[Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2010-09-15 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: gstreamer Importance: Unknown = Wishlist -- rhythmbox is slow! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/73744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2009-06-24 Thread ikus060
I've do some research today about this problem as I find it really annoying. On my side the problem wasn't solved in Jaunty. Rythmbox or Tomet was using 17% of the CPU. My research lead my to alsa. It's seams to be an issue of the sample rate withing the dmix of default alsa device use by

[Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2009-01-20 Thread Sebastien Bacher
the new version is in jaunty now ** Changed in: gstreamer0.10 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- rhythmbox is slow! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/73744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. --

[Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2008-12-01 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
this has been fixed upstream now, thanks for reporting. ** Changed in: gstreamer0.10 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Committed -- rhythmbox is slow! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/73744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug

[Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2008-11-27 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: gstreamer Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- rhythmbox is slow! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/73744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2008-11-16 Thread mlalkaka
I still experience this on Intrepid Ibex. -- rhythmbox is slow! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/73744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2008-10-14 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Changed in: gstreamer0.10 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Triaged -- rhythmbox is slow! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/73744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2008-09-09 Thread davmor2
This no-longer seem to effect me so much has anyone else noticed a marked improvement? -- rhythmbox is slow! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/73744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2008-08-26 Thread cmcginty
yes, I still experience this issue especially when using the music applet. -- rhythmbox is slow! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/73744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list

Re: [Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2008-08-26 Thread Steinar Bang
I still experience this issue on a current Hardy system (all updates accepted since it was originally installed), on an Intel Pentium M laptop (Dell Latitude D610). When the CPU usage reaches a certain threshold, the CPU usage of rhythmbox and pulsaudio increases to take up the rest of the

[Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2008-08-11 Thread davmor2
This has been improved incrementally. I no longer have such an issue with Rhythmbox. How about the others on this bug. -- rhythmbox is slow! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/73744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. --

[Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2008-05-10 Thread mind
same problem here too on a 1,6 ghz duo 2 core with 2 gig ram. eats away between 20-50 % constant. No problems with gutsy, only since I updated to Hardy. -- rhythmbox is slow! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/73744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop

[Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2008-04-29 Thread Steinar Bang
I have the same experience as Lionel Dricot: RM takes from 10-30% CPU, sound is choppy, and pulseaudio takes around 10-15%CPU. This happens when playing podcast MP3s on Hardy, but did not happen on Gutsy on the same hardware (Dell Latitude D610 laptop, with an Intel Pentium M processor). --

Re: [Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2008-04-29 Thread Steinar Bang
Steinar Bang [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have the same experience as Lionel Dricot: RM takes from 10-30% CPU, sound is choppy, and pulseaudio takes around 10-15%CPU. This happens when playing podcast MP3s on Hardy, but did not happen on Gutsy on the same hardware (Dell Latitude D610 laptop, with

[Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2008-03-13 Thread Lionel Dricot
I didn't had any problem with RB under Gutsy but since I upgraded to Hardy, RB takes all the time between 10 and 20% of the CPU ! (I don't use the crossfade plugin). When my computer does something else, the sound is sometimes garbled by lack of CPU time. This never happened in Gutsy ! --

[Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2007-01-03 Thread LGB [Gábor Lénárt]
May not be related, but recently I'm expericencing glitches while hearing music with rbox: no sound for a fraction of second at about every 20 seconds. Local mp3 playing, no CPU load at all ... -- rhythmbox is slow! https://launchpad.net/bugs/73744 -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2006-12-12 Thread Sebastian Dröge
Ok, forwarded upstream with some more times... ** Changed in: gstreamer0.10 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist Status: Needs Info = Confirmed ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #385061 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385061 ** Also affects: gstreamer (upstream)

[Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2006-12-12 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: gstreamer (upstream) Status: Unknown = Confirmed -- rhythmbox is slow! https://launchpad.net/bugs/73744 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2006-12-11 Thread LGB [Gábor Lénárt]
Sure, MPlayer (using also alsa autio output) playing from the same streaming source: real3m9.331s user0m0.444s sys 0m0.132s During playback CPU usage is constant 0%, TIME reported by top just before interrupting playback to get the result was 0.53sec (so about half a sec). --

[Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2006-12-11 Thread Sebastian Dröge
Ok... sounds better ;) What about gst-launch-0.10 playbin uri=file:///path/to/file? -- rhythmbox is slow! https://launchpad.net/bugs/73744 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2006-12-11 Thread LGB [Gábor Lénárt]
As I've already written, it does not make too much difference if I play a streaming URL or a local mp3 file ... Here is the result of gst-launch-0.10 playbin uri=file://... playing an mp3 for local harddisk (it's a 128kbit mp3 stream): real3m0.855s user0m12.177s sys 0m1.372s It's

[Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2006-12-08 Thread LGB [Gábor Lénárt]
OK, I've just tried this: time gst-launch-0.10 playbin uri=http://205.188.215.225:8006 real3m53.003s user0m15.509s sys 0m1.484s If you even ignore system time, user/real*100.0 gives about 6%. Also, I've checked TIME field just before exiting from playing (CTRL-C), it's the same

[Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2006-12-08 Thread LGB [Gábor Lénárt]
Also, I've checked TIME field just before exiting from playing (CTRL-C), it's the same time that 'user' field reported by 'time'. I mean TIME field of command top :) -- rhythmbox is slow! https://launchpad.net/bugs/73744 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2006-12-07 Thread LGB [Gábor Lénárt]
Yes, its version is 0.10.2.debian-1 -- rhythmbox is slow! https://launchpad.net/bugs/73744 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2006-12-07 Thread LGB [Gábor Lénárt]
full list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ dpkg-query -W gstreamer0.10* gstreamer0.10-alsa 0.10.10-1ubuntu1 gstreamer0.10-audiosink gstreamer0.10-colorspace gstreamer0.10-doc 0.10.10-1ubuntu2 gstreamer0.10-esd 0.10.4-0ubuntu3 gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg0.10.1-2ubuntu1 gstreamer0.10-fluendo-mp3

[Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2006-12-07 Thread LGB [Gábor Lénárt]
Ok, I've just removed gstreamer0.10-fluendo-mp3 and gstreamer0.10 -fluendo-mpegdemux just for testing. Playing mp3 and/or a shutcast stream seems to require about half amount of CPU than before removing those packages, however I think ithis CPU usage (about 6-8%) remains too high (on a 1.7GHz P4

[Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2006-12-07 Thread Sebastian Dröge
Definitely too much... but how do you measure the cpu usage btw? -- rhythmbox is slow! https://launchpad.net/bugs/73744 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2006-12-07 Thread LGB [Gábor Lénárt]
Reported by 'top'. Ok, I know it's not the best method. I've got some complex math software, I tried to run with niced to +10 or such (to avoid r.box to glitch by lacking enough cpu time slice), and discovers that time needed to compute somehing grows while running r.box as well compared to the

[Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2006-12-07 Thread Sebastian Dröge
Well, top only reports cpu usage in the exact moment of measurement or at least something very similar to this... i.e. you could even get 100% cpu usage by a app that is sleeping most of the time. A better way would be something like gkrellm's cpu usage graph or just the cpu time of the progress

[Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2006-12-06 Thread Sebastian Dröge
You need ugly for mp3 playback anyway. Do you have gstreamer0.10-fluendo-mp3 installed? -- rhythmbox is slow! https://launchpad.net/bugs/73744 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2006-12-06 Thread Sebastian Dröge
** Changed in: gstreamer0.10 (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed = Needs Info -- rhythmbox is slow! https://launchpad.net/bugs/73744 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2006-11-29 Thread davmor2
Mine isn't moving off 0% amd64bit. Running rhythmbox and playing virgin radio feed. -- rhythmbox is slow! https://launchpad.net/bugs/73744 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2006-11-29 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Thank you for your bug. Does totem do the same? What about playing with gst-launch-0.10 playbin uri=.? Do you use esd or alsa? What process is using the CPU according to top? ** Changed in: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Desktop Bugs Status: Unconfirmed = Needs

[Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2006-11-29 Thread LGB [Gábor Lénárt]
According to 'top', it's rhythmbox itself. If I try using gst-launch, it uses (I mean process 'gst-launch-0.10') around 10-20% CPU, again. So maybe it's not rhythmbox related, but gstreamer? I've just checked out svn repository of beep-media-player-2 uses gstreamer as well: it uses about the same

[Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2006-11-29 Thread Sebastien Bacher
reassigning to gstreamer0.10 then ** Changed in: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: rhythmbox = gstreamer0.10 Status: Needs Info = Unconfirmed -- rhythmbox is slow! https://launchpad.net/bugs/73744 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 73744] Re: rhythmbox is slow!

2006-11-29 Thread LGB [Gábor Lénárt]
Just tried on an AMD64 box (2GHz CPU), the same, somewhat smaller CPU usage, but 10% is far more than it should be , I think (and it's now only a 128kbit/s mp3 file). Since both the i386 - I've reported the bug from - and this machine is installed by me, I'm thinking about if it's my fault ...