On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 14:01 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 09:46 -0800, Sandy Armstrong wrote:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
The new, yet-to-release developer.gnome.org will focus on C, C++,
Python, Javascript, and Vala.
Is C
Data taken from Bugzilla (bug reports with GNOME Target field set):
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMEDbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENEDbug_status=NEEDINFOcf_gnome_target=3.0
[Compared to the last one I removed the 3.0 target for python
introspection,
On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 18:29 +0100, Gendre Sebastien wrote:
On live.gnome.org, I se two project to manage Gnome:
* Control Center: http://live.gnome.org/ControlCenter
* System Settings: http://live.gnome.org/SystemSettings
But who is the winner for Gnome 3.XX? Which will we have?
Am Sonntag, den 09.01.2011, 23:31 +0100 schrieb Vincent Untz:
We'll enter the String and UI Change Announcement Period at the end of
tomorrow.
It probably makes sense at least for the shell team and for the people
working on the default theme to tell gnome-doc-list how much of the UI
can be
Data taken from Bugzilla (bug reports with GNOME Target field set):
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMEDbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENEDbug_status=NEEDINFOcf_gnome_target=3.0
I can send this on a weekly basis if it's considered helpful.
Feedback
Hi Sergey,
Am Montag, den 03.01.2011, 21:00 + schrieb Sergey Udaltsov:
Thanks again, I really hope the release team would consider your
opinion seriously.
to clarify: What exactly do you expect from the release team?
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
Ladies and Gentlemen,
time to take a look at the basic GNOME Bugzilla activity in 2010.
Overall statistics:
2010 20092008
Open reports at the end(*): 42828 40527 37180
Opened in that year: 32232 39403 59309
Closed in that year:
Am Donnerstag, den 30.12.2010, 15:55 -0600 schrieb Brian Cameron:
Regardless of whether the
GNOME community provides any more official support after 2.32.1, distros
will continue to support their supported products.
Distros could work together in these efforts. I see no reason why such
Am Mittwoch, den 29.12.2010, 21:32 +0100 schrieb Johannes Schmid:
What happend to the stable Gtk+ 3.0 end-of-the-year-thing, btw. Or
am I considering the wrong year?
See section Release plan in
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2010-December/msg00108.html
andre
--
Am Mittwoch, den 29.12.2010, 22:18 +0100 schrieb Gendre Sebastien:
Have you any plans for the encoding profiles manager
That is gnome-audio-profiles-properties, as I found out.
and for the GNOME media converter for the Gnome 3?
Does it exist? I see it listed under Future for Gnome Media on
Forwarded Message
From: Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net
To: desktop-devel-list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
CC: GNOME Documentation gnome-doc-l...@gnome.org, Gnome Usability
usabil...@gnome.org, marketing-list marketing-l...@gnome.org,
gnome-accessibility-l...@gnome.org, GNOME i18n
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 20:06:10 -0500
Von: Jason Clinton m...@jasonclinton.com
Betreff: Re: Final GNOME 2.91/3.0 schedule
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 16:23, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
The release schedule for 2.91/3.0
is FINAL now.
The video
Am Mittwoch, den 27.10.2010, 14:06 +0200 schrieb Jan de Groot:
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 17:21 +0200, Javier Jardón wrote:
mozilla (needed by gnome-shell) can't be builded because the version
in moduleset (1.9.1.11) is no longer
available in mozilla ftp repos:
Am Mittwoch, den 27.10.2010, 12:23 -0500 schrieb Jason Clinton:
The release team gives higher priority to the two weeks for UI
changes.
GNOME Marketing team is encouraged to work with the GNOME
shell folks to
get material.
I'm not 100% clear on how
Am Sonntag, den 10.10.2010, 13:30 +0200 schrieb Andre Klapper:
Am Sonntag, den 26.09.2010, 18:39 -0500 schrieb Jason Clinton:
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 16:10, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
A first draft for the GNOME 2.91/3.0 schedule is now available
Am Montag, den 04.10.2010, 13:10 +0200 schrieb Steve Frécinaux:
I'd like to propose libpeas as part of the desktop release set
Module proposal period has ended[1] and module inclusion discussion
should heat up now.
On November 8th, Module Freeze takes place: New modules and
functionality for
Am Montag, den 04.10.2010, 12:50 +0100 schrieb Emmanuele Bassi:
I'm proposing Clutter core as part of the desktop platform
Module proposal period has ended[1] and module inclusion discussion
should heat up now.
On November 8th, Module Freeze takes place: New modules and
functionality for GNOME
Am Donnerstag, den 21.10.2010, 15:02 +1100 schrieb Robert Ancell:
I'm proposing LightDM [1] as a replacement for GDM.
Module proposal period has ended[1] and module inclusion discussion
should heat up now.
On November 8th, Module Freeze takes place: New modules and
functionality for GNOME 2.91
[Please strip the CC list in case of category specific answers!]
Hi,
some might remember Google's GHOP contest in 2007/08.
This year it will take place under the name Google Code-In (GCI) from
November 2010 to January 2011.
GCI is a small sibling of Google Summer of Code for highschool
students
Just a reminder / heads-up in case you (=module maintainer) think about
proposing your module for inclusion in GNOME.
For more info see
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/devel-announce-list/2010-September/msg4.html
Schedule is available on http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointNinetyone (only
issue
Am Sonntag, den 17.10.2010, 23:56 +0200 schrieb Mark:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_keyboard_shortcuts
It would be nice to get that list complete and accurate for _default_
GNOME shortcuts.
http://library.gnome.org/users/user-guide/stable/keyboard-skills.html.en
andre
--
Am Dienstag, den 12.10.2010, 18:03 +0200 schrieb Johannes Schmid:
However, I am mixed about the development tools moduleset. Basically we
need a lot of improvements in that area and probably it is far more
useful to have a central point to start (like a revived
developer.gnome.org) that
Am Freitag, den 08.10.2010, 09:13 +0200 schrieb Johannes Schmid:
So reminder: We need to fix that BEFORE making any moduleset reorganisation!
That would require input from translators. FYI I posted
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-i18n/2010-October/msg00038.html
(once it gets delivered).
Am Sonntag, den 26.09.2010, 18:39 -0500 schrieb Jason Clinton:
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 16:10, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
A first draft for the GNOME 2.91/3.0 schedule is now available
at
http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointNinetyone .
Can we make the UI
Am Dienstag, den 05.10.2010, 10:55 -0700 schrieb Sandy Armstrong:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Matthias Clasen
matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
Stuff thats not updated from 2.32:
...
tomboy:1.5.0
I'm not sure I understand. Tomboy 1.5.0 is our new development
release corresponding
Am Donnerstag, den 30.09.2010, 15:00 +0300 schrieb Zeeshan Ali
(Khattak):
I tried my best to help you out in this regard while fixing all the
critical issues in rygel and the deps in time for GNOME 2.32. What do
I get in return? You completely ignored my project in the release
notes rather
Am Mittwoch, den 29.09.2010, 09:01 +0200 schrieb Juanjo Marin:
There's already a GNOME Goal with a porting guide
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/AppletsDbusMigration
(also linked from http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointNinetyone )
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
Am Dienstag, den 28.09.2010, 08:57 -0700 schrieb Sriram Ramkrishna:
It seems to me that we will need to put these things into
live.gnome.org.
On a related note there is http://live.gnome.org/GNOME3Myths but it does
not mention applets so far.
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
Hej folks!
A first draft for the GNOME 2.91/3.0 schedule is now available at
http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointNinetyone .
There is no 2.32.2/.3 planned as 3.0 should get the main focus.
3.0.0 is planned for early April 2011, but for followup major releases
(3.2.0, 3.4.0, etc) we plan to
Am Samstag, den 25.09.2010, 03:08 -0500 schrieb Brandon Wright:
This is regarding http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=630426
Thomas,
can you please branch metacity for gnome-2-32 and revert the move from
GDK drawing to Cairo (3608ff90798cbb6c8d88be902abd56f1a4b16bc0 /
Am Donnerstag, den 02.09.2010, 16:37 +0200 schrieb Ryan Lortie:
You may want to consider going back to libunique for this cycle.
As hardcode freeze starts on September 13th, which / how many modules
use GApplication and are affected by this?
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
Am Montag, den 09.08.2010, 16:46 +0200 schrieb Maciej Piechotka:
I thought x.9/x.90/x.900 are beta releases before (x+1).0. See gtk+
2.90.4.
Correct.
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 15:39 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
90 is an even number, and thus 'stable', surely?
Correct that this might create
Am Dienstag, den 03.08.2010, 01:28 +0200 schrieb Javier Jardón:
[1]
http://blog.tomeuvizoso.net/2010/06/proposed-gnome-goal-port-your-pygtk-to.html
With the merge of PyGI into PyGObject, this GnomeGoal has been moved to [1].
Also, you have updated info about the porting here: [2]
[1]
Am Donnerstag, den 05.08.2010, 17:53 +0200 schrieb Maciej Piechotka:
May I propose that:
Future 2.31.x/2.32.x uses GTK+ 2.0
Future 2.9x.x uses GTK+ 3.0 (especially if released along the 2.31.x/2.32.x)
That is already the plan.
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
http://www.iomc.de/ |
Am Mittwoch, den 28.07.2010, 15:54 +0200 schrieb Paolo Borelli:
Does this mean that gnome 2.32 will use gtk2? or gtk3 will be released
in time and 2.32 modules can rely on it?
The release-team wants GTK 3.0 to be released before Christmas 2010.
An option we would like to encourage is to
Hi,
Am Montag, den 26.07.2010, 09:47 +0200 schrieb Valent Turkovic:
Because good clipboard manager is just essential to any desktop I
would ask you to consider taking over this project and making it
integral part of GNOME.
You are welcome to work on it and take over.
Apart from that: Wrong
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 23.06.2010, 07:47 -0700 schrieb Mohammed Rashad:
i just now installed glib-2.14.1 and gtk+-2.10.14 on minix3
...which are ancient versions from years ago. Better to get recent
tarballs from ftp.gnome.org and try to compile them.
what should i do to get gnome working
i
Am Donnerstag, den 03.06.2010, 12:42 +0200 schrieb Seif Lotfy:
Can you please elaborate why GAJ was not accepted...
Wrong thread?
Plus you = release-team?
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
Am Donnerstag, den 03.06.2010, 16:02 +0100 schrieb Calum Benson:
http://developer.gnome.org/gep/gep-0.html
...and the guidelines that currently exist:
http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/ModuleProposing
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
http://www.iomc.de/ |
Am Mittwoch, den 02.06.2010, 13:11 +0200 schrieb Luca Ferretti:
if you want to develop for GNOME, then install a jhbuild
sandbox (stable or development) and make your application build and work
inside it.
Depends on how you define build and work, but pretty exactly half of
the current module
Am Mittwoch, den 02.06.2010, 13:54 +0200 schrieb Josselin Mouette:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2008-January/msg00861.html
Aha. So?
Distributions have been and still will be able to make decisions.
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
http://www.iomc.de/ |
Am Donnerstag, den 13.05.2010, 18:11 -0400 schrieb Matthias Clasen:
once per cycle, we should go through the list of external dependencies
Thanks for collecting the list.
Only partially related, but some comments on GNOME3 readiness in the
cleanup area:
avahi no change
Am Donnerstag, den 06.05.2010, 11:46 +0200 schrieb Johannes Schmid:
There was kind of a discussion not to include any full-featured Canvas
in the future in the GNOME platform.
For the records: For an overview of canvases see
http://live.gnome.org/ProjectRidley/CanvasOverview
andre
--
The GNOME release-team will soon decide about module inclusions for
GNOME 3.0 based on the community input from this mailing list.
If you have not commented yet, if there is anything to add, if you have
questions: Please comment now on the corresponding thread for the module
(for a specific
Am Donnerstag, den 06.05.2010, 13:10 -0400 schrieb Randy B:
We want to add Zeitgeist features to all over GNOME
Can I ask you to please answer Colin's questions separately with
*concrete* plans (and maybe a separate section for nice to have)?
Thanks a lot,
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net |
Am Freitag, den 30.04.2010, 15:06 +0200 schrieb Andre Klapper:
If you are a maintainer and plan to propose your module for inclusion in
GNOME 3.0 but have not done yet
Personally I expected but have not yet seen proposals for
* a GOK replacement[1] (caribou?)
* a replacement
Am Samstag, den 17.04.2010, 00:17 +0200 schrieb Jakub Steiner:
Target: Desktop
Please add it to the list of proposed modules at
http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointThirtyone/Desktop
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
Am Donnerstag, den 01.04.2010, 11:01 +0200 schrieb Guillaume Desmottes:
I plan to use in Empathy new API from telepathy-glib so will have to
dump the external dependency to 0.11.
This will be needed for new features and factor out code from Empathy to
tp-glib.
Hope that's fine.
No feedback
Am Dienstag, den 30.03.2010, 08:53 +0100 schrieb Philip Withnall:
Hi,
Would it be possible to bump the external dependency on libgdata up to
version 0.6.4 for the 2.31 release cycle? The work on adding libgdata
support to Tracker[1] has come up against a nasty bug[2] which is only
fixed in
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 20.03.2010, 23:19 +0530 schrieb vikas kushwaha:
1. This is about creating a application to customize gnome. The
application will
allow users to create new menu items and attach actions with them, and
also specify their positioning in the window.
In this way this way,
Hi,
GNOME 2.30.0 will be released on March 29th.
See http://live.gnome.org/Schedule .
Better late than never a quick list of potential GNOME 2.30 blockers
according to Bugzilla (missing any comments - sorry, no time here).
Not necessarily complete. Feedback, updates, help are welcome.
Please do
Am Sonntag, den 07.03.2010, 19:56 -0800 schrieb MPR:
My assumption is that there must be some patch review process that was
not followed.
No, there's not.
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
Hi,
a draft for the GNOME 2.31/3.0 schedule is now available at
http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointThirtyone/
Comments welcome.
Already know some 3.0 plans for the module you maintain?
Take a minute and add them to http://live.gnome.org/RoadMap now!
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
Am Sonntag, den 21.02.2010, 18:12 +0200 schrieb Zeeshan Ali:
I agree but I really suck at UIs
You could ask for a review on the usability mailing list.
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 19.02.2010, 08:09 -0600 schrieb Shaun McCance:
We've talked before about retooling our release sets
You can expect a proposal by the release-team soon on this topic.
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 13.02.2010, 17:10 -0500 schrieb Michael Terry:
I'm not sure if this is too early, but it's been 6 months since
modules proposals opened for 2.30, so I'm guessing it's an appropriate
time for 3.0 modules?
GNOME 2.31 Module proposal period has started this week. :-)
First,
Am Montag, den 12.10.2009, 11:27 -0400 schrieb Ryan Lortie:
The main technical blocker on the inclusion of dconf is that it relies
on a branch of glib that has not yet been merged to master. We have had
a discussion at Boston Summit two days ago between myself, Matthias
Clasen and David
Am Dienstag, den 12.01.2010, 12:13 +0100 schrieb Milan Bouchet-Valat:
OK to raise the dependency on the wiki? I'd also need somebody to update
the jhbuild modulesets.
I don't see any reasons against, especially after you've listed the
issues with the current version.
By the way, may I get the
Am Donnerstag, den 12.11.2009, 11:31 +0100 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo
Monfort:
jhbuild lists pysqlite2 as a GNOME external dependency, although the wiki
doesn't. It's only used by hamster-applet, which can also use the sqlite3
module
shipped with Python = 2.5 (and prefers it).
Since we already
Am Donnerstag, den 30.07.2009, 03:01 +0100 schrieb Alberto Ruiz:
2009/7/29 Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net:
=
ZERO modules dependening on gnome-vfs
=
COMPLETED
Ladies and Gentlemen,
once again it's time to take a look at GNOME Bugzilla activity in 2009
though no scripts were run yet to provide more information because they
probably have not been ported to Bugzilla 3.4. Anyway, the basic info
exists.
Please keep in mind to not draw too many conclusions
(Please do not full quote and reply below the quoted text. Thanks.)
Am Mittwoch, den 16.12.2009, 04:44 +0100 schrieb Uros Nedic:
And, for the end of this reply - when, for example, Mathematica
release its Linux
version, is it for GNOME, KDE, Xfce, or some fourth DE? How do they
make decisions
Am Mittwoch, den 25.11.2009, 12:29 -0500 schrieb Jud Craft:
PS. I have no idea how to file bugs against the interface guidelines
themselves
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=HIG
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
Am Dienstag, den 10.11.2009, 16:53 +0200 schrieb Peteris Krisjanis:
Bastien, I would like to have references like bugzilla bug numbers and
some study about impact of this decision.
This has all been posted on this list already and repeating doesn't make
sense. Search the archives, please.
Am Dienstag, den 10.11.2009, 17:00 +0200 schrieb Peteris Krisjanis:
So because there are maybe majority of happy (and ignorant) users, we
will ignore rather loud opposition to this change? Really nice way to
deal with community.
Thanks for being the true and only voice of the community.
Maybe
Hmm.
This seems to turn into a flamewar with personal attacks.
Don't like that.
The Code of Conduct at http://live.gnome.org/CodeOfConduct states
Assume people mean well, and while we disagree on decisions itself
and/or their parameters (where, how and when it was discussed, decided
and
Am Mittwoch, den 28.10.2009, 20:04 -0700 schrieb Sriram Ramkrishna:
So the current barriers I see is:
[...]
* release process should match with GNOME.
As I see regular (weekly) releases at
ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/tracker/0.7/ I don't see an issue
at all with regard to that point.
Am Donnerstag, den 29.10.2009, 11:57 +0100 schrieb Murray Cumming:
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 10:44 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 28.10.2009, 20:04 -0700 schrieb Sriram Ramkrishna:
So the current barriers I see is:
[...]
* release process should match with GNOME.
As I see
Am Montag, den 10.08.2009, 16:37 +0100 schrieb Emmanuele Bassi:
I'm proposing to move Clutter (core) from the external dependencies to
the Desktop modules.
The GNOME release-team will soon decide about module inclusions for
GNOME 2.30.
To the GNOME developers:
If you have not commented yet, if
Am Donnerstag, den 13.08.2009, 09:25 +0100 schrieb Richard Hughes:
I do not want to propose gnome-packagekit for 2.28, but instead am
intending to propose it during the 2.29 cycle.
The GNOME release-team will soon decide about module inclusions for
GNOME 2.30.
To the GNOME developers:
If you
Am Montag, den 10.08.2009, 16:00 +0100 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
I'm proposing the universally shipped nautilus-sendto for inclusion into
GNOME.
The GNOME release-team will soon decide about module inclusions for
GNOME 2.30.
To the GNOME developers:
If you have not commented yet, if there is
Am Donnerstag, den 13.08.2009, 11:41 +0200 schrieb pwie...@trychlos.org:
I'd like to propose Nautilus-Actions as a new Gnome desktop module.
Nautilus-Actions is a Nautilus extension which allows the user to add
items to the Nautilus context menu. Items are dynamic: they appear
only if some
Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2009, 13:05 +0100 schrieb Martyn Russell:
I would like to propose Tracker as a new GNOME module.
The GNOME release-team will soon decide about module inclusions for
GNOME 2.30.
To the GNOME developers:
If you have not commented yet, if there is anything to add, if you
Am Donnerstag, den 03.09.2009, 00:40 +0200 schrieb Pierre Slamich:
This is a proposal on behalf of the GlobalMenu developers for its
inclusion either in gnome-applets or as a dependency of GNOME.
The GNOME release-team will soon decide about module inclusions for
GNOME 2.30.
To the GNOME
Am Donnerstag, den 01.10.2009, 13:42 +0200 schrieb Rodrigo Moya:
couchdb-glib is a library to implement the protocol to talk to CouchDB
servers (http://couchdb.apache.org), a schema-free, json-based, database
of documents, which offers synchronization and replication between
several machines.
Am Montag, den 12.10.2009, 11:27 -0400 schrieb Ryan Lortie:
dconf is a very conceptually simple key/value storage system with an
implementation that makes it extremely efficient.
The GNOME release-team will soon decide about module inclusions for
GNOME 2.30.
To the GNOME developers:
If you
Am Montag, den 19.10.2009, 12:40 -0400 schrieb Pierre-Luc Beaudoin:
Emerillon is a map viewer.
So what does the community think?
The GNOME release-team will soon decide about module inclusions for
GNOME 2.30.
To the GNOME developers:
If you have not commented yet, if there is anything to
Am Montag, den 12.10.2009, 17:35 +0200 schrieb Krzesimir Nowak:
I'm a maintainer of libvtemm and I'd like to propose it to be a part of
GNOME.
The GNOME release-team will soon decide about module inclusions for
GNOME 2.30.
To the GNOME developers:
If you have not commented yet, if there is
According to our rules only maintainers can propose their modules, but I
assume that Jürg is more than okay with desrt's proposal as he did not
answer with a No way! to this thread. ;-)
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
Am Freitag, den 16.10.2009, 02:25 +0200 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
Andre Klapper wrote:
According to our rules only maintainers can propose their modules
Even for external dependencies?
Ah. Very good point.
I should not try to catch up with 500 emails late at night.
andre
Am Sonntag, den 04.10.2009, 22:57 +0200 schrieb Sietse Brouwer:
Also offer palettes containing the special of (groups of)
languages.
Does this sound like a good idea?
Yes. And even more awesome if this somehow defaulted to the session
language.
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
Am Donnerstag, den 01.10.2009, 20:20 -0400 schrieb Jud Craft:
There is one good reason why this is a good idea: GNOME's support
system is too compartmentalized.
This shows up all the time in bug reports. People have no idea which
component to file against (for particularly tricky
Am Mittwoch, den 30.09.2009, 12:20 -0600 schrieb Wolter Hellmund:
In the following message, I will suggest the creation of a new project
entitled GNOME Innovation in HTML format for easier comprehension.
On a related note:
What I agree with is that GNOME is missing a kind of bazaar where people
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 29.09.2009, 12:44 +0200 schrieb pwie...@trychlos.org:
As the new module proposal for 2.30 period is opened since more than one
month,
is it any page in l.g.o where current candidates are listed ?
This will be done on the http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentynine once
the
Hi Milan,
Am Samstag, den 19.09.2009, 14:02 +0200 schrieb Milan Bouchet-Valat:
The fix I've committed to master is a one-liner with a very low risk
since it only changes the uid variable to user_uid, since it's what
was intended.
Am Donnerstag, den 17.09.2009, 15:26 -0400 schrieb Tristan Van Berkom:
So the bottom line is basically this: if you feel this should
be the minimum standard of attention that a maintainer must
absolutely pay to his buglist, then so be it, but I think you are
being unfair to ask this of me.
Am Freitag, den 18.09.2009, 16:15 +0200 schrieb Pietro Battiston:
Il giorno ven, 18/09/2009 alle 13.44 +0200, Andre Klapper ha scritto:
Yes, I expect maintainers should be able to take a look at the incoming
bug reports at least once in 12 months.
Then, once someone offers to be the glade
Am Freitag, den 18.09.2009, 18:45 +0100 schrieb Lucas Rocha:
2009/9/18 Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=581817
Approval 1/2.
--lucasr
Approval 2/2.
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
Hi Tristan,
Am Freitag, den 18.09.2009, 14:16 -0400 schrieb Tristan Van Berkom:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 17.09.2009, 15:26 -0400 schrieb Tristan Van Berkom:
So the bottom line is basically this: if you feel this should
Am Donnerstag, den 17.09.2009, 14:35 +0200 schrieb Frederic Peters:
Requesting permission to apply this one-liner fix
+1
Frederic
Approval 2/2.
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 11:06 +0200, Carlos Garcia Campos wrote:
Poppler 0.12 is the new stable release. Although it doesn't add any new
API and evince builds with earlier versions, I suggest to bump the
minimum version because this release includes a lot of important
rendering and performance
Am Montag, den 07.09.2009, 12:25 +0300 schrieb Peteris Krisjanis:
Who did a decision to remove icons from gnome-panel main menus
(Places, System and Applications) and why there haven't been wilder
scale discussion about it?
Everything has been written and said about this already.
The decision
Am Freitag, den 28.08.2009, 14:29 -0400 schrieb Behdad Esfahbod:
Why not turn this into an official GOAL for 2.30/3.0 ? This is probably
too late to make every official module with silent-rules by default.
Something like that, yeah. Feel free to write the Goal.
Guys, there's
Am Donnerstag, den 20.08.2009, 08:40 -0400 schrieb Willie Walker:
Which projects are going to use it
According to the jhbuild 2.28 moduleset:
devhelp, epiphany, seed, yelp.
And under suggests (no hard dependency):
anjuta (for devhelp plugin), empathy.
and will there be alternatives for people
Am Donnerstag, den 20.08.2009, 09:42 -0500 schrieb Shaun McCance:
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 16:27 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
According to the jhbuild 2.28 moduleset:
devhelp, epiphany, seed, yelp.
Hi there. Yelp maintainer here. Who exactly decided to
use the webkit branch
Am Donnerstag, den 20.08.2009, 09:50 -0500 schrieb Shaun McCance:
I was busy working on Mallard support for 2.28, and didn't
have time (or make time) to review the WebKit stuff. And
now I consider it to be way too late in the release cycle
for this kind of change.
I agree it's late in the
Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2009, 13:05 +0100 schrieb Martyn Russell:
So I would like to propose Tracker as a new GNOME module.
Getting this back to inclusion requirements:
- GNOME3 readiness:
Please fix http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=581984
- I18N:
Please fix
Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2009, 17:40 +0200 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
I might not be fully up to date on all these things, but has Zeitgeist
even been submitted as a module yet?
Not yet.
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2009, 18:24 +0200 schrieb Rodrigo Moya:
I might be wrong and things might have changed, but isn't beagle
unmaintained?
According to http://git.gnome.org/cgit/beagle/log/ it is not
unmaintained but most probably has less developers/parties working on it
than on tracker:
Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2009, 18:05 +0100 schrieb Martyn Russell:
On 18/08/09 17:48, Dan Winship wrote:
The stigma associated with Tracker is because historically the tracker
hackers have been unable to describe what the non-filesystem-indexing
part of Tracker does without
[...]
claiming
201 - 300 of 427 matches
Mail list logo
