[Bug 220320] Re: .tar.lzma not associated with file-roller

2011-03-09 Thread Michael Terry
** Changed in: dennis Assignee: Michael Terry (mterry) = (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220320 Title: .tar.lzma not associated with file-roller -- desktop-bugs

[Bug 220320] Re: .tar.lzma not associated with file-roller

2011-02-05 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: shared-mime-info Importance: Unknown = Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220320 Title: .tar.lzma not associated with file-roller -- desktop-bugs mailing

[Bug 220320] Re: .tar.lzma not associated with file-roller

2011-01-25 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: shared-mime-info Importance: Medium = Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220320 Title: .tar.lzma not associated with file-roller -- desktop-bugs mailing

[Bug 220320] Re: .tar.lzma not associated with file-roller

2009-03-09 Thread Martin Pitt
This doesn't fall under the SRU criteria (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates). Is this a regression from a previous release? -- .tar.lzma not associated with file-roller https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220320 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop

[Bug 220320] Re: .tar.lzma not associated with file-roller

2009-03-09 Thread Michael Terry
No, not a regression, I believe. And the effect to the user is not critical (no data loss or anything). The criteria I considered this bug hitting was Bugs which do not fit under above categories, but (1) have an obviously safe patch and (2) affect an application rather than critical

[Bug 220320] Re: .tar.lzma not associated with file-roller

2008-10-12 Thread chandrashekhar
** Tags added: hphw-canonical hpsym-osmi -- .tar.lzma not associated with file-roller https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220320 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for shared-mime-info. -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 220320] Re: .tar.lzma not associated with file-roller

2008-08-26 Thread Michael Terry
** Changed in: dennis Assignee: (unassigned) = Michael Terry (mterry) -- .tar.lzma not associated with file-roller https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220320 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for shared-mime-info. --

[Bug 220320] Re: .tar.lzma not associated with file-roller

2008-08-25 Thread Michael Terry
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #13256 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13256 ** Also affects: shared-mime-info via https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13256 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- .tar.lzma not associated with file-roller

[Bug 220320] Re: .tar.lzma not associated with file-roller

2008-08-25 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: shared-mime-info Status: Unknown = Fix Released -- .tar.lzma not associated with file-roller https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220320 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for shared-mime-info. --

[Bug 220320] Re: .tar.lzma not associated with file-roller

2008-08-25 Thread Michael Terry
I'm attaching an SRU minimal debdiff against hardy. This is a safe patch, applied upstream. This bug is annoying for users because they can right click a file/folder in Nautilus, create an archive of it, and not be able to open the archive because the system doesn't know the mime type of the

[Bug 220320] Re: .tar.lzma not associated with file-roller

2008-08-11 Thread Sebastien Bacher
the issue is fixed in intrepid now ** Changed in: shared-mime-info (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: file-roller = shared-mime-info Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- .tar.lzma not associated with file-roller

[Bug 220320] Re: .tar.lzma not associated with file-roller

2008-06-18 Thread Alec Faithfull
The problem seems to be that the MIME types application/x-lzma and application/x-lzma-compressed-tar aren't actually in the shared MIME database; copying the attached file into /usr/local/share/mime/packages and running sudo update-mime-database /usr/local/share/mime adds them, so the archives can

[Bug 220320] Re: .tar.lzma not associated with file-roller

2008-05-04 Thread Andrés Rassol
I also confirm this bug. -- .tar.lzma not associated with file-roller https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220320 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 220320] Re: .tar.lzma not associated with file-roller

2008-04-22 Thread Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
I can confirm this with version 2.22.2-0ubuntu1 on Hardy. debian/file-roller.mime contains these lines, so it's atleast trying to register the MIME type: application/x-lzma; /usr/bin/file-roller '%s'; test=test -n $DISPLAY -a -e /usr/bin/lzma ; priority=5 application/x-lzma-compressed-tar;