Le mardi 17 avril 2012 à 22:47 +0200, Seif Lotfy a écrit :
Purpose:
Zeitgeist is an event logging framework. It stores user activity in a
structured manner and provides a powerful DBus API to query and
monitor the log. Zeitgeist as such does not have a graphical
component, but is intended to
Hi Seif,
FYI we dropped the module proposals period and replaced it by a proposal
period for systemwide features. See
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/devel-announce-list/2012-March/msg5.html
for the GNOME 3.5 call.
So the question would turn into Which (Zeitgeist-based) features could
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.frwrote:
Le mardi 17 avril 2012 à 22:47 +0200, Seif Lotfy a écrit :
Purpose:
Zeitgeist is an event logging framework. It stores user activity in a
structured manner and provides a powerful DBus API to query and
monitor
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 22:47 +0200, Seif Lotfy wrote:
snip
We already have GNOME specific developments:
* We already log everything that pushes into Gtk.RecentlyUsed.
* For better logging we have Totem, Rhythmbox, and gedit
deploying loggers as a soft-dependency in the form
Hi Andre,
Thanks for the quick reply. I have some concern though that for framework
authors, it's very hard to understand the new module proposal process.
This might be slightly off the topic... so I understand if you would put
this in another thread.
New features get planned for GNOME 3.6.
Seif Lotfy s...@lotfy.com wrote:
...
There are 3 issues in discussion or in development where Zeitgeist
integration is reaching a halt due to the uncertainty of where Zeitgeist
stands:
Epiphany (Web): There has long been discussions on how to deploy Zeitgeist
as a backend for Web. Web needed
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote:
Seif Lotfy s...@lotfy.com wrote:
...
There are 3 issues in discussion or in development where Zeitgeist
integration is reaching a halt due to the uncertainty of where Zeitgeist
stands:
Epiphany (Web): There has
I've been having a terrible time trying to get something tested on top
of Gnome 3.4, all because I can't get 3.4 built from jhbuild. I'm too
old to build from tarballs, and my distro doesn't carry 3.4 yet.
I wonder how people who hack on core Gnome do it on a day to day
basis.
Here are the
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 17:55 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
I wonder how people who hack on core Gnome do it on a day to day
basis.
A lot of the time, I do it by finding cases where a dependency on some
bleeding-edge Gnome module is *entirely* gratuitous, and just changing
configure.ac to
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Federico Mena Quintero
feder...@gnome.org wrote:
I don't want to blame jhbuild; this is a larger problem with how we have
structured the development of Gnome. I'm happy that (e.g.) Colin
Walters is working on ostree
(
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 17:55 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
I don't want to blame jhbuild; this is a larger problem with how we have
structured the development of Gnome. I'm happy that (e.g.) Colin
Walters is working on ostree
( http://git.gnome.org/browse/ostree/tree/README.md )
I'll
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 17:55 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
I've been having a terrible time trying to get something tested on top
of Gnome 3.4, all because I can't get 3.4 built from jhbuild. I'm too
old to build from tarballs, and my distro doesn't carry 3.4 yet.
I wonder how people
Let me do comment on one item from your list:
GIR is fragile
The fundamental thing introspection needs to do (and it shares this with
gtk-doc, but we tend to disable that in jhbuild) is run code from the
uninstalled tree at build time.
High level discussion is here:
So let me try to take Web use cases that could use Zeitgeist:
- The user wants to type in the location bar and have suggestions pop
out while typing.
- The user wants to blacklist some websites or all websites starting
with porn from being stored in history
- The user wants to
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Colin
The issue is not so much time as unreliability. I've tried to address
some of those with jhbuild, but there are two major ones remaining:
1) Building from unclean source tree - stale Makefiles, leftover
binaries, etc.
2) Our lack of multi-module
Hi Federico,
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 17:55 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
I wonder how people who hack on core Gnome do it on a day to day
basis.
I showed up at a documentation hackfest just over a year ago with my
laptop. The bad news was my distro of the previous five years was Ubuntu
16 matches
Mail list logo
