> not that bad? right. it's the worst case to CJK users.
>
> then you can only reply on mouth input like disabled persons.
>
> although GNOME is really good at such technologies.
>
> that's not what we want.
All of you seem to assume that breakage/regression must happen. I
don't think so.
On the ot
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Aron Xu wrote:
>> After a long discussion with Mr. Ma privately (3 hours with instant
>> messaging), here are the points he would like to make, which is not
>> acceptable by us obviously:
> Don't disclose my pri
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Aron Xu wrote:
> After a long discussion with Mr. Ma privately (3 hours with instant
> messaging), here are the points he would like to make, which is not
> acceptable by us obviously:
Don't disclose my private opinions next time.
In fact, I'm grateful for your spe
Dear list,
I would like to publicly say *SORRY* to Mr. Ma, who have proceeded
with personal attack because of my leaking his unique but secret
vision to this particular issue.
Also I hope this is the last email on this list because of such
personal issue to avoid bothering everyone once again. Pr
Hi,
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:14 AM, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
> I have to clarify something. The archive is too long for me. I haven't
> read them all.
>
After a long discussion with Mr. Ma privately (3 hours with instant
messaging), here are the points he would like to make, which is not
acceptable by
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Frederic Peters wrote:
> Tomas Frydrych wrote:
>
>> Rather a long discussion over IBus, but it seems to more or less boil
>> down to two voices and this:
>>
>> Gnome developers: we want tighter IM integration and simpler UI in the
>> name of better UX, and are loo
I have to clarify something. The archive is too long for me. I haven't
read them all.
The Unity bug I mentioned doesn't integrate IBus. AFAIK, IBus actually
works not very well on Ubuntu 12.04 with Unity. The bug just eliminate
the possibility of using another input method framework.
True integra
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 10:46 PM, Owen Taylor wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 08:43 +0100, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
>> Rather a long discussion over IBus, but it seems to more or less boil
>> down to two voices and this:
>>
>> Gnome developers: we want tighter IM integration and simpler UI in the
>> n
Tomas Frydrych wrote:
> Rather a long discussion over IBus, but it seems to more or less boil
> down to two voices and this:
>
> Gnome developers: we want tighter IM integration and simpler UI in the
> name of better UX, and are looking at IBus as the underlying technology,
>
> Users: IBus has p
True, it's capable.
but u ought to know "just can work" is far away from "work well", although
ibus developers have done a lot to make it better.
On May 13, 2012 10:46 PM, "Owen Taylor" wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 08:43 +0100, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
> > Rather a long discussion over IBus, bu
On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 08:43 +0100, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
> Rather a long discussion over IBus, but it seems to more or less boil
> down to two voices and this:
>
> Gnome developers: we want tighter IM integration and simpler UI in the
> name of better UX, and are looking at IBus as the underlying
On 13/05/12 09:43, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
Hi everyone,
Rather a long discussion over IBus, but it seems to more or less boil
down to two voices and this:
Gnome developers: we want tighter IM integration and simpler UI in the
name of better UX, and are looking at IBus as the underlying technology
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> I subscribed this list for this thread. As yet another native Chinese
> Linux user I'd say I support IBus integration.
>
to what? GNOME? or all over Linux Distros?
> When I saw Ubuntu Bug #983254, Unity's IBus "integration", I fee
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> I subscribed this list for this thread. As yet another native Chinese
> Linux user I'd say I support IBus integration.
>
> When I saw Ubuntu Bug #983254, Unity's IBus "integration", I feel that
> it was wrong and I spent some effort
Hi, all.
I subscribed this list for this thread. As yet another native Chinese
Linux user I'd say I support IBus integration.
When I saw Ubuntu Bug #983254, Unity's IBus "integration", I feel that
it was wrong and I spent some efforts to spread that bug in Chinese
use community.
https://bugs.laun
That's easy and already implemented， http://youtu.be/ENz7LTd8N5g
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Tomas Frydrych
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Rather a long discussion over IBus, but it seems to more or less boil
> > down to two
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Tomas Frydrych
wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Rather a long discussion over IBus, but it seems to more or less boil
> down to two voices and this:
>
> Gnome developers: we want tighter IM integration and simpler UI in the
> name of better UX, and are looking at IBus a
Hi everyone,
Rather a long discussion over IBus, but it seems to more or less boil
down to two voices and this:
Gnome developers: we want tighter IM integration and simpler UI in the
name of better UX, and are looking at IBus as the underlying technology,
Users: IBus has poor support for CJK in
I'm going to "fix" this email with explanations on the tech bits he
referred, in plain English.
And I can't be more plain English than Justin Wong's. so I won't
explain his email(s). as I said, someone has already started a
conversation with him.
And Liang's email just provides some facts, so no
19 matches
Mail list logo
