On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 08:08, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
[1] http://live.gnome.org/Design/Apps -- just to give an example: I feel
that a backup tool makes more sense than boxes as a core app, imho. And
the wiki says that such a tool is very likely not a core app but would
make a
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Le mercredi 30 novembre 2011, à 00:37 +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) a écrit :
Hi everyone,
As most of you know, we proposed Boxes for 3.4 and from what I can
tell, there were no big objections in the end. There was
Le mercredi 30 novembre 2011, à 10:31 +0100, William Jon McCann a écrit :
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Le mercredi 30 novembre 2011, à 00:37 +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) a écrit :
Hi everyone,
As most of you know, we proposed Boxes for 3.4
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Le mercredi 30 novembre 2011, à 10:31 +0100, William Jon McCann a écrit :
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Le mercredi 30 novembre 2011, à 00:37 +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) a écrit
Le mercredi 30 novembre 2011, à 12:33 +0100, William Jon McCann a écrit :
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Le mercredi 30 novembre 2011, à 10:31 +0100, William Jon McCann a écrit :
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org
Le mercredi 30 novembre 2011 à 12:54 +0100, Vincent Untz a écrit :
The vino/vinagre duo is/was oriented towards sysadmins (although it
could be used for other use cases).
Do you think these should not be part of the GNOME core?
I think vino should stay as a desktop service, but
2011/11/30 Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org
The only thing you mentioned in the other thread that I saw was a
feeling that it wasn't right.
I said that I didn't feel Boxes should be tracked as a feature, and that
I didn't believe it was useful to most users.
I agree with Vincent: there is a
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Luca Ferretti lferr...@gnome.org wrote:
THis feeling drives to me to the following question: what's the
audience you (William and Jackub, if I recall correctly the Boxes
design is from you) you had in mind for GNOME?
And, in suborder, why can't Boxes be
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 14:15 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote:
And, in suborder, why can't Boxes be simply a non-core, featured
application, just like GIMP or Simple Scan?
Because there's a big difference between an integrated, designed,
polished, documented and translated GNOME app and something
2011/11/30 Andrew Cowie and...@operationaldynamics.com:
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 14:15 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote:
And, in suborder, why can't Boxes be simply a non-core, featured
application, just like GIMP or Simple Scan?
Because there's a big difference between an integrated, designed,
However, I don't want too see Boxes as a solution, it's just a tool
that will allow you to use VMs and remote machines.
It could be a plus when we'll release a full GNOME OS, but when this
will occur IT professionists and tech enthusiast people will show more
interest in supported protocols
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 16:32, Andrew Cowie
and...@operationaldynamics.comwrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 14:15 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote:
And, in suborder, why can't Boxes be simply a non-core, featured
application, just like GIMP or Simple Scan?
Because there's a big difference between an
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Andrew Cowie
and...@operationaldynamics.com wrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 14:15 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote:
And, in suborder, why can't Boxes be simply a non-core, featured
application, just like GIMP or Simple Scan?
Because there's a big difference between an
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
zeesha...@gnome.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Andrew Cowie
and...@operationaldynamics.com wrote:
We're getting *ransacked* out there in discussions in LUGs around the
world (e.g. [1]) because power users are trying GNOME 3
Hi!
Regarding the rationale of Boxes as a core app, I think we definitely
need something to nicely handle insertion of an OS installer or live
media. The best thing to do in that scenerio is the creation and
launch of a VM (box) and Boxes already does that for you. Without
Boxes as part of
15 matches
Mail list logo
