[Bug 1288655] Re: Terminal height shrinks - repeatedly restored shorter than the previous height

2022-09-21 Thread Péter Prőhle
This bug disappeared in my case, just when I switched to 2204 Jammy.  I
made a fresh install from scratch, not a dist-upgrade only.

Is there anybody who still has this bug in Jammy, if his/her system is a
fresh install from scratch?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1288655

Title:
  Terminal height shrinks - repeatedly restored shorter than the
  previous height

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-terminal/+bug/1288655/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1888098] Re: Ubuntu 20.04 gnome-shell places windows on second screen when started from primary screen

2022-01-20 Thread Péter Prőhle
tags:   added: impish

** Tags added: impish

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1888098

Title:
  Ubuntu 20.04 gnome-shell places windows on second screen when started
  from primary screen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/1888098/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1916890] Re: each maximisation + un-maximisation cycle of a gnome-termial windows will shrink the terminal by 1 row and by 1 column

2022-01-20 Thread Péter Prőhle
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1288655 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1288655

Duplicate status is still correct.

** Tags added: impish

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916890

Title:
  each maximisation + un-maximisation cycle of a gnome-termial windows
  will shrink the terminal by 1 row and by 1 column

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1916890/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1925732] Re: gnome-terminal ignores the --geometry location requests

2022-01-20 Thread Péter Prőhle
This bug is still there, I am interested in discussing it, but nobody
assigned this bug to anybody.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925732

Title:
  gnome-terminal ignores the --geometry location requests

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1925732/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1925732] Re: gnome-terminal ignores the --geometry location requests

2022-01-20 Thread Péter Prőhle
tags:added: impish

** Tags added: impish

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925732

Title:
  gnome-terminal ignores the --geometry location requests

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1925732/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1928317] Re: window focus is lost after blank screen

2022-01-20 Thread Péter Prőhle
This bug is still there, I am interested in discussing it, but nobody
assigned this bug to anybody.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928317

Title:
  window focus is lost after blank screen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1928317/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1936238] Re: Lock screen does not properly give focus after unlocking on Wayland

2022-01-20 Thread Péter Prőhle
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1928317 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928317

** Tags added: impish

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1936238

Title:
  Lock screen does not properly give focus after unlocking on Wayland

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/1936238/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1928317] Re: window focus is lost after blank screen

2022-01-20 Thread Péter Prőhle
tags:added: impish

** Tags added: impish

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928317

Title:
  window focus is lost after blank screen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1928317/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1288655] Re: Terminal height shrinks - repeatedly restored shorter than the previous height

2021-10-19 Thread Péter Prőhle
The bug is still present in 21.10 .

This bug in 21.04 went away this August 2021 approx.

But upgrading from 21.04 to 21.10 brought back the bug.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1288655

Title:
  Terminal height shrinks - repeatedly restored shorter than the
  previous height

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-terminal/+bug/1288655/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1925732] Re: gnome-terminal ignores the --geometry location requests

2021-05-27 Thread Péter Prőhle
** Description changed:

+ The more gnome-specific and detailed bug description:
+ 
+ the gnome-terminal either ignores or misinterprets the
+ 
+ --geometry=+0+0 , --geometry=+0-0 , --geometry=-0+0 and --geometry=-0-0
+ 
+ requests, while mate-terminal executes the correct positioning in the
+ same environment (display manager and window manager).
+ 
+ In case of Wayland, the gnome-terminal ignores the requests listed
+ above, while mate-terminal is correctly positioned, in contrary to the
+ urban legend, that under Wayland such a positioning is imposibble.
+ 
+ In case of Xorg, the gnome-terminal positions itself into the corners of
+ the rectangle containing the physical screens, even if that corner is
+ not inside any of the physical screens.
+ 
+ I.e.: in case of Xorg the gnome-terminal is ready to position itself
+ into a not visible corner of the virtual space contaning the physical
+ screens instead of do the same as the mate-terminal can do: to position
+ itself into a corner of the visible physical screen.
+ 
+ === The bug of gnome-terminal is that it is not able to position intself
+ into visible corners, while the mate-terminal can do it, ... and in
+ general the usual graphical programs can do it since the 80's.
+ 
+ *** The original bug description:
+ 
  The example "gnome-terminal --geometry=80x24+200+200" from the man page
  of gnome-terminal, does not work: while the 80x24 part of the geometry
  request is executed, the location +200+200 is overridden by the
  automatic positioning of new windows by the "Gnome Shell".
  
  "--geometry=GEOMETRY Set the window size as COLSxROWS+X+Y. For example,
  80x24 or 80x24+200+200."
  
  The "+X+Y" part is ignored since I upgraded from 20.10 to 21.04
  yesterday, just 4 hours after the official release.

** Tags removed: wayland wayland-session
** Tags added: geometry gnome-terminal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925732

Title:
  gnome-terminal ignores the --geometry location requests

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1925732/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1925732] Re: gnome-terminal ignores the --geometry location requests

2021-05-27 Thread Péter Prőhle
** Summary changed:

- [wayland] gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request of the 
gnome-terminal
+ gnome-terminal ignores the --geometry location requests

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925732

Title:
  gnome-terminal ignores the --geometry location requests

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1925732/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1925732] Re: [wayland] gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request of the gnome-terminal

2021-05-27 Thread Péter Prőhle
I have just made a couple of tests, and the result is:

1: mate-terminal interprets correctly the --geometry over the both of
Wayland and Xorg

** hence it was rigth when I derived "theoretically" from the behaviour
of the Gnome Shell, that also over Wayland the client programs can
position their windows!  Now we see, that even the mate-terminal is
capable to position it's window on the base of my --geometry requests

2: gnome-terminal misinterprets the --geometry over Xorg but does
something (see below)

3: gnome-terminal ignores the --geometry over Wayland

** hence the gnome-terminal is the package which has serious
difficulties to interpret the --geometry requests, ... in detail:

If the bottom of "left screen" is higher than the bottom of the "right
screen" and the top of the "left screen"  is also higher than the top of
the "right screen", and the left bar is hidden, then IN XORG:

gnome-terminal --geometry=+0+0 is not at the left edge

gnome-terminal --geometry=+0-0 is neither at the left edge, but even
worse: the bottom of the terminal, --- where we work usually, --- is
below the left screen

gnome-terminal --geometry=-0+0 is also at a wrong location: the top of
it is over the top of the right screen

gnome-terminal --geometry=-0-0 this is the only case, where it is at the
right position: in the lower right corner, bravo!

BUG / 1:  in case of Xorg, the gnome-terminal takes the smallest
rectangle containing the two screens, subtractes the hidden left bar
asif it was shown there, and regardles whether there is a proper
physical screen at the corner in question, it puts the window there,
even if the user can not see it.

BUG / 2:  in case of Wayland, the gnome-terminal ignores the
--geometry=-0+0 alike requests, while mate-terminal demonstrates, that
all of these kind of requests can be correctly satisfied, even in spite
of the urban legend, that it is imposibble over Wayland.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925732

Title:
  [wayland] gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request
  of the gnome-terminal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1925732/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1925732] Re: [wayland] gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request of the gnome-terminal

2021-05-27 Thread Péter Prőhle
** Changed in: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu)
   Status: Opinion => Confirmed

** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu)
   Status: Opinion => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925732

Title:
  [wayland] gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request
  of the gnome-terminal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1925732/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1288655] Re: Terminal height shrinks - repeatedly restored shorter than the previous height

2021-05-27 Thread Péter Prőhle
The error works on 21.04 Wayland as well.  This bug looks very stable,
depending only on the gnome terminal itself, regardless of which version
of it is used.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1288655

Title:
  Terminal height shrinks - repeatedly restored shorter than the
  previous height

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-terminal/+bug/1288655/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1888098] Re: Ubuntu 20.04 gnome-shell places windows on second screen when started from primary screen

2021-05-27 Thread Péter Prőhle
The problem is still there.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1888098

Title:
  Ubuntu 20.04 gnome-shell places windows on second screen when started
  from primary screen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/1888098/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1916890] Re: each maximisation + un-maximisation cycle of a gnome-termial windows will shrink the terminal by 1 row and by 1 column

2021-05-27 Thread Péter Prőhle
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1288655 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1288655

Duplicate status looks correct.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916890

Title:
  each maximisation + un-maximisation cycle of a gnome-termial windows
  will shrink the terminal by 1 row and by 1 column

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1916890/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1928317] Re: window focus is lost after blank screen

2021-05-27 Thread Péter Prőhle
OK, if a bug must be filed to a source package, and nobody who knows
this much better than me did it in the last two weeks, then I will now
signal my first guess:  the windows manager, perhapes it handles the
erroneous behaviour of blanking, I do not know.  Sorry, if I made a
wrong guess.

** Also affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928317

Title:
  window focus is lost after blank screen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1928317/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1925732] Re: [wayland] gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request of the gnome-terminal

2021-05-13 Thread Péter Prőhle
OK, if you think that Wayland is responsible for the but, then:

1: this but must be upstreamed to the developers of the Wayland protocol

2: and this bug is also a bug of the "21.04 release as a whole", since
it is a bug that it makes this buggy Wayland as default.

I understand that this bug reporting system is package oriented, ... ok,
then the base package of "21.04 release as a whole" which defines what
packages belong to the release and what are the default settings HAS
this bug.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925732

Title:
  [wayland] gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request
  of the gnome-terminal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1925732/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1925732] Re: [wayland] gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request of the gnome-terminal

2021-05-13 Thread Péter Prőhle
"Although dragging could be done by relative movements. Setting an
absolute position does appear to be impossible in Wayland."

If it was really impossibble, then how the Gnome shell or any window
manager can position *itself*?

We see, that the diverse components of the diverse window managers does
not float around in an uncontrolled way, but *somehow* they are able to
tell to Wayland where to position that components.

The gnome-terminal should be able to do the same, either directly ask
Wayland, or indirectly ask the window manager, in return of the
--geometry argument.

Hence it is confirmed, that the problem in question is

1: either a severe bug of the windows manager itself

2: or a severe bug of the applications receiving the --geometry
arguments.

I am extremly upset of keeping this bug report on the level of
"opinion".

There are so uncomfortable problems around the terminal windowing since
21.04,

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1925823

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1928317

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1916890

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1888098

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1288655

or the too thick capture bar of a terminal wastes the vertical
space

that I seriousely consieder to change to other distro.  My work depends
heavily on the comfort of character terminals I became used to in the
late 80's, and since 21.04 the level of comfort reached a treshold of
pain.

And now, I can not achieve that this serious bug is taken seriously.

This bug crosses the basics of the windowing standars hold already for
decades.

Perhaps one of the iconic feature of a windowing system is that an
application can position the other windows.

This was possibble already in the mid 80's!

I simply do not understand what is going here around the Wayland, while
on the other hand it seems to be a very promising  progress in the
technology of the windowing system.  But why it is a so big issue to
position a window by an other application?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925732

Title:
  [wayland] gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request
  of the gnome-terminal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1925732/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1288655] Re: Terminal height shrinks - repeatedly restored shorter than the previous height

2021-05-11 Thread Péter Prőhle
The bug is still there in Ubuntu 21.04, and is very disturbing when I
need frequent maximalisation and reset to normal 80 columns, especially
when I give classes at the university.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1288655

Title:
  Terminal height shrinks - repeatedly restored shorter than the
  previous height

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-terminal/+bug/1288655/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1925732] Re: [wayland] gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request of the gnome-terminal

2021-05-10 Thread Péter Prőhle
The definition of "confirmed" is that "Verified by someone other than the
reporter.", hence in case of "gnome-terminal" it was wrong to remove the
"confirmed" tag, since someone other than me reported as well that the
"gnome-terminal" is affected, and hence it is totally right, that the
"gnome-terminal" is non the list named "Affects" with the status of
"Confirmed".

No one told, that "gnome-terminal" is mainly responsible for the bug, but the
title of the list is *not* "The responsible packages", *but* "Affects".

And it is "Confirmed" that "gnome-terminal" is "Affected".

Henc I ask someone else, especially who removed it, to put back the
"Confirmed" status.  Since the "opinion" or "invalid" vould be missleading,
and simply the opposite of the real truth.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925732

Title:
  [wayland] gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request
  of the gnome-terminal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1925732/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1925732] Re: [wayland] gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request of the gnome-terminal

2021-05-10 Thread Péter Prőhle
The bug is clearly stated, reproducible and confirmed by others as well.

Hence it can not be ONLY "invalid + opinion + opinion" at 3 packages,
and no package is mentioned with "new" or "confirmed".

It is acceptable, if someone's opinion is that "mutter is not new but
opinion only".

But it is not acceptable, if the same person does not mark any other
package or the Ubuntu as a whole as "new" or "confirmed", --- since if
all the packages mentioned already becomes either "invalid" or
"opinion", then the bug report is rejected in fact, what would be a
wrong decision since the bug is there confiredly.

In fact, if wayland protocol is not advanced enough to provide the
original standard facility to handle the positioning of windows, then
ALL the packages that wish to use this original standard instead of the
new facilities, all of them have the bug, because it is a buggy
behaviour to rely on something what is not offerd by the underlying
wayland.

Therefore the releases 21.04 as a whole has this bug:  makes something
defuault what brakes the all the packages which wish to position the
main window of it's own applications. A disturbing exampe:

$ wmctrl -d
Cannot get current desktop properties. (_NET_CURRENT_DESKTOP or _WIN_WORKSPACE 
property)
$ wmctrl -l
$

wmctrl -d does not "List  all  desktops  managed  by the window
manager."

wmctrl -l does not "List the windows being managed by the window
manager."

While the same "wmctrl" packages works fine with Xorg.

However the "wmctrl" can not be added to the affected packages, since
the bugs.launchpad does not accept "wmctrl" as an existing package!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925732

Title:
  [wayland] gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request
  of the gnome-terminal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1925732/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1925732] Re: [wayland] gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request of the gnome-terminal

2021-05-08 Thread Péter Prőhle
A very personal comment:  the main reason why I use linux exclusively
since 1994 is that I can work in character terminal using the unix
command line programming environment for my everyday goals (teaching and
researching math and computational math).  This is the reason why I am
so sensitive for the missing positioning of my terminals, since I
frequently invoke and kill terminals, depending on the actual needs, I
have never abandoned windows waiting for nothing.  Sorry for this very
personal comment, but I wanted to explain why I wish not to consider
"invalid" ...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925732

Title:
  [wayland] gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request
  of the gnome-terminal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1925732/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1925732] Re: [wayland] gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request of the gnome-terminal

2021-05-08 Thread Péter Prőhle
Sorry to oppose the opinion of those who probaly know the system much
better than me, but it is simply NOT TRUE that neither Ubuntu nor
especially Mutter is responsible for the huge step backward, the missing
positioning of windows on the screen what was always possible since the
80's.  AND it is neither true, that USING Wayland becomes impossible to
handle the positioning.

Wayland side:  now I am in Mutter over Wayland w/o Xorg, and the top bar
on the screen is NOT appearing randomly depending on the situation, but
it is always aligned on the top of the actual screen, and it never
extends to the other screen.  HENCE the location of top, the location of
top-left corner and the location of the top-right corner CAN BE handled,
--- and I need exactly that:

gnome-terminal --geometry=+0+0   == I wish a terminal into the
top-left corner

gnome-terminal --geometry=-0+0   == I wish a terminal into the
top-right corner

Ubuntu side:  it is not Wayland but Ubuntu who made DEFAULT this Wayland
w/o Xorg any warnings at the login screen, and even the fact that "the
current login will fall into Wayladn w/o Xorg OR there will be Xorg
services" IS HIDDEN, NOT SHOWN rigth where the account name and the
password is due.  HENCE Ubuntu as a strategic decider IS involved in the
case.

Mutter side:  it is not true that Mutter is not capable to handle the
positioning w/o Xorg, there are PLENTY evidences and indications, that
Muter DOES EXACLTY KNOW where the edges of my two physical screens are.

HENCE in spite of the backward downgrading of the Wayland protocol,
Mutter is NOT behindered in knowing the rectangles of my two physical
creens.

Therefore Mutter IS also responsible, that the positioning of a gnome-
terminal dos not work any longer if the default of Ubuntu is Wayland w/o
Xorg.

Sorry, I understand, that I could invoke the Xorg services which are now
considered obsolote by Ubuntu, ...

... but I use computers since 1972, I was an active adult in parallel
with the development of computer systems.  HENCE my experience, that
better not to deviate from the defaults, otherwise I will have more
trubles, than to stand out somehow the defaults.

That is why so interesting for me, that the traditional standard
positionings of windows should work even over raw Wayland w/o Xorg
services.

This is the derivation, why I think that it is proven that the
categorisation of "invalid" is wrong.

Since I am the first reporter, therefore I can not switch this "invalid"
back to the previous "confirmed", henc my only possibility now to change
it back to "new", SORRY for that, but the "invalid" is not true, and it
would behinder the handling of the problem if I leve it "invalid".

I changed only at "mutter", since the gnome-terminal looks forwarding
the positioning requests.

Hence I have choosed "opinion" for the terminal, since there is no
better choice for the situation, that the proper use of the gnome-
terminals are behindered, actually that was the reason why we descovered
the problem around Wayland and the default decison of Ubuntu, but the
gnome-terminal looks not responsible for it's insufficient behaviour in
the daily use.

** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid => New

** Changed in: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid => Opinion

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925732

Title:
  [wayland] gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request
  of the gnome-terminal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1925732/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1925732] Re: new in 21.04: gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request of the gnome-terminal

2021-05-04 Thread Péter Prőhle
If the "GNOME shell" is able to ask Wayland to position the diverse
elements of the destop, then the cooperation of the "GNOME shell" and
"gnome-terminal" should be able to do the same.

Wayland can be asked to position the top bar to the top of the screen,
to position the side bar to the left of the scereen, ... then "GNOME
shell" and "gnome-terminal" should be able to request at Wayland the
top-right or top-left positioning according to the original request of
gnome-terminal --geometry=-0+0" or "gnome-terminal --geometry=+0+0"
respectively.

To position someting into one of the 4 corners is so common request,
that there shuld be a solution for that, --- hence this bug report is
anyways

 a real problem of the cooperation of "gnome-terminal" and "GNOME
shell" with "Wayland".

Yet another issue:

"I think it's more of a security feature than a bug, ..." ---  If
Wayland doesn't support the positioning request due to security
concerns, then even the size requests shuold be forbidden and make that
features obsolote as weel, since a request for maximal possibble size
implies the dangerous request of positioning, namely into the upper left
corner, what positioning request is considered a security threat.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925732

Title:
  new in 21.04: gnome window manager  ignores the --geometry location
  request of the gnome-terminal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/1925732/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1925732] Re: new in 21.04: gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request of the gnome-terminal

2021-05-04 Thread Péter Prőhle
** Also affects: gnome-shell
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925732

Title:
  new in 21.04: gnome window manager  ignores the --geometry location
  request of the gnome-terminal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/1925732/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1925732] Re: new in 21.04: gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request of the gnome-terminal

2021-05-04 Thread Péter Prőhle
"* Find a gnome-shell extension that will remember window positions for
you;"

Thanks, perhaps this is the best direction for me to proceed.

Hence I suggest to close this bug report as "successful".

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925732

Title:
  new in 21.04: gnome window manager  ignores the --geometry location
  request of the gnome-terminal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1925732/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1925732] Re: new in 21.04: gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request of the gnome-terminal

2021-05-03 Thread Péter Prőhle
I do not find how to add "Wayland" to the "affects" list, help please.
Thanks.

"wayland-protocols (wayland-protocols) (Choose another project) wayland-
protocols doesn't use Launchpad to track its bugs. If you know this bug
has been reported in another bug tracker, you can link to it; Launchpad
will keep track of its status for you."

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925732

Title:
  new in 21.04: gnome window manager  ignores the --geometry location
  request of the gnome-terminal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1925732/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1925732] Re: new in 21.04: gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request of the gnome-terminal

2021-05-03 Thread Péter Prőhle
"... this is expected because windows only have control over their size,
and NEVER THEIR POSITION, in Wayland"

This is really a tragedy.

One significant benefit for me of the linux world over the micro and
soft world, that I can POSITION the windows of a project from my shell
script starting that project or during the project.

This is a design bug of Wayland, what needs to be fixed, regardless of
the outcome of the test with "Xorg" (I will do after the funeral today).

If there was no other protocol, if the Wayland was the only protocol,
even in that case this is a very serious design bug.

Hence I suggest to add "Wayland" to the "affects" list.

Do I have to leave the Wayland world, and switch back to Xorg?

But it was told, that Wayland is more advanced, that is the new
direction.

Is the new direction in 2021 that I can not control the location of a
new windows from script?

Then why it STILL is allowed, that we can control the location of a new
window using a mouse?

Is it possibble --- as a further enhancement --- to disable also the
window positioning by the mouse?

I do not find how to add "Wayland" to the "affects" list, help please.
Thanks.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925732

Title:
  new in 21.04: gnome window manager  ignores the --geometry location
  request of the gnome-terminal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1925732/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1925823] [NEW] gnome-terminal losts or ignore the newline character coming from mouse paste

2021-04-23 Thread Péter Prőhle
Public bug reported:

If there is a complete bash command with terminating newline in the cut
and paste buffer,

and it is pasted into a gnome-terminal,

then the command is *not* executed, the newline is ignored by the
terminal.

But in return this bug, the pasted command is showed in reverse
coloring,

what is very disturbing when a command is not executed, but decorated in
a funny way instead.

This is new in 21.04, the dropping commands into a gnome-terminal worked
fine in 20.10, ...

... and in the last 27 years of my linux usage.

** Affects: bash (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Also affects: bash (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925823

Title:
  gnome-terminal losts or ignore the newline character coming from mouse
  paste

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1925823/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1925732] [NEW] new in 21.04: gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request of the gnome-terminal

2021-04-22 Thread Péter Prőhle
Public bug reported:

The example "gnome-terminal --geometry=80x24+200+200" from the man page
of gnome-terminal, does not work: while the 80x24 part of the geometry
request is executed, the location +200+200 is overridden by the
automatic positioning of new windows by the "Gnome Shell".

"--geometry=GEOMETRY Set the window size as COLSxROWS+X+Y. For example,
80x24 or 80x24+200+200."

The "+X+Y" part is ignored since I upgraded from 20.10 to 21.04
yesterday, just 4 hours after the official release.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: mutter (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Also affects: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: mutter (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925732

Title:
  new in 21.04: gnome window manager  ignores the --geometry location
  request of the gnome-terminal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1925732/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1288655] Re: Terminal height shrinks - repeatedly restored shorter than the previous height

2021-03-02 Thread Péter Prőhle
The bug is still there in Ubuntu 20.10, see the riport in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1916890

each maximisation + un-maximisation cycle of a gnome-termial windows
will shrink the terminal by 1 row and by 1 column

two such a sycles (maximize, unmaximize, maximize, unmaximize) shrinks
from 80x42 to 78x40

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1288655

Title:
  Terminal height shrinks - repeatedly restored shorter than the
  previous height

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-terminal/+bug/1288655/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1916890] [NEW] each maximisation + un-maximisation cycle of a gnome-termial windows will shrink the terminal by 1 row and by 1 column

2021-02-25 Thread Péter Prőhle
Public bug reported:

each maximisation + un-maximisation cycle of a gnome-termial windows
will shrink the terminal by 1 row and by 1 column

two such a sycles (maximize, unmaximize, maximize, unmaximize) shrinks
from 80x42 to 78x40:

prohlep@pc56:~$ resize
COLUMNS=80;
LINES=42;
export COLUMNS LINES;
prohlep@pc56:~$ resize
COLUMNS=79;
LINES=41;
export COLUMNS LINES; 
prohlep@pc56:~$ resize
COLUMNS=78;
LINES=40;
export COLUMNS LINES;
prohlep@pc56:~$

My 20.10 is almost release default state, no extension, only a few kbd
shortcuts, that's all.

I use gnome shell with gnome-terminals.

** Affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Also affects: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916890

Title:
  each maximisation + un-maximisation cycle of a gnome-termial windows
  will shrink the terminal by 1 row and by 1 column

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1916890/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1888098] Re: Ubuntu 20.04 gnome-shell places windows on second screen when started from primary screen

2021-02-25 Thread Péter Prőhle
Someone wrote, not to me: "Then log out and in again to verify the bug
still occurs without extensions.".

However my ubuntu 20.10 is in default release state, I added *no*
extension to it (I disbled a few kbd shortcuts, added two kbd shortcuts,
so it is basically in release state).

And I have the same disturbing setting, that

DVI-0 connected primary 2560x1440+0+0 (in the reality this is my
main monitor)

DVI-1 connected 1680x1050+2560+504 (in the reality this is
located as secondary)

and almost everithing arrives to DVI-1, regardless how I started, from
wich termial,

Extremly disturbing, since I do not find any possibility to tell a
program, to wich monitor to arrive.

In addition to this, the terminal and the firefox arrives maximalised,
and the do not know their suggested default size what is larger, thatn
the size of the wrong target, ---

--- since I have 2 monitors, I have to adjust all the window sizes by
hand, as if it was a Windows.

Since 1995, all my programs are started with suggested locations and
sizes, what does not work any longer ...

OK, one thing works, because the main monitor is on the left side:  if I
tell

gnome-terminal --geometry=+0+0

but the

gnome-terminal --geometry=-0+0

it will give a maximalised trash on the wrong monitor, and forgets the
default nom-maximalised size as well.

In addition to this, EACH maximalization and non-maximalisation cycle
SHRINKS the size of the gnome-erminal by one row and one column:  80 ...
79 ... 78 ...

This is an other bug, but I mention here because it might happen the
same problem:  the window size and location subsystem has serious
problems ...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1888098

Title:
  Ubuntu 20.04 gnome-shell places windows on second screen when started
  from primary screen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/1888098/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1738500] Re: Ctrl+Shift+E not working in Bionic

2018-09-01 Thread Péter Prőhle
Who knows, which of the bionic packages provides this Emoji Choice,
since that package is the presumable cause of this CONCEPTUAL BUG.

If you searh for "gnome disable emoji choice" in google, then you will
see, that many other packages is affected in the same way:  TRADITIONAL
KEYBOARD SHORTCUTS ARE OBSCURED by this Emoji Choice.

We are working hard using linux, and not sending continuosly smileys.
It is not acceptable, that for the sake of emojies a widely used
shortcut is taken away from many productive applications.

If someone knows which package is responsible for this diverting, bind
this bug please to that package.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gimp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1738500

Title:
  Ctrl+Shift+E not working in Bionic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp/+bug/1738500/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1738500] Re: Ctrl+Shift+E not working in Bionic

2018-09-01 Thread Péter Prőhle
I just found a temporary work around:

1: start "ibus-setup" as a normal user in a terminal

2: chose "Emoji" tab

3: click the button "..." at "Keyboard Shortcuts Emoji Choice"

4: push "delete" among the "add/apply/delete" buttons

This is a very windows-ish solution, i.e. it can not be a part of an
"after intallation" script, since I don't know how to do it from
terminal by issueing a command.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gimp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1738500

Title:
  Ctrl+Shift+E not working in Bionic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp/+bug/1738500/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1738500] Re: Ctrl+Shift+E not working in Bionic

2018-09-01 Thread Péter Prőhle
Minor TYPO correction: accidentally I wrote "Ctrl-Alt-e shortcut", but
naturally "Ctrl-Shift-e shortcut" is in question, at least in my "bionic
/ gimp" case (fresh install, no unreliable history).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gimp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1738500

Title:
  Ctrl+Shift+E not working in Bionic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp/+bug/1738500/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1738500] Re: Ctrl+Shift+E not working in Bionic

2018-09-01 Thread Péter Prőhle
I have exactly the same problem:  the important Ctrl-Alt-e shortcut is
diverted to bring up a very childish "Emoji Choice" window, while in
GIMP this Ctrl-Alt-e is frequently needed, since if we want to slightly
alter a just scanned *.PNG file and save it back, than this is the
OFFICIAL SHORTCUT of "Export As ..." menu item "since the Big Bang".
Who at all thinks that he or she is allowed to divert important
shortcuts?  Where it can be configured back, preferably from a bash
terminal?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gimp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1738500

Title:
  Ctrl+Shift+E not working in Bionic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp/+bug/1738500/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1738500] Re: Ctrl+Shift+E not working in Bionic

2018-09-01 Thread Péter Prőhle
** Also affects: gimp (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gimp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1738500

Title:
  Ctrl+Shift+E not working in Bionic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp/+bug/1738500/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1755106] Re: /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/media-keys/custom-keybindings/ fails to load

2018-04-03 Thread Péter Prőhle
Today I got similar result:

$ /usr/lib/gnome-settings-daemon/gsd-media-keys

(gsd-media-keys:2834): GLib-GIO-WARNING **: 23:34:21.130: Dropping
signal AcceleratorActivated of type (uuu) since the type from the
expected interface is (ua{sv})

(gsd-media-keys:2834): GLib-GIO-WARNING **: 23:34:37.681: Dropping
signal AcceleratorActivated of type (uuu) since the type from the
expected interface is (ua{sv})

(gsd-media-keys:2834): GLib-GIO-WARNING **: 23:34:44.777: Dropping
signal AcceleratorActivated of type (uuu) since the type from the
expected interface is (ua{sv})

DO I EXECUTE THE RIGHT OR SUITABLE TEST?

Tell me what to test next time?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1755106

Title:
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/media-keys/custom-keybindings/
  fails to load

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1755106/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1755106] Re: /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/media-keys/custom-keybindings/ fails to load

2018-03-31 Thread Péter Prőhle
OK, I forget to tell, that I use Unity!

and my custom settings are:

$ dconf dump /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/media-keys/custom-keybindings/
[custom1]
binding='BackSpace'
command='gnome-session-quit --power-off'
name='gnome-session-quit --power-off'

[custom0]
binding='g'
command='gnome-terminal --geometry=80x99-0+0'
name='gnome-terminal --geometry=80x99-0+0'
$

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1755106

Title:
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/media-keys/custom-keybindings/
  fails to load

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1755106/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1755106] Re: /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/media-keys/custom-keybindings/ fails to load

2018-03-31 Thread Péter Prőhle
Today the problem occurred again, so I could test /usr/lib/gnome-
settings-daemon/gsd-media-keys.  Do I understand correctly that in a
terminal running bash inside, I simply give this /usr/lib/gnome-
settings-daemon/gsd-media-keys fully qualified path as a command?

The result is that it does not return to bash prompt, and initially
gives no kind of messages.  However, when I try any of the custom
keystrokes, or any of the usual but overridden keystrokes, then I get
the followings:

$ /usr/lib/gnome-settings-daemon/gsd-media-keys

(gsd-media-keys:2459): GLib-GIO-WARNING **: 22:32:43.149: Dropping
signal AcceleratorActivated of type (uuu) since the type from the
expected interface is (ua{sv})

(gsd-media-keys:2459): GLib-GIO-WARNING **: 22:32:57.476: Dropping
signal AcceleratorActivated of type (uuu) since the type from the
expected interface is (ua{sv})

(gsd-media-keys:2459): GLib-GIO-WARNING **: 22:33:01.756: Dropping
signal AcceleratorActivated of type (uuu) since the type from the
expected interface is (ua{sv})

(gsd-media-keys:2459): GLib-GIO-WARNING **: 22:33:02.460: Dropping
signal AcceleratorActivated of type (uuu) since the type from the
expected interface is (ua{sv})

(gsd-media-keys:2459): GLib-GIO-WARNING **: 22:33:04.076: Dropping
signal AcceleratorActivated of type (uuu) since the type from the
expected interface is (ua{sv})

(gsd-media-keys:2459): GLib-GIO-WARNING **: 22:33:04.500: Dropping
signal AcceleratorActivated of type (uuu) since the type from the
expected interface is (ua{sv})

(gsd-media-keys:2459): GLib-GIO-WARNING **: 22:33:04.804: Dropping
signal AcceleratorActivated of type (uuu) since the type from the
expected interface is (ua{sv})

(gsd-media-keys:2459): GLib-GIO-WARNING **: 22:33:05.675: Dropping
signal AcceleratorActivated of type (uuu) since the type from the
expected interface is (ua{sv})

(gsd-media-keys:2459): GLib-GIO-WARNING **: 22:37:17.075: Dropping
signal AcceleratorActivated of type (uuu) since the type from the
expected interface is (ua{sv})

(gsd-media-keys:2459): GLib-GIO-WARNING **: 22:37:26.746: Dropping
signal AcceleratorActivated of type (uuu) since the type from the
expected interface is (ua{sv})

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1755106

Title:
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/media-keys/custom-keybindings/
  fails to load

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1755106/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1755106] Re: /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/media-keys/custom-keybindings/ fails to load

2018-03-28 Thread Péter Prőhle
In the last 9 days, the problem became less common, but today it has
started again.

The situation remained the same,as I described at earlier reports.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1755106

Title:
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/media-keys/custom-keybindings/
  fails to load

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1755106/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1758373] [NEW] bison -Wconversion warning

2018-03-23 Thread Péter Prőhle
Public bug reported:

I wish to use the -Wconversion at gcc (the warnings are instructive for
me, and they already taught me a lot), but then:

$ bash bison_conversion_bug.sh 
y.tab.c: In function ‘yyparse’:
y.tab.c:1023:12: warning: conversion to ‘yytype_int16 {aka short int}’ from 
‘int’ may alter its value [-Wconversion]
   *yyssp = yystate;
^~~
y.tab.c:1028:25: warning: conversion to ‘long unsigned int’ from ‘long int’ may 
change the sign of the result [-Wsign-conversion]
   YYSIZE_T yysize = yyssp - yyss + 1;
 ^
$

I get this problem even in an almost empty grammar and minimal C source
frame for it, see the attachment: an example for minimal grammar and
minimal C frame ALREADY providing the error.

This is the error in case of my Ubuntu 18.04 ( bison --version = 3.0.4,
gcc --version = (Ubuntu 7.3.0-12ubuntu1) 7.3.0).

I could try Debian jessie, where I get exactly the same error at exactly
the same line position ( bison --version = 3.0.2, gcc --version =
(Debian 4.9.2-10+deb8u1) 4.9.2).

MY SUGGESTION: IF the bison developers are sure, that "yystate" and
"yyssp - yyss + 1" will always fit into "short int" or "long unsigned
int", THEN an explicit casting could be a solution.  HOWEVER in case of
"yystate" it would be much more relaxing to make a decision whether it
should be an "int" or "short int".

The compilation commands are:

CCOPTS=''
CCOPTS+=' -std=c11'
CCOPTS+=' -Og -g'
CCOPTS+=' -Wabi'
CCOPTS+=' -Wfatal-errors'
CCOPTS+=' -Wall'
CCOPTS+=' -Wextra'
CCOPTS+=' -Wreturn-type'
CCOPTS+=' -Wconversion'  ### bison has 2 conversion errors
CCOPTS+=' -fexceptions'
CCOPTS+=' -pedantic-errors'
CCOPTS+=' -fmax-errors=1'

rm -f y.output y.tab.h y.tab.c y.tab.o
bison --yacc --verbose -d "EXAMPLE_GIVEN_IN_THE_ATTACHMENT.y"
gcc -c ${CCOPTS} y.tab.c

** Affects: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Attachment added: "minimal grammar with minimal C frame"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1758373/+attachment/5088332/+files/bison_conversion_bug.y

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1758373

Title:
  bison -Wconversion warning

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1758373/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1758373] Re: bison -Wconversion warning

2018-03-23 Thread Péter Prőhle
HELP!  I adjusted at the beginning of the bug report, that this is NOT a
gnome-settings-daemon bug, BUT a bison bug, ... there was a possibility
TO CHANGE THE PACKAGE WHAT IS AFFECTED, I do not know why it changed
back to gnome-settings-daemon?

Please, somebody who has enough right for this, change it to bison.
Thanks.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1758373

Title:
  bison -Wconversion warning

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1758373/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1755106] Re: /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/media-keys/custom-keybindings/ fails to load

2018-03-20 Thread Péter Prőhle
I wish to provide better diagnostic information, but I do not know what
to submit in this particular situation.

I am also ready to install some sort of Watchdog daemon, which can
better detect what is going on in this kind of situation.  I can imagine
a say a small shell script or something alike as well.

Right now I have again a boot resulting no custom keybindings while all
the other keybindings work.

Again: "ps acuwx | fgrep gsd" is empty, and "journalctl | grep gsd" has
no new entry since "Mar 12 08:47:48".

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1755106

Title:
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/media-keys/custom-keybindings/
  fails to load

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1755106/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1750846] Re: several g-s-d services are timing out when booting a live session

2018-03-17 Thread Péter Prőhle
Is it possible, that my issue https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1755106
has some connection with this issue, see the journalctl | grep -i key |
grep -i failed > journalctl_key_failed.txt attachment there:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-
daemon/+bug/1755106/+attachment/5082123/+files/journalctl_key_failed.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1750846

Title:
  several g-s-d services are timing out when booting a live session

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1750846/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1755106] Re: /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/media-keys/custom-keybindings/ fails to load

2018-03-17 Thread Péter Prőhle
[continuing the previous comment]

The the output of "ps acuwx | fgrep gsd" is still empty. Should I see
any process containing the substring "gsd"?

Is it possible, that my issue has some connection with the followin
issue: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1750846

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1755106

Title:
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/media-keys/custom-keybindings/
  fails to load

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1755106/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1755106] Re: /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/media-keys/custom-keybindings/ fails to load

2018-03-17 Thread Péter Prőhle
Today I had again a possibility to check the issue.

Tell me please, that what kind of information, what command outputs
should I attach, when I face myself to the issue in question?

Output of "dmesg | grep -i gsd" is empty.

Outout of "journalctl | grep -i gsd" has no new items in the last 4
days.

However I found interesting lines in journalctl, hence I try to add the
result of "journalctl | grep -i key | grep -i failed >
journalctl_key_failed.txt" as an attachment.

** Attachment added: "journalctl | grep -i key | grep -i failed > 
journalctl_key_failed.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1755106/+attachment/5082123/+files/journalctl_key_failed.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1755106

Title:
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/media-keys/custom-keybindings/
  fails to load

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1755106/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1756387] [NEW] Whish: a Unity like desktop bar in Gnome, or the default desktop manager of Ubuntu

2018-03-16 Thread Péter Prőhle
Public bug reported:

I wish a Unity like desktop bar in Gnome, or the default desktop manager
of Ubuntu.

More precisely:  a desktop bar which is capable to steal, to take away
the menu bars of the application windows, and show the menu bar of that
application window which is in focus currently.

I wish this in the default desktop manager, what is currently Gnome if I
know correctly.

The only reason why I still use the Unity is this feature what I find
very comfortable.

Can I configure the Gnome desktop this way right now, or it needs an
amount of programming, and a better knowledge of the gnome system?

If my wish is not only a simple configuration or a bit more only, and if
the solution does not need far too deep knowledge of the Gnome desktop
programming, then I am ready to program it, if someone gives me the
references to concise reading materials enough for this work (I use and
program computers since 1972 on regular daily base, and a I am fluent in
unix/linux tools, including C/C++ what I teach regularly at the
university).

[[it was suggested me at the AskUbuntu, that this kind of wishes fits
here to the bug reports better, and somebody with enough privileges will
mark this as a "wish list" item]]

** Affects: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1756387

Title:
  Whish: a Unity like desktop bar in Gnome, or the default desktop
  manager of Ubuntu

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1756387/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1755106] Re: /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/media-keys/custom-keybindings/ fails to load

2018-03-16 Thread Péter Prőhle
No I had a possibility to check the situation for the question:

Do you have an active "gsd-media-keys" process when getting the issue?

I have the /usr/lib/gnome-settings-daemon/gsd-media-keys ELV binary, but
I do NOT see in the linting of "ps auxw", and even the output of "ps
acuwx | fgrep gsd" is empty.

Interestingly the output of "journalctl | grep gsd-media-keys" remained
exactly the same, as 3 days before, no new entry.

But none of the two user defined shortcuts work, while all the usual
system default shortcuts work.

I welcome further test suggestions in order to be prepared if next time
the issue appears.

One thing is interesting, that just after updating to 18.04, the
frequency of the issue became high for a few days, and as soon as I
submitted this issue, I had to wait 3 days (4 booting) in order to get
the issue again.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1755106

Title:
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/media-keys/custom-keybindings/
  fails to load

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1755106/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1755106] Re: /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/media-keys/custom-keybindings/ fails to load

2018-03-13 Thread Péter Prőhle
"Do other keybinding work?" --- YES they do work, only the "custom
shortcuts" are affected, but ALL of them (I have only 2 custom
shortcuts).

"Does journalctl contains any error about gsd-media-keys?"

journalctl | grep gsd-media-keysgives the following result (I
upgraded to 18.04 one days before the first entry, Mar 10):

Mar 10 19:30:35 pc56 dbus-daemon[884]: [system] Activating via systemd:
service name='org.freedesktop.hostname1' unit='dbus-
org.freedesktop.hostname1.service' requested by ':1.116' (uid=125
pid=8253 comm="/usr/lib/gnome-settings-daemon/gsd-media-keys "
label="unconfined")

Mar 10 19:58:38 pc56 dbus-daemon[883]: [system] Activating via systemd:
service name='org.freedesktop.hostname1' unit='dbus-
org.freedesktop.hostname1.service' requested by ':1.127' (uid=125
pid=5326 comm="/usr/lib/gnome-settings-daemon/gsd-media-keys "
label="unconfined")

Mar 10 19:59:07 pc56 gsd-media-keys[5326]: Error releasing name
org.gnome.SettingsDaemon.MediaKeys: The connection is closed

Mar 11 14:39:51 pc56 dbus-daemon[903]: [system] Activating via systemd:
service name='org.freedesktop.hostname1' unit='dbus-
org.freedesktop.hostname1.service' requested by ':1.115' (uid=125
pid=3011 comm="/usr/lib/gnome-settings-daemon/gsd-media-keys "
label="unconfined")

Mar 12 08:47:22 pc56 dbus-daemon[884]: [system] Activating via systemd:
service name='org.freedesktop.hostname1' unit='dbus-
org.freedesktop.hostname1.service' requested by ':1.121' (uid=125
pid=5137 comm="/usr/lib/gnome-settings-daemon/gsd-media-keys "
label="unconfined")


"Do you have an active "gsd-media-keys" process when getting the issue?"

I had no possibility to check it, because I had only two cold boots
since the last "Mar 12 08:47:22" occurence of the problem, and the both
vere error free.  But I do not find the process in question,

do I test it correctly? :  ps auxw | grep gsd-media-keys

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1755106

Title:
  /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/media-keys/custom-keybindings/
  fails to load

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1755106/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

Re: [Bug 1226962] Re: Hotkeys not functional in non-latin keyboard layout in 13.10

2013-12-08 Thread Péter Prőhle
 Ctrl-Alt-T doesn't open Terminal in russian layout.
 However, with m17n workaround works OK.

Is there a latin letter T in the russian layout?

I mean a real latin letter T, and not only a correspondig cyrillic
letter.

This is the REAL question.

While it is not comfortable, but it is according to the standards, that if 
there is no FOO in a layout, then there is neither Ctrl-Alt-FOO in the 
same layout.

If terminal in russian begins with the CYRILLIC letter say X, then you 
should open your terminal with Ctrl-Alt-X.

I guess that m17n workaround is a tool to break the standards.

I understand you, I also suffer from the fact, that I am neither a native 
english speaker.  But there is no equal opportunity in this partikcular 
World.  We have no equal chances.  We have to afford more efforts to 
achieve the same result.

Peter.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1226962

Title:
  Hotkeys not functional in non-latin keyboard layout in 13.10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ibus/+bug/1226962/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 1226962] Re: Hotkeys not functional in non-latin keyboard layout in 13.10

2013-12-08 Thread Péter Prőhle
 There is a letter T in the Greek layout. Also, terminal in Greek
 translates to τερματικό, both words start with a letter T. So, there
 is no excuse for the Ctrl-Alt-T Unity shortcut not working in Greek
 layout.

Greek T is NOT identical to Latin T, they are DISTINCT letters, which only
correspond to each other.

This is not only a valid excuse, but otherwise we were not able to write a 
pure greek text containing properly shaped greek T letters.

In other words, the unicode code point of greek T and latin T are luckily
different.

Even τερματικό is not identical to termatiko, there is only a natural 
correspondance there.

Hence the correct solution is if Ctrl-Alt-τ works instead of Ctrl-Alt-t.

While it is just a minor amount of difference in terms of the visual shape 
of the letters, but an essential difference in terms of unicode code 
points of them.

I have no greek keyboard experince, but I am reluctant to think that your 
greek layout produces latin-t instead of greek-τ.  Hence Ctrl-Alt-τ should 
work instead of Ctrl-Alt-t.

I think that all of you have implicitely the following suggestion:

the keyboardlayout should be Alt, Ctrl and Ctrl-Alt dependent

and even if the plain state produces russian or greek letters, the Alt, 
Ctrl and Ctrl-Alt layers should be able to remain in US-English layout.

However this would need the redesign of the keyboarlyout config tools, in 
order to make the users able to specify the 4 different layers: the plain, 
the Alt, the Ctrl and the Ctrl-Alt layers INDEPENDENTLY from each other.

Peter.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1226962

Title:
  Hotkeys not functional in non-latin keyboard layout in 13.10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ibus/+bug/1226962/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

Re: [Bug 1226962] Re: Hotkeys not functional in non-latin keyboard layout in 13.10

2013-12-08 Thread Péter Prőhle
 What matters is that the *physical* keyboard shortcuts like Ctrl-Alt-T 
 or Ctrl-C, Ctrl-V should just work no matter what the current layout is.

That is, what you say, that the four layers, i.e. the plain, the Alt, the 
Ctrl and the Ctrl-Alt layers shuld be INDEPENDENT-ly configurable, and so 
we could keep the Ctrl-Alt layer in US-English layout.  This is the 
implicite suggestion what I was mentioning at the end of my previous 
comment.

If a layer is kept in the US-English layout, then we call it as that 
particular layer is in *physical* keyboard layout.

Peter.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1226962

Title:
  Hotkeys not functional in non-latin keyboard layout in 13.10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ibus/+bug/1226962/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1226962]

2013-12-06 Thread Péter Prőhle
Dear Norbert!

 IMHO below. In present time many problems come from GNOME fast 
 destruction and simpility/stupidity behavior. GNOME reduces its 
 functionality very fast, and this changes are not tested for all 
 regressions and bugs, this changes are not discussed with gnome-users. 
 So many problems are common for all distros - i.e. Ubuntu 13.10, 
 OpenSuSe 12.3, Fedora 20, Mageia 4 and others will use the same buggy 
 and untested GNOME 3.x. As the most conservative solution we can use 
 CentOS 6.5 (with GNOME 2.28 !! ) or Gentoo (with GNOME 2.32), but this 
 solution is not universal for all users.

 So If you choose Ubuntu, I recommend to use Ubuntu LTS ...

Thanks for your detailed explanation, now I understand better why it is 
lucky, that my daugther (physicist and chemist) uses LTS.   So I will 
leave her LTS alone until the next LTS.

Best wishes,
Peter.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1226962

Title:
  Hotkeys not functional in non-latin keyboard layout in 13.10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ibus/+bug/1226962/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1113364] [NEW] keyboard layout fails to be different for individual windows

2013-02-02 Thread Péter Prőhle
Public bug reported:

My case is a close variant of the following two bugs closely related to
each other:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-
daemon/+bug/885730

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/622965

My usual setting in system settings ... /  all settings / Keybord
layout is as follows:

allow different layout for individual windows  (this allows me
to fluently work in different languages in parallel)

new windows use the default layout (this enables me to
concentrate on the new window instead of the last one)

Bug #885730 deterministically reproducable in my case: open firefox,
switch to hungarian but the indicator remains ENG. Then switch back to
ENG, and again to HUN, and starting from this second time not only the
keybord input, but also the indicator reflects correctly the HUN state.
This problem never happens working in terminal window.  I do not use
non-ENG in other applications, only in terminal or in firefox.

Bug #885730 has now 4 substatuses: 2 fix release dated 2012-03-16, 1
invalid and 1 Won't Fix, this latter I hope is not true for the
current and future releases.  My case is essentially different from this
bug: my case looks deterministic and restricted to the first switches.
After the third switch indicator shows the state correctly.  However, in
normal work, there is never a second and third switch, hence this bug
causes essentially ALWAYS a missleading language indication.

Bug #622965 dated 2010-08-23 is even older, and my case is essentially
different again, that in contrary to the old deterministically
reproducable bug, right now, I can not reproduce the bug during this bug
submitting period.  While this old bug affects me, whenever I work in
normal: usually I have a single terminal window, or rarely a single
firefox window, and when I want to open the other kind of window, then
the bug is there, but for later changes and new window, the bug is
usually not there.

The reason why I can not reproduce the bug during bug report is, that I
can not close the firefox dufing the preparation of the bug report. What
if the problem in my case is in the cooperation of firefox and the
graphical event handling frame system?

I use now 12.10 with all the possible updates, including proposals.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
Package: gnome-control-center 1:3.4.2-0ubuntu19
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-23.35-generic 3.5.7.2
Uname: Linux 3.5.0-23-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu10
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Feb  2 11:04:00 2013
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-control-center
InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-10-19 (105 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Release amd64 (20121017.5)
MarkForUpload: True
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=set
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: gnome-control-center
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
usr_lib_gnome-control-center:
 activity-log-manager-control-center 0.9.4-0ubuntu4.2
 deja-dup24.0-0ubuntu2
 gnome-control-center-signon 0.0.18-0ubuntu1.1
 indicator-datetime  12.10.2-0ubuntu3.1

** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug quantal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1113364

Title:
  keyboard layout fails to be different for individual windows

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1113364/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs