[Bug 235876] [NEW] The calculator is not located on the screen

2008-05-29 Thread Leo
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gcalctool If to choose the expanded, financial or scientific kind the calculator is not located on the screen. Very wide buttons. It is impossible to change the size of a window on width. 1) Ubuntu 8.04 2) gcalctool 5.22.2-0ubuntu1 3) If to choose the

[Bug 235876] Re: The calculator is not located on the screen

2008-05-29 Thread Leo
** Attachment added: On a screenshot it is visible that the right part of the program is not entered in the screen. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14804026/Screenshot.png ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14804027/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added:

[Bug 235876] Re: The calculator is not located on the screen

2008-05-30 Thread Leo
The program at start from the menu opens with the big buttons. At change of kind of the calculator it simply is not removed on the screen. The calculator looks equally with included and with switched off compiz. locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8 LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=ru_RU.UTF-8

[Bug 285817] [NEW] Crashes by playing video from folder Examples on Live-CD

2008-10-19 Thread Leo
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: totem I run from a Daily Live-CD at 18.10.2008. On-default has Compiz. At playing of video from a folder Examples totem crashes. When Comiz is disable - totem playing video correctly. Live-CD amd64. Video card ATI Mobility Radeon X1600. Locale - RU.

[Bug 303025] Re: file-roller cannot create 7z and zip archive of big directory

2009-04-15 Thread Leo
I have this bug too. I have installed a package p7zip-full. After that at creation of archive by right click file-roller gives out the message Во время добавления файлов в архив произошла ошибка. After deinstalling p7zip-full creating archive by right click works correct. I try to compress

[Bug 216497] Re: gnome-screensaver-gl-helper crashed with SIGSEGV

2009-03-05 Thread Leo
My crash is with ATI HD2600 Pro AGP -- gnome-screensaver-gl-helper crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216497 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 44082] Re: GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations

2009-06-16 Thread Leo
this bug should be a papercut -- GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. --

[Bug 664206] Re: SSH_AUTH_SOCK not being properly set: user has to type password even if saved in the password manager

2010-10-26 Thread Leo
** Also affects: lxdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: gnome-keyring (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- SSH_AUTH_SOCK not being properly set: user has to type password even if saved in the password manager

[Bug 664206] Re: SSH_AUTH_SOCK not being properly set: user has to type password even if saved in the password manager

2010-11-02 Thread Leo
** Also affects: gdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- SSH_AUTH_SOCK not being properly set: user has to type password even if saved in the password manager https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/664206 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop

[Bug 664206] Re: SSH_AUTH_SOCK not being properly set: user has to type password even if saved in the password manager

2011-03-30 Thread Leo
Hi Julien, I'm not using lxdm, just lxde (Lubuntu Desktop actually). I have no idea where the problem is and what the expected behavior should be (the proxy sock being different?)... Do you know what packages from Natty it suffices to download and confirm it to be working? It is really blocking

[Bug 664206]

2011-03-30 Thread Leo
Sorry, I forgot to say I am using Maverick. Downloading the gnome- keyring .deb in Natty is enough? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-keyring in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/664206 Title:

Re: [Bug 664206] Re: SSH_AUTH_SOCK not being properly set: user has to type password even if saved in the password manager

2011-04-03 Thread Leo
I installed the package and all dependencies but the problem persists. Is there a way to backport it? Thanks! -- Leonardo Rolla www.impa.br/~leorolla http://www.impa.br/%7Eleorolla -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 529338] Re: [regression-release] Keyring not unlocked on login anymore in Lucid

2010-06-22 Thread Leo
With normal login as well. Now it seems that changing the login password through the Users and Gruops GUI is not changing the keyring's password accordingly. -- [regression-release] Keyring not unlocked on login anymore in Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529338 You received this bug

[Bug 553733] Re: Removing evolution should remove evolution-common

2010-07-07 Thread Leo
Hi Jonathan, The software responsible for the removal of other packages is APT, not evolution. If it is not being removed that's because either another package still recomends/depends on it or because it comes flagged as manually installed in the standard Ubuntu CD. In neither case the problem

[Bug 529338] Re: [regression-release] Keyring not unlocked on login anymore in Lucid

2010-07-07 Thread Leo
As far as I can remember, when I had this issue I was using ext4, and no dual boot. Also, as far as I can remember, I got rid of this issue by creating a new user account. It could be related to the files inside the user's home folder. It's just a guess, but worth trying: Those who still

[Bug 692791] Re: Lots of Evolution packages are left behind after uninstallation

2010-12-21 Thread Leo
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692791 Title: Lots of Evolution packages are left behind after

Re: [Bug 23810] Re: Evolution is unusable in 1024x768

2010-12-28 Thread Leo
This is low priority from the point of view of Ububtu, which distributes Linux+GNU+a bunch o free software all together. I understand it has low priority as it is not affecting other applications nor blocking the use of the computer. I agree it should be very very high priority for those who

[Bug 771977] Re: Inconsistent user experience, most printing settings are kept but Fit to Printable Area is forgotten

2011-04-27 Thread Leo
** Description changed: Binary package hint: evince File - Print... There are General, Page Setup, Page Handling, Job, Image Quality Every single option is remembered next time, except Page Handling - Page Scaling. - This not only confuses the user with an incinsistent

[Bug 771977] [NEW] Inconsistent user experience, most printing settings are kept but Fit to Printable Area is forgotten

2011-04-27 Thread Leo
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evince File - Print... There are General, Page Setup, Page Handling, Job, Image Quality Every single option is remembered next time, except Page Handling - Page Scaling. This not only confuses the user with an inconsistent behavior and bad Gnome

[Bug 571649] Re: Not action taken at battery critical level, resulting massive data loss and hardware damage

2011-05-04 Thread Leo
Hi Brad, I can confirm that it now works fine with this computer. I'm using an updated 10.10. Either a fix was released or the symptom has been shut by some other change. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 665466] Re: GDM does not sort users by login frequency

2011-05-10 Thread Leo
It also happens to me. I also have Lubuntu-desktop installed Maybe another DE is causing this? You people have another DE installed? ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is

[Bug 510917] Re: gnome-power-manager does not engage after auto log on

2010-08-11 Thread Leo
This is still a problem in 10.04 -- gnome-power-manager does not engage after auto log on https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510917 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing

[Bug 486508] Re: feature request: esc key to close chat windows

2010-08-12 Thread Leo
This is not what Gnome wants: Someone up there decided that Esc means cancel, not close window, and furthermore, that chat windows cannot have the concept of cancel associated to them (in contrast, Save file as... windows can be canceled via Esc key resulting in the window being *closed*). I

[Bug 414107] Re: Palimpsest GUI impossible to use on small screen

2010-08-17 Thread Leo
Could any of you gentle guys deploy a ppa with this palimpsest plus this patch? That would be just so nice! ** Description changed: gnome-disk-utility does not fit netbook screen. the window height is much more than 576px which basically make the app unusable on a netbook screen. The

[Bug 414107] Re: Palimpsest GUI impossible to use on small screen

2010-08-18 Thread Leo
Is there an automated way of producing a .deb out of your branch? -- Palimpsest GUI impossible to use on small screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414107 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-disk-utility in ubuntu.

[Bug 414107] Palimpsest GUI impossible to use on small screen

2010-08-18 Thread Leo
However, this will generate a deb than can be used ONLY in maverick. Why? It has dependencies on package versions more recent than those of Lucid? I am now trying to get this into Lucid through an SRU. If an SRU is not possible, please at least a -backports, or -proposed, or otherwise a ppa.

[Bug 414107] Re: Palimpsest GUI impossible to use on small screen

2010-08-20 Thread Leo
** Attachment added: screenshot of luks-encrypted filesystem https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-disk-utility/+bug/414107/+attachment/1503217/+files/Screenshot.png -- Palimpsest GUI impossible to use on small screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414107 You received this bug

[Bug 414107] Re: Palimpsest GUI impossible to use on small screen

2010-08-20 Thread Leo
Wow, now at least I can use it. That changes my life. Thanks!!! Still there is something that could easily be improved: When I select a filesystem mounted on the top of a luks-mapped device, since the device name is like 10 times bigger than /dev/sdc2, it makes the second column far too wide.

Re: [Bug 23810] Re: Evolution is unusable in 800x600

2010-08-28 Thread Leo
On y eeepc 900 with 1024x600 evolution is my favourite and only email reader. It is certainly not unusable. This bug is about 800x600, though I also find it pretty unusable in bigger screens. -- Evolution is unusable in 800x600 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/23810 You received this bug

[Bug 390040] Re: gvfs mounts with 0700 permissions

2010-08-31 Thread Leo
It is hard-coded. That's bad. Stripping whatever is hard-coded and reading it to a text file would be great. How did Nautilus decide the mount options for a FAT or NTFS hot-plugged disk? Where is it written? If it's still some .c file then it should definitely be fixed. I myself really do hate

[Bug 578822] [NEW] [regression-release] Misleading options when handling pendrives + cannot umount anymore.

2010-05-11 Thread Leo
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus When the user right-clicks on a pendrive at the Desktop, they are given two options: Eject Safely Remove It is not at all clear to the newbie what these are doing and why they would be different at all. Besides, for the experienced user, the

[Bug 578822] Re: [regression-release] Misleading options when handling pendrives + cannot umount anymore.

2010-05-11 Thread Leo
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48275867/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: usr_lib_nautilus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48275868/usr_lib_nautilus.txt ** Tags added: regression-release -- [regression-release] Misleading options when handling

[Bug 578822] Re: [regression-release] Misleading options when handling pendrives + cannot umount anymore.

2010-05-17 Thread Leo
** Description changed: Binary package hint: nautilus When the user right-clicks on a pendrive at the Desktop, they are given two options: Eject Safely Remove It is not at all clear to the newbie what these are doing and why they would be different at all. Besides, for the

[Bug 575302] Re: bad behavior when deleting files from encrypted 7-Zip archive

2010-05-17 Thread Leo
** Also affects: file-roller Importance: Undecided Status: New -- bad behavior when deleting files from encrypted 7-Zip archive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575302 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller

[Bug 557345] Re: .7z compression with encryption gives error

2010-05-17 Thread Leo
** Also affects: file-roller Importance: Undecided Status: New -- .7z compression with encryption gives error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557345 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in ubuntu. --

[Bug 377504] Re: file-roller password-protecting UI confusing

2010-05-17 Thread Leo
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #618906 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=618906 ** Changed in: file-roller Importance: Undecided = Unknown ** Changed in: file-roller Status: New = Unknown ** Changed in: file-roller Remote watch: None = GNOME Bug Tracker #618906 --

[Bug 529338] Re: Keyring not unlocked on login anymore in Lucid

2010-05-17 Thread Leo
** Tags added: regression-release ** Summary changed: - Keyring not unlocked on login anymore in Lucid + [regression-release] Keyring not unlocked on login anymore in Lucid -- [regression-release] Keyring not unlocked on login anymore in Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529338 You

[Bug 557345] Re: .7z compression with encryption gives error

2010-05-17 Thread Leo
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #618908 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=618908 ** Changed in: file-roller Importance: Undecided = Unknown ** Changed in: file-roller Status: New = Unknown ** Changed in: file-roller Remote watch: None = GNOME Bug Tracker #618908 --

[Bug 575302] Re: bad behavior when deleting files from encrypted 7-Zip archive

2010-05-17 Thread Leo
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #618909 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=618909 ** Changed in: file-roller Importance: Undecided = Unknown ** Changed in: file-roller Status: New = Unknown ** Changed in: file-roller Remote watch: None = GNOME Bug Tracker #618909 --

[Bug 45100] Re: Icons for .java .class Files

2010-05-20 Thread Leo
Why is it invalid for sun-java and other java packages? I know many packages who change mime icons when installed. And about the answer upstream, well fortunately we live in the FLOSS world and Ubuntu is not forced to be restricted by such Gnome idiosyncrasies. -- Icons for .java .class

[Bug 585070] [NEW] Evolution icon remains after program is uninstalled

2010-05-24 Thread Leo
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution I have uninstalled Evolution but still there was an icon left at the Office menu. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: evolution (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.33-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux

[Bug 585074] [NEW] Artificial dependendy forcing user's choices

2010-05-24 Thread Leo
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel From the terminal: $ sudo aptitude why evolution-data-server-common i libedataserverui1.2-8 Depends evolution-data-server-common (= 2.27.0) $ sudo aptitude why libedataserverui1.2-8 i gnome-panel Depends libedataserverui1.2-8 (=

[Bug 585074] Re: Artificial dependendy forcing user's choices

2010-05-24 Thread Leo
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49033225/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: GConfNonDefault.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49033226/GConfNonDefault.txt -- Artificial dependendy forcing user's choices https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585074 You

[Bug 585074] Re: Artificial dependendy forcing user's choices

2010-05-24 Thread Leo
** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New ** Attachment added: screenshot http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49034914/Screenshot-1.png -- Artificial dependendy forcing user's choices https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585074 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 585074] Re: Artificial dependendy forcing user's choices

2010-05-24 Thread Leo
Unless I misunderstood something, the only calendar in the attached screenshot is provided by the clock applet. I understand that gnome-panel recommends, suggests or strongly advises the use of evolution applets, but that it *depends* on it, so much that it cannot even be installed and run

[Bug 45100] Re: Icons for .java .class Files

2010-05-24 Thread Leo
It still shows the archive icon instead of java icon for the .jar files. ** Changed in: humanity-icon-theme (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- Icons for .java .class Files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/45100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 585070] Re: Evolution icon remains after program is uninstalled

2010-05-24 Thread Leo
Thank you for clearing. I will keep searching for the original bug and then mark this one duplicate. ** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Confirmed -- Evolution icon remains after program is uninstalled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585070 You received this bug

[Bug 585070] Re: Evolution icon remains after program is uninstalled

2010-05-25 Thread Leo
Hi Sebastien, Thank you for explaining that the icon is from evolution-common, who does not provide the binaries for opening the menu entry and therefore leaves the icon malfuctioning. I did all the efforts to find the duplicate about this behavior and I couldn't. Since it is not invalid, we can

[Bug 585070] Re: Evolution icon remains after program is uninstalled

2010-05-25 Thread Leo
We can stop creating noise in the bug mailing list by properly marking the bug as duplicate of another bug with the same root cause. I don't see why it is a duplicate. I saw Bug #30692 which questions why Evolution should have 2 different icons in 2 different menus, and the issue was assigned to

[Bug 585070] Re: Evolution icon remains after program is uninstalled

2010-05-25 Thread Leo
I see... Being invalid prevents mail from being sent over. I am a user who volunteers in reporting Ubuntu misbehavior, from papercuts like broken icons to critical bugs. It seem that https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage/ actually has less value than unwritten rules, like a maintainer

[Bug 585070] Re: Evolution icon remains after program is uninstalled

2010-05-25 Thread Leo
Invalid: * This status should be used when the bug report does not contain adequate information to determine whether or not it is a bug even if it is resolved for the reporter * This should also be used if the reported problem is not a bug at all, but for example user error * It

[Bug 585070] Re: Evolution icon remains after program is uninstalled

2010-05-25 Thread Leo
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 118898 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118898 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 118898 Desktop pulldown Applications/Office has reference to Evolution after I removed Evolution -- Evolution icon remains after program is uninstalled

[Bug 585070] Re: Evolution icon remains after program is uninstalled

2010-05-25 Thread Leo
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 118898 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118898 Thanks for effectively answering to the bug report. (Together with extra off-topic information, and not-so-polite, but I don't mind at all. It's Ubuntu that asks you to be polite, I just ask you not to

[Bug 118898] Re: Desktop pulldown Applications/Office has reference to Evolution after I removed Evolution

2010-05-25 Thread Leo
The 3rd anniversary of this bug is coming. ** Description changed: + + Package evolution-common creates an entry on Applications/Office menu + but does not provide the binaries the menu entry points to. + + This is obliquely related to wishlist item 30692 The second occurrence of

[Bug 553733] Re: Removing evolution should remove evolution-common

2010-05-25 Thread Leo
I removed Evolution since the problem is not on evolution-common but on the package that recommends or depends on it. ** Package changed: evolution (Ubuntu) = ubuntu ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New = Confirmed -- Removing evolution should remove evolution-common

[Bug 45100] Re: Icons for .java .class Files

2010-06-01 Thread Leo
** Description changed: Something should provide icons and whatever MIME magic is necessary so - that .jar and .class files are clearly identified as Java files in, for + that .java and .class files are clearly identified as Java files in, for example, nautilus. -- Icons for .java .class

[Bug 588250] Re: Icon View exposes wrong accessibility information

2010-06-01 Thread Leo
** Package changed: nautilus (Ubuntu) = accerciser (Ubuntu) -- Icon View exposes wrong accessibility information https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588250 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs

[Bug 587689] Re: No window decoration if Visual Effects = None

2010-06-01 Thread Leo
Hi Pedro, I understand that not having borders to move the windows around, maximize, minimize, etc., is not a security vulnerability or anything that risks important data loss etc... but still it gives users the impression that Ubuntu is unusable. -- No window decoration if Visual Effects =

[Bug 572617] Re: [regression-release] Compiz fails to decorate windows after upgrade

2010-06-01 Thread Leo
** Changed in: gnome-session (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- [regression-release] Compiz fails to decorate windows after upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572617 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 572617] Re: [regression-release] Compiz fails to decorate windows after upgrade

2010-06-02 Thread Leo
For me, the same. This seems to be not at all a compiz bug, but a gnome-session one... So, not only upgrading between two consecutive releases may give a lot of headache, but also sharing the home directory between consecutive releases. ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed =

[Bug 587689] Re: No window decoration if Visual Effects = None

2010-06-02 Thread Leo
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 467668 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/467668 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 572617 [regression-release] Session manager lacks backward compatibility, making the desktop session unusable ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug

[Bug 572617] Re: [regression-release] Session manager lacks backward compatibility, making the desktop session unusable

2010-06-02 Thread Leo
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 467668 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/467668 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 467668 Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start -- [regression-release] Session manager lacks backward compatibility, making the desktop

[Bug 581245] Re: critical battery state action destroys netbook remix on lucid

2010-06-02 Thread Leo
Of course. When and if you want. For information: you can switch user without terminating you session. And unlike MS-Windows, it really works. I will mark this report Invalid as it seems that the logs have been lost and it will be a pain to try and understand exactly what happened (and probably

[Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start

2010-06-02 Thread Leo
@Tony Good. I think it's exactly what Travis is asking for. Can you zip and attach it? @Michał Sorry, I pointed all the other bugs to duplicate this one and now it seems that maybe the problem you observed with Karmic and the problem we observe with Lucid have different roots. Could you try mv

[Bug 588151] Re: Compiz settings gets reset with every restart

2010-06-03 Thread Leo
Thank you for reporting this bug. Since when do you use Lucid? What did you use before? Is this a single personal computer where you installed Lucid yourself or do you have some fancy network settings? Did you just format your HD and install Ubuntu or did you already have another linux distro

[Bug 571649] Re: Not action taken at battery critical level, resulting massive data loss and hardware damage

2010-06-03 Thread Leo
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Not action taken at battery critical level, resulting massive data loss and hardware damage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571649 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs,

[Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start

2010-06-03 Thread Leo
Don't worry :-) Let's refine the search? You can set back some of the folders to see which ones are causing the problem. (For example, ***I am assuming you didn't do anything with the backup folder*** to be sure that the problem is in { .config , .compiz } rsync -a ~/backup/

[Bug 571649] Re: Not action taken at battery critical level, resulting massive data loss and hardware damage

2010-06-03 Thread Leo
Three days ago (May 31st, evening) I left it unattended and it went of battery. According to a friend, it looked like Ubuntu was properly shutting it down. From the syslog and the attached files, is it possible to determine if it was indeed the case? ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status:

[Bug 571649] Re: Not action taken at battery critical level, resulting massive data loss and hardware damage

2010-06-03 Thread Leo
** Attachment added: Syslog of the evening May 31st, when I am not sure whether a proper action was taken at low battery. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49624706/syslog.2 ** Description changed: Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager I had noticed several times that there is no

[Bug 571649] BootDmesg.txt

2010-06-03 Thread Leo
apport information ** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49625097/BootDmesg.txt -- Not action taken at battery critical level, resulting massive data loss and hardware damage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571649 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 571649] Card0.Amixer.values.txt

2010-06-03 Thread Leo
apport information ** Attachment added: Card0.Amixer.values.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49625102/Card0.Amixer.values.txt -- Not action taken at battery critical level, resulting massive data loss and hardware damage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571649 You received this bug

[Bug 571649] Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt

2010-06-03 Thread Leo
apport information ** Attachment added: Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49625107/Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt -- Not action taken at battery critical level, resulting massive data loss and hardware damage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571649 You received this bug

[Bug 571649] CurrentDmesg.txt

2010-06-03 Thread Leo
apport information ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49625109/CurrentDmesg.txt -- Not action taken at battery critical level, resulting massive data loss and hardware damage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571649 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 571649] Dependencies.txt

2010-06-03 Thread Leo
apport information ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49625115/Dependencies.txt -- Not action taken at battery critical level, resulting massive data loss and hardware damage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571649 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 571649] DevkitPower.txt

2010-06-03 Thread Leo
apport information ** Attachment added: DevkitPower.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49625121/DevkitPower.txt -- Not action taken at battery critical level, resulting massive data loss and hardware damage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571649 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 571649] GConfNonDefault.txt

2010-06-03 Thread Leo
apport information ** Attachment added: GConfNonDefault.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49625122/GConfNonDefault.txt -- Not action taken at battery critical level, resulting massive data loss and hardware damage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571649 You received this bug notification

[Bug 571649] IwConfig.txt

2010-06-03 Thread Leo
apport information ** Attachment added: IwConfig.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49625127/IwConfig.txt -- Not action taken at battery critical level, resulting massive data loss and hardware damage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571649 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 571649] Lspci.txt

2010-06-03 Thread Leo
apport information ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49625128/Lspci.txt -- Not action taken at battery critical level, resulting massive data loss and hardware damage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571649 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 571649] Lsusb.txt

2010-06-03 Thread Leo
apport information ** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49625134/Lsusb.txt -- Not action taken at battery critical level, resulting massive data loss and hardware damage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571649 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 571649] PciMultimedia.txt

2010-06-03 Thread Leo
apport information ** Attachment added: PciMultimedia.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49625135/PciMultimedia.txt -- Not action taken at battery critical level, resulting massive data loss and hardware damage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571649 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 571649] ProcCpuinfo.txt

2010-06-03 Thread Leo
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49625140/ProcCpuinfo.txt -- Not action taken at battery critical level, resulting massive data loss and hardware damage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571649 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 571649] ProcInterrupts.txt

2010-06-03 Thread Leo
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49625145/ProcInterrupts.txt -- Not action taken at battery critical level, resulting massive data loss and hardware damage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571649 You received this bug notification

[Bug 571649] ProcModules.txt

2010-06-03 Thread Leo
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49625146/ProcModules.txt -- Not action taken at battery critical level, resulting massive data loss and hardware damage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571649 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 571649] UdevDb.txt

2010-06-03 Thread Leo
apport information ** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49625223/UdevDb.txt -- Not action taken at battery critical level, resulting massive data loss and hardware damage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571649 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 571649] UdevLog.txt

2010-06-03 Thread Leo
apport information ** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49625234/UdevLog.txt -- Not action taken at battery critical level, resulting massive data loss and hardware damage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571649 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 571649] WifiSyslog.txt

2010-06-03 Thread Leo
apport information ** Attachment added: WifiSyslog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49625239/WifiSyslog.txt -- Not action taken at battery critical level, resulting massive data loss and hardware damage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571649 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 571649] gnome-power-bugreport.txt

2010-06-03 Thread Leo
apport information ** Attachment added: gnome-power-bugreport.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49625240/gnome-power-bugreport.txt -- Not action taken at battery critical level, resulting massive data loss and hardware damage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571649 You received this bug

[Bug 23810] Re: Evolution is unusable in 800x600

2010-06-04 Thread Leo
If your screen is 1024x600, considering this bug is known upstream for 6 yeas, I would say the best workaround is to use thunderbird on this computer. -- Evolution is unusable in 800x600 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/23810 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 572617] Re: [regression-release] Session manager lacks backward compatibility, making the desktop session unusable

2010-06-05 Thread Leo
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 467668 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/467668 Hi Doug, Could you please remove all your workarounds, then run: cd ~ ; mkdir backup ; mv .config backup then reboot, see if it is fixed, and post the results at bug #467668 ? Thank you. PS: You shouldn't

Re: [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start

2010-06-05 Thread Leo
Hi Rob. This means the problem is inside .config Thanks for testing. You can restore the previous settings: cd $HOME ; mkdir backup2 ; mv .config backup2 ; mv backup/.config . ; mv .config/gnome-session backup Reboot and tell us please? -- [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor

[Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start

2010-06-06 Thread Leo
Hi Doug, Thanks for helping with the tests. It is hard to get ultimate conclusions as you have a more complex setting with awn as well. It may be related to deeper bugs in the same direction, namely lack of backward compatibility in reading user's home. Yet for most users who had enabled desktop

[Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start

2010-06-07 Thread Leo
Thanks Rob. To make sure what happened: you ran the commands from Post 34 in Bug #572617 and the problem was solved but you lost a lot of settings. Then you ran the command from Post 80 here and the problem is solved without loosing all your settings (maybe just a few about your desktop

[Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start

2010-06-07 Thread Leo
Oops... cd ~ ; cd backup ; tar -czvf gnome-session.tar.gz gnome-session -- [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/467668 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug

[Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start

2010-06-08 Thread Leo
Did you install Ubuntu updates? Has it been fixed for good after log out/in ? -- [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/467668 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a

[Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start

2010-06-09 Thread Leo
@Rob Maybe it is in gnome-session+.compiz? So you can try mv .compiz backup ; rm -rf .config/gnome-session from a terminal session, whithout any desktop session open. -- [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/467668 You

[Bug 377504] Re: file-roller password-protecting UI confusing

2010-10-05 Thread Leo
I don't agree that this have low importance. It's about sensitive data leak due to official Ubuntu software misbehavior. -- file-roller password-protecting UI confusing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377504 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs,

[Bug 550391] [NEW] Music does not play if mouse over mp3 file

2010-03-28 Thread Leo
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus Hello! It happen in Ubuntu 10.04. I move pointer above mp3 file and it does not play. Rhytmbox and movie player plays mp3 files fine. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: nautilus 1:2.29.92.1-0ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature:

[Bug 550391] Re: Music does not play if mouse over mp3 file

2010-03-28 Thread Leo
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42297030/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42297031/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42297032/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment

[Bug 136702] Re: nautilus 'replace file' dialog box could give more information

2010-03-31 Thread Leo
Hey people, please, We should stop posting It also could. This bug has a very specific scope. Something very simple, and very urgent: display file information when propmting to replace. Sophisticated solutions are proposed on other bug reports. -- nautilus 'replace file' dialog box could

[Bug 550391] Re: Music does not play if mouse over mp3 file

2010-03-31 Thread Leo
All works. There was some updates. ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- Music does not play if mouse over mp3 file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550391 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >