- gnome-session doesn't seem to work. When logging in it just hangs and
I see a zombie gnome-login-sound(?) process. Tried running gconf-editor
to turn off the sound server but that didn't help.
I also had this when rebuilding building GNOME from source. It now
works again :-)
What happened
Michael,
Thanks for your reply.
This is perhaps the biggest problem with selling and implementing
system-wide metadata for any existing system, including GNOME.
That's constructive criticism.
There are a large number of applications that have existing, more than
reasonable models and
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 5:19 PM, Anders Feder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In Sebastian's architecture, Conduit would invoke Soprano, which would
then access Evolutions database through a backend. This way, Evolution
(and other applications) doesn't have to implement a SPARQL query
parser.
Why
Iain,
Thanks for your reply.
søn, 15 06 2008 kl. 17:56 +0100, skrev Iain *:
Why does any of this (semantics) need a new GNOME 3?
Can conduit not invoke Soprano in a GNOME 2 desktop?
Certainly - I did not propose a new GNOME 3 for this purpose.
I don't understand the perceived need to
2008/6/14 Anders Feder [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I don't have a blog at Planet GNOME, but would like to comment on some
of the discussions going on these days about the future of the GNOME
product anyway, so I'm taking the liberty of making such a post here
instead. I also am no hacker -
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Emmanuele Bassi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2008-06-14 at 15:27 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 23.04.2008, 10:23 +0100 schrieb Emmanuele Bassi:
Le lundi 21 avril 2008, à 17:10 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit :
Clutter is already
On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 18:19 +0200, Anders Feder wrote:
Which are these existing applications? Can you give a few examples?
Sorry, I thought I did - Evolution, Conduit, Tomboy - in passing.
Adopting an RDF storage model in favor of a dedicated data store would
be a long-term investment with
