it
is set
Sigh.
I let it run for about 15 minutes. I tried to use it, but like I said,
it takes about 1m just to open a window. So I didn't use it much.
It's not possible to monitor the resource usage of nautilus when it's
running inside of valgrind, because it's not in the System Monitor
anymore... a
Ok, after about 30m, I see the same familiar behavior...
After starting at around 25M, nautilus is not sitting on 134.9MiB,
rising 200-300KiB per second.
Now what?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
No, it does not happen; I found two places where this setting was set:
1. In gconf : apps / nautilus / preferences / desktop_is_home_dir
(this setting appears to have no effect, but was a carry-over from an old
version of Ubuntu. -- is nautilus gtk3 or gtk2 at this point?)
2. in
gsettings get org.gnome.nautilus.preferences desktop-is-home-dir
returns false
I changed:
XDG_DESKTOP_DIR=$HOME/
to
XDG_DESKTOP_DIR=$HOME/Desktop
which stopped the problem. Changing it back started it again.
Where are gsettings actually stored, and is dconf the same thing?
--
You received
FYI, I get the same behavior if I set the gstettings key and revert the
xdg settings to normal...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890441
Title:
nautilus memory
I'm still having this bug, and it does seem like it's hard-crashing my
system. I want to get my stability back, but I can't uninstall evince
since gnome-core and about 50 other pacakges seem to depend on it.
I'm on Oneiric 64, I have evince 3.2.1-0ubuntu2.2 and apparmor
So, Sebastien, what's the next step here.
I think I've provided enough context to reproduce and prove that it is
not some other setting on my system?
I see that the bug is still New...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to
I'm in Gnome Shell.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890441
Title:
nautilus memory leak
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Sure, that's an environment variable, I expect ... how do I set this so
that it takes precedence?
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Sebastien Bacher seb...@ubuntu.com
wrote:
Could you try if running DESKTOP_SESSION=ubuntu nautilus makes things
better for you?
--
You received this bug
That did it; Nautilus behaves, after a whole day, is only eating 40M.
Well done!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890441
Title:
nautilus memory leak
To manage
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/841222
Title:
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_main_context_dispatch()
To manage notifications
33 matches
Mail list logo
