On 2/11/07, Nickolay V. Shmyrev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I supspect http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointSeventeen/ExternalDependencies
should be updated because seahorse doesn't build without gpgme.
Yes, done. Thanks for pointing this out.
___
:
8371 Andre Klapper
6258 Karsten Bräckelmann
1857 Susana
1534 Bruno Boaventura
1514 Elijah Newren
1160 Christian Kirbach
The following people reported more than 250 bugs in 2006:
599 Sebastien Bacher
487 Christian Persch
259 Wouter Bolsterlee
252 Bastien Nocera
On 2/4/07, Hans Petter Jansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Overall statistics:
Current open reports: 26942 (*)
Opened in 2006: 67543
Closed in 2006: 59006
Of the bugs closed, 73149 were marked as duplicates
Congratulations to all the hard-working people involved!
Why
On 1/31/07, Carl Worth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Though I am still a bit confused as to what's going on with cairo
versions in the freedesktop-2.x.y.modules files here:
http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/teams/releng/
Here are the things I see:
Gnome version cairo version
2.16.1
On 1/31/07, Carl Worth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for confirming. That's what I wanted to make sure, that GNOME
testers were actually testing the snapshots of cairo that we're making
in preparation for providing cairo 1.4 for GNOME 2.18.
Now, as we continue to make new snapshots, (I
On 1/23/07, Kjartan Maraas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tir, 23.01.2007 kl. 00.00 +, skrev Chris Wilson:
Hi,
today I had the misfortunate to experience a crash with
gnome-terminal. Fortunately Carl Worth was on irc at the time and was
able to diagnose the problem as a known crash
On 1/23/07, Carl Worth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's far enough ahead of GNOME 2.18.0 mean precisely?
It doesn't have a precise meaning, actually. It's basically GNOME
2.6.0 was burned by depending on GTK 2.4.0, which was a low-level
library not on the GNOME release cycle and released far too
On 1/22/07, John (J5) Palmieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
I was going over the GNOME release and noticed we are still using 0.93.
Not only is this a non supported version upstream it contains a denial
of service exploit CVE-2006-6107 - match rules can be removed by apps
that did not
On 1/18/07, Emmanuele Bassi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
good news everyone!
This looks awesome, congrats Emmanuele! However, as noted at
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list,
announcements are probably better just sent to gnome-announce-list
instead of desktop-devel-list.
[Removing some of the cc's; it just looked like too many]
On 1/16/07, Yair Hershkovitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been working lately on some bugs with RTL (right to left languages)
support in Gnome.
I have few suggestions to help improve RTL support in Gnome:
1) I want to start a
On 1/8/07, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a thread about the whole suite. This is not about glade3, or
anjuta, or monodevelop, or devhelp.
The question is: is this suite a good idea or a bad idea?
As with the others, I like the idea in general. Another question:
Should we hold
On 1/10/07, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 10:04 -0500, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
Many modules in gnome may have arbitrarily chosen to use this version
numbering scheme - personally I like it, nowhere have I seen it
enforced
or even officially preffered.
On 1/3/07, Hubert Figuiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On my Debian based system I have 'cvschroot' that allow changing the
CVS/Root for the tree.
It is in a package named cvsutils
It should be available in whatever distro you are using.
There's a similar script that comes with jhbuild, FWIW.
On 12/29/06, Andrew Cowie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-12-27 at 10:11 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
Someone should start a project named 'Harmony'
Did you know that Harmony is the name...
Yes, I am fully aware of that, and of another previous use of that
name; it was actually
On 12/27/06, Hubert Figuiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas Thurman wrote:
1) Launchpad already knows about all the GNOME projects. Would it be
possible to use Rosetta actually on Launchpad just for the translation part
of each project? (From my limited knowledge of Launchpad, I think it
Sorry for being slow to respond; I was swamped earlier with other stuff...
On 12/5/06, Paolo Maggi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
nowadays (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=365899#c20), gedit
depends on Enchant for its spell checker plugin. This dependency can be
eliminated by
On 12/12/06, Danilo Šegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
This is my evaluation (with GTP spokesperson hat on) of the Gnome
modules which are proposed for inclusion in 2.18. It's based only on
the perceived localizability of the app, usually untested, but
judging by the strings in the PO
Hi Brian,
On 11/30/06, Brian Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So info for the paranoia user? Well, it is going to a public bugtracker.
This probably should be made clearer so that user can just
cancel/disable the entire bug-buddy.
I think it is good to document how this works so that
On 11/9/06, Todd Chambery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Another issue with the auto hide panel: When I drag a document off the
desktop to the panel, the panel doesn't unhide unless I move to the
space between the Show Desktop button and the Window List. I want to
raise and focus the
On 10/27/06, Benoît Dejean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't do that. I'm very disappointed : why haven't you talk to
me before doing that ? I would have explained. I was about to ask for
help for autotools...
It's only temporary, and warning was already given that we'd do
this[1].
On 10/28/06, Joseph E. Sacco, Ph.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current version of liboil is 0.3.9 released May06. Version 0.3.9
contains mostly bug fixes and no new API:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/liboil/2006-May/95.html
Do you think the recommended version of liboil at
Hi Benoit,
It looks like you recently added a dependency on pcre to
gnome-system-monitor. Since this isn't one of the approved external
dependencies at
http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointSeventeen/ExternalDependencies, I have
(temporarily) reverted gnome-system-monitor to the gnome-2-16 branch.
On 10/25/06, Alexey Rusakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bastien Nocera wrote:
GNOME Network Proxy Resolver provides proxy lookup with PAC support via
DBUS. This allows other programmes to support the Automatic proxy
configuration option from GNOME control centre's Network Preferences
without
On 10/21/06, Andreas Røsdal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006, Elijah Newren wrote:
On 10/21/06, Andreas Røsdal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Related to this discussion, I have a question:
Is it OK to depend upon the dependencies of the currently listed external
dependencies
On 10/23/06, Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be nice if proposed modules could be included in odd numbered
releases without first fully accepting it so as to help when it comes to
testing and evaluation
See also
On 10/23/06, Shaun McCance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For those who don't keep archives or have broken threading:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2006-October/msg00232.html
Are there any further thoughts about this?
I already gave my $0.02 about that. :-)
Since I think
On 10/20/06, Davyd Madeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In many respects, jhbuild _is_ the dependency tree for building GNOME. A
mode like `jhbuild list` will give you a list of packages you need to
build. It would be easily possible to put the output of this command on
a webpage if people thought
On 10/21/06, Andreas Røsdal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Related to this discussion, I have a question:
Is it OK to depend upon the dependencies of the currently listed external
dependencies for GNOME 2.17.x?
I think we should instead try to make the list more complete. If you
can point out a
On 10/21/06, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2006-10-21 at 17:50 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
The optional dependencies make sense as well, though you
won't find all the information you need for that in the jhbuild
modulesets (e.g. existing optional dependencies
On 10/19/06, Shaun McCance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the 2.15 release cycle, we moved the new module proposal
period to the beginning of the release cycle
snip
This was an incredibly good idea, and whoever thought of it
should get a big pat on the back.
IIRC, it was Jeff's idea. And I
Hi Sergey,
Apparently the desktop module gnome-control-center has recently been
split into two separate modules, with libgswitchit and libkbdraw being
pulled out into a separate module named libgnomekbd. I've already
misunderstood the change once; so, just to verify, did I summarize the
change
On 10/20/06, Rodney Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 13:04 -0400, William Jon McCann wrote:
Hi Jim,
Where should bugs be filed? I don't see a component in gnome
bugzilla. I suppose one should be created.
Just for the record, you don't e-mail them directly to the
On 10/20/06, Shaun McCance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm also half-tempted to try to push 'help' as the standard
component name, even though 'docs' is the de facto standard
right now. We advise using 'help' as the directory name for
user documentation, so it sort of makes sense. (I will also
On 10/19/06, Joe Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was thinking more along the lines of new APIs in GNOME (not sure if it
was platform or desktop). In any case, thanks for the clarification.
Yes, modules headed for or already in the platform have additional
rules about _API_ documentation (see
On 10/18/06, Jamie McCracken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know this is a bit late in the hour but I should be in the nick of
time as the new modules proposals deadlines ends in a few hours!
Actually...as per the release schedule, although freezes are
graphically shown as spanning three dates, the
On 10/3/06, Robert Love [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's try this again.
I'd like to start the discussion on getting NetworkManager--more
explicitly, its GNOME-based applet, nm-applet--into GNOME 2.18.
Could you add this to the proposed desktop modules section of
On 9/24/06, Alex Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, list
As an alternative to GUnique, you could do the kind of thing Maemo does
just by using D-Bus.
If just by using D-Bus means what I think it does, then all desktop
apps doing so are broken. You need to handle startup-notification too
On 9/24/06, Alex Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 09:13 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
Is extensible compatible with hiding the gory details of start-up
notification timestamps? I don't know. I don't have a good sense
of what a prototypical D-Bus exporting application looks
On 9/24/06, Alex Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is exactly the situation BMPx is in, too.
It has pretty cool effects for, say, file managers, too. Consider that
gnomevfs.show_uri had the support to read a D-Bus bus-name and object
path from a .desktop file for an application, and instead
On 9/24/06, Havoc Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Though I guess either way, you have essentially zero chance of getting
this right without using libstartup-notification ... which might be the
bigger picture point.
Actually as long as you aren't forking/execing a new process,
On 9/23/06, Steve Frécinaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Waugh wrote:
Can we use it as-is (or as well-defined cut'n'paste code) in GNOME 2.18 and
plan towards migrating to a GTK+ 2.12 version in GNOME 2.20? Let's at least
have a plan for it, otherwise we're just adding yet another [as
On 9/22/06, Alexander Larsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uhm? Why not use X for IPC?
*shrug* I remember that we (Matthias, Vytas, and I) discussed D-Bus,
Bonobo, and Bacon (since there were several Gnome applications using
each of those for their single-instance mechanism) and X (which
Matthias
On 9/22/06, Matthias Clasen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/22/06, Rob Bradford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 16:51 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
On 9/11/06, Matthias Clasen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The topic came up earlier, and I think there was a general consensus
On 9/22/06, Matthias Clasen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/22/06, Joseph E. Sacco, Ph.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mattias,
I believe that you are correct [for the moment]. I took a quick look
through apps in GARNOME-2.16.x dependent up dbus. I found that
dbus-0.70, required by
This thread is merely wasting everyone's time. If anyone wants to
respond, please do so off-list (as I did previously; you can see my
email at http://www.gnome.org/~newren/temp/offtopic-email.txt).
On 9/21/06, Maxim Udushlivy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I said that this is important to me
On 9/4/06, Emmanuele Bassi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Plans for the 2.17/2.18 cycle (many recycled from the 2.15/2.16 cycle):
snip
* If available, add single instance support to the Dictionary
using the GUnique library;
Note that the GUnique library depends on a patch not yet merged into
On 9/11/06, Matthias Clasen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The topic came up earlier, and I think there was a general consensus
that it is a good idea to freeze the versions of external dependencies,
and use tarball modules for them in the gnome-2.18 moduleset in jhbuild.
Due to the feedback
On 9/21/06, Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/4/06, Emmanuele Bassi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Plans for the 2.17/2.18 cycle (many recycled from the 2.15/2.16 cycle):
snip
* If available, add single instance support to the Dictionary
using the GUnique library;
Note
Third time's a charm, or so I hope...
On 9/21/06, Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
2) gnome-power-manager has an example of how to use libguniqueapp in
gnome-power-manager/src/gpm-prefs.c, which is a relatively short file.
(See bug 357128 first, though!). Other examples can
On 9/21/06, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Before recommending that everyone use GUnique, could we define a
migration path for it to enter the platform? We really don't need yet another
shared library, and yet another module to release, and yet another separate
API to learn. Is this API
On 9/19/06, Maxim Udushlivy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That was done on purpose due to a strange list inactivity. I am still
So you intentionally wasted everyone's time? You're right[1], we do
need stronger list moderation. Please don't do that again.
hoping to get your replies to other my
On 9/19/06, Richard Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 16:12 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Hi,
I just saw on this page
http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointSeventeen/ExternalDependencies
that the Hal version for GNOME 2.17 is 0.5.7, yet GNOME Power Manager
2.17.1
Hi Maxim,
I think I probably came across too harshly in my previous email. I'm
a bit prickly. Hopefully I do a bit better this time, but, knowing
me, no guarantees. ;-)
On 9/19/06, Maxim Udushlivy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it is obvious that Gnome owes to GTK+ its very existence.
Hi David,
On 9/13/06, David Zeuthen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's really what audience we want to optimize for. There are (at least)
two groups of entities that provide the GNOME experience to users;
snip
This of course is only one example. I submit this is a trade off and it
really depends
On 9/12/06, Christian Persch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would prefer to use the cvs/svn/whatever modules on the tag
corresponding to the release, if it exists. That way you can use your
jhbuild checkout to make patches (cvs diff), which is impossible for
tarball builds.
Slightly more involved
On 9/11/06, Matthias Clasen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks good. I'll point out there is a pkgconfig 0.21 now, which we may
want to put on that list, but it doesn't make any practical difference.
Updated. :)
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
A combination of responses...
So, what's the procedure going to be for requesting GNOME to depend on a
new HAL release? I mean, when is the latest point in the release process
that modules in GNOME can require new HAL releases - up until now, I
just worked with the respective GNOME module
On 9/12/06, David Zeuthen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I may have come across much too harshly. Sorry about that.
On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 21:06 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
It is much like glibc and Xorg, but there is a bit of a difference
here. With hal 0.5.8, you're depending
On 9/10/06, Olav Vitters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 05:55:48PM +0200, Étienne Bersac wrote:
How to use gnome bugzilla for gnomescan ?
http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/ForMaintainers
(should probably be linked more)
I added a link to that page from
On 9/7/06, Pat Suwalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Trowbridge wrote:
What in particular isn't possible with the 6-month cycle?
Nothing's impossible, but a longer cycle every so often would encourage
larger and better thought-out changes. I always get the feeling that
GNOME contributors
On 9/6/06, Brent Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rant
For the record, the release notes were really a sprint this year - I
volunteered to convert the wiki pages to docbook, and ended up
committing all the changes to CVS, setting up the build structure, and
touching up and uploading all the
On 9/4/06, Rodrigo Moya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
control-center has been branched for 2.16 (gnome-2-16 branch). In HEAD,
new development will start, which includes:
Don't forget to cc gnome-i18n, release-team, and gnome-doc-list in
branch announcements as specified at
On 8/21/06, Rob Bradford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2006-08-20 at 22:03 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
On 8/20/06, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And to stop depending on cvs versions of freedesktop.org modules
except perhaps in very specific exceptions-to-the-rule
On 8/20/06, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sáb, 2006-08-19 at 18:57 -0600, Brent Smith wrote:
I'm going to commit a change to freedesktop.modules to checkout hal from
the tag HAL_0_5_7_1 and add a patch to jhbuild to fix the two
instances where dbus_connection_close()
On 8/9/06, Federico Mena Quintero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doesn't Debian always build from tarballs? Or are they pulling CVS
snapshots?
I imagine that tarballs aren't that big of a problem, since they have
been at least 'make distcheck'ed and if you are building a .deb or .rpm,
you *do*
On 8/9/06, Jonathon Jongsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But if I remember correctly, Magnus Therning's struggles (mentioned
above and documented on the gnome-love mailing list) were actually
trying to build a tarball set (2.15.90 I believe) and he gave up in
frustration after several weeks. So
On 8/8/06, Federico Mena Quintero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PolicyKit wants to install /lib/security/pamblahblah.so. Since I don't
run jhbuild as root, and I definitely don't want it to mess with my
system installation, I need to
1. wait for the (already painful) jhbuild process to reach
On 8/7/06, Zoran Rilak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I submitted a patch to bug #171938:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171938
The bug caused auto-hidden BOTTOM and RIGHT panels to sometimes realign
themselves along the opposite side of the screen when animation was
turned on.
You
Cc'ing Dan and David, because they brought something like this up at
GUADEC (in the mini metacity/compiz meeting, I think?) and I thought
they had some good ideas for it. I don't remember the details,
though...
On 8/6/06, Havoc Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nigel Tao wrote:
Would it
On 7/26/06, Bastien Nocera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 08:51 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 20:40 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
totem:
No new release of totem was made, meaning that the fix in head for
using dbus_connection_disconnect() isn't
On 7/26/06, Alex Graveley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This sounds great, and will help Gtk# t be used by many more people!
Sorry to add confusion, but how does this help the Tomboy discussion?
I'm using gnome-sharp and gconf-sharp. And hopefully the panel APIs in
the future (there is a crasher
On 7/26/06, Nigel Tao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As previously mentioned, deskbar-applet doesn't build against e-d-s
HEAD - there is a trivial patch to d-a attached to
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=347988 which looks good to
me (and looks good to others).
However, I am running
On 7/26/06, Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Inclusion of baobab in gnome-utils
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2006-April/msg00112.html
Found using the following google search:
site:mail.gnome.org desktop-devel baobab.
Nice to see that I'm not the only one who thinks
Hi,
Does scrollkeeper have any maintainers? I just found out about a
bunch of patches needed for yelp to not choke on scrollkeeper files,
listed at http://live.gnome.org/Yelp (all of the patches are part of
bug 348013). It appears that the gnome-2.16 jhbuild moduleset has
been patched to
On 7/25/06, Bill Haneman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because of build issues I have not been able to test a11y with
gnome-session HEAD.
Are you telling me that a11y is regressed severely in HEAD, as it
sounds?
No, I'd have to know whether it was in order to say so. I just
finally caught up on
On 7/21/06, Mike Kestner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2006-07-22 at 00:03 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
* Should we include Gtk# in the Bindings suite?
- the release management issues have largely been solved, aside from Gtk#
not being split between Platform and Desktop (stable and
On 7/25/06, Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think elementtree is particularly problematic, especially
since it appears that it will be bundled with the next python release
anyway and we already depend on python (so if you had just waited to
depend on elementtree until python 2.5
On 7/25/06, Nigel Tao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mostly, we just need to get people into the habit of announcing new
dependencies that they want to use,
For the record - is desktop-devel-list the appropriate place to raise
such announcements?
Yep. You probably don't need to worry about it
On 7/25/06, Nigel Tao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
er, until we had shifted to using python 2.5
OK, given that GNOME 2.16 will not depend on (the unstable) Python
2.5, I'll re-write the elementtree stuff to use libxml2, unless I am
advised otherwise.
I didn't say that the dependency couldn't be
On 7/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Kestner wrote:
My Gtk#-lite 2.16 binding would be allowed to break API in 2.18 as long
as I make it parallel-installable, thereby breaking all existing
Gtk#-lite applications unless packagers provide Bindings release 2.16
with
On 7/23/06, Luca Ferretti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Il giorno sab, 22/07/2006 alle 12.48 -0600, Brent Smith ha scritto:
* avahi depends on dbus-python and dbus-glib bindings set; dbus-python
and dbus-glib are now in a git repository (bug 347674); need to add to
modulesets and add appropriate
On 7/17/06, Jason D. Clinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 16:32 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
I don't have concerns about this that need addressing. Gtk# has simply not
been proposed for the Developer Platform during GNOME 2.15/2.16.
So, I am seeking clarification, not
On 7/17/06, Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Bindings
So far, GTK# in the bindings seems pretty uncontroversial
Assuming it can satisfy the rules of the bindings release, that is.
Multiple people have pointed out that they would dislike it being
accepted in the proposed form, with it
On 7/14/06, Corey Burger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all,
It seems that the recent discussions of mono (and to a lesser extent
python) have lost sight of two very important things: innovation and
why we are really here.
Regardless of what you think of the language they are being written
On 7/14/06, Calum Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quim Gil wrote:
El dv 14 de 07 del 2006 a les 08:41 +0200, en/na Murray Cumming va
escriure:
Should anyone ever get around to creating some GNOME personas
Someone started http://live.gnome.org/Personas months ago.
Yeesh, didn't know
On 7/12/06, Robert Love [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 14:16 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
So, to start of the discussion, the proposed modules AFAIR are:
* orca (as a replacement to gnopernicus)
* alacarte
* gnome-power-manager
* Tomboy
* Gtk#
* nm-applet
On 7/12/06, Calum Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12 Jul 2006, at 08:56, Johan Svedberg wrote:
* Jul 12 02:21 Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
So, to start of the discussion, the proposed modules AFAIR are:
* orca (as a replacement to gnopernicus)
* alacarte
* gnome
On 7/11/06, Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As per suggestion at
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2006-June/msg00071.html,
here's some loud complaining about 2.15.4 brokenness (taken from an
email from Vincent, except I've added some new notes and probably made
things
As per suggestion at
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2006-June/msg00071.html,
here's some loud complaining about 2.15.4 brokenness (taken from an
email from Vincent, except I've added some new notes and probably made
things much less polite in the process). Slipping the release
Hi everyone,
As per the release schedule (http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointFifteen),
it's time to heat up the module inclusion discussion. So, time to
flame, argue, etc., etc. this week and see if we can reach consensus.
The release team will try to meet next week about new module decisions
with
On 6/20/06, Scott J. Harmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paolo Bacchilega wrote:
Hi,
the file-roller module has now a gnome-2-14 branch for version 2.14,
HEAD will be used to develop version 2.16
Plans for 2.16 are: browse bugzilla and fix bugs.
Bug fixing can be done without
On 6/18/06, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes - shipping build fix patches is a *massive* regression in the release
management process, cf. signature.
snip
Basically my philosophy on release management is that it should be
like police brutality. - Maciej Stachowiak
Hi everyone,
This is just a quick email to ask for help in improving the
dogfoodability of our tarballs and CVS. See the lists below my
verbose explanation if you want to jump to the details. :)
Currently, buildability from either tarballs or CVS is pretty poor; I
wouldn't consider either in a
On 6/11/06, Sri Ramkrishna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So there's been no comment on this (or I must have missed it). Are we
considering Orca for GNOME 2.16[1]?
I did respond[2] but I think your email points out some potential
confusion in the community worth addressing.
[1] I'm assuming this
On 6/6/06, Willie Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've received positive feedback thus far (public and private),
including the following message from Baum, the maintainer of
Gnopernicus:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/orca-list/2006-June/msg4.html
That email pretty much looks like the
On 6/4/06, BJörn Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Supposedly, Gnome's CVS repositories were about to be converted to
Subversion 18th March this year. It didn't happen and not much have
been written about it on the infrastructure list. So I wonder if the
switch is still planned and when it will
On 5/29/06, Rodrigo Moya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
gnome-control-center module in CVS has 'control-center' as the tarball
name, not sure why.
So, I'm planning to change it to gnome-control-center to match the CVS
module name. Anyone has any good reason for not doing so?
Awesome, assuming
On 5/29/06, Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le lundi 29 mai 2006 à 08:11 -0600, Elijah Newren a écrit :
Awesome, assuming no one has any reason against it, thanks for making
things more sane. Would it also be okay if I changed the bugzilla
module name for you (from control-center
On 5/16/06, Matthias Clasen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am still finding tarballs without translations, the latest instance
is gnome-terminal 2.15.0...
Indeed, it looks like we'll either have to use lots of 2.14.x tarballs
or else get lots of new re-rolled ones. We may need to hold up the
On 5/4/06, Wouter Bolsterlee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JFYI, I've commited patches to several modules a few days ago to fix these
sed problems (at least for me they did).
If you did so by modifying po/LINGUAS, please revert. Someone pointed
out to me that we _want_ one language listed per line
101 - 200 of 361 matches
Mail list logo
