There is a fix for the warning message in bug #1644498.
You can follow the instructions in that bug to test the fix. You can
also follow the progress in that bug and wait for the fix to be released
for Xenial.
** No longer affects: appstream (Ubuntu)
** Project changed: ubuntu-gnome =>
Warning still persists as per today 22:07GMT.
fwupd version 0.7.0-0ubuntu4.3 on Xenial.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575248
Title:
"AppStream cache update
** Bug watch removed: Debian Bug tracker #820774
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=820774
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575248
Title:
Ok. Does that joepardize the instalaltion or not?
-Message d'origine-
De : boun...@canonical.com [mailto:boun...@canonical.com] De la part de Krino
Hoogestraat
Envoyé : lundi 28 novembre 2016 19:27
À : c_cromph...@hotmail.com
Objet : [Bug 1575248] Re: "AppStream cache update completed,
Bug still persists after update: 20161128 18:00 GMT.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575248
Title:
"AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was
Please remember that this bug is solved - you are likely running into LP
#1644498 though, which is a new and different issue.
** Changed in: ubuntu-gnome
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is
Confirmed that the error is back on (X)Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS and fwupd
0.7.0-0ubuntu4.3.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575248
Title:
"AppStream cache update
If this bug affects you please also remember to mark it as "Yes, it
affects me" using the little pencil button next to the text under the
title which reads "This bug affects -- people. Does this bug affect
you?" ("--" replaced by the number of people). This adds 'heat' to the
bug meaning that its
same here as of Friday(25th November 2016) update
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575248
Title:
"AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored
Confirmed here also. Just began very recently appearing:
AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to
errors.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
uname -a
4.4.0-47-generic #68-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 26 19:39:52 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64
x86_64 GNU/Linux
lsb_release -a
LSB Version:
I confirm the issue on 0.7.0-0ubuntu4.3.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575248
Title:
"AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due
to
# fwupdmgr refresh
Failed to download
https://s3.amazonaws.com/lvfsbucket/downloads/firmware.xml.gz.asc: SSL
handshake failed
Yet that link works in a browser.
Related?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in
same here.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575248
Title:
"AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due
to errors." on "sudo apt-get
I'm having a similar issue here with "AppStream cache update completed,
but some metadata was ignored due to errors." following the use of sudo
apt update && sudo apt full-upgrade.
sudo apt policy fwupd
fwupd:
Installed: 0.7.0-0ubuntu4.3
Candidate: 0.7.0-0ubuntu4.3
Version table:
***
I confirm the issue on 0.7.0-0ubuntu4.3.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575248
Title:
"AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due
to
Yesterday was the second time that I had noticed this issue, so I
started searching and ran across this. Unsure when it actually started
and how many times it has occurred.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in
** Changed in: fwupd (Debian)
Status: Unknown => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575248
Title:
"AppStream cache update completed, but some
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #837765
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837765
** Also affects: fwupd (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837765
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because
The error message popped out again for me just now. I still cannot get
it to reproduce reliably but I have raised Bugs1644498 to start
diagnosis.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
I started seeing this message:
AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors.
on one machine on the 23rd November 2016. I would expect this to be a seperate
issue. I cannot reproduce it right now, if I am able to do so later I will
try and raise a new bug.
Noticed that I was having this issue ~20 Nov 2016. This is the most
recent mention that Google found. I will provide details if there is
interest. (Or should I just post a new bug?)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to
This bug was fixed in the package fwupd - 0.7.0-0ubuntu4.1
---
fwupd (0.7.0-0ubuntu4.1) xenial-proposed; urgency=medium
* Add name and summary to Rival Steelseries device (LP: #1575248)
-- Mario Limonciello Thu, 28 Apr 2016
09:11:04 -0500
** Changed
This bug was fixed in the package fwupd - 0.7.0-0ubuntu5
---
fwupd (0.7.0-0ubuntu5) yakkety; urgency=medium
* Add name and summary to Rival Steelseries device (LP: #1575248)
-- Mario Limonciello Tue, 10 May 2016
09:39:57 -0500
** Changed in: fwupd
Releasing to xenial-updates is blocked by fixing this in yakkety.
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
I have also tested it now and it appears to fix the problem everywhere
where I could reproduce it before.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575248
Title:
Looks good:
$ fwupdmgr refresh
$ sudo apt update
Get:1 http://za.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial InRelease [247 kB]
Hit:2 http://za.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates InRelease
Get:3 http://za.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-backports
@Orzerch can you please try the fix in -proposed? See the comment in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1575248/comments/8
We're waiting for confirmation from someone other than me ( the
uploader) that it fixes the problem.
--
You received this bug notification because
Just for the record: running "sudo apt update" gave me the same error,
even though original askubuntu post suggested otherwise.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
Importance: High => Medium
** Changed in: fwupd (Ubuntu)
Importance: High => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575248
** Changed in: fwupd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: fwupd (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which
Hello Nikita, or anyone else affected,
Accepted fwupd into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/0.7.0-0ubuntu4.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Shouldn't be necessary to do a new release just for this. SRU's are best to be
small changes with no impact.
I've uploaded a backport of just that patch to xenial-proposed. The release
team will need to ack it and release it and go through the SRU process
If it helps, I can roll a new fwupd tomorrow.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575248
Title:
"AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due
** Changed in: appstream
Importance: Unknown => Undecided
** Changed in: appstream
Remote watch: Debian Bug tracker #820774 => None
** Changed in: appstream
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is
I've added these fields upstream
(https://github.com/hughsie/fwupd/commit/f4e0e88f7cba833a4badc1a3d62f1a08dd1bfd96)
and backported the fix as an SRU to -proposed.
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+
+ * Checks for apt updates using apt or apt-get also update the appstream
+ cache. Some of
** Changed in: appstream
Status: Unknown => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575248
Title:
"AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was
I have marked this bug as 'Comfimed' due to the fact that I have spoken
to many people who have the same bug (you can also see lots of people on
the AskUbuntu question).
** Changed in: ubuntu-gnome
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: fwupd (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
I have marked this bug as 'Confirmed' due to the fact that I have spoken
to many people who have the same bug (you can also see lots of people on
the AskUbuntu question).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in
Btw, the linked Debian bug is valid, because it complains about not being able
to take action on this message, which is something that could be improved.
But since this will usually highlight issues which can only be fixed
server-side, this message is primarily for distributors and
The AppStream component 'com.steelseries.rival-legacy.firmware' in
`/usr/share/app-info/xmls/org.freedesktop.fwupd.xml` must have a and
tag to be valid.
Adding fwupd, because this should be fixed there. Upstream said he will commit
a fix to fwupd tomorrow.
The ID collisions are issues in the
** Also affects: fwupd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to appstream in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575248
Title:
"AppStream cache update completed, but
42 matches
Mail list logo