[Bug 160311] Re: Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult
I use the attached script to increase the window borders to 4 pixels in ubuntu-2D and gnome-fallback. It must be placed in /etc/X11/Xsession.d/ and works in precise by writing configuration files in the directory $HOME/.themes of the current user. ** Attachment added: 50_light-themes-borders https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/metacity/+bug/160311/+attachment/3508550/+files/50_light-themes-borders -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160311 Title: Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/160311/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 160311] Re: Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult
It seems that the attachment was not included in the previous message. ** Attachment added: Increase light themeswindows borders https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/metacity/+bug/160311/+attachment/3508551/+files/50_light-themes-borders -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160311 Title: Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/160311/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 613371] Re: Login is not possible in gdm when the user password is in expiration period
The bug report for lightdm is: #856269. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613371 Title: Login is not possible in gdm when the user password is in expiration period To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/613371/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 749986] Re: Resizing LO window from bottom right brings up pop-up and undesirable effects
@Miklos: you are right. I copied your shotwell binaries in my gtk ppa, thank you. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gtk+2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/749986 Title: Resizing LO window from bottom right brings up pop-up and undesirable effects To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+2.0/+bug/749986/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 160311] Re: Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult
The bug affecting unity was really in compiz and is now marked as fixed: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/953839 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160311 Title: Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/160311/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 160311] Re: Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult
I confirm that in precise the invisible window borders are no more present and the resize process is again difficult. Maybe this is because unity-window-decorator has been replaced by gtk-window-decorator? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160311 Title: Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/160311/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 160311] Re: Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult
In unity the bug has been fixed using invisible window grip support through compiz and unity-window-decorator. See: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/metacity/+bug/160311/comments/246 The resize difficulties remains only when using unity-2d. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160311 Title: Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/160311/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 160311] Re: Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult
Are there any plans to address this bug for unity-2d, after having marked it as critical? Recently the resize grips in the bottom right corner have been entirely removed from precise, leaving the resize process of windows very difficult in unity-2d. I use the attached script (50_light-themes-borders) in /etc/X11/Xsession.d to copy the Ambiance and Radiance themes to the $HOME/.themes user directory and then modify the border width to 3 pixels, for normal frame geometry. The modifications are made only if unity-2d session is used and are reverted for other sessions. However the script may break if changes are made to the original themes. There must be surely a better way to do this... ** Attachment added: 50_light-themes-borders https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/metacity/+bug/160311/+attachment/2840420/+files/50_light-themes-borders -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160311 Title: Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/160311/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 160311] Re: Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult
Using the overlay scrollbar to resize is not very intuitive and can be used only to drag horizontally. Moreover the scrollbar is visible only if the window has a scrollable content, hence is not a general solution. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160311 Title: Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/160311/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 749986] Re: Resizing LO window from bottom right brings up pop-up and undesirable effects
Will the changes be backported to oneiric? In any case I have made available (in a PPA) gtk+2.0 packages for oneiric with the 044_grips.patch removed: https://launchpad.net/~renbag/+archive/gtk -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gtk+2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/749986 Title: Resizing LO window from bottom right brings up pop-up and undesirable effects To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+2.0/+bug/749986/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 749986] Re: Resizing LO window from bottom right brings up pop-up and undesirable effects
You can create a file named .gtkrc-2.0 in your home directory and put
the same content reported in the bug description, i.e.:
style default-style
{
GtkWindow::resize-grip-height = 0
GtkWindow::resize-grip-width = 0
}
class GtkWidget style default-style
This will disable the resize grips for all applications, without the need to
use personalized launchers.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gtk+2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/749986
Title:
Resizing LO window from bottom right brings up pop-up and undesirable
effects
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+2.0/+bug/749986/+subscriptions
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 656297] Re: Brasero always burns at max speed cd-rw
Confirmed also for DVD-R and DVD-RW writing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656297 Title: Brasero always burns at max speed cd-rw -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 600694] Re: Brasero not write in correct speed
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 656297 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656297 This is probably the same bug as #656297 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 656297 Brasero always burns at max speed cd-rw * You can subscribe to bug 656297 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/656297/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600694 Title: Brasero not write in correct speed -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 615859] Re: Select windows when the mouse moves over them is incompatible with global menu bar
Is it possible to add to compiz a focus_delay option, similar to the autoraise_delay? This would allow to move the cursor to the menu bar before another window changes the focus of the original one. However I don't know if this breaks other things... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615859 Title: Select windows when the mouse moves over them is incompatible with global menu bar -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 613371] Re: Login is not possible in gdm when the user password is in expiration period
This bug has been confirmed by two other people in the comments from bug 114620: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/114620/comments/13 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/114620/comments/14 ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613371 Title: Login is not possible in gdm when the user password is in expiration period -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 114620] Re: GDM has no change password option
This happened to me also (again) and is reported as a new bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/613371 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114620 Title: GDM has no change password option -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 613371] Re: Login is not possible in gdm when the user password is in expiration period
Additional informations from auth.log Domain user login with password in expiration period (GDM freezes at this point): Jan 21 10:13:22 pc20 gdm-session-worker[1669]: pam_succeed_if(gdm:auth): requirement user ingroup nopasswdlogin not met by user rb20 Jan 21 10:13:22 pc20 gdm-session-worker[1669]: pam_winbind(gdm:auth): getting password (0x0380) Jan 21 10:13:26 pc20 gdm-session-worker[1669]: pam_winbind(gdm:auth): user 'rb20' granted access Jan 21 10:13:33 pc20 login[1734]: pam_winbind(login:auth): getting password (0x0380) Jan 21 10:13:38 pc20 login[1734]: pam_winbind(login:auth): request wbcLogonUser failed: WBC_ERR_AUTH_ERROR, PAM error: PAM_USER_UNKNOWN (10), NTSTATUS: NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER, Error message was: No such user Jan 21 10:13:38 pc20 login[1734]: pam_winbind(login:account): valid_user: wbcGetpwnam gave WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND Local user (no password expiration): Jan 21 10:13:38 pc20 login[1734]: pam_unix(login:session): session opened for user rbag by LOGIN(uid=0) Jan 21 10:13:42 pc20 sudo:rbag : TTY=tty1 ; PWD=/home/rbag ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/bin/bash Jan 21 10:13:42 pc20 sudo: pam_unix(sudo:session): session opened for user root by rbag(uid=0) Jan 21 10:13:42 pc20 sudo: pam_unix(sudo:session): session closed for user root Login of the domain user from the console and change of the password: Jan 21 10:14:29 pc20 login[1283]: pam_winbind(login:auth): getting password (0x0380) Jan 21 10:14:33 pc20 login[1283]: pam_winbind(login:auth): user 'rb20' granted access Jan 21 10:14:33 pc20 login[1283]: pam_winbind(login:account): user 'rb20' granted access Jan 21 10:14:33 pc20 login[1283]: pam_unix(login:session): session opened for user rb20 by LOGIN(uid=0) Jan 21 10:15:09 pc20 passwd[2253]: pam_winbind(passwd:chauthtok): getting password (0x0020) Jan 21 10:15:14 pc20 passwd[2253]: pam_winbind(passwd:chauthtok): user 'rb20' granted access Jan 21 10:15:14 pc20 passwd[2253]: pam_winbind(passwd:chauthtok): getting password (0x) Jan 21 10:15:23 pc20 passwd[2253]: pam_winbind(passwd:chauthtok): user 'rb20' OK Jan 21 10:15:23 pc20 passwd[2253]: pam_winbind(passwd:chauthtok): user 'rb20' password changed Jan 21 10:15:23 pc20 passwd[2253]: pam_winbind(passwd:chauthtok): user 'rb20' granted access Login of the domain user from gdm with a new password: Jan 21 10:15:45 pc20 gdm-session-worker[2309]: pam_succeed_if(gdm:auth): requirement user ingroup nopasswdlogin not met by user rb20 Jan 21 10:15:45 pc20 gdm-session-worker[2309]: pam_winbind(gdm:auth): getting password (0x0380) Jan 21 10:15:49 pc20 gdm-session-worker[2309]: pam_winbind(gdm:auth): user 'rb20' granted access Jan 21 10:15:49 pc20 gdm-session-worker[2309]: pam_winbind(gdm:account): user 'rb20' granted access Jan 21 10:15:49 pc20 gdm-session-worker[2309]: pam_unix(gdm:session): session opened for user rb20 by (uid=0) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613371 Title: Login is not possible in gdm when the user password is in expiration period -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 356702] Re: Tooltips stick when switching desktops (Compiz)
There is already an explanation of the bug and a patch to solve it (comment #52). There are also packages for lucid on a PPA (comment #59) which work well for me and for others. I'm using these packages since months and did not find particular problems. However it seem that upstream developers do not like the patch... -- Tooltips stick when switching desktops (Compiz) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356702 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gtk+2.0 in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 529696] Re: brasero can't copy audio cd (useless error message)
Brasero and cdrdao have been upgraded in maverick to versions 2.31.91-0ubuntu2 and 1:1.2.3-0.1ubuntu1, respectively. However the plugin window of brasero still says that the cdrdao version is too old ... -- brasero can't copy audio cd (useless error message) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529696 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 605603] Re: brasero can't use cdrdao to burn cd
This is probably a duplicate of bug #529696. There are updated packages of brasero and cdrdao on a PPA for testing: https://launchpad.net/~renbag/+archive/ppa -- brasero can't use cdrdao to burn cd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605603 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 605603] Re: brasero can't use cdrdao to burn cd
Upgrading cdrdao to 1.2.3 has already been requested in bug #495655. -- brasero can't use cdrdao to burn cd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605603 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 529696] Re: brasero can't copy audio cd (useless error message)
From your session log it seems to me that your problem is different from the one described in this bug report. -- brasero can't copy audio cd (useless error message) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529696 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 613371] [NEW] Login is not possible in gdm when the user password is in pre-expiration period
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm Login is not possible in gdm when the user password is in pre-expiration period With an up-to-date maverick system, integrated in an Active Directory network, the login of domain users with gdm is not possible when the password is in the pre-expiration period. After the insertion of the password (not yet expired), the gdm screen freezes, showing a warning about the future password expiration (see screenshot). The same user can instead login using the console. Local users and domain users, whose password are not in pre-expiration period, can login normally. The AD integration of the system was done with winbind and PAM modules. gdm 2.30.2.is.2.30.2-0ubuntu3 libpam0g 1.1.1-3ubuntu3 libpam-krb5 4.2-1 Some log files are reported below. ** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Login is not possible in gdm when the user password is in pre-expiration period https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 613371] Re: Login is not possible in gdm when the user password is in pre-expiration period
** Attachment added: expired_passwd.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53036726/expired_passwd.png -- Login is not possible in gdm when the user password is in pre-expiration period https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 613371] Re: Login is not possible in gdm when the user password is in pre-expiration period
** Attachment added: gdm__0-slave.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53036809/gdm__0-slave.log -- Login is not possible in gdm when the user password is in pre-expiration period https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 613371] Re: Login is not possible in gdm when the user password is in pre-expiration period
** Attachment added: smb.conf http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53036885/smb.conf -- Login is not possible in gdm when the user password is in pre-expiration period https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 613371] Re: Login is not possible in gdm when the user password is in pre-expiration period
** Attachment added: syslog http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53036911/syslog -- Login is not possible in gdm when the user password is in pre-expiration period https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 114620] Re: GDM has no change password option
In my setup within an AD network, when my password is in the expiration period I can barely see the warning in the GDM login window for a fraction of a second. A normal user would not even notice it. Introducing the option of changing the password when it is in the expiration period would also allow a user to be notified of this. -- GDM has no change password option https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114620 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 613371] Re: Login is not possible in gdm when the user password is in expiration period
** Summary changed: - Login is not possible in gdm when the user password is in pre-expiration period + Login is not possible in gdm when the user password is in expiration period ** Description changed: Binary package hint: gdm - Login is not possible in gdm when the user password is in pre-expiration + Login is not possible in gdm when the user password is in expiration period - With an up-to-date maverick system, integrated in an Active Directory network, the login of domain users with gdm is not possible when the password is in the pre-expiration period. - After the insertion of the password (not yet expired), the gdm screen freezes, showing a warning about the future password expiration (see screenshot). The same user can instead login using the console. - Local users and domain users, whose password are not in pre-expiration period, can login normally. + With an up-to-date maverick system, integrated in an Active Directory network, the login of domain users with gdm is not possible when the password is in the expiration period. + After the insertion of the password, the gdm screen freezes, showing a warning about the future password expiration (see screenshot). The same user can instead login using the console. + Local users and domain users, whose password are not in expiration period, can login normally. The AD integration of the system was done with winbind and PAM modules. gdm 2.30.2.is.2.30.2-0ubuntu3 libpam0g 1.1.1-3ubuntu3 libpam-krb5 4.2-1 Some log files are reported below. -- Login is not possible in gdm when the user password is in expiration period https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 529696] Re: brasero can't copy audio cd (useless error message)
Your problem is not related to this bug: you are trying to copy an encripted DVD, for which you need to install the 'libdvdcss2' package from the medibuntu repository. -- brasero can't copy audio cd (useless error message) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529696 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 529696] Re: brasero can't copy audio cd (useless error message)
There must be official packages to mark a bug as Fix released. I think this is not the case at the moment. ** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- brasero can't copy audio cd (useless error message) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529696 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 529696] Re: brasero can't copy audio cd (useless error message)
Upstream developers have already stated in comment 4 of the relative bug (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=617222) that: it turns out that cdrdao 1.2.2 recognizes cdrdao version as an illegal command and since brasero expect a precise string for parsing version, and in the case of 1.2.2 it does not get it, it fails. and that: The plugin associated with cdda2wav was designed to work with the cdda2wav coming from the cdrtools package. Up until now, it would refuse to work if it turned out cdda2wav was a symlink Now I turned off this mechanism just for cdda2wav plugin in next version which means that it should work with a symlink to icedax now. So it seems that the kernel has nothing to do with this bug and we need updated versions of brasero and cdrdao to solve it. -- brasero can't copy audio cd (useless error message) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529696 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 529696] Re: brasero can't copy audio cd (useless error message)
Can someone else test the packages in my ppa? This can be of help to developers to make updated official packages. (https://launchpad.net/~renbag/+archive/ppa) -- brasero can't copy audio cd (useless error message) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529696 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 529696] Re: brasero can't copy audio cd (useless error message)
For me the package in proposed (brasero_2.30.1-0ubuntu2) does not work. I cannot make images of cd-audio and cannot copy cd-audio on the fly. I always get an error saying that all the necessary applications and libraries are not installed. I can do both operations with the packages in my ppa (see comments #56, #60 and #63). -- brasero can't copy audio cd (useless error message) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529696 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 529696] Re: brasero can't copy audio cd (useless error message)
I've also put cdrdao-1.2.3 and gcdmaster-1.2.3 packages in my ppa: https://launchpad.net/~renbag/+archive/ppa They have been build without any of the debian patches used for the 1.2.2 version (but many of them were already merged upstream). They work well with cd-audio in my system. -- brasero can't copy audio cd (useless error message) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529696 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 529696] Re: brasero can't copy audio cd (useless error message)
This is what happens on my system: - with brasero-2.30.0 and cdrdao-1.2.2 I cannot make cd-audio images and cannot copy cd-audio on the fly - with brasero-2.30.0 and cdrdao-1.2.3 I can make cd-audio images and cannot copy cd-audio on the fly - with brasero-2.31.2 and cdrdao-1.2.2 I cannot make cd-audio images and can copy cd-audio on the fly - with brasero-2.31.2 and cdrdao-1.2.3 I can make cd-audio images and can copy cd-audio on the fly So we need both packages upgraded to solve this bug. -- brasero can't copy audio cd (useless error message) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529696 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 356702] Re: Tooltips stick when switching desktops (Compiz)
I have made gtk+2.0 packages with the gtk-fix-sticking-tooltips.patch made by Johan Tavelin. They are available in my ppa archive: https://launchpad.net/~renbag/+archive/ppa (gtk+2.0 - 2.20.1-0ubuntu1renbag2) -- Tooltips stick when switching desktops (Compiz) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356702 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gtk+2.0 in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 529696] Re: brasero can't copy audio cd (useless error message)
I have made packages of brasero-2.31.2 using the sources from ftp.gnome.org, They are available on my ppa archive: https://launchpad.net/~renbag/+archive/ppa However, with cdrdao_1.2.2 the plugin still complains that the version is too old. It is OK with cdrdao_1.2.3. If I did not make mistakes, for me the problem is not solved upstream. -- brasero can't copy audio cd (useless error message) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529696 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 356702] Re: Tooltips stick when switching desktops (Compiz)
I tried the gtk-fix-sticking-tooltips.patch and it works perfectly for me also. Thank you Johan for investigating and solving this bug! I hope that this patch can be applied in time for lucid release. -- Tooltips stick when switching desktops (Compiz) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356702 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gtk+2.0 in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 419143] Re: Printing from evince (and perhaps other GTK apps) to PostScript printers is broken
I can also confirm that the PPA packages with the libcairo fix work well with several karmic boxes installed inside a large network and with several samba printers. I had no particular problems reported by the users. -- Printing from evince (and perhaps other GTK apps) to PostScript printers is broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/419143 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 356702] Re: tooltips stick when they shouldn't
The libwnck-notooltip.patch works for me, thanks. However I get persistent tooltips also when switching applications with the window list applet, so I don't think the issue is related to the workspace switcher only. The attached patch disables tooltips for the window list applet. I have simply commented the lines of codes in libwnck/tasklist.c related to tooltips, but it works for me in jaunty. ** Attachment added: Disables tooltips for the window list applet. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31015765/libwnck-tasklist-notooltip.patch -- tooltips stick when they shouldn't https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356702 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
After installing the latest gvfs and nautilus from hardy-proposed, I can say that all is working well now, like in intrepid and jaunty. Thanks again to all the developers! -- nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 356702] Re: tooltips stick when they shouldn't
This bug is not excusively related to tooltips about drag and drop of windows between viewports, but also to other general type of tooltips. For example, when I switch from a workspace containing a terminal windows to one containing firefox (with this page open) I get a persistent tooltip on the panel saying: Bug #356702 in libwnck (Ubuntu). tooltips stick when they shouldn't - Mozilla Firefox -- tooltips stick when they shouldn't https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356702 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
Thank you very much, Steve, for fixing this bug. I have applied your patch by recompiling gvfs from source and now the browsing of the network and of the shares is working as expected. However I'm still experiencing a known issue with nautilus: double clicking the first time on a share icon does not open a new window, I have to double click again a second time to actually open it. This should have been fixed by the 91_svn_change_new_mounts_correctly_displayed.patch reported here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/251809/comments/47 Looking at the changelogs of the nautilus version in hardy I did not find a mention to this patch. From what I'm seeing, looks like it was not applied. This issue was described in comments #47 to #50 of the upstream bug report: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524485#c50 -- nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
Sorry for not having noticed in the changelogs that the patch was introduced in nautilus 1:2.22.5.1-0ubuntu2 I was already using it with all hardy-updates. However, since I was still seeing that behaviour, I tried to build nautilus from source. This is the relevant output of dpkg-buildpackage: ... Applying patch 90_from_svn_dont_allow_recursive_copies.patch patching file libnautilus-private/nautilus-file-operations.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 3352 (offset 131 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 3412 (offset 131 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 3974 (offset 131 lines). Applying patch 91_svn_change_new_mounts_correctly_displayed.patch patching file debian/patches/91_svn_change_new_mounts_correctly_displayed.patch Applying patch 99_ltmain_as-needed.patch patching file ltmain.sh ... The 91_svn_change_new_mounts_correctly_displayed.patch file actually patches itself, instead of the file which was supposed to (nautilus- mime-actions.c). -- nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 356702] Re: Jaunty: window switcher tooltips stick when they shouldn't
I confirm this bug in jaunty with compiz enabled. I'm used to frequently switch from one virtual desktop to another and I find this bug extremely annoying. Also disabling panel tooltips in gconf-editor (/apps/panel/global/tooltips_enabled) does not help at all. -- Jaunty: window switcher tooltips stick when they shouldn't https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356702 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
No, the issues of comment 220 are not present in jaunty and in intrepid. They are specific of hardy and of the 95_svn_change_fix_smb_browsing.patch, since reverting to the version of gvfs in hardy-updates restores the ability to browse the smb:/// Windows Network (but not, of course, the domain shares). -- nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
I have tested the gvfs and nautilus packages in hardy-proposed. Here are the problems I found (they are essentially the same described some time ago in the upstream bug report: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524485#c57 In virtualbox running ubuntu 8.04.2: When the machine is not joined to an AD domain (LAB), opening the Network Servers icon puts me in network:///, showing the Windows Network icon. Clicking on Windows Network I enter smb:/// but nautilus reports: 0 objects Inserting manually smb://LAB/ in the location bar I am asked for a password and after inserting the credentials of a domain user I can access the list of the machines. Share browsing can be done without problems. When the machine is joined to an AD domain (LAB) and I login as a local user the situation is as described above. When the machine is joined to AD domain (LAB) and I login as a domain user (with kerberos ticket), opening the Network Servers icon puts me directly in smb://LAB. Share browsing can be done without problems (but this was also possible without the patched gvfs). So, with the proposed packages there are problems in browsing the Windows Network (smb:///) with machines not joined to an AD domain or in the absence of kerberos tickets. From the normal user point of view, this situation is probably worse than before. -- nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
Sebastien, looks like that in the current gvfs packages in hardy-proposed the 95_svn_change_fix_smb_browsing.patch was not really applied. The patch file in the source contains a typo: --- gvfs-1.0.2.orig/debian/patches/91_svn_change_fix_smb_browsing.patch +++ gvfs-1.0.2/debian/patches/91_svn_change_fix_smb_browsing.patch should be: --- gvfs-1.0.2.orig/debian/patches/95_svn_change_fix_smb_browsing.patch +++ gvfs-1.0.2/debian/patches/95_svn_change_fix_smb_browsing.patch -- nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
Tested gvfs (1.0.2-0ubuntu2) an nautilus (1:2.24.1-0ubuntu2) from intrepid-proposed. They work very well inside my AD network, with and without kerberos tickets. Thanks to all the developers involved. -- nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
Sebastien: the gvfs upstream patch requires an additional nautilus patch to work properly in intrepid and hardy, otherways browsing smb will look like a regression. This is described in comments #47 to #50 of the upstream bug report: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524485#c50 -- nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
I have tested the new gvfs (1.1.3-0ubuntu1) and nautilus (1:2.25.2-0ubuntu4) packages in a virtual machine installed from the latest jaunty live-cd. I found no problems inside my AD network. It works well in all the cases described in the original bug submission. -- nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
The upstream developer Tomas Bzatek has committed a gvfs-smb-browse- auth.patch to gvfs-1.1.3: * daemon/gvfsbackendnetwork.c: * daemon/gvfsbackendsmbbrowse.c: * daemon/smb-browse.mount.in: SMB browsing authentication support (#524485) Make smb-browse backend not automounted Mount smb root on network backend automount (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524485#c67) This patch requires another already committed patch to nautilus to work properly. The upstream bug report is now marked as RESOLVED - FIXED. It remains to be seen if these patches can be backported to intrepid or to hardy (8.04.2 ?) ... -- nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
Please, read comments 54 to 57, they already contain instructions on how to apply a patch and to compile packages from source. You can use these instructions to apply the latest patches which were made upstream for gvfs and nautilus. -- nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
There is now an upstream near-final patch for gvfs that is working well in intrepid and which does not have the problems with unreachable bookmarks. It requires an additional small patch to nautilus to work properly, though. Details may be found at the upstream bug report (starting from comment 46): http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524485 -- nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
This bug was reported upstream since the beginning. At last, it seems that now someone has really started working on this. See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524485#c35 and following comments. If you do not have unreachable bookmarks in nautilus, you can use, in intrepid, the temporary patch they have produced. -- nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 260918] Re: needed: libv4l and associated application patches (or gspca stopped working in 2.6.27)
My webcam is now working in intrepid 64-bit, after installing version 0.5.2-1~dooz1 of libv4l-0 and lib32v4l-0. Cheese and ekiga work as in hardy. However I'm not able to see the video with skype. lsusb: Bus 001 Device 031: ID 046d:08b1 Logitech, Inc. QuickCam Notebook Pro dmesg: [10177.516782] pwc: Philips webcam module version 10.0.13 loaded. [10177.516793] pwc: Supports Philips PCA645/646, PCVC675/680/690, PCVC720[40]/730/740/750 PCVC830/840. [10177.516795] pwc: Also supports the Askey VC010, various Logitech Quickcams, Samsung MPC-C10 and MPC-C30, [10177.516798] pwc: the Creative WebCam 5 Pro Ex, SOTEC Afina Eye and Visionite VCS-UC300 and VCS-UM100. [10179.617120] pwc: Logitech QuickCam Notebook Pro USB webcam detected. [10179.617260] pwc: Registered as /dev/video1. [10179.621379] usbcore: registered new interface driver Philips webcam [10179.946834] usbcore: registered new interface driver snd-usb-audio -- needed: libv4l and associated application patches (or gspca stopped working in 2.6.27) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260918 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for ekiga. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
A new version of the patch has been made upstream: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524485#c35 It seems to work in my AD network, but the severe unreachable smb bookmark regression is still present for me, as I reported there. -- nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 193232] Re: Remote Samba shares not showing up in Nautilus through network:///
The bug you're talking about has been better described and triaged here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/207072 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524485 Some effort by ubuntu developers has been made, although not (yet) successfull. -- Remote Samba shares not showing up in Nautilus through network:/// https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193232 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
Steve, as described in comment 12, I'm using kerberos authentication inside an ADS network and I have no problems with nautilus and gvfs. However my setup is different from yours. The smb.conf is like this: [global] workgroup = LAB realm = MYDOMAIN.COM netbios name = %h-DEB server string = %h-DEB (Samba %v, Ubuntu) security = ADS password server = dhcpias1.mydomain.com restrict anonymous = 2 client NTLMv2 auth = Yes client lanman auth = No client plaintext auth = No log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m os level = 0 preferred master = No local master = No domain master = No idmap domains = LAB idmap config LAB: default = yes idmap config LAB: backend = rid idmap config LAB: range = 10-100 template shell = /bin/bash winbind separator = _ winbind enum users = Yes winbind enum groups = Yes winbind use default domain = Yes winbind refresh tickets = Yes winbind offline logon = Yes invalid users = root [Share] comment = %h-DEB_Share path = /home/LAB/adsusername/Share valid users = LAB_adsusername, @LAB_domain users, @users force user = LAB_adsusername read only = No The PAM configuration has been changed by using this line in /etc/pam.d /common-auth: auth sufficient pam_winbind.so krb5_auth krb5_ccache_type=FILE cached_login This means that the login user is a domain user (not a local user) and that it automatically acquires a kerberos ticket. With this setup I'm able to browse with nautilus all network shares (including the one of the local workstation) even without the gvfs patch from darkrain42. So it seems that in my case gvfs is correctly using kerberos credentials and I wonder if your problem may be related to something else than the gvfs patch. If necessary, I can post the complete configuration of my workstation, but at the moment I will not be able to do other test inside the ADS network until next week. -- nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
Thank you, Steve, for the patch and for your other suggestions. I think that the patch is implementing the right fallback sequence. I will be able to test it when back at work. I will also surely remove the 'restrict anonymous = 2' option from samba configuration, although it is not causing problems after a kerberos authentication. In any case I don't have problems in allowing anonymous browsing. -- nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
I have compiled gvfs 64-bit from source, as I have described in comment 20. If you follow the instructions given here: http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/apt-howto/ch-sourcehandling.html it is not that hard. Essentially you do this (you must have the deb-src lines active in /etc/apt/sources.list): $ sudo apt-get update $ apt-get source gvfs ... apply the patch properly, then $ sudo apt-get build-dep gvfs (this takes care of installing all the build dependencies). Finally, from inside the gvfs source directory): $ sudo dpkg-buildpackage -uc -b (this generates all the new .deb packages) The most difficult part is installing the patch, the other commands take care of everything else. -- nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
Just a final note to the last post of wolfwitch: The apt-get install command does not work for local packages, to install the new debs you have to use this: $ sudo dpkg -i gvfs_0.2.4-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb gvfs- backends_0.2.4-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb gvfs-fuse_0.2.4-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb libgvfscommon0_0.2.4-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb -- nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
To apply the patch you have to recompile gvfs from source. Instructions on how
to do it can be found here:
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/apt-howto/ch-sourcehandling.html
After dowloading the sources you have to apply the gvfs.patch using the
'patch' command ('man patch', for instructions). However, some manual
editing of the patch file may be needed, because it was made for an
older gvfs version. But it should work also with the latest version.
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
Sebastien: I found no issues with kerberos, I was only pointing out that acquiring a ticket at login allows subsequent browsing of password protected shares, because of the credentials already acquired. Infact this is also true after using the package likewise-open to join the AD domain, probably because it does the same type of authentication. -- nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
Acquiring a kerberos ticket from an AD server, using pam_winbind at login (or using kinit in a shell), allows a user to browse samba shares with its cached credentials. This is described here: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ActiveDirectoryWinbindHowto#head-a1da1a136c89873cbd7c7a1e1fbd75d621d18c9a Maybe gvfs expects to find this or other authentications, but in any case this behaviour is different from what happened with gnomevfs in previous releases. Users should be aware of this. I still think that a gvfs patch is needed to ask for a password when it is required, indipendently of kerberos tickets. -- nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
I have recompiled gvfs sources with Paul's patch and indeed it works inside my ADS network. Tested with nautilus in all the cases I have reported and found no problems. A password prompt is displayed when needed, and all the machines can be browsed. Now I really hope that this bug can be solved before the final release of hardy, otherways it will make it difficult to use hardy inside many networks that require browsing authentication. I think also that this bug should have a high priority. -- nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
Yes, when using nautilus in gutsy a password is requested for browsing the machines in cases 1 and 2, but not in case 3. I checked it also with a gutsy live CD, because the presence of gnome-keyring does make it difficult to say if browsing a share requires or not a password. So the problem in hardy is that nautilus does not ask for it. In case 3 it shows the shares because they are browseable without password. -- nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 207072] [NEW] Nautilus in hardy does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus Using hardy beta, when I browse with nautilus other machines in an Active Directory (ADS) network, some of them do not show their shared folders. The ADS integration of the hardy box was done using winbind, kerberos and PAM libraries, essentially as described here: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ActiveDirectoryWinbindHowto The network contains mostly windows clients, but also several linux boxes, which were joined to the ADS domain with the command: 'net ads join'. Machines running windows XP, windows 2003 and samba show '0 objects' in nautilus, but after inserting the complete path (eg.: smb://server/share) the folders can be accessed after the password prompt. Machines running windows 2000 show their folders regularly. Here is a detailed description of what happens: Case 1 - Browsing from hardy-beta a machine running ubuntu-gutsy server. In a terminal window: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ smbclient -L gutsy-server Password: (password inserted here) Domain=[LAB] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.26a] Sharename Type Comment - --- IPC$ IPC IPC Service (gutsy-server (Samba 3.0.26a, Ubuntu)) share Disk gutsy-server_share Domain=[LAB] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.26a] In Nautilus: Open Network -- Double-click on the 'LAB' icon (Domain) -- All machines are displayed; Double-click on the 'gutsy-server' icon -- after a while, Nautilus returns '0 objects', without asking for a password; Insert the full address (smb://gutsy-server/share) -- a password is requested and the share content is displayed. Case 2 - Browsing from hardy-beta a machine running Windows XP In a terminal window: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ smbclient -L XP-ACQ Password: (password inserted here) Domain=[LAB] OS=[Windows 5.1] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager] Sharename Type Comment - --- IPC$ IPC Remote IPC Data Disk Domain=[LAB] OS=[Windows 5.1] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager] In Nautilus: Same behaviour as in case 1. smb://XP-ACQ -- '0 objects'; smb://XP-ACQ/Data -- content displayed after password. Case 3 - Browsing from hardy-beta a machine running Windows 2000 In a terminal window: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ smbclient -L TF-2000 Password: (password inserted here) Domain=[LAB] OS=[Windows 5.0] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager] Sharename Type Comment - --- IPC$ IPC Remote IPC Data Disk Domain=[LAB] OS=[Windows 5.0] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager] In Nautilus: Open Network -- Double-click on the 'LAB' icon (Domain) -- All machines are displayed; Double-click on the 'TF-2000' icon -- All the shared folders are displayed, without asking for a password; Double-click on the 'Data' folder icon -- a password is requested and the content is displayed. (This is the correct and the expected behaviour). Using ubuntu-gutsy boxes, with exactly the same samba configuration (smb.conf), to browse the same machines I never observed Nautilus return '0 objects' as in case 1 and 2. Such a behaviour in hardy will make a normal user think that browsing an ADS network does not work at all. ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Nautilus in hardy does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 207072] Re: Nautilus in hardy does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
** Attachment added: smb.conf http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12893752/smb.conf -- Nautilus in hardy does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 193232] Re: Remote Samba shares not showing up in Nautilus through network:///
I have reported a new bug, describing exactly the problem in my usecase: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/207072 -- Remote Samba shares not showing up in Nautilus through network:/// https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193232 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 193232] Re: Remote Samba shares not showing up in Nautilus through network:///
In my situation, being or not in the same workgroup does not make a difference. In any case here are some detailed descriptions of what happens. As I wrote in comment 8, I have a virtual machine running hardy-beta, which is in the same worgroup (or Domain) of all other network machines. This is a large network, with mostly windows clients, but also with several MacOsX and linux boxes. All linux boxes were joined to the ADS domain with the command: 'net ads join'. The relative smb.conf file is like this: [global] workgroup = LAB realm = XXXLAB.IT netbios name = %h server string = %h (Samba %v, Ubuntu) security = ADS password server = dhcserv1.xxxlab.it username map = /etc/samba/domain_users.map restrict anonymous = 2 client NTLMv2 auth = Yes client lanman auth = No client plaintext auth = No log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m os level = 0 preferred master = No local master = No domain master = No idmap domains = LAB idmap config LAB: default = yes idmap config LAB: backend = rid idmap config LAB: range = 10-100 template shell = /bin/bash winbind enum users = Yes winbind enum groups = Yes winbind use default domain = Yes winbind offline logon = Yes invalid users = root Case 1 - Browsing from hardy-beta a machine running ubuntu-gutsy server. In a terminal window: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ smbclient -L gutsy-server Password: (password inserted here) Domain=[LAB] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.26a] Sharename Type Comment - --- IPC$IPC IPC Service (gutsy-server (Samba 3.0.26a, Ubuntu)) share Disk gutsy-server_share Domain=[LAB] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.26a] Server Comment ---- gutsy-server gutsy-server (Samba 3.0.26a, Ubuntu) WorkgroupMaster ---- LAB In Nautilus: Open Network -- Double-click on the 'LAB' icon (Domain) -- All machines are displayed; Double-click on the 'gutsy-server' icon -- after a while, Nautilus returns '0 objects', without asking for a password; Insert the full address (smb://gutsy-server/share) -- a password is requested and the share content is displayed. Case 2 - Browsing from hardy-beta a machine running Windows XP In a terminal window: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ smbclient -L XP-ACQ Password: (password inserted here) Domain=[LAB] OS=[Windows 5.1] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager] Sharename Type Comment - --- IPC$IPC Remote IPC DataDisk ADMIN$ Disk Remote Admin C$ Disk Default share Domain=[LAB] OS=[Windows 5.1] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager] Server Comment ---- WorkgroupMaster ---- In Nautilus: Same behaviour as in case 1. smb://XP-ACQ -- '0 objects'; smb://XP-ACQ/Data -- content displayed after password. Case 3 - Browsing from hardy-beta a machine running Windows 2000 In a terminal window: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ smbclient -L TF-2000 Password: (password inserted here) Domain=[LAB] OS=[Windows 5.0] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager] Sharename Type Comment - --- IPC$IPC Remote IPC ADMIN$ Disk Remote Admin C$ Disk Default share DataDisk Domain=[LAB] OS=[Windows 5.0] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager] Server Comment ---- WorkgroupMaster ---- In Nautilus: Open Network -- Double-click on the 'LAB' icon (Domain) -- All machines are displayed; Double-click on the 'TF-2000' icon -- All the shared folders are displayed, without asking for a password; Double-click on the 'Data' folder icon -- a password is requested and the content is displayed. (This is the correct and the expected behaviour). I want to stress again that in ubuntu-gutsy boxes, with exactly the same smb.conf configuration, I never observed Nautilus return '0 objects' as in case 1 and 2. Such a behaviour in hardy will make a normal user think that browsing a samba network, in a situation similar to the one described here, does not work at all, and so I think that this bug should gain a higher
[Bug 193232] Re: Remote Samba shares not showing up in Nautilus through network:///
I suppose you mean workgroup. In my case, when using the hardy-alfa6-live CD the box was not in the same workgroup as the others. However, the virtual machine running up-to-date hardy was integrated in the same domain of all other network machines (including those running gutsy and debian, which do not show the bug). The ADS integration was done using winbind, kerberos and PAM libraries, essentially as described here: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ActiveDirectoryWinbindHowto -- Remote Samba shares not showing up in Nautilus through network:/// https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193232 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 193232] Re: Remote Samba shares not showing up in Nautilus through network:///
I am experiencing a similar problem with hardy installed in a virtual machine and with up-to-date packages. When I try to browse machines in a mixed environment some of them do not show any shared folders in nautilus. The network is using ADS and is controlled by a windows 2003 server. Machines running windows XP, windows 2003 and samba show '0 objects' in nautilus, but after inserting the complete path (eg.: smb://server/share) the folders can be accessed after the password prompt. Machines running windows 2000 show their folders regularly. I have observed the same behaviour using a hardy-alfa6-live CD, without any editing of smb.conf or other configurations. In the same network environment there are several machines, running ubuntu gutsy and debian etch, which do not have similar problems. -- Remote Samba shares not showing up in Nautilus through network:/// https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193232 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 26338] Re: Changing users randomly affects other users and group memberships
As suggested by Yann, I've opened a new bug for the situation described in comment 57: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-tools/+bug/164475 -- Changing users randomly affects other users and group memberships https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/26338 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 26338] Re: Changing users randomly affects other users and group memberships
I have tested gnome-system-tools_2.20.0-0ubuntu2 in gutsy for the situation described in comment 57 (presence of domain users managed by winbind). As expected, the situation is not changed, since this is to be considered like a second test case. -- Changing users randomly affects other users and group memberships https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/26338 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 26338] Re: Adding a user to a group modifies other users' groups and passwords
In reply to comment 67 (Yann Rouillard): I don't know if I have to file a separate bug for the behaviour I have described. Maybe some other developer can say that. After all, the fact is that system-tools-backend is not able to behave correctly as do the command line utilities in all the situations described for this bug. It seems that no one had problems with adduser and deluser. So my question is: why don't make system-tools-backend act as a simple front-end to that commands? Is there any operation that the command line utilities are not able to do? Or are there other motivations? By the way, I can confirm that the bug is still present after a fresh installation of gutsy. -- Adding a user to a group modifies other users' groups and passwords https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/26338 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 26338] Re: Adding a user to a group modifies other users' groups and passwords
My login.defs Linux pc76 2.6.20-16-generic #2 SMP Sun Sep 23 19:50:39 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux ** Attachment added: login.defs http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10064187/login.defs -- Adding a user to a group modifies other users' groups and passwords https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/26338 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 26338] Re: Adding a user to a group modifies other users' groups and passwords
Since I manually changed some PAM config files for the setup described in comment 57, I'm also including these ones... Linux pc76 2.6.20-16-generic #2 SMP Sun Sep 23 19:50:39 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux ** Attachment added: pam_files.tgz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10064195/pam_files.tgz -- Adding a user to a group modifies other users' groups and passwords https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/26338 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 26338] Re: Adding a user to a group modifies other users' groups and passwords
I've experienced this bug in the following situation: at my workplace I've set up several machines running Ubuntu 7.04 and which are integrated in an Active Domain Network controlled by a Windows Server. I did this using samba, kerberos and winbind, and now these machines can be used with local and domain accounts (domain accounts are not listed in /etc/passwd but are managed by winbind). To allow some domain accounts to gain administrative privileges I added them manually to the admin group with 'adduser'. After that, if you use System - Administration - Users and Groups to add a new user, all the domain users (not local users) which were granted admin rights will lose their privileges. This happens because they are deleted from the admin group in /etc/group. The problem does not occur when using the command line utility (adduser). -- Adding a user to a group modifies other users' groups and passwords https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/26338 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
