[Bug 1021375] Re: Nautilus says the USB stick is read only when it is not

2013-05-05 Thread StephanBeal
This problem had gone away in 12.04 for a while, at least on external USB drives (but still on SD cards plugged in to a USB adapter), but came back with one of the updates made in the past few days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is su

[Bug 1021375] Re: Nautilus says the USB stick is read only when it is not

2012-10-14 Thread StephanBeal
Seeing the same on a VFAT 500GB USB drive on Ubuntu 12.04, nautilus 3.4.2. Symptoms are identical to the OP's. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1021375 Title: Nautil

[Bug 783612] Re: Nautilus shows wrong file name in copy/move dialog

2011-06-09 Thread StephanBeal
i agree - the behaviour you described is what i'm seeing now, and they're not quite the same. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/783612 Title: Nautilus shows wrong fil

[Bug 783612] Re: Nautilus shows wrong file name in copy/move dialog

2011-06-09 Thread StephanBeal
Hi! i just updated and tried again, and i'm seeing exactly what you (Brendan) describe. i was careful to make sure that the first copy i copied would also be the first one skipped. The behaviour might (i haven't tried) be different if the second file copied is the one to skip. The copying does stop

[Bug 783612] [NEW] Nautilus shows wrong file name in copy/move dialog

2011-05-16 Thread StephanBeal
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus Nautilus displays the wrong filename in the copy/move dialog when one of the files is "skipped". Here's how to reproduce: - Find two files for testing. Use large files (several hundred MB) so that the copy dialog will be shown long enough to obs

[Bug 578873] Re: Cursor invisible until window is moved/resized

2010-10-14 Thread StephanBeal
(Very) Unfortunately, suspend and hibernate do not work on my new box (a really flay 64-bit machine with intel P4 processors), so i cannot test it. The problem only happened after waking from hibernation. In any case, it was only minorly annoying and not anything critical. -- Cursor invisible unt

[Bug 578873] [NEW] Cursor invisible until window is moved/resized

2010-05-11 Thread StephanBeal
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-terminal gnome-terminal 2.29.6 on Ubuntu 10.4: since upgrading to this version, the terminal cursor remains invisible until i resize or move the window. i can type as normal, but cannot see where the cursor is until moving/resizing. To reproduce:

[Bug 519583] Re: can't add, move, unlock applets & no clock

2010-05-04 Thread StephanBeal
This _might_ be a similar/related bug: starting this morning, my Gnome Panel clock is stuck at a specific time. If i remove the clock (or kill its process), the image of the clock stays on the panel but it no longer reacts like a clock (e.g. right-clicking brings up the panel menu, not the clock me

[Bug 519583] Re: can't add, move, unlock applets & no clock

2010-05-04 Thread StephanBeal
Well, i say "fixed" the problem, but now Alt-Tab no longer works to switch windows, and re-enabling effects doesn't fix it. -- can't add, move, unlock applets & no clock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/519583 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, whic

Re: [Bug 432598] Re: can_suspend and can_hibernate values aren't respected

2009-12-17 Thread StephanBeal
@Giorgio: please try: sudo apt-get install devicekit-power and then edit: /usr/share/polkit-1/actions/org.freedesktop.devicekit.power.policy as shown in the post from stacktracer. That works on my Karmic machine, but i have no idea if the fix works out of the box on a new/clean Karmic install.

Re: [Bug 432598] Re: can_suspend and can_hibernate values aren't respected

2009-11-20 Thread StephanBeal
@Daniel: step...@jareth:~$ dpkg -S org.freedesktop.devicekit.power.policy dpkg: *org.freedesktop.devicekit.power.policy* not found. Possibly because this machine has been through too many dist-updates, and it's now confused. Hibernation worked in previous versions, though, and i miss it sorely. s

Re: [Bug 432598] Re: can_suspend and can_hibernate values aren't respected

2009-11-20 Thread StephanBeal
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 6:16 PM, stacktracer wrote: > Suspend and hibernate still appear in the logout menu, but all they do > is lock the screen. > > On my system this file doesn't exist. Maybe that's why my Suspend/Hibernate options do not appear any more (since upgrading to Karmic). Would you

[Bug 432598] Re: can_suspend and can_hibernate values aren't respected

2009-11-04 Thread StephanBeal
i've got just the opposite problem - i can't get hibernate/suspend options to show up in Gnome (they do in KDE). They worked fine in 9.04, but disappeared in 9.10. The various gconf-editor hacks i've read about have made no difference. -- can_suspend and can_hibernate values aren't respected http

[Bug 473139] Re: gnome-keyring demands unspecified password, breaking svn commits

2009-11-04 Thread StephanBeal
i have reported this "upstream" at: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=600758 and tagged it as gnome-keyring. Maybe they will know where to categorize it. Merci, Sebastien! ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #600758 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=600758 -- gnome-keyr

Re: [Bug 473139] Re: gnome-keyring demands unspecified password, breaking svn commits

2009-11-04 Thread StephanBeal
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > The issue is an upstream one and it would be nice if somebody having it > could send the bug the to the people writting the software > (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Upstream/GNOME) > It seems like it _might_ be a distro-specific configur

Re: [Bug 473139] Re: gnome-keyring demands unspecified password, breaking svn commits

2009-11-04 Thread StephanBeal
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:12 AM, pleiades wrote: > I was experiencing this issue and I resolved it as follows: > > rm ~/.gnome2/keyrings/login.keyring > After a reboot i was having the problem again (forgot to unset SSH_AUTH_SOCK in my login script, so i'm not sure if that's a long-term fix or no

Re: [Bug 473139] Re: gnome-keyring demands unspecified password, breaking svn commits

2009-11-03 Thread StephanBeal
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > Thank you for your bug report, are you sure you are using the right > keymap with no capslock enabled? could you run ssh -vvv and get details > on what is happening there? > That was a quick response! i'm not using SSH here - the svn rep

Re: [Bug 473139] Re: gnome-keyring demands unspecified password, breaking svn commits

2009-11-03 Thread StephanBeal
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > Could you try to unset SSH_AUTH_SOCK and see if that makes a difference? > what value does it have there? > step...@jareth:~/cvs/qboard/trunk$ echo $SSH_AUTH_SOCK /tmp/ssh-BnKSce7396/agent.7396 step...@jareth:~/cvs/qboard/trunk$ svn ci

Re: [Bug 473139] Re: gnome-keyring demands unspecified password, breaking svn commits

2009-11-03 Thread StephanBeal
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > > ignore the question about the login password the response is in the > description > Actually: step...@jareth:~/cvs/qboard/trunk$ echo $SSH_AUTH_SOCK step...@jareth:~/cvs/qboard/trunk$ svn ci -m "testing gnome-keyring thingie" config.

[Bug 473139] [NEW] gnome-keyring demands unspecified password, breaking svn commits

2009-11-03 Thread StephanBeal
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-keyring First of all, i'm ASSUMING that this problem is caused by gnome-keyring - it might not be. Ubuntu 9.10, updated from 9.04 (updated from 8.10, updated from...) When i try to commit to a SVN repository (of which i have many) i am prompted by

[Bug 347681] Re: maximized windows didn't occupes full screen after desktop type change from netbook to classic

2009-05-06 Thread StephanBeal
A related problem: after switching back to classic mode, all windows try to start up maximized. To fix this, one has to disable the Maximus (in Startup Apps) or open up the gconf editor, search for "maximize", and disable the property found under "maximus" (i don't have the netbook with me, so i ca