On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 09:37 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 11:10 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 09:34 +0200, Rui Tiago Cação Matos wrote:
On 24/04/2012, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote:
snip
So, I don't think it really works to just ignore
On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 14:50 +0100, Sergey Udaltsov wrote:
snip
And, did you think about setting up the formal survey? Your idea to
ask people was really good!
I think that our past experience with surveys done in the context of
GNOME have shown that this sort of survey isn't useful.
Asking
On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 12:27 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 16:00 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Isn't that a whole lot more confusing? Plus, do we have time in the 3.6
cycle to do a good job at inventing a replacement for non-legacy apps?
Is that the best use of our
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 21:09 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 17:52 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Work is on-going to make Totem into that:
https://live.gnome.org/Design/Apps/Videos#Tentative_Design
The thumbnail view looks really nice! And the searching
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 03:33 +0100, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
2012/4/24 Federico Mena Quintero feder...@gnome.org
* Some sort of connection with a BitTorrent client. I know
this is
treading on taboo ground, but I assume that a lot of people
download
Hello Federico,
Em Mon, 2012-04-23 às 20:58 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero escreveu:
snip
From http://live.gnome.org/CodeOfConduct
Assume people mean well
From your mail:
The design team IS NOT welcome to:
* Second-guess maintainers or well-intentioned contributors.
* Block development
Em Tue, 2012-04-24 às 15:50 +0200, Andre Klapper escreveu:
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 10:54 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
I think an apology is in order.
That would require criticizing somebody in an inappropriate way first.
I don't see that here.
I don't agree. I find it rude and out-of-order
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 10:58 -0400, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 10:54 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Hello Federico,
Em Mon, 2012-04-23 às 20:58 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero escreveu:
snip
From http://live.gnome.org/CodeOfConduct
Assume people mean well
Federico
Em Tue, 2012-04-24 às 10:40 -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna escreveu:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Piñeiro apinhe...@igalia.com
wrote:
The change is trivial. It is only required to change the
default value
of 'toolkit-accessibility' on
Work is on-going to make Totem into that:
https://live.gnome.org/Design/Apps/Videos#Tentative_Design
Which means more clutter (the framework) and less clutter (the mess).
Cheers
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 02:20 +0200, Seif Lotfy wrote:
So let me try to take Web use cases that could use Zeitgeist:
* The user wants to type in the location bar and have
suggestions pop out while typing.
* The user wants to blacklist some websites or all websites
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 23:43 +0200, Seif Lotfy wrote:
Clocks: The clocks app is designed by the GNOME designers.
It is still more
or less a prototype I am working on alongside Emily Gonyer.
We wanted to
make use of Zeitgeist in storing
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 17:55 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
I've been having a terrible time trying to get something tested on top
of Gnome 3.4, all because I can't get 3.4 built from jhbuild. I'm too
old to build from tarballs, and my distro doesn't carry 3.4 yet.
I wonder how people
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 22:47 +0200, Seif Lotfy wrote:
snip
We already have GNOME specific developments:
* We already log everything that pushes into Gtk.RecentlyUsed.
* For better logging we have Totem, Rhythmbox, and gedit
deploying loggers as a soft-dependency in the form
Em Fri, 2012-03-16 às 12:51 +0100, Carlos Garnacho escreveu:
Hey,
In order to provide some background to the ML, scroll events were being
sent to widgets with GDK_BUTTON_PRESS_MASK (no scroll mask required),
but this played odd with smooth scrolling as scrolled windows get scroll
events in
Em Wed, 2012-03-14 às 19:17 +0100, Sebastien Bacher escreveu:
snip
I think that's an issue we should look at addressing before 3.4, either
by doing some compat work in GTK (i.e keep emiting the scroll up down
events as well as the smooth ones if possible) or by patching the
applications,
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 14:03 +, Richard H Lee wrote:
Hi,
I'm using the MediaPlayerKeyPressed signals in org.gnome.SettingsDaemon.
But they only signal when a key has been pressed, i.e. a keydown then
key up cycle.
Is there any where to detect the individual key up and key down
On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 13:15 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 22:44 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
After having to send in another code freeze break request e-mail, I
realised that the process is problematic. Apart from the release team
and the patch sender, nobody else knows
Em Fri, 2012-01-27 às 09:45 -0500, Colin Walters escreveu:
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 17:49 -0500, Ryan Lortie wrote:
hi Bastien,
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 22:38 +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
commit 27fa171efe4179c0a42ec79e0dc501077f042a08
Author: Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net
Date
Em Sat, 2012-01-28 às 18:21 +0200, Ionut Biru escreveu:
On 01/28/2012 05:31 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
snip
[1]: I'll repeat once again that Ubuntu, Debian, SUSE and Fedora were
the only supported distros in the old mechanism.
I keep seeing this. Add to the list Arch Linux as well
Em Sat, 2012-01-28 às 18:39 +0200, Ionut Biru escreveu:
On 01/28/2012 06:36 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Em Sat, 2012-01-28 às 18:21 +0200, Ionut Biru escreveu:
On 01/28/2012 05:31 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
snip
[1]: I'll repeat once again that Ubuntu, Debian, SUSE and Fedora were
the only
Em Sat, 2012-01-28 às 11:52 -0500, Colin Walters escreveu:
On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 15:31 +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Ubuntu has apparently taken steps to fix the problem, Debian can
probably use the same code, and OpenSUSE can use the RPM I made and
linked to earlier in the thread
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 10:54 +0100, Frederic Crozat wrote:
2012/1/23 Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 10:14:32AM +0100, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
Why do you guys insist in making that a Canonical,Ubuntu issue?
Only that distribution is affected by the functionality
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 17:49 -0500, Ryan Lortie wrote:
hi Bastien,
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 22:38 +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
commit 27fa171efe4179c0a42ec79e0dc501077f042a08
Author: Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net
Date: Thu Jan 19 22:33:21 2012 +
datetime: Remove datetime D
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 09:34 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 08:04:36AM +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
On 20 January 2012 03:25, Lennart Poettering mzta...@0pointer.de wrote:
Now that gnome-control-center uses systemd's date time
mechanism[1],
we don't
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 13:23 +0200, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 01/20/2012 10:34 AM, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 08:04:36AM +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
On 20 January 2012 03:25, Lennart Poettering mzta...@0pointer.de wrote:
Now that gnome-control-center uses systemd's date
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 13:57 +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:37:44PM +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 09:34 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 08:04:36AM +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
On 20 January 2012 03:25, Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 08:47 -0500, Ryan Lortie wrote:
hi Bastien,
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 12:36 +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
No, the distributions/systems that choose not to use systemd will have
to provide a compatible D-Bus service.
This is what I guessed you'd say.
Why did you ask
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 15:06 +0100, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
Le 20/01/2012 13:00, Olav Vitters a écrit :
It is called systemd, and it is NOT a dependency. What we depend on is
a few simple dbus APIs. If an OS doesn't implement those APIs, certain
functionality won't work. These APIs have been
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 09:48 -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
snip
While writing the extra code that Debian and Ubuntu will need may only
take a day or a few days' work for you, it's probably beyond my
abilities.
I don't think it is. Take systemd's tarball, and call it
systemd-services. Package up
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 10:12 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 12:36 +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 17:49 -0500, Ryan Lortie wrote:
hi Bastien,
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 22:38 +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
commit
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 10:29 -0500, Ryan Lortie wrote:
snip
and get them to package up the missing
bits. An afternoon's work, and no need to scream bloody murder.
As mentioned above -- Lennart has no intention of making it easy to use
his code outside of systemd (and I don't blame him).
On 20 Jan 2012, at 17:21, Sebastien Bacher seb...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Le 20/01/2012 17:50, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
In about 40 minutes, I created a binary RPM[1] that contains the 3
services we care about in GNOME from the systemd Fedora package. I
believe you do something similar.
Thanks
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 22:44 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote:
Hey Bastien,
FYI, moved the git repo to be under the linuxwacom project in
sourceforge (one of the few still there I guess, updated in ), and made
a tarball release:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/linuxwacom/files/libwacom/
FYI, moved the git repo to be under the linuxwacom project in
sourceforge (one of the few still there I guess, updated in ), and made
a tarball release:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/linuxwacom/files/libwacom/
Cheers
___
desktop-devel-list mailing
Em Thu, 2011-12-01 às 16:16 -0500, Jasper St. Pierre escreveu:
We're happy to announce that extensions.gnome.org is now in
public alpha testing at:
https://extensions.gnome.org
snip
Known Bugs and Problems
===
* There are some bugs that currently cause the browser
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 13:56 +0100, Julien Blanc wrote:
Hi,
First of all, i apologize if it's not the good list to discuss about this,
but i couldn’t find a list more specifically related to gnome-terminal
features.
Patches should be sent to http://bugzilla.gnome.org
I find current
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 10:17 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 4:59 AM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:21:17PM -0500, Ray Strode wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 6:47 AM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
3. Access is determined using doap
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 10:44 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
What do you suggest then?
1. Let anyone with git.gnome.org upload any tarball they want
2. Let selected people upload any tarball they want; handled by
accou...@gnome.org.
3. Only maintainers, release team
I think
Time to get your X server fixed!
Those 2 patches are necessary to fix XInput2 grabs and ungrabs:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42298
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/commit/?h=server-1.11-branchid=347f5610ca023fb31485aa19c20607af8bf9c834
The 2nd patch is already in X.org
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 14:14 +0100, Timo Kluck wrote:
Dear gnome-developers,
I've started a branch to allow writing plugins for
gnome-settings-daemon in Vala.
We use the gnomecc list (copied) for gnome-settings-daemon and
gnome-control-center development, or you can find us on #control-center
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 16:54 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On jue, 2011-10-06 at 10:49 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Rodrigo Moya rodr...@gnome-db.org wrote:
On jue, 2011-10-06 at 10:31 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
- Integration with thunderbird in the
On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 09:40 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:44:32PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
I think that, at the very least for GNOME 3.4 onwards, we should switch
to using a keyword in bugzilla, and the release-team, docs team and i18n
teams can monitor newly
Heya,
After having to send in another code freeze break request e-mail, I
realised that the process is problematic. Apart from the release team
and the patch sender, nobody else knows about the freeze break request,
or about the status of the request.
I think that, at the very least for GNOME
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 22:44 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Heya,
After having to send in another code freeze break request e-mail, I
realised that the process is problematic. Apart from the release team
and the patch sender, nobody else knows about the freeze break request,
or about
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 18:28 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net wrote:
Heya,
After having to send in another code freeze break request e-mail, I
realised that the process is problematic. Apart from the release team
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 12:26 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
GNOME 3.2 is polishing up nicely, but some of us have twitchy fingers
and are looking forward to 3.4.
One of my goals is to complete the desktop color management work, and
bring OSX-style full screen color management to the GNOME
On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 11:40 +0200, Piñeiro wrote:
On 09/01/2011 03:49 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
As for the OSK, I don't think we'll have time to integrate this properly
for GNOME 3.2, unless Dan does magic soon. We already have a UI for
setting up the OSK, but things get very complicated
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 09:22 -0400, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 11:25 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
Shaun wrote:
I noticed that we have Contacts, Documents, and Sushi in the
apps moduleset. If shipped, all of these are just core parts
of the desktop experience, so I want
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 18:50 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
Data taken from Bugzilla (bug reports with GNOME Target field set):
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMEDbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENEDbug_status=NEEDINFOcf_gnome_target=3.2
Total number: 15
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 19:01 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 17:56 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
gnome-control-center: Network: custom connections don't show up in the
list
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=645094
There is an old patch by hadess available
Hello Ben,
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 20:21 +1200, Ben Cooksley wrote:
To all concerned developers,
As you may or may not be aware, the name System Settings for an
application is currently in use by KDE. A recent renaming by your
GNOME control center developers to this name creates a naming
On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 18:35 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Hi,
After going through all the feedback, here's the second version of the
proposed survey.
There is a proposal to delay the survey until 3.2 is released, to try
to avoid some of the initial negative feedback of 3.0, I guess. If
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 20:51 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 15:49 +0200, Michael Terry wrote:
Hello! You may remember me as the bloke that proposed the Déjà Dup
backup tool as a GNOME module a little back, right as modules were
being reorganized.
I've been
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 14:52 +0200, Xan wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
jas...@humppa.nl wrote:
Hi,
I'm quite worried about this change...
You are aware you have just made Epiphany a Linux-only webbrowser?
There is no NM support for any of the BSD nor
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 23:14 +0200, Paolo Bacchilega wrote:
goobox 2.90.1 is now available for download at:
snip
* Use symbolic icons
* Prefer the dark theme
Why? Goobox certainly isn't the type of application we would want using
a dark theme. It's not presenting video, or images, so it
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 07:55 +0200, Jens Georg wrote:
Hi,
What I would like to propose is something in the lines of less open DLNA
sharing. This is a feature on top of Rygel.
It would be similar to the Play to feature of Windows 7, where you can
right-click on a file and send it to
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 17:10 +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net wrote:
The functionality is interesting, and I would think that integrating it
in nautilus-sendto would probably be a good idea, but nautilus-sendto
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 18:08 +0200, Johannes Schmid wrote:
Hi!
I talked to the designers who had shown interest in the past on
designs for Sharing feature and it seems that none of them have any
time to do any designs for this any time soon. I'm just afraid that if
we wait on our
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 10:22 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 23 May 2011 10:18, Richard Hughes install-mod...@master.gnome.org wrote:
http://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-power-manager/3.0/gnome-power-manager-3.0.2.tar.gz
(4.81M)
I've noticed that mails are being now sent automatically
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 08:02 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Over the past week, I've been working with Ray on fleshing out the
plans for gdm in 3.2. We are aiming for 2 things for 3.2:
- A new 'shell-style' greeter. You can see a mockup on the feature page.
Will the UI be something that can
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 15:19 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote:
Il giorno ven, 20/05/2011 alle 08.02 -0400, Matthias Clasen ha scritto:
- An 'initial-setup' tool. The goal here is to allow setting up a few
essential things on a new system before you start to use it for the
first time.
I
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 10:18 -0400, Michael Terry wrote:
On 19 May 2011 09:19, Lennart Poettering mzta...@0pointer.de wrote:
(also, all big distributions but one have announced their plans to
switch to systemd by now)
Hopefully it's easy to see how such comments (and the way it's phrased
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 13:09 -0400, Michael Terry wrote:
On 19 May 2011 11:17, Jason D. Clinton m...@jasonclinton.com wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:02, Michael Terry m...@mterry.name wrote:
True. I guess I'm really just interested in an official answer to
What are the criteria for
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 14:09 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Heya,
I'd like to propose systemd (GPL2+,
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd) as blessed external
dependency for GNOME 3.2.
Currently the interfacing between GNOME and systemd is minimal. Bastien
has been
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 14:46 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 14:09 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
[setting the hostname and other little interfaces]
In the long run I expect the following additional interfaces used by
GNOME or one of its components:
- I am
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 09:21 +0300, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
On 05/16/2011 01:42 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 12:44 +0300, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
On 05/14/2011 11:24 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
The fact that we have only one implementation means that we have one
well
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 09:37 -0500, Ted Gould wrote:
On Sat, 2011-05-14 at 21:24 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 10:20 +0200, Ted Gould wrote:
On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 16:52 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
This library should be used in place of Geoclue's D-Bus API
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 04:03 +0200, Robert Ancell wrote:
On 17 May 2011 11:37, Fernando Herrera fherr...@onirica.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Robert Ancell robert.anc...@gmail.com
wrote:
So, how? I mean, currently I don't see anycode on lighDM for this. Are
you
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 12:31 -0500, Brian Cameron wrote:
Shaun:
So the question here is not Does LightDM better serve
the needs of some GNOME-based operating systems? The
question is simply Should LightDM replace GDM as the
display manager for GNOME?
Perhaps I am confused, but I
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 11:31 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 11:55 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 07:32 +0200, Michael Terry wrote:
So as the Deja Dup maintainer, life will go on when you drop support.
Worst case, I can just make the panel a dialog
On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 13:30 -0500, Brian Cameron wrote:
Bastien:
snip
I'll repeat what I said in the past. Solaris developers will need to
write some code at some point, or just give up. We can't stand around
waiting for them to make a move when we want to better the functionality
of
On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 21:50 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:15:02PM +0100, Allan Day wrote:
Sounds like it should be both a new feature and a part of GNOME core. It
would be great to be able to introduce it as a feature in 3.2.
I've started a feature page here [1].
On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 12:44 +0300, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
On 05/14/2011 11:24 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
The fact that we have only one implementation means that we have one
well maintained implementation. I don't think it's much of a problem. Do
you have particular reasons why you think
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 13:37 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
The release-team mailing list is intended for private discussions
between release-team members. It should not be interesting as anything
that is important, we'll either announce or bring to an appropriate
mailing list.
The release-team
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 13:56 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:45:10PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Note that release-team-lurkers is a test. We will remove the entire
mailing list if we think it has a bad effect.
You could also have made the mailing-list private
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 16:15 +0100, Justin Joseph wrote:
As for the look and feel, can you be more precise? Are you
saying e.g.
Sushi should not use a custom/dark theme if the application
counterpart
doesn't?
The UI chrome for Sushi is *very*
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 20:20 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 16.05.11 18:44, Ross Burton (r...@burtonini.com) wrote:
On 16 May 2011 18:22, Lennart Poettering mzta...@0pointer.de wrote:
conmann also does geoloc? Is there something it doesn't do? Sounds
almost as crazy as
On Sat, 2011-05-14 at 12:31 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
Hello Matthias, Dave,
Matthias Clasen [2011-05-13 8:33 -0400]:
* Language Selector, which allows you to configure your language and
fallbacks ($LANGUAGE/$LC_MESSAGES), locale ($LANG), list of
installed languages (packages
On Sat, 2011-05-14 at 12:58 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote:
Il giorno Fri, 13/05/2011 alle 18.26 +0100, Bastien Nocera ha scritto:
The correct way to behave then is to work on the search backends, not to
complain here.
You have misinterpreted my words; It wasn't a complain for that specific
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 10:20 +0200, Ted Gould wrote:
On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 16:52 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
This library should be used in place of Geoclue's D-Bus API for
geocoding and reverse geocoding.
Is this now deprecated in the Geoclue API?
Pretty much, though I can hardly tell
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 08:58 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
Bastien Nocera wrote:
Feel free to follow the discussions about firewalls on the
fedora-desktop list. (...)
Shouldn't we try to have an appropriate @gnome.org list to discuss
such things (os level), if we consider that *desktop
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 18:44 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote:
2011/5/13 Luca Ferretti lferr...@gnome.org:
Bonus question: are you sure this all work happens upstream can lead
to better and faster solutions?
I forgot a little example for this: 3 years ago I wrote
a trivial patch to add a Search
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 13:43 -0500, Brian Cameron wrote:
Robert:
I am one of the 3 GDM maintainers. I think there is a real need for
LightDM as a FreeDesktop module, so I think it is great that LightDM
has joined the FreeDesktop family.
GDM has evolved into a display manager that is most
On Sat, 2011-05-14 at 12:13 +1200, John Stowers wrote:
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 10:05 +0100, Calum Benson wrote:
On 11 May 2011, at 17:52, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
One detail of Open if file manager is that it is trivial to make apps
call nautilus --blahblah, but ideally this should
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 09:37 +0200, Ted Gould wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 02:15 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote:
Il giorno mar, 10/05/2011 alle 20.51 +0100, Bastien Nocera ha scritto:
http://live.gnome.org/DejaDup/Screenshots/Future for screenshots.
Déjà Dup 19.1, which includes those changes
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 16:21 +0200, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
Le jeudi 12 mai 2011 à 13:48 +0200, Gendre Sebastien a écrit :
System-config-* are not only one: Lirc settings? Boot (Grub+Plymouth)
settings, etc.
Recently, I read in Phoronix that AMD want to add the support of all
these
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 16:02 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 16:44 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 09:37 +0200, Ted Gould wrote:
Could someone please articulate the GNOME position for downstream
distributors of GNOME
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 16:50 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
Colin Walters wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Dave Neary dne...@gnome.org wrote:
If we hard-code what GNOME supports into the design, when the needs
evolve then we need a centralised decision for each new need. Better to
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 02:00 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote:
Il giorno gio, 12/05/2011 alle 19.12 -0400, Matthias Clasen ha scritto:
This is really starting to drift into a highly emotional and
non-productive direction.
I'm not emotional, just a little overemphatic :)
Not allowing random
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 17:12 -0700, Dylan McCall wrote:
I wasn't intending to jump into this because it has become vastly
tangential and there's a pretty unhappy signal to noise ratio already.
So, I realize I might be totally misunderstanding this. If I sound
accusatory or anything, it's purely
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 20:06 -0400, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 18:14 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
Why? Because the premise of System Settings in GNOME 3 is,
surprisingly, to change your system settings or personalize the
experience. E.g. we think it genuinely makes sense to
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 11:02 +1000, Danielle Madeley wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 01:27 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
#1 -- was this announced/proposed to desktop-devel-list?
No, because it was only made for one particular module
(gnome-bluetooth), and by me. The reason we had
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 10:14 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 07:32 +0200, Michael Terry wrote:
So as the Deja Dup maintainer, life will go on when you drop support.
Worst case, I can just make the panel a dialog.
But dropping the existing API feels like a frustrating bait
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 10:16 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 20:51 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
I suspect GNOME might be interested in having a backup story so I'm
offering this one. And I'd be happy to have increased design advice
and developer eyeballs.
I'd really
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 10:03 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
Michael Terry wrote:
My plans have always been aimed at personal data only, with any
support for whole-system backup as a nice bonus. There are technical
issues there like if you hit a file the user doesn't have read
support
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 13:05 +0200, Guillaume Desmottes wrote:
Le mercredi 11 mai 2011 à 11:47 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 11:02 +1000, Danielle Madeley wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 01:27 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
#1 -- was this announced/proposed
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 22:58 +0200, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
Le mardi 10 mai 2011 à 19:13 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
So, what do you think? The patches for apps should be pretty small, and
they really provide much better circulation within your files.
And applications that can
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 17:16 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 19:13 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
And applications that can send out files, could also add a little menu
item to send it out using nautilus-sendto (the API there being
nautilus-sendto filename
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 10:18 -0400, Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
Le mercredi 11 mai 2011 à 12:16 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
FWIW, this is exactly the use-case I'm missing. I would like to copy
my
personal data to an external hard drive, remote server or cloud
storage
service, so
401 - 500 of 941 matches
Mail list logo
