[Bug 15495] Re: "Archive Manager" doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an "archive" is

2017-01-03 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: file-roller
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495

Title:
  "Archive Manager" doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an
  "archive" is

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/archive-behavior-research/+bug/15495/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: "Archive Manager" doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an "archive" is

2016-09-12 Thread Magdalena Mirowicz
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
 Assignee: Magdalena Mirowicz (magdalena-mirowicz) => (unassigned)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495

Title:
  "Archive Manager" doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an
  "archive" is

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/archive-behavior-research/+bug/15495/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2015-01-14 Thread Matthew Paul Thomas
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
 Assignee: Nick Tait (jnick-tait) = Magdalena Mirowicz (magdalena-mirowicz)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495

Title:
  Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an
  archive is

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/archive-behavior-research/+bug/15495/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2012-11-29 Thread Chris Wilson
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Milestone: app-descriptions = None

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495

Title:
  Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an
  archive is

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/archive-behavior-research/+bug/15495/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2012-11-28 Thread Chris Wilson
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Milestone: None = raring-ee

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495

Title:
  Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an
  archive is

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/archive-behavior-research/+bug/15495/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2012-11-06 Thread Chris Wilson
Nick, this has been on the paper cuts backlog forever. The proposal is
to rename and/or design a new icon. What does design think about this?

** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Nick Tait (jnick-tait)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495

Title:
  Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an
  archive is

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/archive-behavior-research/+bug/15495/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2012-07-07 Thread Chris Wilson
Just another bump on this. Is there anything happening with it?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495

Title:
  Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an
  archive is

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/archive-behavior-research/+bug/15495/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2012-06-10 Thread Chris Wilson
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
   Importance: High = Wishlist

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495

Title:
  Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an
  archive is

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/archive-behavior-research/+bug/15495/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2012-04-11 Thread Chris Wilson
Just a quick bump on this one as it's been hanging around for a while
now. A number of suggestions have been made for using a more descriptive
icon, which seems like a logical solution since the current one gives
the impression the app is related to gardening work in some way.

** Also affects: ayatana-design
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495

Title:
  Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an
  archive is

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/archive-behavior-research/+bug/15495/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2012-04-11 Thread Chris Wilson
I've added Ayatana Design to the projects list to see what they think of
designing a new icon.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495

Title:
  Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an
  archive is

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/archive-behavior-research/+bug/15495/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2011-12-04 Thread John Kinsella
I disagree, dumbing down menu's will only lead to new users NOT learning
in the future...  Why not have a screen during install that shows the
Archive Manager and what it can do (mainly create ZIP files) and educate
instead ?!?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495

Title:
  Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an
  archive is

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/archive-behavior-research/+bug/15495/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2010-12-15 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Changed in: file-roller (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs) = (unassigned)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495

Title:
  Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2010-09-15 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: file-roller
   Importance: Unknown = Wishlist

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2010-09-10 Thread Michael Jonker
I don't think the name is that important. The graphic could be clear
enough to convey the concept to any user of any language if done
cleverly.

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2010-08-29 Thread yman
Name of app: File Compression.

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2010-08-28 Thread Michael Gilbert
rather than doing anything drastic, how about just providing brief
examples; something like Create an archive (e.g. zip, tar.gz, etc)

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2010-06-22 Thread Oli Ptang
I do not think that we should simply use a particular term just because
it is understood by users of a particular operating system:  as has
already been mentioned above, Windows and OSX use different
terminologies anyway.

I prefer the idea of using our own expressive terminology, ideally
something that a complete novice to computer systems in general might
grasp intuitively.  As such I would suggest using the terms group (or
bunch?) and compress (or squish?) in a context-sensitive manner.
For example, right clicking on a single file could offer the option to
Compress this file..., whilst right clicking on a selection of
multiple files would offer something along the lines of Group and/or
compress these files... (or Bunch and squish these files...?).

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2010-03-21 Thread Krzysztof Kosinski
A lot of the discussion here is that some archives do not offer
compression, and therefore they should not be renamed to compressed
files. This is a completely irrelevant technicality. You are thinking in
the UNIX way, not in the simple user way. The simple user doesn't
recognize the difference between compression and archiving, because he
has no use for archiving. Why would anyone want to clump files together
if it offers no savings in disk space?

Also consider that power users know that to compress means to reduce
the size of data, but for an unsophisticated user it might as well refer
to compressing the number of files!

Bundling, packing or packaging are wrong. Bundling refers to
something you get as a gratis with e.g. a video card or a magazine.
Packaging is when you wrap or put the files in something. Zipping is
only recognizable to WinZip users and shouldn't be used.

Another point: it is clear that Compress... won't destroy anything,
because it has an ellipsis. This means that the user will be offered
further choices. Moreover it is a given that if anything is about to
destroy user data, a warning is displayed, so considering the
possibility that users might be afraid to click on this is a
distraction.

The correct solution is Compressed File Manager or Compressed File
Browser and Compress...

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2010-03-21 Thread Beni Cherniavsky
@Krzysztof Kosinski:
 The simple user doesn't recognize the difference between 
 compression and archiving, because he has no use for 
 archiving. Why would anyone want to clump files together
 if it offers no savings in disk space?

On the contrary, the simple user nowdays doesn't care about 
file sizes and disk space, but does care about attaching a 
dozen files to an email vs. attaching one archive.

(The ideal fix for that use case would be to support attaching 
whole directories.  They can be transparently converted to an 
archive when you attach them and exploded to a directory 
when you save an attachment.  But this won't be ubuquitous 
any time soon, so we still need an easy way to explicitly handle 
archives.)

Anyway, I agree with your analysis of Compress... being best.

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-12-11 Thread smilingfrog
An interesting thing about this papercut is that it is primarily trying
to help explain what the function of a right clicked menu item will be
for a user who is not already familiar with it. What about adding a
description that pops up on the menu when hovering over the selection,
similar to the way a text box opens up when hovering over an HTML image
described with a title tag?

An example of this would be as follows. Assuming you are reading this in
Firefox, and assuming that you have the NoScript add-on installed (and
that some scripts are forbidden), right click on this page and hover
over the NoScript.

Similarily, as suggested by @sub.mesa above under
Applications-Accessories-Terminal, if you hover over the Terminal it
gives you a description (All panel items do so).

Would this papercut not become a great deal less troublesome if the
Nautilus right click menus also could pop up a short description of the
function?

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-12-06 Thread Elonoir
Pack  Bundle sound nice. I still prefer 'package' even if it's reserved
for .deb packages, technically those are the same. But these
alternatives sound nice too.

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-12-01 Thread Beni Cherniavsky
+ Another word: pack seems to capture both meaning, while not exactly
stepping on package reserved for .debs?

+ What about expanding the vague meaning of the operation by labeling
the menu Combine / Compress...?

+ What about letting the option explain itself in a submenu?  Something like:
  - Create file.tar.bz2
  - Create file.zip
  - Other / help me choose...
  
  Benefits:
  
  - A submenu header is less threatening than a Compress... button, 
so it helps dicovery.
  
  - A submenu allows including the familiar ZIP.
  
  - A submenu allows fast access to common functionality.  (Perhaps it 
should grow to include formats you have used, a-la Open With?)

In any case, I think the real bug is that users don't understand these
operations, and playing with the wording can only help users stumble
upon the functionality.  But will they successfully compelete their
task?  With , will they understand what it does and whether they want
it?  Will they choose the best format?

The current dialog looks like this:

ICON  Filename:  __file   [ .tar.gz   | ▽ ]
Location:  [ places | ▽ ]
▷ Other Options
[Help]  [Cancel]  [Create]

(where Other Options expands to Password, Encrypt, Split - greyed out
most of the time!)

The harder part of the fix is re-designing the dialog to be educational!
It's a hard task, and I don't have a polished proposal, only a starting-point 
suggestion:

  Save result as:  __fileFormat:
  Location:  [ places   | ▽ ]┌───┐
   │ .zip - cross-platform │
  [x] Combine many files into one. │ .tar.bz2 - compress well  │
   │...│
  [x] Compress - create a smaller file(s). └───┘
  Without compression,  Tar + BZip2 - very good
  the files take 5.2 MB.  compression, somewhat slow,
easy to open on Linux  Mac.
  
   ▷ Other Options
  
  [Help] [Cancel]  [Create]

[x] Combine would be greyed out if only one file is seleted.  (Or entirely 
omitted?  I think educating users about the ability is important.)
When it's unselected, many files can be compressed individually (a message 
warning of that should appear below the checkbox).

The [x] Combine and [x] Compress boxes would grey out irrelevant lines
in the formats list; clicking a line in the format list would assign [x]
Combine and [x] Compress to the appropriate values; typing an extension
in the filename output would also choose format and checkboxes.

Additionally, I'd argue that the [x] Compress section should also notify
you when you have selected uncompressed images / audio / videos, and at
least point you to the appropriate applications.

Ideally, it should allow you to directly:
- Compress losslessly to PNG and FLAC
- Compress lossly to JPG, Vorbis, Theora
- Reduce resulution / sampling rate

This is major new functionality, but it's very useful for sending/uploading 
files, and it's part of what the user might expect from an option called 
Compress
Instead of hiding behind but that's not what the word means I think we should 
cover the meanings.

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-12-01 Thread Beni Cherniavsky
Ahh, it botched my ascii art.
Attached above dialog proposal in .txt form (UTF-8).


** Attachment added: archive-dialog.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36297669/archive-dialog.txt

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-11-30 Thread Stephan Fabel
A compressed file archive isn't really an archive at all. I put things
into an archive that I don't want to see on my desk anymore, but might
need it again in the future. Really, when talking about an archive,
you're talking about it because we used to only be using tar (T ape AR
chive ).[*]

A zip file obviously doesn't work because we are creating a myriad of
archives here, possibly tar.gz, tar.bz2, .rar, .7z, etc.

While having no clear answer, possible candidates that describe better
what is happening here, could be:

- aggregate
- collect
- combine

when looking for terminology in terms of an archive, how about:

instead of add to... 
- aggregate in file 
- create collection 
- combine to single compressed file

  = popup choose format dropdown with zip, tar.gz, etc.

Just putting some thoughts out there from a pure English point of view.

[*] http://www.gnu.org/software/tar/#introduction

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-11-01 Thread Kat Amsterdam
What I am missing in this whole discussion is the concept of
Education.

Ubuntu is a different operating system. It's okay for users to learn new
ways of performing tasks they may or may not have performed in other
operating systems. Using wording that is familiar or unfamiliar to them.

The bests comments have been so far the ones that educate the users as
to what they are trying to do through tool tips or through use of active
verbs.

Playing to peoples ignorance just leaves everyone dumb.

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-10-15 Thread Alex Bruce
Interesting Paper Cut

I just thought I would add something in regards to the windows world
that is mentioned throughout

I think its slightly incorrect to think of the Send To -- Compressed
(zipped) folder dialog as universally used under windows. Ever since
zip files were handled by XP released in 2002-2003, I still run across
people who still think they need to install Winzip\Winrar or whatever
app to create\open zip files.

It is not very well advertised in the OS and people are most still using
windows as if its windows 98 and nothing has changed. eg still need
Winzip (shareware woot!) installed.. still need Nero installed to create
a simple data CD

So using this as the standard for how things should be implemented is
not entirely correct. I do think the windows way is more seamless than a
separate application though and ill usually just install 7zip on windows
(for myself and other users) to handle other archive formats (and more
advanced zip file creation) but leave windows as the associated app for
zip and cab files.

Still how it is implemented at the moment in Ubuntu is great. I do think
there should be less abstraction involved with dealing with archive
files (eg make them look like a folder with all the same operations as
mentioned above) BUT they still need to be recognized as files to the
user and it needs to be obvious that they are archive files so the user
can make decisions based on that

on the topic at hand.. I think Compress file\s... is only slightly
better than Create Archive. Most people would think that one zip
file will be created when clicking this... I doubt a majority of people
will think if they click this they will create many compressed files or
something silly like that

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-10-15 Thread Alex Bruce
Another quick thought

are the words zip zipped unzip etc patented but Winzip in some
way?

so to use these words as a generic term for all compression, as apposed
to just referring to a zip file (compressed in zip format etc), may mean
its possible for Ubuntu to be sued for patent\brand usage etc (I'm not a
lawyer but yeah that bollocks stuff).

Windows has obviously paid out over these patent issues so can use
zipped in there dialogs

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-09-13 Thread Lunis Neko
@Nils-Werner, This actually is a picture perfect paper cut. It's small,
easy to fix, and actually is very confusing.

My opinion is this:

The technical side: These files are archives, whether or not they're
compressed. I don't think that we should stop using the terminology of
an Archive. To start using Compressed File, Compress..., etc would be
counter-productive. While I believe that Nils-Werner's comment is way
off base and quite immature, I do believe that no one wants to see
Ubuntu over-simplified. The solution here is actually quite simple.

The bigger picture: The reason people use archives is for the sake of
the Internet. Once upon a time archives were used to save space on
floppies and zip disks, but those were far enough back that they can be
put out of our minds. The current convention of an archive is that of
the Internet. By that I mean that people needed a means of transferring
sets of files over slow Internet. This was two problems in one: the
archiving of many files (say for a Windows theme) and then sending that
data compressed over a slow connection. We no longer need to compress
(generally) to send a file, but we still need to archive. Seperating
those two actions a bit, however, would most likely only cause more
problems. I think it's obvious that the word `zip' and the word
`extract' are the most commonly known ones for archiving and unarchiving
(or compressing and uncompressing) files. WinZIP helped make this the
case. Even now on a Windows computer zip is the most common archiving
method. Now to say that this only applies in Windows is silly. When we
want to compress in Linux we do what? gZIP. bZIP2. The zip convention is
still around, but we don't want it to be. Archiving is the correct term,
compression is just an option.

tldr;
Archive (zip) files...
Add to new archive (zip)...


Also, the Macintosh method of disk images is clever. When you download an 
archive Gnome should (optionally) automatically open that file. The idea of 
treating an archive as a normal folder the way one would mount an iso to loop 
is genius, and treating archive compression the way Windows would treat 
compression on an NTFS filesystem (in short: transparently) is even better. 
However, I believe that is certainly beyond the scope of a paper cut. I only 
reiterate that idea because when it was first mentioned by Martin (#16 above) 
it didn't seem to get much love, and it deserves it.

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-08-12 Thread Nils-Werner Claesson
This isn't even close to a paper cut. Archive Manager handles more than
zipfiles. The overall name of these files are archives. What do you want
to call it? Zip-rar-tar-and-a-lot- more-manager, huh? Fix PPTP instead
so people can use VPN under Ubuntu. I don't believe som of you people.
Archive Manager is just fine. People who don't know that zip-files are
archive stick by Windows. I'd hate to see Ubuntu turn into Linux for
dumb*ss*s.

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-08-10 Thread mac_v
removing milestone as per comment 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-
roller/+bug/15495/comments/42

And this is not incomplete [doesnt need more info from the bug reporter]
, but rather a triaged bug.

** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
   Importance: Low = High

** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
   Status: Incomplete = Triaged

** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Milestone: round-1 = None

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-08-04 Thread sub.mesa
I may have a different solution, that addresses the needs of most points
addressed here.

In the Gnome menu, for example Applications  Accessories, each
application should have both a title name and a description beneath it,
preferably with a small font size and silver-grey coloured text.

For example, the Terminal option in the Accessories menu has the same
problem as the Archive Manager; if people don't know what a terminal is
they don't know what it does. With a small description beneath it saying
Opens a command prompt would clarify the use of the application
instantly to new users, and would make new users to ubuntu find
equivalent applications quicker without having to choose a very generic
name for each application.

Conveying this idea to the Archive Manager dilemma, i propose:

1. In the Applications menu the original Archive Manager title, with a
description labeled Let's you create and edit compressed files would
both be correct and still most users would recognise this as an
equivalent to WinZIP/WinRAR.

2. In the file manager (nautilus), users should just be able to
doubleclick archives as if they were folders, but they should be folders
with a very specific colour to indicate these are compressed. While
looking inside the archive, users should be able to copy/paste files in
and out to edit the archive.

3. When right-clicking the archive, users should see:
- Open zip archive (if its a tar archive it should say tar archive)
- Extract archive (would remove the colour of the archive-folder, so 
basically it gets extracted to a folder of the same name and the archive file 
itself is removed afterwards)
- Extract archive leaving a copy (does the same bus leaves the archive 
intact, with a slightly different name i guess)
- Extract to other location (opens a dialog to select a folder to extract to)

This would attract both novice and advanced users who are very attached
to apps like WinRAR and find Linux-alternatives not very appealing,
although their motivations vary. Key here is they attract the user with
something specific, such as the colours used in WinRAR archives, and the
right click menu had these colours too. I think we shouldn't focus too
much on the exact words, by using visual elements you can let users make
the proper connection to their windows counterpart without having read a
word.

I realise this may not be the ideal place to present this idea. As
implementing it would changing both Nautilus and Gnome. Could anyone
direct me to where i should file this? Still wanted to post it here, as
i think it would solve alot of issues addressed here.

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-07-28 Thread Aaron Plattner
If we're looking for synonyms, how about bundle?  From dict.org:
  bundle
   n 1: a collection of things wrapped or boxed together [syn: {package},
 {packet}, {parcel}]
   2: a package of several things tied together for carrying or
  storing [syn: {sheaf}]
  [...]
   v 1: make into a bundle; he bundled up his few possessions
[syn: {bundle up}, {roll up}]
It has less of the room full of dusty books connotation than archive.

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-07-28 Thread Tom Wright
I think that now it is time to stop looking at synonyms and accept that
there is not always a perfect answer - the problem is that users are
required to know what this technical term/operation is non-transparently
during every day tasks, not what term is used.

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-07-24 Thread mac_v
Proposed solution:
* Change Archive Manager to Compressed Files on the Applications menu 

The proposed solution is not right. Compressed Files is not a app
name, but rather end-result of the app.

/As an application menu/ , it is better as *File Compressor* , or
something of the sort.

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-07-22 Thread David Siegel
** Also affects: research38917
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-07-21 Thread Remco
I have a few suggestions:

Pack into / as file...
Store in / as file...
Combine into / as file...
Create (zip) archive...
Pack for web or email...

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-07-20 Thread mac_v
Just an FYI to all: The context[right-click] menu ,in Karmic, is now
Compress.

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-07-20 Thread mac_v
But the Subsequent dialogue, Is also Compress , that still needs to be
changed.

So this bug has actually been partially fixed.

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-07-19 Thread David Stansby
If this is marked incomplete, and someone is looking for a replacement
cut, shouldn't the milestone be moved back to a later date or removed?

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-07-18 Thread Jess Miller
Package makes sense conceptually but we're already using that, and it
would only be more confusing to use that term for two completely
different things.

Envelope makes sense, but doesn't make a good verb. You could also say
you were creating a packet or maybe a collection.

The concept behind the archive is really something that needs to be
taught to be understood and there's no non-digital analogue that's a
really close fit, in my opinion. Perhaps a discoverable method of
explaining what things do would be better than changing the terminology
to something that would not necessarily improve understanding.

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-07-15 Thread Phylum
Yes. I agree. This could be very useful.

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-07-12 Thread Elonoir
Although I am a new user I wanted to add my thoughts to this bug. It
might help to get this papercut completed.

To get back on to the subject; As Martin Owens said above, I think it is
a good idea to look at how people use Archives. People, as I know, don't
use archives to store something or to compress files together. The way
those people use an archive is as an package, something they can send
with their emails or upload to a webhost. If they use it as an package;
Why shouldn't you just call it package?

What about the current ?
Call applications what they are, Applications. When I want an application I 
don't think of  'a wrapped or boxed object;'.

Alternate suggestions...?

I hope I don't repeat things to much, I just wanted to say what I think.

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-07-07 Thread David Siegel
This bug appears to be stuck. We have reports of user testing that
produced data completely contradicting the design decision. Together, we
have spent more than a day on this so I am marking incomplete and will
look for a replacement paper cut.

** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
   Status: Triaged = Incomplete

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-07-06 Thread appi2012
If the word Package is reserved for .debs, why don't we call an archive
a parcel or something similar. Also, it would make more sense to call
.debs Applications, as that is more specific than packages, and call
archives, which may or may not be applications packages.

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-07-06 Thread Tom Wright
I agree, a package sounds much more like an archive than what is
essential (from a new users perspective) an installer. On the other hand
package is established with more knowlegable users as is (to a lesser
extent) archive so unless we can think of a name which is actually
unambiguously better wouldn't looking at the workflow for common uses of
archives be better (e.g. offering to combine files on upload or
similar).

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-07-01 Thread Toni Ruottu
I think the problem with saying compress is that creating a tar
archive is most typical use case and tar archives are not compressed.

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-07-01 Thread Toni Ruottu
How about enclose within a file

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-07-01 Thread Loïc Martin
I've asked a few non-technical users (mostly Windows users), all were
confused by the term compress. They can grasp the extract idea, but
unless you're technical or learned to used zip at a time were space
was dear (floppies, small hard drives) you'll have no idea what
compression can mean on a computer. People I asked had ideas of
physically compressing stuff, like hydraulic presses and the stuff, and
it never related to any space-saving idea, even less on anything that
could make sense in a computer.

One also has to note that zip has long been supplanted by RAR on the
Windows side (other OS users never really favored zip, which has bad
compression ratio). RAR labels the files it produces as _archives_ , not
any other term.

There's also self-extracting archives on the Windows side, they end by
.exe and are called self-extracting _archives_

So my guess is we'd be shooting ourselves in the foot in order to
appease a small fraction of our userbase. There might be a better word
than archives, but up now that's the only descriptive name people are
used to, including on Windows (discarding the ones that only know the
files by their extensions in Windows, which we can't do much about,
since zip isn't really used any more on the Internet, and RAR, like zip,
doesn't mean much for people that don't know those extensions). As for
compress, it's far more confusing (you're focusing on the not-so-
simple compression process, while for archives people can far more
easily grasp the idea that some files are grouped inside a wrapping).
Also, when people extract a file, they can clearly see the idea that
some files are inside another one - have fun explaining the idea that
the same files were also compressed ;)

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-29 Thread Tom Wright
I think that moving away from the term archive is a great idea as whilst
in the past people may have used archiving to store old files these days
it is mainly used for email attachments and similar. I think that we
should definetly include an imperitive verb such as create as it gives
users a clear idea about what the menu item actually does (creates a
file not changes the folder compression as the same menu icon would in
XP). Create compressed file... is best as it gives users maximum
knowledge about the action. We should also look at changing zip to the
default archive format as people who care about compression enough to
use tar.gz or tar.bz2 rather than simply wanting to email files to a
friend with windows will know about it (I will submit a bug report
depending on the responce from this).

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-28 Thread Jeffrey Flaker
Terminology encyclopedia?
I scanned this threaded discussion and I was thinkingwhy not have a 
terminology encyclopedia?

I am not sure how it would be implemented, but possibly have a help
context from the menu?  When right clicking on things, in such the case
of create archive have something right under that that says, help,
what's an archive or a bubble showing the selected language's
definition in the simplest terms possible.

just my $0.02.

Terminology is the novice killer and is why people think that Linux is a
CLI environment

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-28 Thread appi2012
The word Package or Box would accurately describe the purpose of
Archives, to combine files and/or to compress them. It gives a more
intuitive name, which a new user could understand.

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-28 Thread Valsodarg
Box is a too generic word that means almost anything and new users might
have trouble understanding the concept of Box this items... or Box
files and folders. Package is reserved for deb files (which are still
archives). I wonder if users will be able to distinguish package and
archives differently. For example: when you double click a package: an
installer pops up, while when you double click and archive - the archive
manager opens it to show its contents.

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-26 Thread Jordan
 I recommend Compress because all the participants could predict what
that might do and why they might use it.

Was one of the understood reasons why they might use it to group many
files into one to send as an attachment, or to create a single file
backup of a directory? That seems to be the primary use for archives,
not to save space but to include many files in one. Also, in the future
( if / when btrfs is the default file system ) compression may be built
into the file system so you could compress a file or directory without
creating a separate file. What should a user look for to send multiple
files in an attachment when compressing them doesn't make that any
easier? I am not disagreeing with making the change for Karmic, just
noting some possible issues / questions.

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-25 Thread Ivanka Majic
The aim of the paper cuts project is to improve the usability of the
Ubuntu desktop. What this debate reflects is that there are many ways to
solve this problem; what the design team aims to do is resolve these
discussions by conducting research with a broader audience.

In order to use something a person does not need to have an accurate
picture of how it works, they need to be able to predict the effect a
particular action will have. Mental models don't need to be correct to
be useful.

I recommend Compress because all the participants could predict what
that might do and why they might use it and terms like Archive and Zip
were less clear to people. To quote one participant: I know what a zip
is on my jacket?

Based on research, the solution from the design team is:
* In the context menu rename Create Archive to Compress...
* The subsequent dialog box should be re-titled to read: Create compressed 
file
* The input box on the dialog box should be re-labelled from 'Archive' to 
'Filename'

What I would really like to do is heal 100 paper cuts for Karmic - let's
try this now and, if usability testing shows this is not the optimum
solution we can improve it in Karmic +1.

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-25 Thread Sebastien Bacher

** Attachment added: update with the suggested changes
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28369323/file-roller.patch

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-25 Thread Sebastien Bacher
I've added the suggested changes upstream with a comment and wait for
them to reply now

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-24 Thread pt123
Archive is the correct term in English. 
Next you will have to change Search to Google in the menus.
If there is a need to be more verbose it could be Archive (incl. Compress) , 
where (incl. Compress) can be in a less contrast text.

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-24 Thread Franck
I quite desagree with compress... archives are not necessarly
compressed, and compressed files are not necessarly included in an
archive.

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-24 Thread Valsodarg
I agree with Franck. 
A tar file is an *archive* but its not a compress file. So by renaming all 
Create Archive (the fits all scenario) to compress files will cause confusion 
on how to create tar files. Perhaps a joined venture such as Compress/Archive 
will be much appropriate in the gnome menu.
Here is what I propose:
Proposed solution:
* In context menu rename Create Archive to Compress/Archive
* The subsequent dialog box should be re-titled to read: Create Compressed 
File/Archive
* The input box on the dialog box should be re-labelled from 'Archive' to 
'Filename'
* Change Archive Manager to Archive Manager on the Applications menu (with 
tooltip Create and edit compressed files/Archives)

I believe the name Archive Manager should remain, just like people are
used to WinZip, WinRaR, 7-Zip. None of the commercial/popular windows
software have Compress in their name and in fact they are even more
confusing than Archive Manager

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-24 Thread Mat Tomaszewski
Mac OS (tiger) uses Create archive of [whatever was selected]. It is
very difficult to understand for new users as well as for people coming
from the Windows Compressed (zipped) files world. So the problem we're
facing is that Archive is the only correct way of describing the
general category of files that have been... archived :)

A common understanding is that archive = compressed zip file. That is
not true. But on the other hand, there should be an easy and intuitive
was of creating zip files, immediately discoverable. The question is,
should we use a wrong name, just because that's what people have learned
using Windows, or should we try and teach users correct name instead,
showing that Archive simply means a zip file or equivalent. The only
issue is to make the initial connection between their mental model (I
want a zip file) and the correct menu option (Create Archive).

Reassuming: Compress... does not sound optimal, because:

- it's not necessarily going to be compressed

and, more importantly:

- it may not be enough guidance for people trying to create .zip
files.

The more I think about it, the more I can't see any easy solution. One
way could be to have an additional menu option saying Add to .zip
file, that would simply create .zip archive without any prompts. And
that's quite ugly. The other would be to somehow suggest that Create
Archive has something to do with creating .zip files. This is also non-
trivial - Create Archive (.zip) would be incorrect, since there are
other options available and the default selection is tar.gz.

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-24 Thread Stuart Langridge
To reiterate the point I made (in the attached Gnome bug) when I filed
this originally, a reasonable proportion of computer users do not
recognise the word archive as referring to a file containing other
files. I asked the original user who prompted me to file this bug, and I
also surveyed around ten other people (members of my family, non-
technical computer users in my office, and one guy at a bus stop), and
every one of them (all native English speakers) thought that an
archive was a big dusty room full of books and folders, like a
library. None of them recognised the term archive as being anything to
do with computer files, and after I explained the meaning to (most of)
them, they said that it didn't really make sense as a word.

Whether Archive Manager is a technically correct term is rather
beside the point, I feel; if users don't understand what the word means
then it's not useful to them. My friend (who originally asked the
question which caused me to file this bug) was looking for a way to
create a Zip file; when I explained that Archive Manager was the way
to do that, he said that he'd seen that in the menus but hadn't tried
using it because he didn't want to manage an archive (because an archive
is a big dusty room full of books).

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-24 Thread Mat Tomaszewski
Stuart, great example. The issue is then - if archive is not a good
name for files that contain other files, but it can also be one file,
just compressed to a smaller size, what name should we use?

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-24 Thread Stuart Langridge
Mat, that's why my original set of suggestions (Create Compressed File
and so on) were to be taken with a large pinch of salt, because I
couldn't think of anything better :)

However, there are, I think, three possible cases:

1. collecting many files together into one file and compressing that one file 
(zip, rar, tar.gz)
2. taking one file and compressing it (gz)
3. collecting many files together into one file and not compressing it (tar)

I don't have any user data on this (and some would be useful), but I
suspect that case (1) is the most common, and case (2) trivially
collapses into case 1 (since there's not much difference between a
gzipped file and a zip file with one file in it, and I would imagine
that anyone who understands the difference can handle the difference
manually).

Hence Create Compressed File: that caters for cases (1) and (2), and
use-cases for case (3) are relatively uncommon (and I believe that
people who need uncompressed tarballs know enough to know that file-
roller will do it anyway, even though the name is a bit wrong).

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-24 Thread Lightbreeze
 Create Compressed File isn't far different from Compress..., although
'create' might make it clearer to the user that the file selected itself
won't be compressed.

We might use 'Compress (.zip)...' where .zip becomes whichever was the last
format used in the dialog. So it could read Compress (.tar.gz)

Does it matter that 'compress' isn't entirely accurate, just because an
archive doesn't have to be compressed? As Stuart points out, #3 is the least
common need for an average user.

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:39 AM, Mat Tomaszewski 
mat.tomaszew...@canonical.com wrote:

 Stuart, great example. The issue is then - if archive is not a good
 name for files that contain other files, but it can also be one file,
 just compressed to a smaller size, what name should we use?

 --
 Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive
 is
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.

 Status in The FileRoller Archive Manager: New
 Status in One Hundred Paper Cuts: Triaged
 Status in “file-roller” package in Ubuntu: Triaged

 Bug description:
 A new user thinks I need to create a zip file, and doesn't know how to do
 it.
 If you don't know that a zip file is an archive, which many new users do
 not,
 then it's very difficult to tell how to create one. Create archive on the
 Nautilus context menu, Archive Manager in the Applications menu, etc, are
 all
 meaningless. (This happened to me today when someone I know rang me for
 technical support to ask how to create a zip file, and when I explained
 how, he
 said what's an archive?)

 Suggested fixes (to be taken with a very large pinch of salt and replaced
 with
 better suggestions):
 Change Create archive to Create compressed file on the context menu
 Change Archive Manager to Compressed Files on the Applications menu
 (with
 tooltip Create and edit compressed files)

 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300655:
 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300655

 Then won't you get questions like: What's a compressed file?  Perhaps
 some other wording may help such as: Create a safe copy of a file.

 Proposed solution:
 * In context menu rename Create Archive to Compress...
 * The subsequent dialog box should be re-titled to read: Create compressed
 file
 * The input box on the dialog box should be re-labelled from 'Archive' to
 'Filename'
 * Change Archive Manager to Compressed Files on the Applications menu
 (with tooltip Create and edit compressed files)

 More data and discussion can be found here:
 * http://www.designintheopen.org/profiles/blogs/zip-archive-package-or and
 * http://www.ivankamajic.com/?p=143#comment-23493



-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-24 Thread Valsodarg
@Stuart:
Changing the name of the application is pointless and rather silly. Most other 
archive managers have different names [WinZip, WinRaR, 7Zip]. 

Changing the menu entry to as I have proposed earlier might seem more
appropriate (I don't think user will care the name of the application or
that changing it will make it any better). And most users don't create
empty archives, they right click the file and compress it - which
eliminates the need to even know the name of the archiver. Think about
it: when was the last time when you needed to create an empty archive by
launching the application?

-
Proposition:
* In context menu rename Create Archive to Compress/Archive
* The subsequent dialog box should be re-titled to read: Create Compressed 
File/Archive
* The input box on the dialog box should be re-labelled from 'Archive' to 
'Filename'
* Change Archive Manager to Archive Manager on the Applications menu (with 
tooltip Create and edit compressed files/Archives)

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-24 Thread Mat Tomaszewski
Lightbreeze – I think it's acceptable for Compress... to be not
entirely accurate. I also agree that people who know what an Archive is
should not be affected by it. Will they find it acceptable though? Are
we not going to get flooded with Compress... is incorrect bugs? :)

Maybe there is a better solution, but if not, I think Compress... is
indeed a lot better than Create Archive for most users.

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-24 Thread Martin Owens
After giving this some more thought, I think I'd like to see the
existing wording kept as is. this is because we are trying to change the
wording to better suite users who have had alternative education and not
because the wording accurately describes or make the process immediately
obvious. We are confusing usability with familiarity.

I'd also like to point out that most of the users I teach don't want to
'zip things up' because they need compression, but because they need to
combine files together into a virtual folder. Calling it compress
actually detracts from the thought pattern of what users want to do.

Useful Words: Pack, Package, Combine, Box, Cabinet, Store, Wrap,
Collect, Basket, Archive...

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-24 Thread Scott Ritchie
** Tags added: needs-design

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-24 Thread deanm
I think Marting Owens is absolutely correct.  The current term Archive
is the most descriptively prudent term that encompasses all the tasks
the Archive Manager accomplishes.

The term zip, and its derivatives is not an accurate description of the
underlying computer action...it is accurate when you are closing your
jacket or pants.

My two cents, the term Archive is perfect, it should not be changed,
other terms such as compress are ok, but not better, perhaps the final
wording should be:

Manage Archives

or just plain Archive

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-23 Thread Ivanka Majic
Proposed solution:
* In context menu rename Create Archive to Compress...
* The subsequent dialog box should be re-titled to read: Create compressed 
file
* The input box on the dialog box should be re-labelled from 'Archive' to 
'Filename'
* Change Archive Manager to Compressed Files on the Applications menu (with 
tooltip Create and edit compressed files)

More data and discussion can be found here:
* http://www.designintheopen.org/profiles/blogs/zip-archive-package-or and
* http://www.ivankamajic.com/?p=143#comment-23493

** Description changed:

  A new user thinks I need to create a zip file, and doesn't know how to do 
it.
  If you don't know that a zip file is an archive, which many new users do 
not,
  then it's very difficult to tell how to create one. Create archive on the
  Nautilus context menu, Archive Manager in the Applications menu, etc, are 
all
  meaningless. (This happened to me today when someone I know rang me for
  technical support to ask how to create a zip file, and when I explained how, 
he
  said what's an archive?)
  
  Suggested fixes (to be taken with a very large pinch of salt and replaced with
  better suggestions):
  Change Create archive to Create compressed file on the context menu
  Change Archive Manager to Compressed Files on the Applications menu (with
  tooltip Create and edit compressed files)
  
  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300655:
  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300655
  
  Then won't you get questions like: What's a compressed file?  Perhaps
  some other wording may help such as: Create a safe copy of a file.
+ 
+ Proposed solution: 
+ * In context menu rename Create Archive to Compress...
+ * The subsequent dialog box should be re-titled to read: Create compressed 
file
+ * The input box on the dialog box should be re-labelled from 'Archive' to 
'Filename'
+ * Change Archive Manager to Compressed Files on the Applications menu 
(with tooltip Create and edit compressed files)
+ 
+ More data and discussion can be found here: 
+ * http://www.designintheopen.org/profiles/blogs/zip-archive-package-or and
+ * http://www.ivankamajic.com/?p=143#comment-23493

** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
   Status: In Progress = Confirmed

** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
 Assignee: Ivanka Majic (ivanka) = (unassigned)

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-23 Thread Mat Tomaszewski
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
   Status: Confirmed = Triaged

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-23 Thread Darwin Award Winner
On a related note, it might be prudent to add a How do I open ...?
section to the help, which would list how to open common types of files
and provide places to search for information on uncommon ones.

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-23 Thread Martin Owens
What I find interesting about this design bug is that the very concepts
are clashing with the way it works. If you talk of compressed files then
you could easily be talking about a directory of txt.gz files, which
would technically each be compressed with gzip compression.

On the other hand the reason tar was separated from gzip and bz2 was
because it performs a different function, it collects files together
into a virtual folder that can also be compressed.

What would be nice (and kind of out of scope for this bug) would be to
remove the file-roller and integrate into the OS the ability to treat a
tar as a folder and treat compression as a file / folder access filter.
I don't know if you'd just want to do it in nautilus or if you'd want to
do it lower down the stack, but it'd certainly be much clearer if you
'Compressed a Folder' and you could still access the contents and such,
selecting folders in file dialogs for attachments and uploads could be
filtered to other way and converted to tars on the way out.

All things we could do to make the bug disappear and have the wording
'compressed file/folder' make sense.

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-19 Thread Laco Horváth
DanielV@ OK, not problem.

But in that case, if you double-click on archive it will anyway open
archive manager to view files, not directly extract them. And in this
case there should be on windows decoration insted of 'Archive manager'
banner written something generic like 'Content of whatever archive
file' this sound good to me..

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-19 Thread David Siegel
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Milestone: None = round-1

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-19 Thread Peter VandeHaar
I think those users need to learn how to use a search engine or
reference manual. Assuming that an archive is always for compressing a
file, thought, compressed file could replace it.

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-18 Thread Takmadeus
I agree with Mark, hope this gets retranslated ;)

Although this looks minimal, well, for a novice linux user this can be
misleading (no way for them to guess what archive manager does), better
to talk about compressed files, it is more understandable ;)

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-18 Thread Ivanka Majic
Getting some input here: http://www.ivankamajic.com/?p=143

** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
   Status: Confirmed = In Progress

** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Ivanka Majic (ivanka)

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-14 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Scott Ritchie wrote:
 There is a general problem here that we insist on having Open with foo
 rather than actual application-defined verbs.  The top four entries on
 the right click menu shouldn't be Open with Archive Manager but rather
 something like Open archive
   

That's a *really* interesting idea.

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-11 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Could the design team come with wording suggestion there?

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-11 Thread Laco Horváth
IMO i thing that entire archive manager desktop file is anyway BS.
Everybody compress/uncompress files by right clicking on 'Add to
archive' or 'Extract files' command. Nobody needs any 'Archive manager'

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-11 Thread DanielV
@Laco: I disagree, I regularly have to check which files are in an
archive without having to extract them, or add some files to an existing
archive. Having an archive manager is great for this.

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


Re: [Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-11 Thread Vadim Peretokin
Yeah, I wonder where is he coming from. I for one create archives and mail
them out often, its part of my normal workflow with a computer.

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-11 Thread Scott Ritchie
There is a general problem here that we insist on having Open with foo
rather than actual application-defined verbs.  The top four entries on
the right click menu shouldn't be Open with Archive Manager but rather
something like Open archive

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-04 Thread Mat Tomaszewski
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
   Importance: Undecided = Low

** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-06-03 Thread Martin Albisetti
** Also affects: hundredpapercuts
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-02-23 Thread gib
** Description changed:

  A new user thinks I need to create a zip file, and doesn't know how to do 
it.
  If you don't know that a zip file is an archive, which many new users do 
not,
  then it's very difficult to tell how to create one. Create archive on the
  Nautilus context menu, Archive Manager in the Applications menu, etc, are 
all
  meaningless. (This happened to me today when someone I know rang me for
  technical support to ask how to create a zip file, and when I explained how, 
he
  said what's an archive?)
  
  Suggested fixes (to be taken with a very large pinch of salt and replaced with
  better suggestions):
  Change Create archive to Create compressed file on the context menu
  Change Archive Manager to Compressed Files on the Applications menu (with
  tooltip Create and edit compressed files)
  
  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300655:
  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300655
+ 
+ Then won't you get questions like: What's a compressed file?  Perhaps
+ some other wording may help such as: Create a safe copy of a file.

** Tags added: archive manager

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2009-02-07 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Changed in: file-roller (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Sebastien Bacher (seb128) = Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs)

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2008-07-17 Thread StevenMcCoy
Archive has been in the English language since at least 1603:

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/archive

Zip isn't even in the dictionary as referring to a collection:

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/zip

Zip is only knowledgeable to WinZip users of old.  Noting that Windows
XP built in support is labelled Compressed (zipped) Folders.  The
litmus test should be whether a new computer user would understand the
terminology zip or archive, and quite clearly they will have no
knowledge of the former and reasonable English education would be aware
of the latter.

Transpose the title if you need further clarification:  ZIP Manager
doesn't mean anything if you don't know what a zip is.

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2007-10-22 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Changed in: file-roller (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Triaged

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 15495] Re: Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is

2006-11-03 Thread Jon Anderson
There has been LOTS of discussion about this on the GNOME bug page, and
I can confirm that this is still a live issue on recent GNOME packages.

** Changed in: file-roller (Ubuntu)
   Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed

-- 
Archive Manager doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an archive is
https://launchpad.net/bugs/15495

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs