On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 18:33, Lennart Poettering <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Mon, 12.01.09 16:55, Josselin Mouette ([email protected]) wrote: > > > Le lundi 12 janvier 2009 à 15:43 +0100, Lennart Poettering a écrit : > > > I don't think the advent of sound cards that do this kind of switching > > > in software should hold as back and require us to export every single > > > crazy volume control to the user. > > > > Still, this is not a reason to break things on systems which, for one > > reason or another, can't decently work with PA. I'd prefer to see a > > transition phase during which there is support for both setups (native > > PA or whatever GStreamer exports); the old interface could be removed > > once PA supports a reasonably complete range of setups. > > Isn't the fact that we plan to include both volume controls in GNOME > transition phase enough? Those distros who like PA adopt the new one, > the ones who don't continue to use the old one. Distros who are unable > to decide have to ship both, but hey that's what you get when you > cannot decide. > > Given that some people don't want to adopt PA anytime soon (such as > the Solaris folks) I don't think we will be able to remove the old Gst > mixer any time soon either. >From what I have read, it looks like there's no way to ship "both". What I'm looking for is an "advanced" button on gnome-volume-control, so my view could be a bit biased. -- Enver
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
