On Di, 2016-09-20 at 19:06 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> glibmm, [snip] gtkmm,
I generally don't do a .0 version of glib or gtkmm until the .0 version
of glib and gtk+ exists.
--
Murray Cumming
murr...@murrayc.com
www.murrayc.com
___
desktop-dev
Hi,
On Mon, 2016-09-19 at 12:03 +0200, Hanno Böck wrote:
> I recently reported a couple of bugs to GNOME-components that were
> easily discovered with a feature called Address Sanitizer (asan):
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762417 (glib)
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=
Hi,
On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 02:14 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> I couldn't and I said so. To a release team member.
Well that's all we ask, thanks. There was probably a communication
failure. :( Happens.
> We've always
> figured out how to include stuff released on the Tuesday, why can't
> we
>
Hi,
On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 02:14 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> I couldn't and I said so. To a release team member.
Well that's all we ask, thanks. There was probably a communication
failure. :( Happens.
> We've always
> figured out how to include stuff released on the Tuesday, why can't
> we
>
On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 19:06 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 00:00 +, Release Team wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > We would like to inform you about the following:
> > * GNOME 3.22.0 newstable tarballs due
> > * Hard Code Freeze ends
>
>
> Hi,
>
> The following modules
On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 00:00 +, Release Team wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We would like to inform you about the following:
> * GNOME 3.22.0 newstable tarballs due
> * Hard Code Freeze ends
Hi,
The following modules missed the Monday deadline and will be included
in GNOME 3.22.0 with an unstable ve
