Re: How to control desktop files

2010-07-09 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 08 juillet 2010 à 16:09 -0500, Brian Cameron a écrit : One crude way to resolve this problem would be to simply not install (or uninstall) packages that introduce desktop files. However, this is not an ideal solution for many reasons. It is especially a problem for Oracle because

Re: (L)GPLv3

2010-07-09 Thread Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller
I would strongly prefer glib to not change its license, we are keeping the lgplv2.1 in GStreamer, partly because a lot of people making products with GStreamer prefer it over lgplv3. If glib switched under us it would make our license stability a bit of a joke. If someone wants to use glib under

Re: desktop schemas review [was: Re: GSettings migration status]

2010-07-09 Thread Ryan Lortie
hi On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 15:15 -0400, Shaun McCance wrote: But if you provide an API with GFile, I suppose people will expect to be able to hand it all sorts of GFiles, so storing the URI would be preferable. I think this is getting ridiculous. As it stands, I made recent modifications to

Re: (L)GPLv3

2010-07-09 Thread Maciej Piechotka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On 09/07/10 16:37, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote: I would strongly prefer glib to not change its license, we are keeping the lgplv2.1 in GStreamer, partly because a lot of people making products with GStreamer prefer it over lgplv3.

Re: (L)GPLv3

2010-07-09 Thread Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 16:53 +0200, Maciej Piechotka wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On 09/07/10 16:37, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote: I would strongly prefer glib to not change its license, we are keeping the lgplv2.1 in GStreamer, partly because a lot