Re: GNOME 2.26 module inclusion discussion heats up

2009-01-13 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 12 janvier 2009 à 20:54 +0100, Lennart Poettering a écrit : Oh right, so we have to choose between supporting only PA and screw other users, or not benefit from PA at all. What a choice. Uh? You can ship both if you wish and pass the decision what to use to the user. I mean, that

Re: Brasero improvements over the 2.26 release cycle

2009-01-13 Thread Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 3:19 AM, Luis Medinas lmedi...@gnome.org wrote: [snip - nice things said about Brasero] I recently ran a poll [1] on debian-user mailing list, and the favourite disc burner was: * K3b (14 votes) * wodim/cdrecord (6 votes) * Brasero (4) * Gnomebaker (2) With this much

Re: GNOME 2.26 module inclusion discussion heats up

2009-01-13 Thread Enver ALTIN
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 18:33, Lennart Poettering mzta...@0pointer.dewrote: On Mon, 12.01.09 16:55, Josselin Mouette (j...@debian.org) wrote: Le lundi 12 janvier 2009 à 15:43 +0100, Lennart Poettering a écrit : I don't think the advent of sound cards that do this kind of switching in

Re: Brasero improvements over the 2.26 release cycle

2009-01-13 Thread Philippe Rouquier
Le lundi 12 janvier 2009 à 19:18 +, Bastien Nocera a écrit : On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 01:19 +, Luis Medinas wrote: Hi! After the previous discussion about proposing Brasero for GNOME 2.26 the Brasero has made lot's of improvements based on some feedback from the community.

Re: Brasero improvements over the 2.26 release cycle

2009-01-13 Thread Alberto Ruiz
2009/1/13 Philippe Rouquier rouquie...@wanadoo.fr: Le lundi 12 janvier 2009 à 19:18 +, Bastien Nocera a écrit : On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 01:19 +, Luis Medinas wrote: Hi! After the previous discussion about proposing Brasero for GNOME 2.26 the Brasero has made lot's of improvements