Am Donnerstag, den 29.10.2009, 11:57 +0100 schrieb Murray Cumming: > On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 10:44 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, den 28.10.2009, 20:04 -0700 schrieb Sriram Ramkrishna: > > > So the current barriers I see is: > > [...] > > > * release process should match with GNOME. > > > > As I see regular (weekly) releases at > > ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/tracker/0.7/ I don't see an issue > > at all with regard to that point. > > But what about API freezes, for instance, and other freezes?
Of course that's a must, but so far I don't expect proposed modules to follow that before even being proposed. ;-) Freezes for 2.29.x are listed at http://live.gnome.org/Schedule & http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentynine and every approved app must follow these - same for tracker after a potential inclusion and I expect tracker maintainers to be totally aware of this. andre -- mailto:[email protected] | failed http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
