On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 9:55 PM Jan Tojnar via desktop-devel-list
wrote:
> 3. GitLab does not support any references from gitrevisions(7) other
> than commit hash, compare
> https://github.com/GNOME/gnome-shell/commit/af34b7c25e39e727f7dbd6e3dae0e7c5fe60f141%5E
> and
>
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Michael Ikey Doherty
michael.i.dohe...@intel.com wrote:
Thank you for the clarification. I do believe the GNOME wiki and various
sites could do with updating and being more informative. I lose count of
how many times I'm sent to broken/dead/deleted links.
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 10:11 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
...
You still haven't answered why it's important to keep ConsoleKit.
Because I'm opposing your methods here on *general principle*. I don't
care about
Hi,
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Alberto Ruiz ar...@gnome.org wrote:
...
That's not a reason at all, Yorba seems open to work on making Shotwell more
GNOME 3 friendly... so those widgets can be shared anyway
Therefore, for these reasons, if you look at the gnome-photos tree, it
is
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Le mercredi 30 novembre 2011, à 00:37 +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) a écrit :
Hi everyone,
As most of you know, we proposed Boxes for 3.4 and from what I can
tell, there were no big objections in the end. There was
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Le mercredi 30 novembre 2011, à 10:31 +0100, William Jon McCann a écrit :
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Le mercredi 30 novembre 2011, à 00:37 +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) a écrit
Really ought to stay out of this thread but there is one point that is
important to address below.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
But again, as I said, if there's no survey on Earth you could trust,
just ignore the results. Results by
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 5:31 AM, Dave Neary dne...@gnome.org wrote:
Hi,
Allan Day wrote:
Dave Neary wrote:
Presumably you others are still not interested in drawing a few
developers and designers into a gnome-design mailing list, separate from
the usability list
I think it's
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Johannes Schmid j...@jsschmid.de wrote:
Hi!
On 1 June 2011 12:57, Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
Basically, mailing lists don't work for many kinds of productive
discussion.
Agreed. In my recent discussions with the dudes in
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Johannes Schmid j...@jsschmid.de wrote:
Hi Jon!
Are they listening or participating? Transparency and reporting is
pretty simple to solve. Publish logs, document (wiki), and blog and
you're pretty much there. Participation and engagement is much
harder.
Hi,
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org wrote:
Le mercredi 18 mai 2011 à 14:09 +0200, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
systemd itself has very minimal external dependencies. You need Linux,
udev, D-Bus, and that's it. (there are a couple of additional optional
deps
Hi,
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Robert Ancell robert.anc...@gmail.com wrote:
- LightDM is a cross-platform solution. Ubuntu is planning to switch
to it this cycle, and other distributions have expressed interest in
the project. By sharing this piece of infrastructure GNOME can spend
Hi,
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Robert Ancell robert.anc...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm proposing LightDM [1] as a replacement for GDM. I started the
proposal for this in GNOME 3.0 [2] but due to the young age of the
project I thought it better to wait until 3.2 before making a full
proposal.
Hi,
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 6:13 PM, Robert Ancell robert.anc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 May 2011 23:42, Luca Ferretti lferr...@gnome.org wrote:
Il giorno gio, 12/05/2011 alle 20.45 +0100, Sergey Udaltsov ha scritto:
GNOME is not an OS. GNOME is not a distribution. GNOME is a core
desktop
Hi,
This thread has clearly jumped the shark but there is one point worth
responding to here. (which is a shame because deja dup is really
pretty cool. It is too bad the thread was turned on a tangent)
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Luca Ferretti lferr...@gnome.org wrote:
...
And note,
Hi,
Some very brief thoughts.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Alexander Larsson al...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 13:19 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
In general, then, my current position is that, despite it not being the
primary way in which people will access messaging, we do still
is the default behavior, but it's not mentioned and it's
unclear what happens by default; --no-prompt doesn't do anything with
--power-off).
Vincent
Le jeudi 24 février 2011, à 22:56 +, William Jon McCann a écrit :
commit 8663860ff44b9a5e441e4909a49eee4cfa08378d
Author: William Jon McCann jmcc
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:58 PM, C.J. Adams-Collier c...@colliertech.org wrote:
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 01:04 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 19:19 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
Is there a place where
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 06:37:33PM +0100, Gendre Sebastien wrote:
Le mardi 04 janvier 2011 à 10:54 +0100, Christopher Roy Bratusek a
écrit :
[..]
GNOME3 + Compiz = Fail ... or: GNOME3 + Sawfish = Fail
[..]
I agree
Hi Vincent,
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Le mardi 28 décembre 2010, à 15:20 +0100, Olav Vitters a écrit :
However, the fallback is meant as a fallback, not as providing
gnome-panel and its applets. So I don't see anything wrong with not
providing the
Hi Carlos,
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Carlos Garcia Campos
carlo...@gnome.org wrote:
Excerpts from Frederic Peters's message of jue dic 23 10:22:40 +0100 2010:
Hi,
Sergey Udaltsov wrote:
I am confused, what's the story with gnome-panel and gnome-applets in
3.0? Are they in, are they
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Stef Walter stef-l...@memberwebs.com wrote:
On 2010-10-20 11:39, Lucas Rocha wrote:
seahorse doesn't build with libnotify 0.7
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=632712
What's the replacement in libnotify for attaching a notification to a
widget?
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to float the idea of splitting up gnome-games upstream into
separate git modules. The main rationale is that downstream, we want
separate binary packages; this is most convenient to do if upstream is
Hey Ryan,
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Ryan Lortie de...@desrt.ca wrote:
hi Vincent,
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 09:26 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Do you feel okay with the idea of allowing proprietary apps to use our
platform but not GPLv2 apps?
In short, yes.
Anybody who has an application
Hey Lucas,
Overall this sounds good to me. Definitely a step in the right direction.
...
In summary, this means that the GNOME releases would be composed by the
following modulesets:
- Desktop
- Platform
- Extended Platform
- Mobile
A few questions about this list. Is Platform a
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Diego Escalante Urrelo die...@gnome.org wrote:
El jue, 01-04-2010 a las 13:31 +0100, Bastien Nocera escribió:
The idea would be to have the appearance cut down to only
personalisation (background and screensaver), and leave the icon and
control themes
Hi Calum,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Calum Benson calum.ben...@sun.com wrote:
On 14 Nov 2009, at 09:58, Andrew Cowie wrote:
So anyone care to put a stake in the ground about what is correct?
Well, the HIG advice hasn't really changed over the years:
Hi Luca,
I'm not sure your evidence supports your conclusion.
I agree that changing the font size (basically the scale of the
screen) is an important thing. I've written up some thoughts on this
here:
http://live.gnome.org/Design/DesktopFontPreferences
Also, in some cases using a text-only
One small clarification...
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:02 PM, William Jon McCann
william.jon.mcc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Luca,
I'm not sure your evidence supports your conclusion.
I agree that changing the font size (basically the scale of the
screen) is an important thing. I've written up
Hey,
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Emmanuele Bassieba...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 14:54 +0100, Neil J Patel wrote:
I would love to have Nautilus running in UNR as it handles
auto-mounting much better than the launcher can, however it does not
have a 'daemon-mode' so it
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 5:12 AM, Vincent Untzvu...@gnome.org wrote:
Le samedi 08 août 2009, à 17:51 -0400, William Jon McCann a écrit :
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Frederic Petersfpet...@gnome.org wrote:
However for compatibility reasons, I have been interested by Colin
Walters
Hey,
So, in preparation for GNOME Shell and 3.0 a number of us have been
trying to address various inconsistencies in how we name applications.
I've just posted a blog about this:
http://blogs.gnome.org/mccann/2009/08/08/whatchamacallit/
My proposal for 2.28 is:
1. We need to patch the
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Frederic Petersfpet...@gnome.org wrote:
William Jon McCann wrote:
My proposal for 2.28 is:
UI Freeze for 2.28 is set to Monday; sure we could grant an exception
and rush things, but I'd prefer to wait for the beginning of 2.29,
especially as we may want
Hey Jason,
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Jason D. Clintonm...@jasonclinton.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Calum Benson calum.ben...@sun.com wrote:
So if it turns out that the GNOME community like the general direction
we've suggested for the control center, then sure, I'd
Hi Luca,
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Luca Ferretti elle@libero.it wrote:
2009/5/15 William Jon McCann william.jon.mcc...@gmail.com:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Luis Menina liberfo...@freeside.fr wrote:
Please, don't try to abuse the system tray for things that should be
applets
Hey Luis,
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Luis Menina liberfo...@freeside.fr wrote:
Toms a écrit :
1) System tray - applets that could end up in system tray, most
probably contextually - like, when they are needed or make sense. Or,
sometimes per user request in preferences (something like
Hi Calum,
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Calum Benson calum.ben...@sun.com wrote:
On 21 Apr 2009, at 04:34, Travis Watkins wrote:
This one at least has been solved in Windows 7 by merging the
QuickLaunch area with running applications. A dock would also solve
this problem nicely. You'll
Hey Owen,
The main open question for gnome-shell is not how to implement them.
It's the user interface question. And when we look at the user interface
question I think the label applet is a bit deceptive. We have all sort
of different things that are applets, and their only commonality is
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Luca Ferretti elle@libero.it wrote:
Il giorno sab, 24/01/2009 alle 14.22 +0100, Wouter Bolsterlee ha
scritto:
2009-01-24 klockan 14:06 skrev Luca Ferretti:
Now, someone has the same issue? And how can I try to investigate it?
The only evidence that
2009/1/11 Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org:
Le dimanche 11 janvier 2009 à 12:21 +0100, Luca Ferretti a écrit :
Please also note that on current trunk the Audio capplet from
gnome-control-center and the Volume Control applet from gnome-applets
was replaced in favour of new gnome-volume-control
Hey Christian,
2008/11/10 Christian Hammond [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Very critical notifications can be set to have a non-expiring timeout. This
would ensure that they stay visible until the user acknowledges them.
Some people have also talked about writing a notification backlog for
important
gnome-media branched for 2.24.
New volume control going into trunk.
Thanks,
Jon
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Hey Calum,
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Calum Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 28 Oct 2008, at 18:36, Karl Lattimer wrote:
Gather up data from humble users, performing a specific set of tasks
which are challenging enough and enough like real life to build up
decent data sets so we
2.24 is stable. Development continues on trunk.
Jon
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Hi,
Dan Winship and Lucas Rocha have done a nice job revamping the
gnome-session codebase. It was a meritorious task. You can read
about the design here:
http://live.gnome.org/SessionManagement/NewGnomeSession
The new code is much cleaner. Parts of the new design are very good.
In particular,
Hey Lennart,
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Lennart Poettering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 25.06.08 19:07, William Jon McCann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
We can still support applications that only know if they should
inhibit just in time by emitting a signal when a logout is
requested
Hi,
I have branched gnome-screensaver. The stable branch is gnome-2-22 and
development continues on trunk.
Jon
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Hi,
2008/4/26 The DarkMaster [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
...
Update: I found that after launching nautilus in E17, the gnome wallpaper is
setted in background.
Nautilus opens a fake desktop window when you opn it (to avoid this you
should launch it with nautilus --no-desktop) and a normal browser
2008/4/21 Luca Ferretti [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
...
Emmanuele, IMHO the better and faster way to show everyone the Clutter
goodnees is provide a Coverflow[1] like[2] plugin for Rhythmbox whitin 4
weeks ;-)
That would be awesome.
Here's the bug:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415816
Hi Joe,
2008/2/3 Joe Marcus Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The status of gvfs for GNOME 2.22 was recently discussed, and it seems
good progress is being made on this to reduce regressions, but I have
seen no mention of the regressions introduced in GDM 2.21. The move of
GDM to D-BUS has
Hi Seb,
On Dec 7, 2007 7:13 AM, Seb James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
2) I think this is one for the gdm developers or specifically for the
gdm theme developers. The window that shows up when you choose Log Out
$user or Shut Down always has slightly the wrong options when you are
in an XDMCP
Hi Owen,
On 9/27/07, Owen Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
My first reaction to this is cool! But then, I think how much of
the time is the desktop actually visible? It seems a bit of a wasteful
thing to spend CPU cycles animating something that's entirely obscured
by my full-screen
On 5/29/07, Adam Rosi-Kessel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The image slideshow screensaver in gnome-screensaver puts such a load on
my laptop's CPU that the fan runs constantly and tasks such as music
playing with totem become very choppy. Although it's an older laptop, I
would hope it wouldn't be
Hello,
I have branched nautilus-cd-burner and gnome-screensaver. The stable branch is
gnome-2-18 and development continues on HEAD.
No specific plans at the moment.
Jon
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
Hey Brian,
On 4/4/07, Brian Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Obviously root needs to actually run these commands and I guess the
display-manager daemon has been a convenient place for this logic.
It might be better to move this functionality into a separate daemon
that works with KDE and
Hi Calvin,
On 2/13/07, Calvin Gaisford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 14:15 -0500, Thomas Thurman wrote:
On 12/02/07, Calvin Gaisford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has there been any discussion on making the Fusa functionality available
in other components? I've been playing
Hey Rodrigo,
On 2/6/07, Rodrigo Moya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 14:42 -0500, William Jon McCann wrote:
Regarding configuration, I think the slab is in a better position to
provide an interface that doesn't require configuration of quick
access to the most used tools
Hi Calum,
On 2/5/07, Calum Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 13:02 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote:
How is it slow to get to things vs a traditional hierarchal menu? My
important apps are two clicks away - open menu - click. Hierarachal
menus more clicks than that. Don't
On 2/5/07, Wouter Bolsterlee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007-02-05 klockan 20:42 skrev William Jon McCann:
* when you don't know the appropriate category for an application
(Evolution is in Internet, right?)
Yeah, why don't we put Evolution in both the Office and Internet categories
Hi,On 10/31/06, Étienne Bersac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,I fully agree with you. I must point the GSmartMix project which isbased on gstreamer and allow fine mix between app. If nautilus-cd-burnerwas able to simply play a sound at the end to the burn process, it must
do that in a consistent
Hi Jim,Where should bugs be filed? I don't see a component in gnome bugzilla. I suppose one should be created.Some initial thoughts from just a first look so they may be ignorant and superficial:* Ellipsis is used for items that require input (eg. Log Out...) and for those with not enough space.
Hello,I have branched gnome-screensaver. The stable branch isgnome-2-16 and development continues on HEAD.Plans include:* Adding a power management baseline timeout
* Doing less polling* Try to standardize theme format (bug #354811)* Interacting with ConsoleKit
Hello,I have branched nautilus-cd-burner. The stable branch isgnome-2-16 and development continues on HEAD.Plans include: * Better error reportingJon
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
Hello,
I have branched gnome-screensaver. The stable branch is
gnome-2-14 and development continues on HEAD.
Plans include:
* Add refcounting to Inhibit DBUS API (bug #334907)
* Removing themes from the list (bug #316462)
* Add XEVIE support (bug #337203)
*
Hi Vincent,
Vincent Untz wrote:
Le mercredi 15 février 2006 à 11:45 -0600, Shaun McCance a écrit :
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 12:54 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
Quoting David Zeuthen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This was moved to gnome-power-manager by Jon, as monitor DPMS control
was considered more of
Hi Davyd,
Davyd Madeley wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 12:27:34PM +, Richard Hughes wrote:
A comment about the notification spam: the user only gets 4
notifications for low battery, very low battery and critical
battery and one saying I'm doing the low-power action in 10 seconds
-- and
Hello Davyd,
Davyd Madeley wrote:
I see that both Ubuntu Dapper and Fedora Core 5 test 2 are shipping
with gnome-screensaver now.
Having now used both of them, does it seem slow for anyone else? It
seems that something has gone astray once or twice and forced me to
have to change vt and kill
Hello Ryan,
You have some interesting comments about power management. I too have
been thinking about this recently and I have a few questions and comments.
Ryan Lortie wrote:
[snip]
Certainly, at the current time, it appears to be the best offering.
However, after discussing this at length
Hi Ryan,
I should point out that I can't speak for Richard, or David and these
are merely my interpretations of their work.
Ryan Lortie wrote:
On Wed, 2006-18-01 at 10:32 -0500, William Jon McCann wrote:
How is a system daemon more secure than a user session daemon?
A system daemon runs
Christopher James Lahey wrote:
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 09:11 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote:
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 15:06 -0400, William Jon McCann wrote:
* Don't display the Unlock button when show the switch users options
This makes sense.
Deleted the original email, sorry.
I don't understand
Christopher James Lahey wrote:
What does it have if the person doesn't have a face?
Chris
A bag? No, in fact, the latest version doesn't use an image if the face
image is not available.
Jon
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
Hi Rodney,
Rodney Dawes wrote:
On my machine, it seems to use a horrendously scaled up version of the
image not found icon, albeit, not the one in my icon theme. This is also
an ugly thing to show, and is going to show up the majority of the time,
as most people do not set faces. It's also
Hi Shaun,
Good comments. I'll reply inline.
Shaun McCance wrote:
* On https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ScreenSaver there's the suggestion:
...an OS-X-like dialog shake would save having to print ugly
That password was incorrect text.
I notice that you have the shake effect, but that you
Hello,
I am pleased to propose gnome-screensaver for inclusion in the GNOME
2.14 Desktop release.
gnome-screensaver is a new screensaver that can replace xscreensaver. It
is designed to integrate well with the desktop and provide an control
interface that is desktop neutral. It simplifies
Hi,
Xavier Bestel wrote:
Just for the record, does it run xscreensaver hacks ? Especially OpenGL
ones ?
Sure does. More details are in the FAQ:
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeScreensaver_2fFrequentlyAskedQuestions
Jon
___
desktop-devel-list mailing
Hi JP,
JP Rosevear wrote:
I'm in favour with a couple of notes:
1. I liked the UI for unlocking circa 0.13 much better than the current
I made some changes in response to Matthew Paul Thomas' analysis [1]. I
don't agree with all of his conclusions but overall it seemed to be
less which as
Hi Davyd,
Davyd Madeley wrote:
Applet Current ProposedNotes
-- -- -
clock panel applets remove e-d-s dep in panel
This has come up a few times now and I still don't really understand it.
I think e-d-s is destined to
Luis Villa wrote:
I'm guessing gnome-power-manager[1] and gnome-screensaver fall into the
2.14 time-frame.
And fast-user-switcher. I'd personally *love* to see that whole pile
land in 2.14.
My hope is that we can get a nice DBus interface to GDM going by then.
Hi David,
David Zeuthen wrote:
1. How do see this being integrated with power management solutions like
e.g. the existing gnome-power project and some of the ideas that were
discussed at GUADEC [1]?
This is certainly the next step. Up until now I have been concentrating
mostly on feature
Hi Nat,
I am very glad to hear about this. The video sounds really interesting.
Perhaps we should start compiling all the usability study data on the
web site someplace.
Nat Friedman wrote:
For example, we asked a lady to send mail to a friend. Against all
odds, she started Evolution
Hi,
gnome-screensaver is now being maintained in GNOME CVS.
There is a preferences tool included:
http://acs.pha.jhu.edu/~mccannwj/GNOME/Screenshot-Screensaver%20Preferences.png
http://acs.pha.jhu.edu/~mccannwj/GNOME/Screenshot-Screensaver%20Preferences-1.png
To do:
* include a
Hey Bastien,
Bastien Nocera wrote:
I was wondering, what's the current state of this tool?
I tried it out quickly, and the screenies[1] rock :)
What's the TODO list, and will you push it to GNOME CVS?
The 0.0.2 version had a few problems. There was a race while
transferring the keyboard grab to
Hello,
I have branched nautilus-cd-burner for GNOME 2.10. The stable branch is
gnome-2-10 and development continues on HEAD.
Jon
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
83 matches
Mail list logo
